1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
3.1. Description of Study Area
3.2. Collection of Samples and Serological Testing
3.3. Demographic Data Collection
3.4. Ethical Considerations
3.5. Data Analysis
4. Results
| Factor /Parameter | NE | Number Positive (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IP | HIV | ||||
| IgG | IgM | IgG | IgM | ||
| Overall | 400 | 45 (21.5) | 14 (7.0) | 72 (36.0) | 3 (1.5) |
| Age group | |||||
| 20 - 24 | 56 | 4 (7.1) | 3 (5.4) | 8 (14.2) | 2 (3.6) |
| 25 - 29 | 75 | 15 (20.0) | 2 (2.7) | 13 (17.3) | 1 (1.3) |
| 30 - 34 | 105 | 11 (10.5) | 4 (3.8) | 18 (17.1) | 1 (0.9) |
| 35 - 39 | 85 | 8 (9.4) | 4 (4.3) | 13 (15.3) | 1 (1.2) |
| > 40 | 79 | 5 (6.3) | 1 (1.3) | 20 (25.3) | 0 (0.0) |
| Occupation | |||||
| Artisan | 55 | 5 (9.1) | 3 (5.5) | 13 (23.6) | 1 (1.8) |
| Civil servant | 56 | 5 (8.9) | 1 (1.8) | 6 (10.7) | 0 (0.0) |
| Farmer | 12 | 0 (0.0) | 1 (8.3) | 2 (16.7) | 0 (0.0) |
| Student | 93 | 12 (12.0) | 3 (3.2) | 6 (6.5) | 1 (1.1) |
| Teacher | 38 | 8 (12.1) | 1 (2.6) | 4 (10.5) | 0 (0.0) |
| Trader | 110 | 13 (11.8) | 5 (4.6) | 33 (30.0) | 1 (0.0) |
| Unemployed | 36 | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 8 (22.2) | 0 (0.0) |
| Educational status | |||||
| Primary | 40 | 6 (15.0) | 2 (5.0) | 15 (37.5) | 0 (0.0) |
| Secondary | 160 | 9 (5.6) | 5 (3.2) | 32 (20.0) | 2 (1.3) |
| Tertiary | 200 | 28 (14.0) | 7 (3.5) | 25 (12.5) | 1 (0.5) |
| Sex | |||||
| Female | 265 | 26 (15.0) | 8 (3.0) | 44 (16.6) | 2 (0.8) |
| Male | 135 | 17 (12.6) | 6 (4.4) | 28 (20.7) | 1 (0.7) |
| CD4 | |||||
| < 200 | 105 | 0.7 (6.7) | 0 (0.0) | ||
| 200 - 399 | 115 | 18 (15.7) | 1 (0.9) | ||
| 400 - 599 | 70 | 10 (14.3) | 0 (0.0) | ||
| > 600 | 110 | 35 (31.8) | 2 (1.8) | ||
Abbreviations: IgG, Immunoglobulin G-toxoplasma ELISA test; IgM, Immunoglobulin M-toxoplasma ELISA test; IP, immunocompetent subjects; HIV, immunocompromised subjects; NE, number examined
aP = 0.9044 (P < 0.05).
| Risk Factors | NE | NP IgG | NP IgM | Mean Seperationa | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IP | HIV | IP | HIV | |||
| Engage in farming | ||||||
| Yes | 242 (60.50) | 19 (9.50) | 36 (18.00) | 4 (2.00) | 2 (1.00) | 1.68A |
| No | 158 (39.50) | 24 (12.00) | 36 (18.00) | 10 (5.00) | 1 (0.50) | 1.38A |
| Wash fruits | ||||||
| Yes | 116 (29.00) | 12 (6.00) | 16 (8.00) | 3 (1.50) | 0 (0.00) | 0.42B |
| No | 284 (71.00) | 31 (15.50) | 57 (28.50) | 11 (5.50) | 3 (1.50) | 0.89A |
| Drink treated water | ||||||
| Yes | 73 (18.25) | 14 (7.00) | 0 (0.00) | 3 (1.50) | 0 (0.00) | 1.13B |
| No | 327 (81.75) | 29 (14.50) | 72 (36.00) | 11 (5.50) | 3 (1.50) | 1.88A |
| History of owning pets | ||||||
| Yes | 124 (31.00) | 8 (4.00) | 44 (22.00) | 2 (1.00) | 0.5 (0.25) | 0.80A |
| No | 276 (69.00) | 35 (17.50) | 27.5 (13.75) | 12 (6.00) | 2.5 (1.25) | 0.75A |
| Consume Suya | ||||||
| Yes | 51 (12.75) | 7 (3.50) | 3 (1.50) | 5 (2.50) | 0 (0.00) | 0.67A |
| No | 350 (87.50) | 36 (18.00) | 70 (35.00) | 9 (4.50) | 3 (1.50) | 1.05A |
Abbreviations: IgG, Immunoglobulin G-Toxoplasma ELISA; IgM, Immunoglobulin M-Toxoplasma ELISA; IP, Immunocompetent Persons; HIV, Immunocompromized subjects; NE, Number Examined; NP, Total number positive to Toxoplasma gondii
aMeans that do not share a letter are significantly different P < 0.05 (P < 0.05).