Abstract
Background:
Multiple case reports have shown promising results with remdesivir, tocilizumab and convalescent plasma. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with remdesivir, tocilizumab, steroids, antibiotics and convalescent plasma in COVID-19 patients.Objectives:
To assess whether a multi-pronged approach to tackling SARS-CoV-2 had an impact on our primary end goal of decreasing the need for mechanical ventilation and identify some of the complexities involved with combination treatment regimens.Methods:
In this retrospective, single center study, six confirmed SARS-CoV-2 patients with similar demographics and comorbidities treated with a combination of remdesivir, tocilizumab, antibiotics, steroids and convalescent plasma were followed.Results:
At the time of initiation of treatment, all six patients were requiring at least 3 liters of supplemental oxygenation via nasal cannula. All patients received remdesivir for 5 - 10 days, tocilizumab for a total of 4 doses each across 2 days, methylprednisone and antibiotics. Commonly used antibiotics were cefepime, azithromycin, ceftriaxone and piperacillin/tazobactam. Convalescent plasma was given to three out of the six patients. Despite combination therapy with remdesivir, tocilizumab, steroids, antibiotics and convalescent plasma, four out of the six patients (66.67%) deteriorated and required invasive mechanical ventilation.Conclusions:
There are currently no set treatment guidelines for COVID 19. Most institutions appear to be utilizing some form of combination therapy against COVID-19. In this study, invasive mechanical ventilation was avoided in only two of six patients despite robust use of combination therapy in all patients. Our study suggests that multiple medications may not be the answer. Instead, a clearer understanding of the pathophysiology along with timing at which medications are introduced might play a more important role. We propose judicious use of combination therapy in a methodical and sequential use in patients requiring three or more liters of supplemental oxygen. Use of any of these medications, either by itself or in combination, after mechanical ventilation has minimal if any benefits and should be used as a last resort. Currently, a few clinical trials in the recruiting stage are underway that look at various combination therapies that could provide a more comprehensive understanding regarding the efficacy of combination therapy against SARS-CoV-2.Keywords
COVID-19 Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized Antiviral Agents Adenosine Monophosphate Coronavirus Infections Pandemics Steroids Drug Therapy, Combinations Drug Combinations Antibodies Viral
1. Background
Since the emergence and escalation of Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) to pandemic status, there has been an urgency to identify management options that could treat or at least contain the disease. COVID-19, a viral illness caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (a beta coronavirus) was identified in Wuhan, China in Dec 2019 (1, 2). Initially, antivirals such as combinations of lopinavir-ritonavir, antibiotics such as azithromycin, and anti-malarial agents like chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine with potential anti-viral properties were studied (3-5). Though modest benefits were noted with these treatment options, adverse effects often limited use (4, 5). Favipiravir, ribavirin and interferon are other antivirals that are currently in the clinical trial phase. While the efficacy of ribavirin and interferon remain unclear, Favipiravir showed encouraging initial results and was approved by China for treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infections (2, 3, 5). Remdesivir, a broad-spectrum antiviral that inhibits ribonucleic acid (RNA)-dependent RNA polymerases showed promising results (6). Studies have shown faster viral clearance and recovery time with improved mortality benefit especially in non-critically ill COVID patients (7-10). Remdesivir is currently the only Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved drug for SARS-CoV-2.
As awareness of the immunopathology associated with SARS-CoV-2 and deleterious effects of cytokine storm evolved, a targeted approach to curbing immune response appeared to be favorable (11, 12). Immunological agents like interleukin (IL)-6 inhibitors such as tocilizumab and siltuximab, interleukins, tumor necrosis factor alpha and corticosteroids were tested. Multiple studies have shown varying results with tocilizumab, though the majority did show improvement in oxygen requirements and clinical improvement (13-18). Steroids showed no mortality benefit. However, the recent randomized evaluation of COVID-19 therapy (RECOVERY) trial by Horby et al. (19) revealed improved outcomes with using the selective glucocorticoid dexamethasone in patients requiring supplemental oxygen.
Despite multiple treatment options, no report of a combination therapy with either remdesivir and IL-6 inhibitors, IL-6 inhibitors and steroids or a combination of all the above was found as of July 11, 2020.
2. Objectives
The objectives of our report was to assess whether a multi-pronged approach to tackling SARS-CoV-2 had an impact on decreasing the need for mechanical ventilation, identify some of the complexities involved in these combination treatment regimens, and suggest that additional studies that examine the sequential use of drugs in the management of these acutely ill patients are needed.
3. Methods
3.1. Study Design, Population, Setting and Data Collection
This retrospective study was conducted at a single tertiary medical center. Six hospitalized patients between ages 50 to 77 years with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 formed the study group. SARS-CoV-2 status was confirmed by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay of nasopharyngeal swab specimens.
3.2. IRB Waiver
As only anonymized (deidentified) data was included in the study, informed consent was waived.
3.3. Data Collection
Data was gathered through the electronic medical records of the institution. Information obtained included demographic data, comorbidities, presenting clinical signs or symptoms, laboratory and radiological findings along with medications provided.
3.4. Specimen Collection and Testing
COVID status was confirmed by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) approved real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) diagnostic panel. RT-PCR uses nucleic acid amplification technology to quantitatively detect and diagnose SARS-CoV-2 from nasopharyngeal samples.
3.5. Inclusion Criteria
Eligible patients included in the study were confirmed SARS-CoV-2 positive patients with active infection including fever, chills, shortness of breath and elevated inflammatory indices [c-reactive protein (CRP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), ferritin, D-dimer and low procalcitonin] with chest X-ray showing bilateral hazy infiltrates and use of supplemental oxygen. At time of initiation of treatment, all six patients required at least 3 liters (L) nasal cannula or more of supplemental oxygenation.
3.6. Exclusion Criteria
A negative COVID test result, presence of renal failure, hepatic failure patients on mechanical ventilation or those who were discharged or demised within 24 hours were not included in the study.
3.7. Study Definitions
Six patients with similar demographics and comorbidities were treated with a combination of treatments that included antibiotics, remdesivir, steroids, convalescent plasma and tocilizumab. The end point of this study was to assess whether a combination of medical treatments decreased the chances of the subject requiring invasive mechanical ventilation.
4. Results
4.1. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of the Patients
In this study, six patients who tested positive for SARS-COV-2 were followed. Demographics and clinical features (signs and symptoms) of the patients can be seen in Table 1. The patients ranged from 50 to 77 years with the mean age of 64. The study population was predominantly Hispanic. Given their age, most patients had underlying comorbidities with diabetes, hypertension and obesity being the most predominant.
Demographic Information, Clinical, Laboratory & Radiological Features and Treatments Provided to Study Population
| Name | Patient 1 | Patient 2 | Patient 3 | Patient 4 | Patient 5 | Patient 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (y) | 56 | 66 | 72 | 50 | 64 | 77 |
| Sex | M | M | F | M | F | M |
| Underlying conditions | Morbid obesity | Obesity, GERD | DM | HTN, DM | DM, HLD | DM, HTN |
| Presenting features | SOB, fever, chills | Fever, cough, SOB, | Fever/chills, SOB, cough, myalgia | Fever, myalgia, HA, SOB, cough | SOB, fever, cough | SOB, fever, chills, cough |
| Chest Xray | Bilateral opacities | Bilateral opacities | Bilateral opacities | Bilateral opacities | Bilateral opacities | Bilateral opacities |
| Lab findings | ||||||
| WBC | 15.34 | 6.33 | 5.5 | 10.82 | 12.17 | 16.9 |
| Hb/Hct | 12.6/37.2 | 16.2/50.4 | 13.2/395 | 10.2/35.1 | 14.9/45.1 | 15.7/48.6 |
| Platelets | 353 | 283 | 203 | 80 | 326 | 223 |
| D-dimer | 3.3 | 2.96 | 0.55 | >20 | 2.59 | 12.57 |
| Ferritin | 669 | 717 | 797 | 1280 | 544 | 475 |
| IL-6 levels | 344 | 1204 | 138.3 | 543 | 153.7 | 798 |
| Procalcitonin | 2.3 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.56 | 0.13 | 0.09 |
| LDH | 701 | 592 | 415 | 674 | 544 | 608 |
| Antibiotics | Ceftriaxone, Azithromycin | Ceftriaxone, Azithromycin, Cefepime | Ceftriaxone, Azithromycin | Pip/tazo, Azithromycin | Ceftriaxone, Azithromycin, Cefepime | Ceftriaxone, Azithromycin |
| Steroids | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Remdesivir | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| IL-6 inhibitor | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Convalescent plasma | no | + | No | no | + | + |
| Mechanical ventilation | IMV | IMV | No | no | IMV | IMV |
4.2. Laboratory and Radiological Findings
At admission, elevated white blood cells were seen in 50% (3/6) of the study population and lymphopenia was seen in 67% (4/6). Analysis of inflammatory markers showed elevation of LDH, ferritin and D-dimer in all six (100%) of the patients. The mean LDH value was 589 and the median D-dimer level was 6.995. Procalcitonin levels were noted to be elevated in 34% of the patients, the mean value of 0.53. Chest X-rays showed bilateral infiltrates in all six (100%) patients (Table 1).
4.3. Management
All six subjects were given a combination of antibiotics (cefepime, ceftriaxone, azithromycin and piperacillin/tazobactam), remdesivir, IL-6 inhibitors (tocilizumab), steroids and convalescent plasma, in no order of preference.
4.4. Outcomes
Adjuvant therapy with remdesivir (anti-viral), tocilizumab (IL-6 inhibitor), convalescent plasma, steroids and antibiotics were provided in all six subjects. All patients received remdesivir for 5 - 10 days, tocilizumab for a total of 4 doses each across 2 days, methyl prednisone and antibiotics. The antibiotics most used were cefepime, azithromycin, ceftriaxone and piperacillin/tazobactam. Convalescent plasma was given to three out of the six patients. Four of the six (66.67%) subjects required invasive mechanical ventilation despite a robust and multifold treatment regimen.
5. Discussion
In our study, while the invasive mechanical ventilation was averted in 2 out of 6 patients, it is hard to draw a quantifiable conclusion regarding the efficacy of combination therapy due to the small sample size of our study population. It is interesting to note that multiple medications alone may not be the answer. Rather, a clear understanding of the underlying pathophysiology and appropriate time at which medications are administered, would prove more beneficial.
Data regarding the combination of remdesivir, IL-6 inhibitors, steroids, convalescent plasma and antibiotics is limited. Review of literature regarding combination therapy showed encouraging results though those reports were based on single individuals (20, 21). Anderson et al. (20) described successful management of an obstetric critically ill COVID-19 patient with a mixture of remdesivir, glucocorticoids and convalescent plasma. Coyle et al. (21) reported successful treatment and extubation of a COVID-19 patient with a disease course complicated by myocarditis and ARDS with a combination of corticosteroids, tocilizumab and experimental drug AT-001. Our study, albeit limited, questions whether there is any benefit in combining these treatment modalities.
Not only is the efficacy of combination therapy at question, but the safety profile of these combination regimens is a concern. There may be increased adverse effects with use of multiple medications during a similar time frame. Elevated aminotransferase levels are a documented adverse effect of remdesivir and tocilizumab (5, 15, 22) and some antibiotics as well. Of note, patients demonstrating aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) levels of five times the upper limit of normal or estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of less than 50 mL/min formed the exclusion criteria in the remdesivir study by Goldman et al (8). No studies were found that compared the safety profile, compatibility or drug-to-drug interaction for remdesivir with tocilizumab (22). Currently, there are only a few clinical trials in the recruiting stage studying combination therapy (NCT04409262, NCT04410354, NCT04310228) that could advance our understanding in the future. NCT04409262 a randomized, double-blind study focuses on the safety and efficacy of the combination of remdesivir with tocilizumab compared to remdesivir with placebo in hospitalized patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 (23). NCT04410354 aims to study the combination of merimepodib, an antiviral and immunological agent that inhibits inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase with remdesivir in SARS-CoV-2 patients with a score of 3 or 4 on the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) 8-point ordinal scale (24). NCT04310228 is another multi-center study that examines the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab combined with Favipiravir (25).
5.1. Limitations
Limitations of this case study include the limited sample size, non-uniformity of the use of medications, irregularity in timing of introduction of medications, the sequencing of the use of these drugs varied and finally underlying comorbid conditions may have played a confounding factor towards the outcomes.
5.2. Conclusion
Treatment modalities for COVID-19 appear to still be in its nascent stage. In our study, despite utilization of multiple drugs that have previously shown favorable results in other reports, invasive mechanical ventilation was thwarted only in 2 out of 6 study subjects. Due to the limited sample size, it is hard to draw any conclusive evidence that using multiple medications (remdesivir, IL-6 inhibitors, convalescent plasma, antibiotics and steroids) made any significant difference on stabilizing the patient and decreasing the need for invasive mechanical ventilation, morbidity and mortality. Combination therapy, however, remains intriguing and controversial. Many centers continue to use a variety of combinations of these medications without supporting data regarding the safety and efficacy profiles. Hopefully, ongoing studies will help further define the use of these medications and improve treatment outcomes. Judicious use of these medications in a methodical sequential use in patients that require three or more liters of supplemental oxygen is proposed. Use of any of these medications, either by itself or in combination, after mechanical ventilation has minimal if any benefits and should be used as a last resort.
Acknowledgements
References
-
1.
Rothan HA, Byrareddy SN. The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. J Autoimmun. 2020;109:102433. [PubMed ID: 32113704]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7127067]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102433.
-
2.
Ahn DG, Shin HJ, Kim MH, Lee S, Kim HS, Myoung J, et al. Current status of epidemiology, diagnosis, therapeutics, and vaccines for novel Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020;30(3):313-24. [PubMed ID: 32238757]. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2003.03011.
-
3.
Lu CC, Chen MY, Lee WS, Chang YL. Potential therapeutic agents against COVID-19: What we know so far. J Chin Med Assoc. 2020;83(6):534-6. [PubMed ID: 32243270]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7176266]. https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000318.
-
4.
Cao B, Wang Y, Wen D, Liu W, Wang J, Fan G, et al. A trial of lopinavir-ritonavir in adults hospitalized with severe Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(19):1787-99. [PubMed ID: 32187464]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7121492]. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2001282.
-
5.
Jean SS, Lee PI, Hsueh PR. Treatment options for COVID-19: The reality and challenges. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2020;53(3):436-43. [PubMed ID: 32307245]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7129535]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2020.03.034.
-
6.
Ko WC, Rolain JM, Lee NY, Chen PL, Huang CT, Lee PI, et al. Arguments in favour of remdesivir for treating SARS-CoV-2 infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;55(4):105933. [PubMed ID: 32147516]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7135364]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105933.
-
7.
Grein J, Ohmagari N, Shin D, Diaz G, Asperges E, Castagna A, et al. Compassionate use of remdesivir for patients with severe Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(24):2327-36. [PubMed ID: 32275812]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7169476]. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2007016.
-
8.
Goldman JD, Lye DCB, Hui DS, Marks KM, Bruno R, Montejano R, et al. Remdesivir for 5 or 10 days in patients with severe Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(19):1827-37. [PubMed ID: 32459919]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7377062]. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2015301.
-
9.
Mahase E. Covid-19: Remdesivir is helpful but not a wonder drug, say researchers. BMJ. 2020;369:m1798. [PubMed ID: 32357949]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1798.
-
10.
Antinori S, Cossu MV, Ridolfo AL, Rech R, Bonazzetti C, Pagani G, et al. Compassionate remdesivir treatment of severe Covid-19 pneumonia in intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU patients: Clinical outcome and differences in post-treatment hospitalisation status. Pharmacol Res. 2020;158:104899. [PubMed ID: 32407959]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7212963]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2020.104899.
-
11.
Zhang C, Wu Z, Li JW, Zhao H, Wang GQ. Cytokine release syndrome in severe COVID-19: Interleukin-6 receptor antagonist tocilizumab may be the key to reduce mortality. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;55(5):105954. [PubMed ID: 32234467]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7118634]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105954.
-
12.
Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Netea MG, Rovina N, Akinosoglou K, Antoniadou A, Antonakos N, et al. Complex immune dysregulation in COVID-19 patients with severe respiratory failure. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;27(6):992-1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2020.04.009.
-
13.
Jamilloux Y, Henry T, Belot A, Viel S, Fauter M, El Jammal T, et al. Should we stimulate or suppress immune responses in COVID-19? Cytokine and anti-cytokine interventions. Autoimmun Rev. 2020;19(7):102567. [PubMed ID: 32376392]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7196557]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102567.
-
14.
Radbel J, Narayanan N, Bhatt PJ. Use of tocilizumab for COVID-19-induced cytokine release syndrome: A cautionary case report. Chest. 2020;158(1):e15-9. [PubMed ID: 32343968]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7195070]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.04.024.
-
15.
Michot JM, Albiges L, Chaput N, Saada V, Pommeret F, Griscelli F, et al. Tocilizumab, an anti-IL-6 receptor antibody, to treat COVID-19-related respiratory failure: A case report. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(7):961-4. [PubMed ID: 32247642]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7136869]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2020.03.300.
-
16.
Luo P, Liu Y, Qiu L, Liu X, Liu D, Li J. Tocilizumab treatment in COVID-19: A single center experience. J Med Virol. 2020;92(7):814-8. [PubMed ID: 32253759]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7262125]. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25801.
-
17.
Toniati P, Piva S, Cattalini M, Garrafa E, Regola F, Castelli F, et al. Tocilizumab for the treatment of severe COVID-19 pneumonia with hyperinflammatory syndrome and acute respiratory failure: A single center study of 100 patients in Brescia, Italy. Autoimmun Rev. 2020;19(7):102568. [PubMed ID: 32376398]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7252115]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102568.
-
18.
Antony SJ, Davis MA, Davis MG, Almaghlouth NK, Guevara R, Omar F, et al. Early use of tocilizumab in the prevention of adult respiratory failure in SARS-CoV-2 infections and the utilization of interleukin-6 levels in the management. J Med Virol. 2021;93(1):491-8. [PubMed ID: 32644254]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7361804]. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26288.
-
19.
Horby P, Lim WS, Emberson J, Mafham M, Bell J, Linsell L, et al. Effect of dexamethasone in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 – Preliminary report. medRxiv. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.22.20137273.
-
20.
Anderson J, Schauer J, Bryant S, Graves CR. The use of convalescent plasma therapy and remdesivir in the successful management of a critically ill obstetric patient with novel coronavirus 2019 infection: A case report. Case Rep Womens Health. 2020;27. e00221. [PubMed ID: 32426243]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7229947]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crwh.2020.e00221.
-
21.
Coyle J, Igbinomwanhia E, Sanchez-Nadales A, Danciu S, Chu C, Shah N. A recovered case of COVID-19 myocarditis and ARDS treated with corticosteroids, tocilizumab, and experimental AT-001. JACC Case Rep. 2020;2(9):1331-6. [PubMed ID: 32368755]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7196388]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccas.2020.04.025.
-
22.
Barlow A, Landolf KM, Barlow B, Yeung SYA, Heavner JJ, Claassen CW, et al. Review of emerging pharmacotherapy for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019. Pharmacotherapy. 2020;40(5):416-37. [PubMed ID: 32259313]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7262196]. https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.2398.
-
23.
Roche H. A study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of remdesivir plus tocilizumab compared with remdesivir plus placebo in hospitalized participants with severe Covid-19 pneumonia (remdacta). USA: U.S. National Library of Medicine; 2021, [updated 2021; cited 2020]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04409262.
-
24.
ViralClear Pharmaceuticals. Study of merimepodib in combination with remdesivir in adult patients with advanced COVID-19. USA: U.S. National Library of Medicine; 2021, [cited 2020]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04410354.
-
25.
Wang G; Peking University First Hospital. Favipiravir combined with tocilizumab in the treatment of Corona virus disease 2019. USA: U.S. National Library of Medicine; 2021, [cited 2020]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04310228.