Abstract
Background:
Recurrent urinary tract Infection (UTI) is a common problem in pediatric age group. Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is a common cause for recurrent UTI.Objectives:
This study was conducted to determine the prevalence of VUR in children who presented with recurrent UTIs and to assess the effect of endoscopic treatment in patients with grade III-V VUR.Methods:
This was a prospective study recruiting 1232 patients who presented with recurrent UTI during April 2008 and January 2012. We used voiding cystourethrogram to diagnose VUR, and treated grades III-V VUR by bulking agent. One to 2 sessions were performed and the participants were followed-up postoperatively at first, second, third, and 12th months postoperatively.Results:
VUR was found in 437 (35.5%) of the patients. Amongst those, 197 (16%) patients were diagnosed with VUR grade I and II. Additionally, 240 (19.5%) cases were diagnosed with VUR III-V. Two sessions were required to correct the reflux in all patients with grade III. The success rate of correction of grade IV was 79% after the second session. The success rate was 71% in grade V. New contralateral reflux with low grade (I and II) de novo VUR was found in 28/240 (11.7%) cases. After successful correction of VUR, UTI occurred in 12/203 (5.9%) of the patients.Conclusions:
VUR was common in children with recurrent UTI with a good prognosis after endoscopic correction. Further study is needed to follow-up the participants who did not respond to treatment.Keywords
1. Background
Urinary tract infection is one of the most common infections in pediatric age group and particularly in infants (1). The first attack of infection occurs in the first year of life and can cause permanent parenchymal scarring in young vulnerable growing kidneys (1, 2). Recurrent infections in such an age group is believed to correlate with the risk of developing permanent kidney damage that may predispose to serious sequelae later in life, such as hypertension and end-stage renal disease (2, 3). Therefore, UTIs require accurate management and careful follow-up (1-3). Vesicoureteral reflux is the most common congenital abnormalities found in children with recurrent UTI (3, 4). Previous studies have found that radiological abnormalities can exist in 25% to 55% of children after their first attack of UTI (5, 6). To prevent VUR related sequels, participants can be treated by continuous antibiotic prophylaxis, surgical intervention by ureteric reimplantation, or endoscopic treatment by injecting bulking agents (7). Continuous antibiotic prophylaxis might be associated with increased levels of resistance (8) and antibiotics-related side effects. Therefore, many studies have recommended surgical intervention and particularly endoscopic treatment as the first line of management (9-15).
2. Objectives
The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of VUR in children who presented with recurrent UTIs and to assess the effect of endoscopic treatment in patients with grade III-V VUR.
3. Methods
3.1. Patients
This study was conducted in Heevi pediatric hospital in Duhok city, northern Iraq, during April 2008 and January 2012. During the study, 1232 cases with recurrent UTI were referred to Heevi pediatric hospital. We used voiding cystourethrogram to diagnose VUR. A subureteral transurethral injection or hydrodistention implantation technique was used to inject Deflux to the refluxing ureter. The procedure was performed under general anesthesia in the department of surgery at Heevi hospital, and all patients were discharged on the same day of operation. During the cystoscopy, the bladder, urethra, and ureteric orifices were evaluated and any abnormality was recorded. One to 2 sessions were performed, depending on the success of the endoscopic treatment (ET). Then, the participants were followed-up postoperatively at the first and second months with clinical evaluation, general urine examination, and urine for culture and sensitivity to exclude UTI. Voiding cystourethrography was conducted in all patients to assess the response three months after operation. Participants who did not respond were scheduled for another session while those who responded to ET were evaluated after 1 year for the recurrence of reflux and frequency of UTI occurrence.
3.2. Ethical Consideration
Written consent was recorded from guardians on behalf of the participants involved in the study. This study and method of attaining consent were approved by ethics committee of the University of Duhok, College of Medicine, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.
4. Results
4.1. Patients’ Characteristics
VUR was found in 437 (35.5%) of the patients. Among them, 197 (16%) patients were diagnosed with VUR grade I and II. Additionally, 240 (19.5%) cases were diagnosed with VUR III-V. All patients with grade I and II were referred to the pediatric department for follow-up and they were excluded from the follow-up study. All patients with VUR grade III-V were managed with bulking agent and then followed-up. 134/240 (55.8%) of them were male. Among the recruited patients, 91/240 (37.9%) had bilateral VUR, making the total refluxing unit of 389.
4.2. VUR Grades
We found 200 units of grade III reflux. Two sessions were required to correct it in all patients with grade III (Table 1). A total of 152 units were diagnosed with grade IV reflux. The success rate of correction of grade IV was 79% after the second session (Table 1). Grade V was diagnosed in 37 units and the correction success rate was 71% after the second session (Table 1). The overall VUR was corrected successfully in 203/240 (84.6%) of the patients.
The Success Rate of VUR per Grades After First and Second Sessions
| Grade | Unilater, No. | Bilateral, No. | Cure Rate per Unit, % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st Injection | 2nd Injection | |||
| Grade III | 58 | 142 | 89 | 100 |
| Grade IV | 32 | 120 | 64 | 79 |
| Grade V | 1 | 36 | 53 | 71 |
4.3. Outcomes and Complications
Then, the participants were followed-up postoperatively at the first and second months with clinical evaluation, general urine examination, and urine for culture and sensitivity to exclude UTI. At the third month, cystourethrography was performed for all participants. All patients were evaluated after 1 year by cystography, urine examination, and urine culture. During the follow-up period, new contralateral reflux low grade (I and II) de novo VUR was found in 28/240 (11.7%) cases. UTI only occurred in 12/203 (5.9%) of the patients after successful correction of VUR. UTI occurred in 6 patients soon after the procedure, while it occurred in 3 patients 3 months after the procedure. The rest (3 patients) were diagnosed with UTI after 12 months. All patients with UTI (after successful correction of VUR) were referred for further evaluation.
5. Discussion
UTI is the second most common infection worldwide following respiratory tract infection (1, 4, 16). Different factors may predispose to such an infection in children including VUR, which is a common urological problem that is associated with long-term complications (1, 4, 16). In VUR, elevated bladder pressure can be transmitted to the kidney causing reflux nephropathy and scarring. In addition, urinary tract infection may predispose to new scarring even when UTI is afebrile and asymptomatic (16, 17). Early determination of the risk factor associated with renal scarring, such as UTI and/or VUR, and treating them are pivotal for the prevention of renal impairment. Several studies have reported the incidence of VUR in general population and found it to be ranging from 0.4% and 1.8% (18). In addition, the prevalence of VUR in the pediatric age group varies in different countries. Different studies in Western countries found that the prevalence of VUR ranges from 41% and up to 63% (5, 19). Interestingly, the lowest VUR prevalence was reported in Black Americans and Jamaicans, indicting racial variations (20, 21). In our study, VUR was found in 35.5% of the recruited participants. Among them, 16% of patients were diagnosed with VUR grade I and II, while 19.5% of the cases were diagnosed with VUR III-V. This is slightly higher than that reported in Turkey (19.4) and lower than that found in Kuwait (33%) (6, 18, 22, 23). All patients with grade I and II were referred to the pediatric department for follow-up and they were excluded from this study, whereas higher grades were corrected endoscopically. The overall endoscopic correction success rate was 84.6%, which was comparable to previous studies from Iraq and elsewhere (7, 24). For grade III reflux, 2 sessions were required to correct 100% of them. The success rate achieved in our study was higher than that found in Italy (25). On the other hand, 152 units were diagnosed with grade IV reflux. The success rate of correction of grade IV was 79% after the second session. This success rate was comparable with what was reported in Italy, where they report a success rate of 82% for grade IV (25). In the current study, grade V was diagnosed in 37 units and the correction success rate was 71% after the second session. It was previously thought that open-surgery should be preserved for grade V and the endoscopic correction offered the best result in grade II-IV only. However, recent data, including this study, have shown that endoscopic corrections for grade V have a higher success rate than open-surgery, with only 3.6% failure rate and 5.4% recurrence rate (26). In a previous study conducted in Iraq, de novo contralateral VUR was found in 3.8% of the patients after operation (27). Additionally, Kirsch et al. similarly reported 4.5% occurrence of contralateral VUR after the operation (28). In our study, new contralateral reflux low grade (I and II) de novo VUR was found in 11.7% cases. The exact cause for this is unknown, but it was thought to be due to elimination of pop off mechanism. UTI is a common problem in our region and is caused by multi-drug resistant microorganisms (8, 29). Such an infection can predispose to septicaesmia and renal scaring. Early diagnosis of UTI and determining its causes may help prevent deleterious complications. VUR was common in our study, and after correcting it, UTI occurred in 5.9% of the recruited participants. In a previous study conducted in Iraq and after successful correction of VUR, recurrent UTI was eliminated in all participants (27). Thus, screening for VUR should be offered to all patients presenting with recurrent UTI.
To conclude, VUR was common in children with recurrent UTI. Treating VUR carried a good prognosis and helped to prevent recurrent UTI. Further studies are needed to follow-up the participants who did not respond to treatment.
References
-
1.
Robinson JL, Finlay JC, Lang ME, Bortolussi R, Canadian Paediatric Society ID, Immunization Committee CPC. Urinary tract infections in infants and children: Diagnosis and management. Paediatr Child Health. 2014;19(6):315-25. [PubMed ID: 25332662]. https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/19.6.315.
-
2.
Storm DW, Patel AS, Horvath DJ, Li B, Koff SA, Justice SS. Relationship among bacterial virulence, bladder dysfunction, vesicoureteral reflux and patterns of urinary tract infection in children. J Urol. 2012;188(1):236-41. [PubMed ID: 22595065]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.03.025.
-
3.
Park YS. Renal scar formation after urinary tract infection in children. Korean J Pediatr. 2012;55(10):367-70. [PubMed ID: 23133482]. https://doi.org/10.3345/kjp.2012.55.10.367.
-
4.
Peters CA, Skoog SJ, Arant BJ, Copp HL, Elder JS, Hudson RG, et al. Summary of the AUA Guideline on Management of Primary Vesicoureteral Reflux in Children. J Urol. 2010;184(3):1134-44. [PubMed ID: 20650499]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.05.065.
-
5.
Shah KJ, Robins DG, White RH. Renal scarring and vesicoureteric reflux. Arch Dis Child. 1978;53(3):210-7. [PubMed ID: 646430].
-
6.
Ditchfield MR, de Campo JF, Nolan TM, Cook DJ, Grimwood K, Powell HR, et al. Risk factors in the development of early renal cortical defects in children with urinary tract infection. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;162(6):1393-7. [PubMed ID: 8192006]. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.162.6.8192006.
-
7.
Yu RN, Roth DR. Treatment of vesicoureteral reflux using endoscopic injection of nonanimal stabilized hyaluronic acid/dextranomer gel: initial experience in pediatric patients by a single surgeon. Pediatrics. 2006;118(2):698-703. [PubMed ID: 16882825]. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-0178.
-
8.
Habeeb A. Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization among secondary school students at Duhok City-Iraq. J Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;4(2):59-63. https://doi.org/10.5799/ahinjs.02.2014.02.0128.
-
9.
Biocic M, Todoric J, Budimir D, Cvitkovic Roic A, Pogorelic Z, Juric I, et al. Endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in children with subureteral dextranomer/hyaluronic acid injection: a single-centre, 7-year experience. Can J Surg. 2012;55(5):301-6. [PubMed ID: 22854114]. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.003411.
-
10.
Cerwinka WH, Scherz HC, Kirsch AJ. Endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux with dextranomer/hyaluronic acid in children. Adv Urol. 2008:513854. [PubMed ID: 18604293]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/513854.
-
11.
Chandrasekharam VV. Endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteric reflux with dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (Deflux): Single-surgeon experience with 48 ureters. Indian J Urol. 2013;29(3):173-6. [PubMed ID: 24082435]. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.117269.
-
12.
Chung PH, Lan LC, Wong KK, Tam PK. Deflux injection for the treatment of vesicoureteric reflux in children--a single centre's experience. Asian J Surg. 2009;32(3):163-6. [PubMed ID: 19656756]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1015-9584(09)60388-2.
-
13.
Hsieh MH, Madden-Fuentes RJ, Lindsay NE, Roth DR. Treatment of pediatric vesicoureteral reflux using endoscopic injection of hyaluronic acid/dextranomer gel: intermediate-term experience by a single surgeon. Urology. 2010;76(1):199-203. [PubMed ID: 20035980]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2009.10.034.
-
14.
Puri P, Kutasy B, Colhoun E, Hunziker M. Single center experience with endoscopic subureteral dextranomer/hyaluronic acid injection as first line treatment in 1,551 children with intermediate and high grade vesicoureteral reflux. J Urol. 2012;188(4 Suppl):1485-9. [PubMed ID: 22906657]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.023.
-
15.
Puri P, Pirker M, Mohanan N, Dawrant M, Dass L, Colhoun E. Subureteral dextranomer/hyaluronic acid injection as first line treatment in the management of high grade vesicoureteral reflux. J Urol. 2006;176(4 Pt 2):1856-9. discussion 1859-60. [PubMed ID: 16945672]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.03.124.
-
16.
Williams G, Fletcher JT, Alexander SI, Craig JC. Vesicoureteral reflux. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;19(5):847-62. [PubMed ID: 18322164]. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2007020245.
-
17.
Tsai JD, Huang FY, Tsai TC. Asymptomatic vesicoureteral reflux detected by neonatal ultrasonographic screening. Pediatr Nephrol. 1998;12(3):206-9. [PubMed ID: 9630038]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004670050438.
-
18.
Peru H, Bakkaloglu SA, Soylemezoglu O, Buyan N, Hasanoglu E. The relationship between urinary tract infections and vesicoureteral reflux in Turkish children. Int Urol Nephrol. 2009;41(4):947-51. [PubMed ID: 18688755]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-008-9420-1.
-
19.
Melhem RE, Harpen MD. Ethnic factors in the variability of primary vesico-ureteral reflux with age. Pediatr Radiol. 1997;27(9):750-1. [PubMed ID: 9285738]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002470050217.
-
20.
Askari A, Belman AB. Vesicoureteral reflux in black girls. J Urol. 1982;127(4):747-8. [PubMed ID: 7069845]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)54024-0.
-
21.
West W, Venugopal S. The low frequency of reflux in Jamaican children. Pediatr Radiol. 1993;23(8):591-3. [PubMed ID: 8152871]. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02014974.
-
22.
Stokland E, Hellstrom M, Jacobsson B, Jodal U, Lundgren P, Sixt R. Early 99mTc dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) scintigraphy in symptomatic first-time urinary tract infection. Acta Paediatr. 1996;85(4):430-6. [PubMed ID: 8740300].
-
23.
Zaki M, Mutari GA, Badawi M, Ramadan D, Al deen Hanafy E. Vesicoureteric reflux in Kuwaiti children with first febrile urinary tract infection. Pediatr Nephrol. 2003;18(9):898-901. [PubMed ID: 12883980]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-003-1219-9.
-
24.
Chertin B, Colhoun E, Velayudham M, Puri P. Endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux: 11 to 17 years of followup. J Urol. 2002;167(3):1443-5. discussion 1445-6. [PubMed ID: 11832767]. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-200203000-00075.
-
25.
Capozza N, Caione P. Modification of the sting procedure for vesicoureteral reflux: ureteral repositioning and injection. Arch Esp Urol. 2008;61(2):254-7. [PubMed ID: 18491743]. https://doi.org/10.4321/S0004-06142008000200021.
-
26.
Menezes MN, Puri P. The role of endoscopic treatment in the management of grade v primary vesicoureteral reflux. Eur Urol. 2007;52(5):1505-9. [PubMed ID: 17517467]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2007.04.082.
-
27.
Jaafar S, Hussein NR. Long-term results of dexell endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux: An option for the management of recurrent urinary tract infection. Int J Infect. 2016;3(3). https://doi.org/10.17795/iji-35691.
-
28.
Kirsch AJ, Perez-Brayfield MR, Scherz HC. Minimally invasive treatment of vesicoureteral reflux with endoscopic injection of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer: the Children's Hospitals of Atlanta experience. J Urol. 2003;170(1):211-5. [PubMed ID: 12796692]. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000072523.43060.a0.
-
29.
Assafi MSA, Ibrahim NMR, Hussein NR, Taha AA, Balatay AA. Urinary bacterial profile and antibiotic susceptibility pattern among patients with urinary tract infection in duhok city, kurdistan region, Iraq. Int J Pure Appl Sci Technol. 2015;30(2):54.