https://doi.org/10.17795/iji-22822

Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of Vibrio cholera Strains Isolated From Afghan and Iranian Patients in Iran

authors:

avatar Seyed Mehdi Tabatabaei ORCID 1 , * , avatar Alireza Salimi Khorashad 1

Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, IR Iran
International Journal of Infection: Vol.2, issue 1; e22822
published online: January 20, 2015
article type: Research Article
received: August 16, 2014
accepted: August 16, 2014

how to cite: Tabatabaei S M, Salimi Khorashad A. Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of Vibrio cholera Strains Isolated From Afghan and Iranian Patients in Iran. Int J Infect. 2015;2(1):e22822. https://doi.org/10.17795/iji-22822.

Abstract

Background:

The increasing prevalence of multidrug resistant strains of Vibrio cholerae in recent cholera epidemics across the world is a growing global public health challenge.

Objectives:

This study was undertaken to identify the patterns of antimicrobial resistance in isolates collected from laboratory-confirmed cases of cholera during an outbreak occurred between August and September 2013 in Sistan and Balouchestan province, southeast of Iran.

Patients and Methods:

Forty eight V. cholerae isolates were obtained from clinical samples. All the strains were identified as Inaba serotype. Antibiotic susceptibility of the isolates for sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, tetracycline, nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, ampicillin, ceftriaxone and erythromycin were determined. The method used for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) was standard disk diffusion technique (Kirby-Bauer method). According to the criteria published by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), the isolates were characterized as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant.

Results:

A ST revealed high levels of resistance to sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (89.6%), tetracycline (60.4%), ampicillin (56.3%), nalidixic acid (43.7%) and erythromycin (22.9%). Intermediate susceptibility levels to erythromycin (68.8%), nalidixic acid (56.3%) and ampicillin (33.3%) were identified. All the samples were susceptible to ciprofloxacin and ceftriaxone. Resistant to erythromycin, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim and ampicillin dominated in Afghan patients' samples, while a greater proportion of samples from Iranian patients showed resistance to tetracycline and nalidixic acid. All the differences were statistically significant.

Conclusions:

Our findings suggested a worrying increase in resistance of V. cholerae strains to commonly used antibiotics. Differences in patterns of resistance between Afghan and Iranian patients' samples were observed, which further emphasize a need for constant observation.

1. Background

Cholera is an acute diarrheal infection with epidemic and pandemic potentials, caused by the bacterium Vibrio cholerae. Annually, there are approximately 3-5 million cases of V. cholerae worldwide, causing 100 000 to 120 000 deaths (1). The world has been witnessing a striking growth in the burden of cholera during the recent years, spreading to countries that had not previously experienced this disease, reflecting the failure in implementation of control measures (2). More than 200 serogroups of V. cholerae have been identified, but serogroups O1 and O139 are the most common causative agents of cholera epidemics (3). The O1 serogroup has two biotypes (classical and El Tor) each of which has three serotypes, Ogawa, Inaba and Hikojima (4). The last serotype is extremely rare; V. cholerae O1 strains have the ability to interchange between the Ogawa and Inaba serotypes (5). Cholera is transmitted by the fecal-oral route and V. cholerae is sensitive to the low pH found in human stomach. Therefore, people with low stomach acid production such as young children, the elderly and patients who take antacids are at increased risks of contracting cholera (6). A potent enterotoxin (CT, also called choleragen) produced by V. cholerae strains is responsible for lethal symptoms of the disease, which causes massive secretion of electrolytes and water into the intestinal lumen (4). Replacement of fluid and electrolytes is the basis of cholera treatment (3). However, antibiotics are commonly administered for treatment of severe cases to reduce the duration of illness and to lessen shedding of V. cholerae in the stool, and hence, the risk of infection spread (7). The rapid emergence and spread of multidrug resistant V. cholerae with resulting outbreaks across the globe can undermine the success of antimicrobial therapy (8). However, there is a great variation in patterns of antibiotic resistance at different times and different places, with multiple antibiotic-resistant V. cholerae commonly found during epidemics. There are several reports of V. cholerae resistance against tetracycline and fluoroquinolones and the disease surveillance statistics across the world show that multidrug-resistant V. cholerae outbreaks are on a rise (9). Nalidixic acid-resistant V. cholerae O-1 strains have been detected in Karachi, Pakistan (10). Antimicrobial drug resistance in Vibrio spp. can develop through efflux pumps, spontaneous chromosomal mutation, conjugative plasmids, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT) elements and integrons, and integrating conjugative elements (ICEs) (9). Many O139 and O1 isolates have acquired SXT elements or a closely related ICE (11). Improper administration of antibiotics by health professionals, misuse by unskilled practitioners and ordinary people, substandard quality of antimicrobials, poor sanitation that facilitates the spread of multidrug-resistant V. cholerae, and inadequate diseases surveillance are among the social and behavioral factors associated with appearance of antibiotic resistance pathogens in developing countries (12). Other factors contributing to the emergence of antimicrobial drug resistance in Vibrio spp. include an increase in the number of susceptible people in communities, international travel and population movements, and the breakdown of public health measures (13). Given the fact that the geographical and temporal occurrence of V. cholerae shows changes across the world, there is a continuing need to monitor antimicrobial resistance patterns of this potentially life-threatening pathogen (14). Periodic outbreaks of cholera have been reported from Sistan and Balouchestan province, southeast of Iran. Most of these outbreaks have been linked to the cross-border movement of populations (15). Although the predominant V. cholerae serotype in Sistan and Balouchestan province is Ogawa and serotype Inaba is rare, all the V. cholerae strains isolated during a recent outbreak that occurred between August and September 2013 were of Inaba serotype. In Pakistan, a country in which cholera is endemic (16), which has a long common border with Sistan and Balouchestan province, serotype Inaba has outnumbered serotype Ogawa and the pathogen has been resistant to sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim and chloramphenicol, but not to ampicillin, tetracycline and ofloxacin (17). The increasing antimicrobial resistance in V. cholerae strains isolated from cases detected in the region and also in Sistan and Balouchestan province is a major challenge in treatment of patients with cholera (8, 18).

2. Objectives

Since the majority of patients with cholera in the 2013 outbreak were Afghans entering Iran through Pakistan border, the authors decided to investigate the possible drug resistance in isolates collected from laboratory-confirmed cases of cholera and compare the antimicrobial resistance patterns between non-Iranian and Iranian patients with cholera.

3. Patients and Methods

This study included V. cholerae strains recovered from stool samples of 48 patients (42 Afghans and 6 Iranians) with acute watery diarrhea. The mean age of patients was 22.1 ± 9.7 years old. All the patients were either Afghans who newly crossed the Iran-Pakistan border or Iranians that came in contact with Afghan patients. The stool samples were collected before starting the antibiotic therapy. All the strains were characterized as serotype Inaba. As recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), the standard disc diffusion technique (Kirby-Bauer method) (19) on Mueller-Hinton agar was used to determine the in vitro susceptibility of the identified V. cholerae isolates (19). The antibiotic discs used in this study were purchased from Iranian Padtan Teb Company (www.padtanteb.com). The antibiotics discs were used at the following concentrations: sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim5μg, tetracycline 30 μg, nalidixic acid 30 μg, ciprofloxacin 5 μg, ampicillin 10 μg, ceftriaxone 30 μg, and erythromycin 15 μg. The zones of growth inhibition were recorded. The criteria published by the CLSI (20) were used to interpret the test results. Since the reliability of disk diffusion results for ciprofloxacin and nalidixic acid has not been validated, the interpretive criteria for Enterobacteriaceae was used as the tentative zone size standards (21). Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as the control sample. Susceptibility levels of the V. cholerae isolates were determined as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant.

4. Results

The results for antimicrobial susceptibility testing using the standard disk diffusion technique (Kirby-Bauer method) for V. cholerae isolates are presented in Table 1. About 89.6% of V. cholerae isolates exhibited resistance to sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, while the proportions of intermediate and sensitive strains were 2.1% and 8.3%, respectively. For tetracycline, 60.4% of the isolates were resistant, while 39.6% were sensitive. Resistant and intermediate outcomes for ampicillin were identified in 56.3% and 33.3% of samples, respectively. Only 10.4% of the isolates were sensitive to ampicillin. None of the samples were sensitive to nalidixic acid and intermediate outcome was found in 56.2% of isolates and 43.8% were resistant. The majority of isolate were resistant (22.9%) or intermediate (68.8%) against erythromycin and 8.3% were sensitive. All the samples were resistant to ciprofloxacin and ceftriaxone. The pattern of antimicrobial resistance greatly differed between the V. cholerae strains isolated from Afghan patients and the bacteria isolated from Iranian patients with cholera (Table 2). The isolates from Afghan patients were more likely to be resistant to erythromycin, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim and ampicillin. Only 2.4% of isolates form Afghan patients were sensitive to erythromycin, while 50% of isolates from Iranian patients were sensitive. In comparison with Iranian isolates, a greater proportion of Afghan patients' isolates showed intermediate resistance (73.8% versus 33.3%) or resistance (23.8% versus 16.7%)against erythromycin and the difference was statistically significant (P value < 0.006). Almost all the samples obtained from Afghan patients (97.6%) were resistant to sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, while 3.3% of Iranian samples were resistant and 50% were sensitive (P value < 0.0001). For ampicillin, 61.9% of V. cholerae strains from Afghan patients were resistant and this proportion was 16.7% for Iranian samples (P value < 0.0001).However, a greater proportion of V. cholerae strains obtained from Iranian patients showed antimicrobial resistance to tetracycline (83.3% versus 57.1%) and nalidixic acid (66.7% versus 40.5%). All of the abovementioned differences were statistically significant. Isolated V. cholerae strains from both Iranian and Afghan patients were 100% sensitive to ciprofloxacin and ceftriaxone.

Table 1.

Patterns of Antimicrobial Susceptibility in Vibrio cholerae Strains Obtained From Cholera Patients a

SusceptibilityFrequencyDisc Content, μgInhibitory Zone, mm
Erythromycin1521.2 ± 4.8
Intermediate33 (68.8)
Resistant11 (22.9)
Sensitive4 (8.3)
Ampicillin1012.9 ± 3.2
Intermediate16 (33.3)
Resistant27 (56.3)
Sensitive5 (10.4)
Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim510.5 ± 3.6
Intermediate1 (2.1)
Resistant43 (89.6)
Sensitive4 (8.3)
Tetracycline3022.2 ± 10.3
Resistant29 (60.4)
Sensitive19 (39.6)
Nalidixic acid3012.4 ± 6.4
Intermediate27 (56.3)
Resistant21 (43.8)
Ciprofloxacin524.6 ± 5.3
Sensitive48 (100.0)
Ceftriaxone3029.5 ± 1.1
Sensitive48 (100.0)

aData are presented as mean ± SD or No. (%).

Table 2.

Comparison of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns Between Vibrio cholerae Strains Isolated From Afghan and Iranian Patients a

SusceptibilityNationalityP Value b
AfghanIranian
Erythromycin, 15 μg0.006
Sensitive1 (2.4)3 (50.0)
Intermediate31 (73.8)2 (33.3)
Resistant10 (23.8)1 (16.7)
Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim, 5 μg< 0.0001
Sensitive1 (2.4)3 (50.0)
Intermediate0 (0.0)1 (16.7)
Resistant41 (97.6)2 (33.3)
Ampicillin, 10 μg< 0.0001
Sensitive1 (2.4)4 (66.7)
Intermediate15 (35.7)1 (16.7)
Resistant26 (61.9)1 (16.7)
Tetracycline, 30 μg0.223
Sensitive18 (42.9)1 (16.7)
Resistant245 (7.1)5 (83.3)
Nalidixic acid, 30 μg0.220
Intermediate25 (59.5)2 (33.3)
Resistant17 (40.5)4 (66.7)
Ciprofloxacin, 5 μg
Sensitive42 (100.0)6 (100.0)
Ceftriaxone, 30 μg
Sensitive42 (100.0)6 (100.0)

aData are presented as No. (%).

bP value for Fisher's exact test.

5. Discussion

Our findings showed that strains of V. cholerae have become resistant to commonly used antibiotics and multidrug resistance has been on a rise. We also found different patterns of antimicrobial susceptibility for V. cholerae isolates obtained from Iranian and non-Iranian patients with cholera. Our findings were consistent with the results from studies that have documented an increase in emergence of multidrug-resistant V. cholerae strains during the outbreaks occurred in the past decade in Iran. Comparing the results from the present study with a similar study on antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of V. cholerae strains in Sistan and Balouchestan province during 2008-2010, showed a similar pattern of resistance for sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim and no resistance to ciprofloxacin. However, the dominated pattern for ampicillin and tetracycline changed from intermediate to resistant, that of nalidixic acid shifted from resistant to intermediate, and for erythromycin it altered from sensitive to mostly intermediate (18). In 2005 in a cholera outbreak in Hamedan province, Iran, resistance to furazolidone, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and erythromycin was 100%, 98% and 62%, respectively (22). Antibiotic susceptibility testing of 60 clinical V. cholerae isolates isolated from four different provinces of Iran during 2004-2006, showed that 95% of samples were resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (23). The majority of patients with cholera in the 2013 cholera outbreak in Sistan and Balouchestan province were linked to Pakistan. Since 1988, cholera has become a significant cause of gastroenteritis in both adults and children in Pakistan (24). The socio-cultural and environmental circumstances including poor sanitation, massive religious gatherings and some natural disasters such as severe flooding, facilitates the continued presence as well as the spread of the disease in Pakistan (16, 25). When facing repeated cholera epidemics, the emergence of multidrug-resistant strains of V. cholerae is a major public health problem in Pakistan. A review of reported antimicrobial sensitivity levels of the V. cholerae isolates from 1990 to 1996 in Pakistan showed that most sensitive strains became resistant to commonly used antibiotics such as tetracycline (91%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (96%) and erythromycin (66%), but remained sensitive to nalidixic acid (16). In 1994, the V. cholerae isolates from patients with cholera admitted to the pediatric ward of Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, were resistant to tetracycline, ampicillin and erythromycin, but sensitive to ceftriaxone, cefixime, ofloxacin and nalidixic acid (24). However, some studies have revealed that susceptibility patterns fluctuate from year to year. For instance, in comparison with the antimicrobial sensitivity patterns of V. cholerae isolates obtained during 1993-1994 which were resistant to sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (99%) and chloramphenicol (35%), the samples collected during 2000-2001 were almost 100% sensitive (26). Similar antimicrobial resistance patterns have also been reported from other cholera endemic areas such as African countries and the Indian subcontinent. A significant increase in the trend of antimicrobial resistance of V. cholerae 01 strains isolated during two cholera epidemics in 1997 and 1999 in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, was reported. The greatest increase was 37%, observed to ampicillin, followed by 35.9% increase in resistance against erythromycin, 35% to tetracycline and 16.7% to nalidixic acid (27). However, no change for susceptibility to ciprofloxacin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole was identified. Similarly, antibiogram results of V. cholerae isolates during cholera epidemics in North West Ethiopia from August 2006 to September 2008 identified high levels of resistant to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and ampicillin. The majority of samples tested were susceptible to erythromycin, tetracycline and ciprofloxacin (28). All the isolated strains of V. cholerae, obtained from patients during a series of cholera outbreaks occurred in the West African country, Senegal, between October 2004 and March 2006, were susceptible to doxycycline and fluoroquinolones, with majority of isolates being resistant to sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (29). The continuous emergence of multidrug-resistant V. cholerae strains in the Indian subcontinent has been well documented. Antibiotic susceptibility testing of the V. cholerae isolates collected from different cholera outbreaks in India between 2004 and 2010 revealed high rates of resistance towards trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, nalidixic acid and susceptibility to tetracycline. V. cholerae isolates from the latest outbreak in Eastern India were also resistant to tetracycline (30). Resistance to antibiotics such as nalidixic acid, furazolidone , trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and ciprofloxacin was constantly high (100%) among V. cholerae O1 Inaba isolates collected from cholera patients admitted to a hospital in East Delhi during 2001-2006 (31). Monitoring of multi-drug resistance patterns of V. cholerae isolates in India during 2000-2004 showed that 25% to 75% of isolates that were susceptible to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin and ampicillin in 2000, developed resistance in 2004 (32). Resistance to tetracycline in V. cholerae strains isolated from patients with cholera in Sevagram, India, over 16 years (from January 1990 to December 2005), also varied between 2% and 17% (8). In contrary with our findings, the study on the trends of antimicrobial resistance patterns of V. cholerae in Thailand between 2000 and 2004 showed no increase in resistance during the study period (33). The strains investigated showed no resistance to norfloxacin. Antimicrobial resistance was observed with a higher frequency in Ogawa isolates with 16.3% and 60.5% resistant to tetracycline and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, respectively. The proportion of resistant Inaba serotypes against these two antibiotics was less than 1%. Similarly, during the 2004 cholera epidemic in Douala, Cameroon, the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of isolated V. cholerae strains showed no changes (34). One of the major challenges in antimicrobial treatment of cholera is the rapid fluctuations in the resistance patterns identified in V. cholera (35). An abrupt increase in resistance levels of V. cholerae to tetracycline with some degrees of resistance to erythromycin was reported during 2004-2005 in Bangladesh. However, this pattern of resistance was followed by some fluctuations in the following years (36). Likewise, chloramphenicol and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole-resistant strains of V. cholerae O139 were isolated with high frequencies from patients with cholera admitted to the Infectious Diseases Hospital, Calcutta, India, during 1994-1995. This was followed by a sharp decline in the proportion of resistant strains in succeeding years (37). This could be partly explained by the fact that V. cholerae microorganisms are not able to steadily carry resistance-causing plasmids (35, 38). Resistance patterns for V. cholerae strains can vary greatly depending on geographical location, patterns of antibiotic consumption among the studied population, and the time of study. In addition to the factors related to the microorganism itself, lacking or inadequate regulation of antimicrobials distribution and consumption, inappropriate implementation of existing laws, and international travels and population movements are among social and behavioral factors related to emergence of multidrug-resistant microorganisms in developing countries (39). In summary, according to the results from different epidemiological studies across the globe, V. cholerae strains have become resistant to several antibiotics and multidrug resistance is increasing. The spread of V. cholerae strains related to human behavior can be more easily targeted than complex environmental factors, especially in developing countries. Therefore, enhancing the infectious diseases surveillance systems with a special focus on early detection of possible cholera outbreaks is crucial for better understanding of the dynamics of the disease and improving cholera preparedness and responses (13). Antimicrobial susceptibility tests for V. cholerae strains should be an integrated part of the diseases surveillance system. Monitoring the changing patterns of susceptibility to antimicrobials should be specially considered when responding to cholera outbreaks. Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance could be used as a guide to select appropriate antimicrobial treatments in response to different settings and circumstances. These interventions need to be coupled with promotion of prudent use of antibiotics via precise regulations and effective disease control programs.

Acknowledgements

References

  • 1.

    World Health Organization. Cholera. WHO; 2014.

  • 2.

    Piarroux R, Faucher B. Cholera epidemics in 2010: respective roles of environment, strain changes, and human-driven dissemination. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(3):231-8. [PubMed ID: 22288560]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03763.x.

  • 3.

    Sharifi Mood B, Metanat M. Diagnosis, Clinical Management, Prevention, and Control of Cholera; A Review Study. Int J Infect. 2014;1(1). ee18303.

  • 4.

    Finkelstein RA. Cholera, Vibrio cholerae O1 and O139, and Other Pathogenic Vibrios. In: Baron S, editor. Medical Microbiology. University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston: Galveston; 1996.

  • 5.

    Mandal S, Mandal MD, Pal NK. Cholera: a great global concern. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2011;4(7):573-80. [PubMed ID: 21803312]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1995-7645(11)60149-1.

  • 6.

    Cash RA, Music SI, Libonati JP, Snyder MJ, Wenzel RP, Hornick RB. Response of man to infection with Vibrio cholerae. I. Clinical, serologic, and bacteriologic responses to a known inoculum. J Infect Dis. 1974;129(1):45-52. [PubMed ID: 4809112].

  • 7.

    Pierce NF, Banwell JG, Mitra RC, Caranasos GJ, Keimowitz RI, Thomas J, et al. Controlled comparison of tetracycline and furazolidone in cholera. Br Med J. 1968;3(5613):277-80. [PubMed ID: 4873660].

  • 8.

    Narang P, Mendiratta DK, Deotale VS, Narang R. Changing patterns of Vibrio cholerae in sevagram between 1990 and 2005. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2008;26(1):40-4. [PubMed ID: 18227596].

  • 9.

    Kitaoka M, Miyata ST, Unterweger D, Pukatzki S. Antibiotic resistance mechanisms of Vibrio cholerae. J Med Microbiol. 2011;60(Pt 4):397-407. [PubMed ID: 21252269]. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.023051-0.

  • 10.

    Mahmood A. Emergence of nalidixic acid resistant Vibrio cholerae O-1 in Karachi. J Pak Med Assoc. 1999;49(11):286. [PubMed ID: 10647244].

  • 11.

    Sjolund-Karlsson M, Reimer A, Folster JP, Walker M, Dahourou GA, Batra DG, et al. Drug-resistance mechanisms in Vibrio cholerae O1 outbreak strain, Haiti, 2010. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17(11):2151-4. [PubMed ID: 22099122]. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1711.110720.

  • 12.

    Okeke IN, Lamikanra A, Edelman R. Socioeconomic and behavioral factors leading to acquired bacterial resistance to antibiotics in developing countries. Emerg Infect Dis. 1999;5(1):18-27. [PubMed ID: 10081668]. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid0501.990103.

  • 13.

    Cohen ML. Epidemiological factors influencing the emergence of antimicrobial resistance. Ciba Found Symp. 1997;207:223-31. discussion 231-7. [PubMed ID: 9189644].

  • 14.

    Das S, Choudhry S, Saha R, Ramachandran VG, Kaur K, Sarkar BL. Emergence of multiple drug resistance Vibrio cholerae O1 in East Delhi. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2011;5(4):294-8. [PubMed ID: 21537071].

  • 15.

    Sargolzaie N, Kiani M. Cholera Outbreaks Evaluation in Sistan and Baluchestan Province of Iran. Int J Infect. 2014;1(1). ee19636.

  • 16.

    Sheikh A, Khan A, Malik T, Fisher-Hoch SP. Cholera in a developing megacity; Karachi, Pakistan. Epidemiol Infect. 1997;119(3):287-92. [PubMed ID: 9440430].

  • 17.

    Jabeen K, Zafar A, Hasan R. Increased isolation of Vibrio cholerae O1 serotype Inaba over serotype Ogawa in Pakistan. East Mediterr Health J. 2008;14(3):564-70. [PubMed ID: 18720620].

  • 18.

    Salimi Khorashad A, Tabatabaee SM, Amirabadi A, Roudbar Mohamadi S. Vibrio cholerae and Changing of Microbial Resistance Patterns in Sistan and Balouchestan Province. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2012;14(8):63-6.

  • 19.

    Hudzicki J. Kirby-Bauer Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Test Protocol: American Society for Microbiology. American Society for Microbiology; 2013, [updated 2013]. Available from: http://www.microbelibrary.org/component/resource/laboratory-test/3189-kirby-bauer-disk-diffusion-susceptibility-test-protocol.

  • 20.

    Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, Seventeenth Informational Supplement. Wayne: CLSI; 2010.

  • 21.

    Bopp CA, Ries AA, Wells JG. Laboratory methods for the diagnosis of epidemic dysentery and cholera. Atlanta: Foodborne and Diarrheal Diseases Laboratory Section; 1999.

  • 22.

    Keramat F, Hashemi SH, Mamani M, Ranjbar M, Erfan H. Survey of antibiogram tests in cholera patients in the 2005 epidemic in Hamadan, Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J. 2008;14(4):768-75. [PubMed ID: 19166158].

  • 23.

    Adabi M, Bakhshi B, Goudarzi H, Zahraei SM, Pourshafie MR. Distribution of class I integron and sulfamethoxazole trimethoprim constin in Vibrio cholerae isolated from patients in Iran. Microb Drug Resist. 2009;15(3):179-84. [PubMed ID: 19728775]. https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2009.0885.

  • 24.

    Nizami SQ, Farooqui BJ. Cholera in children in Karachi from 1990 through 1995: a study of cases admitted to a tertiary care hospital. J Pak Med Assoc. 1998;48(6):171-3. [PubMed ID: 9813989].

  • 25.

    Shah MA, Mutreja A, Thomson N, Baker S, Parkhill J, Dougan G, et al. Genomic epidemiology of Vibrio cholerae O1 associated with floods, Pakistan, 2010. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20(1):13-20. [PubMed ID: 24378019]. https://doi.org/10.3201/.eid2001.130428.

  • 26.

    Jabeen K, Hasan R. Re-emergence of Vibrio cholerae O139 in Pakistan: report from a tertiary care hospital. J Pak Med Assoc. 2003;53(8):335-8. [PubMed ID: 14558737].

  • 27.

    Urassa WK, Mhando YB, Mhalu FS, Mjonga SJ. Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of Vibrio cholerae O1 strains during two cholera outbreaks in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. East Afr Med J. 2000;77(7):350-3. [PubMed ID: 12862151].

  • 28.

    Abera B, Bezabih B, Dessie A. Antimicrobial suceptibility of V. cholerae in north west, Ethiopia. Ethiop Med J. 2010;48(1):23-8. [PubMed ID: 20607994].

  • 29.

    Manga NM, Ndour CT, Diop SA, Dia NM, Ka-Sall R, Diop BM, et al. [Cholera in Senegal from 2004 to 2006: lessons learned from successive outbreaks]. Med Trop (Mars). 2008;68(6):589-92. [PubMed ID: 19639824].

  • 30.

    Jain M, Kushwah KS, Kumar P, Goel AK. Molecular Characterization of Vibrio cholerae O1 Reveals Continuous Evolution of Its New Variants in India. Indian J Microbiol. 2013;53(2):137-41. [PubMed ID: 24426099]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-013-0372-5.

  • 31.

    Das S, Saha R, Kaur IR. Trend of antibiotic resistance of Vibrio cholerae strains from East Delhi. Indian J Med Res. 2008;127(5):478-82. [PubMed ID: 18653912].

  • 32.

    Chandrasekhar MR, Krishna BV, Patil AB. Changing characteristics of Vibrio cholerae: emergence of multidrug resistance and non-O1, non-O139 serogroups. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2008;39(6):1092-7. [PubMed ID: 19062701].

  • 33.

    Supawat K, Huttayananont S, Sawanpanyalert P, Aswapokee N, Mootsikapun P. Antimicrobial resistance surveillance of Vibrio cholerae in Thailand from 2000 to 2004. J Med Assoc Thai. 2009;92 Suppl 4:S82-6. [PubMed ID: 21294503].

  • 34.

    Noeske J, Guevart E, Kuaban C, Solle J, Fonkoua MC, Mouangue A, et al. Routine use of antimicrobial drugs during the 2004 cholera epidemic in Douala, Cameroon. East Afr Med J. 2006;83(11):596-601. [PubMed ID: 17455448].

  • 35.

    Sack DA, Lyke C, McLaughlin C, Suwanvanichkij V. Antimicrobial resistance in shigellosis, cholera, and campylobacteriosis. World Health Organization Geneva; 2001.

  • 36.

    Klontz EH, Das SK, Ahmed D, Ahmed S, Chisti MJ, Malek MA, et al. Long-term comparison of antibiotic resistance in Vibrio cholerae O1 and Shigella species between urban and rural Bangladesh. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58(9):e133-6. [PubMed ID: 24457344]. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciu040.

  • 37.

    Garg P, Chakraborty S, Basu I, Datta S, Rajendran K, Bhattacharya T, et al. Expanding multiple antibiotic resistance among clinical strains of Vibrio cholerae isolated from 1992-7 in Calcutta, India. Epidemiol Infect. 2000;124(3):393-9. [PubMed ID: 10982062].

  • 38.

    Sack RB, Rahman M, Yunus M, Khan EH. Antimicrobial resistance in organisms causing diarrheal disease. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;24 Suppl 1:S102-5. [PubMed ID: 8994788].

  • 39.

    Ilic K, Jakovljevic E, Skodric-Trifunovic V. Social-economic factors and irrational antibiotic use as reasons for antibiotic resistance of bacteria causing common childhood infections in primary healthcare. Eur J Pediatr. 2012;171(5):767-77. [PubMed ID: 21987082]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-011-1592-5.