https://doi.org/10.17795/iji-19229

Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter jejuni

authors:

avatar Masoud Salehi 1 , avatar Ebrahim Shafaei 1 , avatar Zakaria Bameri ORCID 1 , * , avatar Shahram Shareki zahedani 1 , avatar Mohammad Bokaeian 1 , avatar Bahman Mirzaee 1 , avatar Saeideh Mirfakhraee 1 , avatar Taj Bagom Rigi 1 , avatar Mehdi Akbari 1

Infectious Disease and Tropical Medicine Research Center, Boo-Ali Hospital, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, IR Iran
International Journal of Infection: Vol.1, issue 2; e19229
published online: July 20, 2014
article type: Research Article
received: April 1, 2014
revised: May 25, 2014
accepted: May 30, 2014

how to cite: Salehi M, Shafaei E, Bameri Z, Shareki zahedani S, Bokaeian M, et al. Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter jejuni. Int J Infect. 2014;1(2):e19229. https://doi.org/10.17795/iji-19229.

Abstract

Background:

Campylobacter spp. are Gram-negative bacilli enteric pathogens that pose a major public health problem worldwide. In this genus, the most important species is Campylobacter jejuni. This bacterium causes diarrhea as its main symptom, which its intensity varies from mild to severe. Patients’ stools may be watery or bloody.

Objectives:

In this study, we aimed to determine the prevalence of the species of Campylobacter. jejuni in Zahedan, a major city in southeastern Iran.

Patients and Methods:

Fecal samples from 164 patients with acute diarrhea from Zahedan hospitals were collected from 2011 to 2013. Then the samples were streaked onto a campylobacter selective agar containing supplement and 7% defibrinated sheep blood. Conventional bacteriological tests (such as culture and biochemical tests) were performed to confirm the genus and differentiate at the species level. Finally, disk diffusion method was performed according to the recommendation of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) to determine the susceptibility of isolates to antibacterial agents.

Results:

Out of 164 samples, 19 (11.6%) were reported positive by culture which confirmed by biochemical tests. Fifteen (78.9%) patients, whose samples were positive, hospitalized in infant ward. Two (10.5%) patients treated as outpatients. Two remaining (10.5%) patients were admitted in internal medicine ward. All of isolated strains were susceptible or moderately susceptible to erythromycin as the drug of choice.

Conclusions:

In this study, the prevalence of the disease (11.6%) is found to be more than other parts of Iran. The symptomatic infection mainly affects children younger than 5 years.

1. Background

Gastroenteritis caused by Campylobacter bacilli poses a major public health problem worldwide, and its rate has been increasing (1, 2). The genus Campylobacter consists of at least 20 species , among them Campylobacter jejuni is the major cause of diarrhea in many countries (3).

These bacteria cause diarrhea as their main symptom, which its intensity varies from mild to voluminous. Patients’ stools may be watery or bloody. Another frequent digestive tract symptom is abdominal pain, but vomiting is uncommon. Fever, headache, asthenia, and anorexia can also be present and may precede diarrhea.

The disease develops 2-3 days after the ingestion of contaminated food and the symptoms usually resolve within a week (4-6). Sequelae can occur, including the autoimmune-mediated demyelinating neuropathies such as Guillain-Barre and Miller Fisher syndromes (7).

Campylobacter infection is a zoonotic disease that can be hyperendemic, linked to outbreaks and sporadic infections. Known risk factors for the disease include ingestion of undercooked poultry and other meats, contaminated food and water or unpasteurized milk and dairy products, direct contact with pets, farm animals, small children, and swimming in lakes and travel abroad. Foods of animal origin, particularly poultry, are significant sources of C. jejuni, especially when eaten raw and undercooked or decontaminated following cooking.

Normally, Stool samples remain positive for several weeks (8-10). In some countries such as Norway, Romania, Yugoslavia, Hong Kong, and India, Campylobacter sp. are the second most common cause of bacterial enteritis (11-14). However much remains to be done about the epidemiology of these pathogens. In some developing countries like Iran, because the routine culture and isolation of Campylobacter sp. require special media and incubation temperature, the reports about this pathogen are limited (15).

While most cases of enteritis do not require antimicrobial treatment because of their short duration and clinically mild and self-limiting symptoms, antimicrobial treatment is necessary for systemic Campylobacter infections, immunosuppressed patients and severe or prolonged illnesses. Treatment appears to be beneficial if it is administered early enough in the course of the disease.

Macrolides, in particular erythromycin, are the usual drugs of choice. However, for the empiric treatment of adults with suspected bacterial gastroenteritis, the preferred drug typically includes a fluoroquinolone (ciprofloxacin) because of its broad scope of efficacy against almost all enteric bacterial pathogens (16). However, acquired resistance to macrolides, fluoroquinolones and other most widely used antibiotics gives rise to a challenge in campylobacteriosis control worldwide (17-20). In developing countries, various patterns of campylobacter susceptibility to antibiotics were described (21).

2. Objectives

In this study, we aimed to determine the prevalence of the species C. jejuni in Zahedan, a major city in southeastern Iran. The age and sex of patients and the seasonal distribution of C. jejuni and their antibiotic sensitivity patterns were investigated too.

3. Patients and Methods

We collected more than 800 fecal samples from two major hospitals in Zahedan ( Boo-Ali and Ali-ibn-Abi-Taleb) and 164 acute diarrhea samples ( watery, with leukocyte, mucus and RBC) were screened over a period of 2 years from 2011 to 2013.

No patient had received antibiotic therapy up to 72 hour prior to the collection of the samples. The patients were categorized according to their age, sex, and ward of hospital. The presence of leukocytes, erythrocytes and bacilli bacteria with darty motility in stools was determined microscopically.

To isolate Campylobacter sp., each sample was streaked onto a campylobacter selective agar (Lot No: VM800548 643, Merk company, Germany) containing supplement (50 µg/mL polymyxin B, 1 µg/mL trimethoprim and 2 µg/mL vancomysin) and 7% defibrinated sheep blood. These plates were incubated for 24 to 72 h at 42ºC in microaerophilic condition.

Typical colonies from each suspected cultures were selected. Conventional bacteriological tests were performed (catalase, oxidase, hippurate hydrolysis, urease, H2S production, susceptibility to nalidixic acid and cephalothin) to confirm the genus and differentiate at the species level. Various testing methods, such as disk diffusion, broth microdilution, agar dilution and Etest, can be performed to verify the susceptibility of Campylobacter sp. to antimicrobial agents.

Although no internationally accepted criteria have been established for the interpretation of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) data or resistance breakpoints, the agar dilution method (a time-consuming test, rarely carried out as a routine diagnostic) has now been approved by CLSI as the standard susceptibility testing method for Campylobacter sp.

In this study, we used disk diffusion method to determine the susceptibility of isolates to antibacterial agents. Isolates were inoculated on Mueller Hinton agar with 5% sheep blood. Disks containing erythromycin (15µg), nalidixic acid (30 µg), and cephalothin (30µg) (Mast company, Germany) were placed on the inoculated plates. The plates were then incubated in a microaerophilic atmosphere at 42ºC for 24 to 72 h. Susceptibility categorization was carried according to the recommendation of CLSI (22).

4. Results

Out of 800 fecal samples, 164 diarrheic samples were screened. Among 164 patients (83 [50.6%] male; and 81 [49.4%] female), 127 patients (77.4%) were younger than 5 years, 12 (7.3%) 6 to 15 years old, 11 (6.7%) 16 to 30 years old, 11 (6.7%) 31 to 60 years old and 3 (1.8%) older than 60 years.

Out of all samples, 19 (11.6%) were positive by culture and then confirmed by biochemical tests. Fifteen (78.9%) patients, whose samples were positive, hospitalized in infant ward. Two (10.5%) patients treated as outpatients and the remaining patients (10.5%) admitted in internal medicine ward. All of the patients with C. jejuni infection suffered from acute gastroenteritis symptoms but no one had systematic symptoms. All of isolated strains were susceptible or moderately susceptible to erythromycin as the drug of choice.

5. Discussion

Acute gastroenteritis, though common, can be lethal and therefore constitutes one of the most common challenges faced by medical practitioners in the developing countries. Etiological agents can be viral, bacterial, or protozoan. Bacterial agents can be either enteropathogenic, toxigenic, or both. Among the bacterial agents, thermotolerant Campylobacter spp. (Campylobacter jejuni,Campylobacter coli) are the most frequent cause of intestinal infections worldwide.

Prevalence of C. jejuni varies in different part of Iran: Tehran, 8% (23); Semnan, 9.8% (24); and Shiraz, 9.8% (15). In this study, the prevalence (11.6%) is more than other parts of Iran because of different reasons such as level of hygiene, nutrition, weather, and multi-cultural population in this city. These data show similarity to other studies in other developing countries such as China, Bangladesh, Thailand, Egypt, Jordan, Nigeria (1) and Pakistan (25) in which C. jejuni has been a common enteropathogen.

Campylobacter jejuni could infect all age groups but clinical presentation may differ. Enteritis caused by C. jejuni is the infection most frequently observed before the development of Guillain-Barre and Fisher syndromes, making Campylobacter infection a major public health issue. Like other studies, the symptomatic infection mainly affects children younger than 5 years, particularly in developing countries such as Bangladesh, Thailand, Egypt and Nigeria (1).

In this study peak incidence of Campylobacter infection associated with diarrhea was observed in 0 to 5 age too. Other researchers have shown that Campylobacter enteritis can occur in adults as well as children (1), but in current study prevalence of C. jejuni in adults was low. Because the diagnosis of these bacteria by culture, serologic, molecular and biochemical tests are not routine in our laboratories, true prevalence of Campylobacter spp. is more than we think.

The most commonly used drugs are erythromycin (the first choice therapy) and fluoroquinolones (26). The increasing level of macrolides resistance to C. jejuni is becoming a major public health concern in some parts of the world (27). Furthermore, life threatening systemic diseases caused by Campylobacter sp. is diagnosed more and more.

Thus, it is imperative to investigate the clinical impact of macrolides resistance in Campylobacter infections. In the current study, all isolates were susceptible or moderately susceptible to erythromycin. Unlike some surveillances (20, 23, 28-34), we did not find macrolide-resistant strains.

Since C. jejuni is one of the most important enteropathogens, further studies are still needed in order to reveal the geographic prevalence and resistance distributions of these microorganisms in Iran.

Acknowledgements

References

  • 1.

    Coker AO, Isokpehi RD, Thomas BN, Amisu KO, Obi CL. Human campylobacteriosis in developing countries. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8(3):237-44. [PubMed ID: 11927019]. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid0803.010233.

  • 2.

    World Health Organization. The increasing incidence of human campylobacteriosis report and proceedings of a WHO consultation of experts, Copenhagen, Denmark, 21-25 November 2000. 2001.

  • 3.

    Barros-Velázquez J, Jiménez A, Villa TG. Isolation and typing methods for the epidemiologic investigation of thermotolerant campylobacters. International Microbiology. 2010;2(4):217-26.

  • 4.

    Tauxe RV, Hargrett-Bean N, Patton C, Wachsmuth I. Campylobacter isolates in the United States. MMWR Morb Mort Wkly Rep. 1988;37:1-13.

  • 5.

    Skirrow MB. Campylobacter enteritis: a "new" disease. Br Med J. 1977;2(6078):9-11. [PubMed ID: 871765].

  • 6.

    Blaser MJ, Berkowitz ID, LaForce FM, Cravens J, Reller LB, Wang WL. Campylobacter enteritis: clinical and epidemiologic features. Ann Intern Med. 1979;91(2):179-85. [PubMed ID: 380433].

  • 7.

    Dingle KE, Colles FM, Ure R, Wagenaar JA, Duim B, Bolton FJ, et al. Molecular characterization of Campylobacter jejuni clones: a basis for epidemiologic investigation. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8(9):949-55. [PubMed ID: 12194772]. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid0809.020122.

  • 8.

    Pezzotti G, Serafin A, Luzzi I, Mioni R, Milan M, Perin R. Occurrence and resistance to antibiotics of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in animals and meat in northeastern Italy. Int J Food Microbiol. 2003;82(3):281-7. [PubMed ID: 12593931].

  • 9.

    Salazar-Lindo E, Sack RB, Chea-Woo E. Early Treatment with Erythromycin of Campylobacter Jejuni-assocmted Dysentery in Children. Pediatric Emergency Care. 1986;2(4):270-1. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006565-198612000-00020.

  • 10.

    Raupach JC, Hundy RL. An outbreak of Campylobacter jejuni infection among conference delegates. Commun Dis Intell Q Rep. 2003;27(3):380-3. [PubMed ID: 14510066].

  • 11.

    Lassen J, Kapperud G. Epidemiological aspects of enteritis due to Campylobacter spp. in Norway. J Clin Microbiol. 1984;19(2):153-6. [PubMed ID: 6699143].

  • 12.

    Popovic-Uroic T. Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli diarrhoea in rural and urban populations in Yugoslavia. Epidemiol Infect. 1989;102(1):59-67. [PubMed ID: 2917618].

  • 13.

    Ho BS, Wong WT. A one-year survey of campylobacter enteritis and other forms of bacterial diarrhoea in Hong Kong. J Hyg (Lond). 1985;94(1):55-60. [PubMed ID: 3973381].

  • 14.

    Nair GB, Bhattacharya SK, Pal SC. Isolation and characterization of Campylobacter jejuni from acute diarrhoeal cases in Calcutta. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1983;77(4):474-6. [PubMed ID: 6636274].

  • 15.

    Hassanzadeh P, Motamedifar M. Occurrence of Campylobacter jejuni in Shiraz, Southwest Iran. Med Princ Pract. 2007;16(1):59-62. [PubMed ID: 17159366]. https://doi.org/10.1159/000096142.

  • 16.

    Engberg J, Neimann J, Nielsen EM, Aerestrup FM, Fussing V. Quinolone-resistant Campylobacter infections: risk factors and clinical consequences. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10(6):1056-63. [PubMed ID: 15207057]. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1006.030669.

  • 17.

    Ruiz-Palacios GM. The health burden of Campylobacter infection and the impact of antimicrobial resistance: playing chicken. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44(5):701-3. [PubMed ID: 17278063]. https://doi.org/10.1086/509936.

  • 18.

    Moore JE, Barton MD, Blair IS, Corcoran D, Dooley JS, Fanning S, et al. The epidemiology of antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter. Microbes Infect. 2006;8(7):1955-66. [PubMed ID: 16716632]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2005.12.030.

  • 19.

    Senok A, Yousif A, Mazi W, Sharaf E, Bindayna K, Elnima el A, et al. Pattern of antibiotic susceptibility in Campylobacter jejuni isolates of human and poultry origin. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2007;60(1):1-4. [PubMed ID: 17314416].

  • 20.

    Serichantalergs O, Dalsgaard A, Bodhidatta L, Krasaesub S, Pitarangsi C, Srijan A, et al. Emerging fluoroquinolone and macrolide resistance of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolates and their serotypes in Thai children from 1991 to 2000. Epidemiol Infect. 2007;135(8):1299-306. [PubMed ID: 17306054]. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268807008096.

  • 21.

    Sangaré L, Nikiéma AK, Zimmermann S, Sanou I, Congo-Ouédraogo M, Diabaté A, et al. Campylobacter Spp. Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Susceptibility in a Developing Country, Burkina Faso (West Africa). African Journal of Clinical and Experimental Microbiology. 2012;13(2). https://doi.org/10.4314/ajcem.v13i2.9.

  • 22.

    WAYNE P. performance standards for antimicrobial suscetibility testing. Int J Food Microbiol. 2002.

  • 23.

    Feizabadi MM, Dolatabadi S, Zali MR, Esen B, Kurtoglu D, Coplu N. Isolation and drug-resistant patterns of Campylobacter strains cultured from diarrheic children in Tehran. Japanese j infectious diseases. 2013;60(6):217-9.

  • 24.

    Jazayeri Moghadas A, Irajian Gh, Kalantari F, Monem M, Salehian A, Rahbar H, et al. Prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni in diarrheic children in Semnan (Iran). Koomesh. 2008;9(4):297-300.

  • 25.

    Butzler JP, Skirrow MB. Campylobacter enteritis. Acta Paediatr Belg. 1979;32(2):89-94. [PubMed ID: 495094].

  • 26.

    Campana R, Patrone V, Federici S, Fulvi S, Baffone W. Antibiotic resistance of Campylobacter spp isolated from chickens and humans in Central Italy. J food safe. 2010;30(4):924-40.

  • 27.

    Gibreel A, Taylor DE. Macrolide resistance in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006;58(2):243-55. [PubMed ID: 16735431]. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkl210.

  • 28.

    Wang SM, Huang FC, Wu CH, Tang KS, Tiao MM. Clinical significance of erythromycin-resistant Campylobacter jejuni in children. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2011;44(1):63-6. [PubMed ID: 21531355]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2011.01.012.

  • 29.

    Wieczorek K, Kania I, Osek J. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter spp. isolated from poultry carcasses in Poland. J Food Prot. 2013;76(8):1451-5. [PubMed ID: 23905805]. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-035.

  • 30.

    Samie A, Guerrant RL, Barrett L, Bessong PO, Igumbor EO, Obi CL. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic and bacterial pathogens in diarrhoeal and non-diarroeal human stools from Vhembe district, South Africa. J Health Popul Nutr. 2009;27(6):739-45. [PubMed ID: 20099757].

  • 31.

    Beatty ME, Ochieng JB, Chege W, Kumar L, Okoth G, Shapiro RL, et al. Sporadic paediatric diarrhoeal illness in urban and rural sites in Nyanza Province, Kenya. East Afr Med J. 2009;86(8):387-98. [PubMed ID: 20575313].

  • 32.

    Gaudreau C, Gilbert H. Comparison of disc diffusion and agar dilution methods for antibiotic susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuni and Campylobacter coli. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1997;39(6):707-12. [PubMed ID: 9222038].

  • 33.

    Luangtongkum T, Morishita TY, El-Tayeb AB, Ison AJ, Zhang Q. Comparison of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter spp. by the agar dilution and the agar disk diffusion methods. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45(2):590-4. [PubMed ID: 17122005]. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00986-06.

  • 34.

    Han K, Jang SS, Choo E, Heu S, Ryu S. Prevalence, genetic diversity, and antibiotic resistance patterns of Campylobacter jejuni from retail raw chickens in Korea. Int J Food Microbiol. 2007;114(1):50-9. [PubMed ID: 17207550]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.10.042.