Nocturnal enuresis in children is a common concern for both pediatricians and parents. Some treatments have been introduced to solve these issues, but their efficacy is debated. One of the common treatments for nocturnal enuresis is desmopressin, which is used because of the theory of an insufficient increase in ADH at nighttime. A vasopressin analog like desmopressin is prescribed to treat enuresis, but the responsiveness to this drug is insufficient (
8,
9).
Arginine vasopressin, or ADH, regulates the homeostasis of fluids released from the pituitary into circulation. Some studies worked on the AVP in plasma as a biomarker for diagnosing and treating diseases associated with stress and fluid disorders (
18). On the other hand, clinical assessment of AVP for a short half-time, instability, and technical reasons are so difficult. Copeptin is as equimolar as AVP and a reliable surrogate of AVP; the most advantages of this biomarker are the small amount of serum or plasma required and its very stable in plasma (
15-
17). The role of this new biomarker is well known in some diseases like cardiovascular, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and neurological and metabolic disorders (
18,
22), but the relationship between this new marker and enuresis is under debate. Only a few studies assessed the role of copeptin in enuresis, and the results showed controversy. Hara et al. reported that copeptin has predictive value for desmopressin responsiveness, although studies are quite limited in this area to be compared with this research (
10).
In this study, the mean level of copeptin in the case and control groups were 6.7 ± 4.27 and 6.87 ± 8.52 pg/mL, respectively, which was significantly lower in the case group (P = 0.03), which is in agreement with the study by Nalbantoglu et al. (
4) and Girisgen et al. (
1). Nalbantoglu et al. studied 88 enuresis children and healthy ones between 6 - 14 years old and showed that the level of copeptin was significantly lower in the enuresis group; that was the first report about this assessment (
4).
Girisgen et al. studied 119 patients with enuresis that was 49 patients with monosymptomatic enuresis, and 40 healthy children 5 - 16 years that showed serum copeptin levels were significantly lower in comparison with healthy children and introduced that copeptin could be a surrogate biomarker of AVP. The authors stated that their study was the third article on this topic (
1).
Hara et al. demonstrated that plasma copeptin level could be a predictive biomarker for evaluating desmopressin response. This study was conducted on 32 children with PMNE between 6 and 11 years old, the first study on this topic (
10).
On the other hand, Szymanik-Grzelak et al. explained that there is no relationship between PMNE and copeptin level and showed that the role of copeptin as a reliable biomarker is under debate. It was a study of 25 children with the clinical diagnosis of PMNE between 5 - 15 years old, and the authors stated that assessment of the relationship between copeptin and enuresis required more studies (
9).
In this study, there was a significant relationship between age and copeptin level, but Nalbantoglu et al. demonstrated that there was no relationship between this parameter, as is seen in Szymanik-Grzelak et al. article (
4,
9). The mean age of the Nalbantoglu et al. study was 9.70 ± 2.04 compared with our study, which was 8.05 ± 2.46 years (
4). In this study, in both age groups, there was a statistically significant difference between the level of copeptin in the enuresis and the control groups; however, the mean level of copeptin in children younger than 10 years is less than that in older children in both the case and the control group. It is recommended that further studies be designed to focus on the level of copeptin in different age groups.
According to our study in the female group, the mean level of copeptin in the enuresis group was less than that in the control group; however, it was not statistically significant (P = 0.35). Although in the male group, it was statistically significant (P = 0.035). In the study of Nalbantoglu et al. and Szymanik-Grzelak et al., there was no significant difference between the sex and the copeptin level (
4,
9). In this study, the mean of copeptin level is not different between males and females as shown in Szymanik-Grzelak et al. and Skrzypczyk et al. and Przybylowski et al. study, but according to some studies, copeptin level in males is higher than in females (
9,
23-
26).
This study has some limitations; some confounders exist in enuresis, such as family history, sleep status, constipation, caffeine intake, sodium, and potassium, which were not assessed. Moreover, the sample size is small. It is recommended that a prospective study with a larger number of cases and control with proper sample size in sex and age subgroups be designed. The confounder item should be mentioned. Patients with a low level of copeptin should be treated with desmopressin, and the effectiveness of the treatment should be evaluated.
5.1. Conclusions
In this study, the mean level of copeptin in PMNE was significantly lower than that in the control group, which suggests it may be considered as a probable biomarker for the prediction of response to treatment with desmopressin, but further study, especially before and after desmopressin therapy in patients with a low level of copeptin is required to confirm this hypothesis.