Autoimmune hepatitis is an inflammation of the liver parenchyma caused by an autoimmune response to hepatocytes, which is characterized by elevated transaminase serum levels, positive serum autoantibodies, high IgG and/or γ-globulinemia, and interstitial hepatitis upon histological examination (
1). Regarding autoantibody patterns, AIH is further classified into three subtypes: AIH-1, AIH-2, and AIH-3. AIH-1 is characterized by SMA, ANA, or both. AIH-2 is characterized by the presence of specific anti-kidney and anti-liver microsomal antibody type-1, whereas anti-liver cytosol type-1 and anti-LKM type-3 antigen antibodies are rare. AIH-3 is characterized by soluble liver antigen/liver pancreas antibodies (
15). The clinical manifestations of AIH are different; however, most patients have an insidious onset represented as chronic liver diseases (
16). The most common symptoms include lethargy, fatigue, and intermittent jaundice; however, physical examination may reveal hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, ascites, and, occasionally, peripheral edema (
1,
17). In our study, the patient presented with yellow sclerae, liver and spleen enlargement; elevated levels of ALT, AST, TBIL, IBIL, and DBIL, positive ANA and SMA, slightly increased IgG, and increased γ-globulin levels. Her liver biopsy revealed diffuse swelling of the liver lobule cells, cytoplasmic loosening, spotty necrosis, and extensive lymphocyte infiltration in the portal area. According to the findings, the patient was diagnosed with AIH. As the morphological examination of her peripheral red blood cells indicated, 18% of the cells were spherical, the MCV, MSCV, and MRV levels were decreased, RET was increased; G6PD activity was normal, and the Coombs test was negative. These findings suggested that the patient's abnormal liver function was not the result of AIH alone and that she might have also been suffering from hemolytic anemia.
Hereditary spherocytosis is a common hereditary hemolytic disease. Gene mutations lead to defects in erythrocyte membrane proteins, which decrease the longitudinal associations of a lipid bilayer with protein (
18), cause membrane lipid bilayer loss or destabilization and the formation of microvesicles, reduce the cell membrane surface area to volume ratio, and change the red blood cell’s morphology from a biconcave disc to a spherical shape. These changes reduce deformability and increase the osmotic fragility of erythrocytes, resulting in their destruction when passing through the small splenic vessels and, ultimately, hemolytic anemia. Clinical manifestations vary widely among HS patients. Patients with severe and moderate HS often have anemia, jaundice, and splenomegaly, whereas those with mild HS have either atypical symptoms or are asymptomatic (
4). As suggested by the British Committee for Standards in hematology (
6) guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of HS, patients with a positive family history, typical clinical features, and increased MCHC, spherocytosis, and reticulocytes, compared to normal values, are diagnosed with HS without further examination. Accordingly, patients with mild HS and no symptoms are either easily misdiagnosed, or the diagnosis is entirely missed. Furthermore, because of the similar clinical manifestations of HS and AIH, such as jaundice and splenomegaly, the HS diagnosis is frequently missed even in symptomatic patients, and it is misdiagnosed as AIH.
Deng et al. (
19) reported a patient with mild HS who had jaundice but no symptoms of anemia and was misdiagnosed with AIH. The type of jaundice can be classified by measuring TBIL, IBIL, and DBIL. Cases with hepatobiliary diseases usually exhibit higher TBIL, mainly attributable to increased DBIL. Patients with hemolytic anemia also have increased TBIL, which can primarily be attributed to increased IBIL. In our patient, TBIL was increased because of both DBIL and IBIL, with each factor accounting for 50%. The patient had hepatomegaly and splenomegaly but no anemia symptoms, which might have easily led to the misdiagnosis of HS.
HS can be rapidly diagnosed with laboratory blood count, erythrocyte morphology, or the assessment of reticulocyte-associated variables. If spherocytes made up above 7.8% of RBCs, the specificity and sensitivity in the diagnosis of HS would be 84.8% and 56.7%, respectively (
20). Moreover, spherocytes may exist within peripheral blood smears from cases with G6PD deficiency and autoimmune hemolytic anemia (
5). Liao et al. (
21) reported that, with MCHC ≥ 334.9 g/L as the threshold, the HS diagnosis sensitivity and specificity were 82.1 and 94.5%, respectively. The elevated bilirubin level in serum may cause a false increase in MCHC. MSCV represents a unique measuring method for spherocytes, and when it is used with MCV, the efficiency of the HS diagnosis is greatly enhanced. As Chiron et al. suggested (
22), for the MSCV < MCV, the sensitivity, and specificity of the HS diagnosis were 100 and 93.3%, respectively. According to Broseus et al. (
23), when the Coombs test was negative and MCV-MSCV > 9.6 fL, the specificity and sensitivity of the HS diagnosis were 90.57 and 100%, respectively. In another study, Xu et al. (
24) reported that MRV was ideal for the HS diagnosis, with the specificity and sensitivity of 91.20 and 86.80% at MRV ≤ 95.77 fL, respectively. Our patient met all diagnostic criteria; hence, her laboratory results strongly indicated HS; however, she had no typical clinical symptoms or positive family history. As a consequence, the genetic analysis became necessary for an accurate diagnosis. Using high-throughput sequencing, we found two novel compound heterozygous mutations within exon 46 c.6544G>C (p.D2182H) and exon 2 c.134G>A (p.R45K) from
SPTA1. PCR combined with Sanger sequencing confirmed that the first mutation was from the asymptomatic mother, and the second mutation was from the father.
About 75% of the HS cases result from an autosomal dominant inheritance, which mostly includes ANK1, SPTB, or SLC4A1 gene mutations. However, the other 25% are related to novel mutations or autosomal recessive inheritance. In this regard,
SPTA1 and EBP42 are the most frequently detected compound heterozygous mutations (
25). Being located within the chromosome 1 q22-q23 region, the 80 Kb
SPTA1 gene possesses 52 exons, contains 2419 amino acids, and can encode α-spectrin, which is a cytoskeletal protein combined with β-spectrin to form α-β heterodimers in a reverse parallel arrangement. The terminal end of the polymers formed by the two heterodimers combines with actin and transmembrane proteins forming a "junction complex." The latter forms a grid structure in the cell membrane, thereby maintaining lipid bilayers and the biconcave disc shape of the erythrocytes (
26). The expression of α-spectrin is four times higher than that of β-spectrin, and the formation of α-β heterodimers is not affected by relative decreases in the α-spectrin expression (
27). Consequently, compound heterozygous or homozygous mutations within
SPTA1 are possibly related to the pathogenic mechanism of HS with deficient recessive α-spectrin. Individuals with heterozygous mutation are likely to generate sufficient α-spectrin to balance β-spectrin synthesis while maintaining cytoskeleton of erythrocytes (
28,
29). The
SPTA1 missense mutation of c.134G>A (p.R45K) made the 45th amino acid change from arginine to lysine. The amino acid sequence analysis showed that the mutation site was highly conserved among different species. In the protein structure analysis, mutant residue had a decreased size compared to WT one, while the latter was associated with the multimer contact. Mutant residue may be too small to make multimer contacts, thereby negatively affecting the function of α-spectrin. The missense mutation of c.6544G>C (p.D2182H) made the 2182nd amino acid change from aspartic acid to histidine. This site is also highly conserved among different species. The protein structure analyses suggested that the mutation was located in the protein residue repeated stretch, referred to as spectrin 20. Moreover, another residue mutation probably broke such a repeat or the associated functions. The mutant residue lies within the domain required for binding additional molecules, which may thus disturb this function (
14) Furthermore, we speculated that c.6544G>C (p.D2182H) mutation played the pathogenic role via Mutation Taster, Polyphen-2, PROVEAN, and SIFT. Accordingly, the heterozygous mutations of the novel compound c.134G>A (p.R45K) and c.6544G>C (p.D2182H) in the
SPTA1 gene might have caused HS in the patient with AIH.
5.1. Conclusion
Patients with both HS and AIH are rare. HS displays clinical presentations close to AIH; therefore, it is challenging to diagnose HS in the co-existing of AIH. If a single autoimmune hepatopathy cannot explain laboratory results, there may be a concurrent disorder. In this case, the lesion should be diagnosed by genetic analyses and pedigree investigations