Abstract
Background:
Considering the lack of studies to investigate the effect of atropine administration on delirium incidence in a post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) in children, this study was conducted with the aim of investigating the effect of atropine administration on delirium incidence and other complications in children undergoing surgery.Methods:
The present double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted on 70 children aged 1 - 6 years that were candidates for lower abdominal surgery. The patients were assigned to two groups, each consisting of 35 patients. Before induction of anesthesia, 0.02 mg/kg of atropine and 0.02 mg/kg of normal saline were administered intravenously in the first (atropine) and second (control) groups, respectively. Patients’ mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and incidence of complications after surgery were recorded.Results:
The results of the present study revealed that the two groups had no significant difference in terms of the mean MAP in any of the studied times (P-value > 0.05). However, the mean HR during surgery was significantly higher in the atropine group compared with the control group (P-value < 0.05). In addition, although the incidence and severity of delirium in the atropine group were insignificantly higher than that of the control group, respiratory complications such as decreased saturation and laryngospasm were lower in the atropine group compared with the control group (P-value > 0.05). The volume of suctioned secretions in the atropine group, with a mean of 6.26 ± 2.47 cc was significantly lower than its volume in the control group, with a mean of 14.57 ± 4.27 cc (P-value < 0.001).Conclusions:
According to the findings of the present study, although the administration of atropine slightly increased delirium incidence, it could reduce the incidence of respiratory complications and secretions after surgery. However, more studies are required to make a more definitive conclusion in this respect.Keywords
1. Background
There are many challenges facing pediatric anesthesiologists, including frequent oral and pharyngeal secretions that increase as some anesthetic agents are prescribed (1). On the other hand, considering the predominant parasympathetic effect in children, the administration of anesthetic agents and even laryngoscopy may cause bradycardia in children (2).
One of the solutions that have been used for years to solve the above two problems is the atropine administration before induction of anesthesia, which, considering its anticholinergic and vagolytic effects, reduces secretions and prevents bradycardia in children during anesthetic induction (2, 3).
Delirium and agitation are commonly seen in children after waking up from anesthesia (3, 4), which are more likely to occur considering anticholinergic properties of atropine. The incidence of delirium in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) increases restlessness, crying, as well as the risk of injury to the child, delayed hospital secretions, the need for more nursing care, and increased treatment costs (4, 5).
So far, various studies have been conducted to find methods of prevention and treatment of pediatric delirium in PACU, and it is recommended to use a single dose of propofol, midazolam, dexmedetomidine, or fentanyl before induction of anesthesia or to use propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) to prevent delirium in PACU (6-10).
2. Objectives
Since there has been no study on the relationship between atropine administration before induction of pediatric anesthesia and delirium incidence in PACU, the present study aimed to determine the effect of atropine administration on delirium incidence and complications in children aged 1 - 6 years old undergoing lower abdomen surgery compared with the control group.
3. Methods
This is a double-blind, randomized clinical trial that was performed in Pediatric Clinic of Imam Hossein Hospital, Isfahan, Iran, from 2020 to 2021. The target population included children aged 1 - 6 years undergoing lower abdominal surgery. The study was approved by and registered in the Ethics Committee of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IR.MUI.REC.1396.3.855) and also approved by the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20200825048515N33). Inclusion criteria included age range of 1 - 6 years, candidates for lower abdominal surgery, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score I or II patients, and no psychiatric problems, including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), depression, and other behavioral disorders. Exclusion criteria comprised the prolongation of surgery or complication of surgery (such as bleeding).
The sample size was estimated at 35 in each group using the sample size formula with 95% confidence level, test power 80%, the incidence of postoperative delirium (30%) (9), and the least significant difference between the two groups to be equal to 0.3. After obtaining written informed consent from the children’s parents, 70 eligible children were included using convenience sampling and divided into two groups using the random allocation software (Figure 1). At the beginning of the study, the children’s age and gender were recorded. Before induction of anesthesia, 0.02 mg/kg of atropine (after being diluted with a volume of 0.1 mg per cc) was administered intravenously in the first group (atropine group), and 0.02 mg/kg of normal saline (after being diluted with a volume of 0.1 mg per cc) was administered intravenously in the second group.
CONSORT flowchart of the patients
It is necessary to mention that the nurse who injected the drug, the researcher who registered the group allocation, and the patients were unaware of the type of medication and group allocation. Patients were separated from their parents after receiving 0.01 mg/kg midazolam +1 mg/kg ketamine as a premedication, and anesthetic induction was performed in the operating room using 2 mg/kg propofol, 2 mcg/kg fentanyl, and 0.5 mg/kg atracurium. Anesthesia was maintained with 50% O2 in air plus propofol (200 mcg/kg/min). Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were measured and recorded before drug administration, before induction of anesthesia, 5 minutes after induction of anesthesia, and every 15 minutes during surgery. Salivary secretions during surgery and extubation were suctioned and recorded in cubic centimeter (cc). After the surgery and extubation, the patients were transferred to PACU, and the pain score was recorded according to face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability (FLACC) scale every 15 minutes, and in case of pain score ≥ 3, fentanyl (1 mcg/kg) was administrated.
Delirium score was recorded according to the pediatric anesthesia emergence delirium scale (PAED). A delirium score ≥ 10 was considered emergence delirium, and the patient was treated with 1 mg/kg propofol. The length of stay in PACU was recorded according to the modified Aldrete score tool in two groups. The frequency of complications such as laryngospasm, bronchospasm, SPO2 < 90%, nausea, and vomiting were evaluated and recorded in both groups.
3.1. Statistical Analysis
Finally, the data were entered into SPSS ver. 25. The data were shown with indicators such as means, standard deviation (SD), frequency, and percentage frequency. The independent samples t-test, repeated measures ANOVA, and chi-squared test were used to compare the mean of quantitative variables between two groups, the change of the mean of quantitative variables over time in each of the groups, and the frequency distribution of qualitative variables, respectively. P-value < 0.05 was considered significant.
4. Results
In this study, there were 27 and 29 boys in the atropine and control groups (77.1% vs. 82.9%), respectively, and the rest of the patients were girls (P = 0.551). The mean age of the atropine and control groups was 4.11 ± 1.13 and 4.2 ± 1.28 years, respectively (P = 0.770). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of mean age and sex frequency distribution (Table 1).
Comparison of Children’s Demographic Characteristics Between the Two Groups a
The mean MAP did not differ between the two groups at any of the follow-up times (P-value > 0.05), but the atropine group had a higher intraoperative HR (P-value < 0.05). Intragroup comparison showed significant changes in intraoperative MAP and HR in the atropine group; however, there were significant changes only in intraoperative HR (P-value < 0.05), but not in the MAP of the control group (P-value > 0.05) (Table 2).
Comparison of Patients’ Blood Pressure and Heart Rate at Study Times Between the Two Groups a
| Parameter | Atropine Group (n = 35) | Control Group (n = 35) | P b |
|---|---|---|---|
| MAP; mmHg | |||
| Upon entering the operating room | 65.58 ± 7.30 | 66.4 ± 7.51 | 0.600 |
| Before induction of anesthesia | 67.62 ± 7.41 | 66.4 ± 7.90 | 0.501 |
| 5 minutes after surgery | 67.55 ± 7.53 | 65.8 ± 7.36 | 0.360 |
| 15 minutes after surgery | 67.43 ± 7.49 | 65.7 ± 7.61 | 0.341 |
| 30 minutes after surgery | 67.80 ± 7.67 | 65.9 ± 7.22 | 0.282 |
| 45 minutes after surgery | 70.81 ± 6.44 | 62.00 ± 6.30 | 0.064 |
| Change mean | 5.30 ± 1.36 | -4.40 ± 3.16 | 0.533 |
| P c | < 0.001 | 0.11 | |
| HR; bpm | |||
| Upon entering the operating room | 119.40 ± 8.60 | 118.00 ± 9.28 | 0.513 |
| Before induction of anesthesia | 125.31 ± 10.11 | 121.4 ± 8.63 | 0.085 |
| 5 minutes after surgery | 139.32 ± 10.25 | 122.1 ± 9.36 | < 0.001 |
| 15 minutes after surgery | 140.27 ± 11.10 | 122.4 ± 9.16 | < 0.001 |
| 30 minutes after surgery | 140.88 ± 11.56 | 122.3 ± 9.55 | < 0.001 |
| 45 minutes after surgery | 143.30 ± 7.68 | 126 ± 12.41 | 0.024 |
| Change mean | 23.90 ± 4.16 | 8.00 ± 2.60 | < 0.001 |
| P c | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
In addition, the delirium severity was higher upon entering PACU and 15, 30 and 45 minutes after entering PACU in the atropine group; however, there was no significant difference between the two groups at any time follow-up (P-value > 0.05). Also, changes in delirium severity in the atropine group were higher than the control group during stay in the PACU; however, this difference was not statistically significant (P-value = 0.163). Intragroup investigation showed a significant reduction in delirium severity in both atropine and control groups in PACU (P-value = 0.042 and P-value < 0.001, respectively). On the other hand, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the incidence of delirium cases requiring treatment (scores > 10) at any time period (P-value > 0.05) (Table 3).
Comparison of Severity and Incidence of Delirium Between the Two Groups a
| Delirium | Atropine Group (n = 35) | Control Group (n = 35) | P b |
|---|---|---|---|
| Severity of delirium | |||
| Upon entering PACU | 7.17 ± 3.19 | 5.45 ± 2.88 | 0.061 b |
| 15 minutes | 5.9 ± 2.56 | 5.66 ± 2.17 | 0.654 b |
| 30 minutes | 5.14 ± 1.83 | 5.03 ± 1.65 | 0.790 b |
| 45 minutes | 4.71 ± 1.72 | 4.34 ± 1.63 | 0.371 b |
| Change mean | 3 ± 0.86 | 1.11 ± 0.69 | 0.163 b |
| P d | 0.042 | < 0.001 | |
| Delirium incidence | |||
| Upon entering PACU | 6 (17.1) | 3 (8.6) | 0.281 c |
| 15 minutes | 5 (14.3) | 1 (2.9) | 0.090 c |
| 30 minutes | 1 (2.9) | 0 (0) | 0.998 c |
| 45 minutes | 1 (2.9) | 0 (0) | 0.998 c |
The mean volume of suctioned secretions in the atropine and the control groups was 6.26 ± 2.47 and 14.57 ± 4.27 cc, respectively (P-value < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of pain severity during their stay in PACU (P-value > 0.05). The mean length of stay in PACU in the atropine and control groups was 39.14 ± 9.03 and 40.86 ± 9.35 hours (P-value >0.05). In general, the incidence of postoperative complications in the atropine group, with 5.7%, was significantly lower than the control group, with 22.9% (P-value = 0.041). Among these complications, six patients had a decrease in SPO2 (two patients in the atropine group and four patients in the control group). Moreover, although there were two cases of vomiting and two cases of laryngospasm in the control group, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of incidence of complications (P-value > 0.05). Propofol was given to eight patients in the atropine group and four patients in the control group (22.9% vs. 11.4%) (P-value > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the prescribed dose of fentanyl between the two groups (20.00 ± 4.08 vs. 18.75 ± 2.5 mg; P-value > 0.05). Also, the need for fentanyl was reported to be 31.4% in both groups. There was no significant difference in the prescribed dose of fentanyl between the two groups (15.38 ± 4.31 vs. 18.15 ± 3.78 mg; P-value > 0.05) (Table 4).
Mean Volume of Suctioned Secretions and Postoperative Complications Between the Two Groups a
| Variable | Atropine Group (n = 35) | Control Group (n = 35) | P b |
|---|---|---|---|
| Volume of suctioned secretions; cc | 6.26 ± 2.47 | 14.57 ± 4.27 | < 0.001 |
| Postoperative pain intensity | |||
| Upon entering PACU | 2.06 ±.97 | 1.54 ± 1.22 | 0.068 |
| 15 minutes | 1.63 ± 0.69 | 1.77 ± 1.11 | 0.520 |
| 30 minutes | 1.40 ± 0.6 | 1.54 ± 0.7 | 0.361 |
| 45 minutes | 1.20 ± 0.42 | 1.45 ± 0.52 | 0.245 |
| Changes | 0.86 ± 0.36 | 0.09 ± 0.28 | 0.411 |
| P c | < 0.001 | 0.590 | |
| Incidence of postoperative complications | |||
| Total | 2 (5.7) | 8 (22.9) | 0.041 |
| Drop in SPO2 | 2 (5.7) | 4 (11.4) | 0.395 |
| Vomiting | 0 (0) | 2 (5.7) | 0.152 |
| Laryngospasm | 0 (0) | 2 (5.7) | 0.152 |
| Need for propofol | 8 (22.9) | 4 (11.4) | 0.211 |
| Propofol dose; mg | 20 ± 4.08 | 18.75 ± 2.5 | 0.601 |
| Need for fentanyl | 13 (37.1) | 13 (37.1) | 1.00 |
| Fentanyl dose; mg | 15.38 ± 4.31 | 18.15 ± 3.78 | 0.116 |
| Length of stay in PACU; min | 39.14 ± 9.03 | 40.86 ± 9.35 | 0.442 |
5. Discussion
Pediatric anesthesiologists face many challenges, including the problems of frequent oral and pharyngeal secretions, which increase with the prescription of a number of anesthetic drugs (1). Anesthesia and even laryngoscopy may cause bradycardia in the child (2). One solution that has been used for years to solve the above two problems is the atropine administration before induction of anesthesia. It reduces secretions and prevents bradycardia in children during anesthetic induction considering its anticholinergic and vagolytic effects (2, 3). The risk of delirium is theoretically increased with atropine considering the anticholinergic effects; therefore, atropine administration is limited (4, 5).
The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of atropine administration on the incidence of delirium and other complications in children aged 1 - 6 years undergoing lower abdominal surgery compared with the control group. Examination of patients’ hemodynamic parameters showed that atropine recipients had a higher mean HR and overall, the trend of changes in HR was significantly different between the two groups. Considering that bradycardia is a serious complication in pediatric surgeries and the administration of atropine in this study increased children’s HR and caused mild tachycardia, it seems that its prescription will be beneficial due to the slight increase in HR and its acceptable tolerance by children, as well as its positive effects on respiratory complications and reduction of secretions after surgery.
Hudek reported that atropine administration in pediatric surgeries was associated with greater hemodynamic stability and reduced bradycardia (11). Prugh et al. also used atropine to reduce the incidence of agitation and delirium in pediatric surgery. They found that atropine administration was associated with a reduction in the incidence of hemodynamic disorders, especially bradycardia (12). Another study showed that the pre-emptive administration of atropine (dose of 0.02 - 0.5 mg/kg) could reduce the incidence of bradycardia during the intubation procedure (13). Therefore, according to the above findings, it seems that atropine administration is safe and beneficial in pediatric abdominal surgery.
The findings of the present study showed that preoperative atropine injection is associated with a reduction in oral and pharyngeal secretions during surgery and stay in PACU. Also, since high volume of secretions during surgery and stay in PACU can be associated with complications such as aspiration and coughing, atropine administration can reduce the volume of secretions. Wilmott et al. also showed that preoperative atropine injection in children was associated with a decrease in airway secretions (13). In fact, atropine can be classified as an anticholinergic agent (14). Anticholinergic agents reduce the effect of the parasympathetic nervous system and, in doing so, block the effects of the vagus nerve. Atropine allows for increased stimulation of the sinoatrial node by blocking vagal activity and conduction through the cardiac electrical system resulting in the contraction of the cardiac muscle. Because bradycardia is related to anesthesia, paralysis, and direct laryngoscopy is thought to be predominantly vagally mediated, atropine is a natural choice for counteracting these effects (13-17).
The findings of the present study showed no significant difference between the atropine and control groups in terms of the incidence of delirium during stay in PACU. On the other hand, as the length of stay in PACU increased, the delirium severity decreased in both groups, but there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of changes in the severity of delirium. Hudek (11) and Prugh et al. (12) found that preoperative atropine administration was associated with decreased delirium severity and postoperative agitation. In the meantime, Asadi et al. showed that adding atropine to ketamine can significantly reduce excessive salivation without causing adverse effects on treatment success and length of stay in the emergency department (2).
The results of the current study showed that preoperative atropine administration is associated with a reduction in postoperative complications. Atropine is an anticholinergic drug that increases HR, reduces gastrointestinal, urinary, and biliary motility, and has anti-secretory effects by blocking acetylcholine receptors, and is therefore used in various cases such as bradycardia, antidote for organophosphate poisoning, and inhibition of salivation (13). It should be noted that evaluating the effect of atropine on respiratory complications and hemodynamic parameters in pediatric surgeries can be considered the strong point of this study; however, the small sample size and the non-evaluation of different doses of its administration can be some of the limitations of the present study. Therefore, it is suggested to conduct similar studies in the future addressing different doses of this drug and different types of pediatric surgeries so that the obtained results can be more reliably generalized to the target population.
5.1. Conclusions
The findings of the present study indicated that although the administration of atropine results in not only higher HR but also a slightly higher incidence of delirium in the atropine group compared to the control group, it may reduce the incidence of respiratory complications and the volume of secretions after surgery. In fact, in spite of a slight change in HR and a slight increase in the incidence of delirium, it can be stated that administration of atropine can be useful in the reduction of complications and secretions of volume after surgery. However, more studies are needed to make a more definitive conclusion in this regard.
References
-
1.
Kye YC, Rhee JE, Kim K, Kim T, Jo YH, Jeong JH, et al. Clinical effects of adjunctive atropine during ketamine sedation in pediatric emergency patients. Am J Emerg Med. 2012;30(9):1981-5. [PubMed ID: 22748697]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2012.04.030.
-
2.
Asadi P, Ghafouri HB, Yasinzadeh M, Kasnavieh SM, Modirian E. Ketamine and atropine for pediatric sedation: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013;29(2):136-9. [PubMed ID: 23364373]. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0b013e31828058b2.
-
3.
Brown DV, Heller F, Barkin R. Anticholinergic syndrome after anesthesia: a case report and review. Am J Ther. 2004;11(2):144-53. [PubMed ID: 14999367]. https://doi.org/10.1097/00045391-200403000-00010.
-
4.
Moore AD, Anghelescu DL. Emergence delirium in pediatric anesthesia. Paediatr Drugs. 2017;19(1):11-20. [PubMed ID: 27798810]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40272-016-0201-5.
-
5.
Funk W, Hollnberger H, Geroldinger J. Physostigmine and anaesthesia emergence delirium in preschool children: a randomized blinded trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008;25(1):37-42. [PubMed ID: 17655781]. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265021507001159.
-
6.
Rosen HD, Mervitz D, Cravero JP. Pediatric emergence delirium: Canadian Pediatric Anesthesiologists' experience. Paediatr Anaesth. 2016;26(2):207-12. [PubMed ID: 26559766]. https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.12812.
-
7.
Huett C, Baehner T, Erdfelder F, Hoehne C, Bode C, Hoeft A, et al. Prevention and therapy of pediatric emergence delirium: A national survey. Paediatr Drugs. 2017;19(2):147-53. [PubMed ID: 28130755]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40272-017-0212-x.
-
8.
Ko YP, Huang CJ, Hung YC, Su NY, Tsai PS, Chen CC, et al. Premedication with low-dose oral midazolam reduces the incidence and severity of emergence agitation in pediatric patients following sevoflurane anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Sin. 2001;39(4):169-77. [PubMed ID: 11840583].
-
9.
van Hoff SL, O'Neill ES, Cohen LC, Collins BA. Does a prophylactic dose of propofol reduce emergence agitation in children receiving anesthesia? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Paediatr Anaesth. 2015;25(7):668-76. [PubMed ID: 25917689]. https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.12669.
-
10.
Frederick HJ, Wofford K, de Lisle Dear G, Schulman SR. A randomized controlled trial to determine the effect of depth of anesthesia on emergence agitation in children. Anesth Analg. 2016;122(4):1141-6. [PubMed ID: 26771265]. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000001145.
-
11.
Hudek K. Emergence delirium: A nursing perspective. AORN J. 2009;89(3):509-16. quiz 517-9. [PubMed ID: 19326585]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2008.12.026.
-
12.
Prugh DG, Wagonfeld S, Metcalf D, Jordan K. A clinical study of delirium in children and adolescents. Psychosom Med. 1980;42(1 Suppl):177-95. [PubMed ID: 7413902]. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-198001001-00012.
-
13.
Wilmott AR, Thompson GC, Lang E, Powelson S, Wakai A, Vandermeer B, et al. Atropine therapy versus no atropine therapy for the prevention of adverse events in paediatric patients undergoing intubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;2018(1). CD010898. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6491140]. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010898.pub2.
-
14.
Lucking SE, Maffei FA, Tamburro RF, Thomas NJ. Pediatric critical care study guide. London, UK: Springer Nature; 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-923-9.
-
15.
Bean A, Jones J. Atropine: re-evaluating its use during paediatric RSI. Emerg Med J. 2007;24(5):361-2. [PubMed ID: 17452710]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2658493]. https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.2007.048512.
-
16.
Jones P, Dauger S, Peters MJ. Bradycardia during critical care intubation: mechanisms, significance and atropine. Arch Dis Child. 2012;97(2):139-44. [PubMed ID: 21622996]. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2010.210518.
-
17.
Eisa L, Passi Y, Lerman J, Raczka M, Heard C. Do small doses of atropine (<0.1 mg) cause bradycardia in young children? Arch Dis Child. 2015;100(7):684-8. [PubMed ID: 25762533]. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2014-307868.