1. Context
2. Objectives
3. Methods
3.1. Eligibility Criteria
3.2. Search Strategy
3.3. Screening and Selection of Studies
3.4. Data Extraction
3.5. Quality Assessment Methods
3.6. Statistical Analysis
3.7. Publication Bias
4. Results
4.1. General Description of Overall Studies
| N | Study (First Author, Year) | Sample | GA (Week) a | Birth Weight (g) a | Age on Admission (day) a | Criteria to ET | Intervention Group | Dosage of Albumin | Control Group | Endpoints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alharis et al., 2020 (21) | Follows AAP guidelines for exchange transfusion | 20% human albumin combined with ET | A dose of 1 g/kg | ET | Post-ET TSB levels at 6 and 12 hours; acute bilirubin encephalopathy; need for repeating ET; duration of PT; incidence of death prior to hospital discharge; adverse reactions during albumin infusion | ||||
| Treatment | 24 | 38.62 ± 0.78 | 3122 ± 296 | 5.6 ± 0.99 | ||||||
| Control | 29 | 38.25 ± 0.8 | 3091 ± 262 | 5.2 ± 0.98 | ||||||
| 2 | Dash et al., 2015 (20) | When two TSB values at least 4 hours apart were 2 mg/dL or more below the PT threshold for that postnatal age | 20% human albumin combined with ET | A dose of 1 g/kg | 0.9% saline at 5 mL/kg combined with ET | Post-ET TSB levels at 6 and 12 hours; acute bilirubin encephalopathy; need for repeating ET; duration of PT; Incidence of death prior to hospital discharge; adverse reactions during albumin infusion | ||||
| Treatment | 23 | 38.2 ± 1.5 | 2952 ± 382 | 4.98 ± 2.47 | ||||||
| Control | 27 | 37.7 ± 1.7 | 2926 ± 626 | 4.46 ± 1.75 | ||||||
| 3 | Mitra et al., 2011 (13) | Defined as the inability to produce a decline of 1 - 2 mg/dL within 4 hours after the initiation of PT | 5% human albumin combined with ET | A dose of 1 g/kg | Intravenous fluid at 20 mL/kg combined with ET | Post-ET UCB levels at 6 and 12 hours; acute bilirubin encephalopathy; need for repeating ET; duration of PT; Incidence of death prior to hospital discharge; adverse reactions during albumin infusion | ||||
| Treatment | 21 | 34.5 ± 1.65 | 1619 ± 324 | 6.23 ± 1.6 | ||||||
| Control | 21 | 34 ± 1.6 | 1660 ± 320 | 6.67 ± 1.43 | ||||||
| 4 | Shahian and Moslehi, 2010 (14) | The inability to produce a decline of 1 to 2 mg/dL within 4 hours after the initiation of PT | 20% human albumin combined with ET | A dose of 1 g/kg | ET | Post-ET TSB levels at 6 and 12 hours; acute bilirubin encephalopathy; need for repeating ET; duration of PT; Incidence of death prior to hospital discharge; adverse reactions during albumin infusion | ||||
| Treatment | 25 | 39.3 ± 1.2 | 3239 ± 585 | 7 ± 1.1 | ||||||
| Control | 25 | 39.5 ± 1.5 | 3264 ± 428 | 8 ± 1.0 |
Abbreviations: N, number; GA, gestational age; ET, exchange transfusion; AAP, American Academy of Pediatrics; TSB, total serum bilirubin; PT, phototherapy; UCB, unconjugated bilirubin.
a Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
4.2. Assessment of Risk of Bias
| Bias | Authors’ Judgment | Support for Judgment |
|---|---|---|
| Shahian and Moslehi, 2010 (14) | ||
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | The random numbers were computer generated. |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Slips bearing the allocated group were placed in serially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes. |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) | High risk | Twenty-five neonates in the intervention group received intravenous 20% human albumin one hour before exchange; nevertheless, the control group only underwent a blood exchange. |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) | Low risk | TSB was measured every 6 hours for both groups during the first 24 hours following the exchange using a Unistat® bilirubinometer. |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) | Low risk | None |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Undiscovered |
| Other types of bias | Low risk | Undiscovered |
| Mitra et al., 2011 (13) | ||
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Randomization was performed using statistical software. |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Slips containing the allocated group were placed in serially numbered sealed envelopes. |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) | Unclear risk | The infusion of 5% albumin solution was performed for newborns in the intervention group 2 hours before the exchange transfusion. The intravenous maintenance fluid at 20 mL/kg was administered to newborns in the control group for 2 hours. |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) | Unclear risk | Two senior pediatricians clinically examined the newborns for evidence of patent ductus arteriosus, necrotizing enterocolitis, and pulmonary edema independently. K-statistics was utilized to evaluate inter-observer variations in evaluating the severity of birth asphyxia and albumin infusion-associated complications. |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) | Low risk | None |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Undiscovered |
| Other types of bias | Low risk | Undiscovered |
| Dash et al., 2015 (20) | ||
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Randomization into two groups was based on a web-generated random number sequence. |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Allocation was concealed in opaque, sealed envelopes which were kept by a person not involved in any other aspect of the study. |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) | Low risk | Separate personnel, in a separate room away from the patient care area, prepared the study drug. Blinding was ensured using special black-colored, completely opaque syringes and brown-colored opaque extension intravenous tubing for loading and administration of study drugs. |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) | Low risk | Investigators, members of the treatment team, and laboratory technicians remained masked during the intervention. |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) | Low risk | None |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Undiscovered |
| Other types of bias | Low risk | Undiscovered |
| Alharis et al., 2020 (21) | ||
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Randomization was performed by taking the odd numbers as the control group and even numbers as the albumin group. |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk | Taking the odd numbers as the control group and even numbers as the albumin group |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) | High risk | Taking the odd numbers as the control group and even numbers as the albumin group |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) | Low risk | TSB was measured by drawing blood using heparinized capillary tubes by pricking the heal and then centrifuged with serial number 0000526-01.00 with 1000 rounds per minute and then placed in a bilirubinometer. |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) | Low risk | None |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Undiscovered |
| Other types of bias | Low risk | Undiscovered |
Abbreviation: TSB, total serum bilirubin.




