The administration of the surfactant through a noninvasive or less invasive approach has been the subject of several studies performed in the last two decades. In a study performed by Kattwinkel et al. in 2004, 23 neonates within the gestational age range of 23 - 27 weeks weighing within 560 - 1804 g at birth received surfactant. In vaginal delivery, once the neonate’s head appeared in the perineum, the delivery provider prevented the birth of shoulders and provided a timespan for the neonatologist required for administering 3 - 4.5 mL of surfactant (Infasurf) by inserting the tip of a catheter into the posterior pharynx. For neonates born via cesarean section, the procedure was performed when the neonate’s head appeared in the surgical incision area, and then, while the neonate was allowed to complete the birth process, CPAP was applied using a 10-cm water pressure mask. The results showed that 13 out of the 15 neonates born through vaginal delivery and 3 out of the 8 neonates born through cesarean section did not need any additional respiratory support. The rest required nCPAP support (
27).
In a study conducted by Berggren et al. in 2000, 32 neonates were involved in the RDS process with 27 - 34 weeks of gestation in two groups, each consisting of 16 cases undergoing CPAP and CPAP in conjunction with surfactant administration using a nebulizer. The aforementioned study did not show statistically significant results regarding the prevalence of the need for invasive mechanical ventilation, patent ductus arteriosus, IVH, air leak, and CLD between the two groups (
28).
In another study conducted by Zhang et al. in 2004 on the administration of intra-amniotic surfactant to prevent the occurrence of RDS and its complications, of the 45 pregnant women being exposed to preterm labor, intra-amniotic surfactant was administered for 15 pregnancies, and 30 pregnancies were considered the control group. The occurrence of RDS was significantly higher in the control group (
29).
In 2007, a study was carried out by Kribs et al. (
18) on the administration of surfactant using a trachea catheter. During a 13-month period, 29 neonates born at University Cologne Children’s Hospital in Germany within 23 - 27 weeks of gestation received nCPAP by Infant Flow Driver (EME, Brighton, UK) after birth. In case FiO
2 ≥ 40% was required to maintain SpO
2 within the range of 85 - 93%, the neonates were administered surfactant through an endotracheal catheter. For performing this therapeutic intervention, 0.025 mg/kg of atropine is first given to the neonate intravenously, and then the neonate’s head is placed in a position similar to intubation. Afterward, a 4F feeding tube with only one end hole connected to a syringe containing 100 mg/kg of Survanta with a mark 1.5 cm away from the end made by a Magill forceps in the intubation position is inserted into the trachea using a laryngoscope so that the mark on the catheter is at the same level as the vocal cords. The catheter is held in place by the fingers of the right hand, and the laryngoscope is removed. Surfactant is then administered gradually over 1 to 3 minutes. Demonstrations, such as hypoxia, heart rate, coughing, and choking, can occur during the treatment, which need to be managed and can be accompanied by a temporary cessation of the treatment. This group of neonates, along with another group of 34 neonates (control group), with a mean of 25 weeks of gestation who were also managed using the same treatment but whose surfactant was administered through INSURE method, were statistically compared in terms of IVH, PVL, CLD, pulmonary interstitial emphysema (PIE), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), and rupture of membrane. The prevalence of IVH (grades III and IV) and PIE in the control group showed a significant increase.
The administration of surfactant by laryngeal mask has also been the focus of a limited number of studies. In a study conducted by Sadeghnia et al. in 2013 administrating surfactant by i-gel in neonates weighing more than 2000 g, the a/APO
2 gradient in surfactant administration by i-gel was significantly higher than the same gradient in the administration of surfactant by INSURE (
19).
Regarding the administration of surfactant through aerosolization, a study was performed by Finer et al. in 2006 in which 17 newborns with RDS with 29 - 32 weeks of gestation received surfactant by CPAP and nebulizer administered by Lucinactant and Aerosurf. In the aforementioned study, no mortalities were reported, and no neonatal air leakage syndromes and NEC occurred. Thirteen newborns did not need supplemental oxygen at day 28, with four neonates having markers of CLD (
21).
In a study performed by Bochenek et al. in 2018, Survanta was administered using a nebulizer to neonates with less than 37 weeks of gestation with RDS. The neonates requiring intubation during the resuscitation process, with congenital anomalies, and with pneumothorax were excluded from this study. A total of 17 newborns with less than 37 weeks of gestation with RDS participated in the study whose mean age was estimated at 35 weeks, 15 of whom underwent a single course of Survanta under noninvasive ventilation (
30).
5.1. Conclusions
Studies on surfactant administration with approaches having minimal invasive indicators have been vastly conducted over the last two decades. Although the study by Kattwinkel et al. was conducted with the aim of avoiding trachea intubation, prophylactic surfactant administration was used in this approach, which is in contrast to the early rescue surfactant administration approach. Currently, the prophylactic administration of surfactants cannot be regarded as a strong approach to surfactant administration according to s meta-analysis study performed by Soll and Morley. The same limitation seems to exist in the study conducted by Zhang et al. (
2,
27,
29).
The administration of intratracheal surfactant by thin catheter was also considered by researchers, such as Kribs et al. In these studies, catheters can be either rigid or soft, as in the study carried out by Kribs (2016), in which a soft catheter was inserted into the trachea using Magill forceps. However, the use of these catheters requires using a laryngoscope, which still makes this approach invasive (
18,
31).
In the study conducted by Sadeghnia et al., surfactant was administered with a supraglottic device approach. The study was performed using i-gel for neonates weighing 2000 g and higher. Although this approach is less invasive since no laryngoscope was used, due to structural limitations in the laryngeal mask, it cannot be used for very low birth weight neonates who are regarded as the target population in RDS treatment (
19).
In 2006, a study was conducted by Finer et al. in which 17 RDS newborns with 29 - 32 weeks of gestation were administered Lucinactant with Aerosurf. However, the aforementioned study was not an RCT. Likewise, Bochenek et al. carried out a study in 2018 in which 17 neonates with an average of 35 weeks of gestation with RDS received Survanta using a jet nebulizer, which again was not an RCT (
21,
30).
In the present study, Survanta was administered by a mesh nebulizer, and, as shown in
Table 2, after receiving surfactant, a/PAO
2 gradient showed no significant difference between the two groups. As shown in
Table 3, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of the side effects under investigation.
In conclusion, it can be mentioned that, although the studied indicators in this study did not show any significant difference, due to the unique noninvasive nature of Survanta administration using a mesh nebulizer, it seems justifiable to conduct further studies since the sample size of the present study was relatively small, which is one of the limitations of this study.