Abstract
Background:
As the role of nettle supplementation for type 1 diabetic patients is still unclear, we aimed to evaluate the impact of nettle supplementation on children with type 1 diabetes mellitus.Methods:
In this single-blind randomized controlled trial, 50 patients with type one diabetes aged 12 - 18 with improper glycemic parameters (HbA1c greater than 6.5 mg/dL) received either insulin with 5 cc of nettle syrup (i.e., quercetin-based on at least 0.04 mg/mL of chlorogenic acid) twice daily for 12 weeks, or insulin monotherapy. Demographic characteristics, fasting blood sugar, HbA1c, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum creatinine, and insulin dosage were investigated at the beginning of the study and at multiple intervals in both groups.Results:
Changes in fasting blood sugar (FBS), HbA1c, mean dose of rapid-acting and long-acting insulin, and mean total insulin dose were significant in both groups, and the increase in total insulin dose was significantly lower in the intervention group (P < 0.05). The trend of BUN and serum creatinine changes was not significant over time (P = 0.532 and P = 0.785, respectively).Conclusions:
We found lower total insulin dose in the intervention group that may emphasize the positive effect of nettle concomitant use through insulin secretion or sensitizing effect.Keywords
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Urtica dioica Complementary Therapies Herbal Medicine Glycemic Parameters
1. Background
Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is one of the most prevalent chronic diseases with childhood onset (1). According to recent epidemiological studies, about 11 to 22 million people worldwide suffer from T1DM, and 90% of diabetic children have T1DM. In recent years, the incidence, prevalence, and severe complications of T1DM have increased significantly (2). Besides, T1DM is an autoimmune disorder characterized by destroying pancreatic beta cells, and patients require long-term insulin therapy to survive, which has multiple limitations (3, 4). For example, insulin therapy can increase glucagon, leading to metabolic syndrome and obesity, which can cause cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and other complications (5). Therefore, several studies have been carried out to find insulin adjunct treatments.
Anti-diabetic oral agents such as incretin mimetics, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, etc., can be used as an insulin adjunct therapy. Still, their side effects are significant and cost a lot (6). Therefore, we should seek insulin adjunct therapy with fewer side effects and costs, and herbal medicines are one of the candidates (7). Pandey et al. reported that about 800 herbs could improve glycemic parameters, and stinging nettle (Urtica dioica L.) is one of them (8).
Urtica dioica L. is a perennial flowering plant commonly called stinging nettle, and its application has a deep root in traditional medicine (9). It is a member of the Urticaceae family and includes a variety of biochemicals, including formic acid, acetylcholine, and histamine, as well as beneficial substances such as flavonoids, saponins, phytosterols, tannins, proteins, and amino acids (10). Its derivatives include dry extract, infusion (herbal tea), decoction, crude dried powder, or fresh juice (11). According to previous studies, nettle has many potential therapeutic effects on different diseases, such as allergies (12), arthritis rheumatoid (13), anemia (14), burns (15), internal bleeding (16), kidney stones (17), prostatic hyperplasia (18), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) (19).
The positive effects of nettle on T2DM have been proven to a large extent. Nettle may have diverse mechanisms for affecting glycemic control. The following mechanisms were noted in a molecular and biochemical study by Altamimi et al. (20). Nettle may inhibit alfa-glucosidase enzyme, disaccharidase, and transmission of glucose through glucose transporter 2 (GLUT-2) and decrease glucose transport to caco-2 cells. Boscaro et al. (21) also mentioned increased insulin secretion and sensitivity in addition to inhibiting alfa-amylase activity after nettle use. They also noticed that quercetin is the main component for glycemic control properties, which can be found in the aqueous phase of the extract.
A meta-analysis study based on eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that measured nettle's effects on T2DM demonstrated that nettle might be effective in controlling these patients' fasting blood sugar (FBS) (19). Nettle has anti-inflammatory (22) and antioxidant (23) effects. On the other hand, it can increase glucose uptake by adipose tissue and skeletal muscle (24). These are some of the proposed mechanisms of nettle's impact on diabetes and its complications. Similar to T2DM, inflammation, oxidative stress, and reduced glucose uptake are seen in T1DM (25, 26).
To the best of our knowledge, several RCTs have been conducted on the nettle effects on T2DM patients. Still, no RCT has been conducted on the effects of nettle on T1DM patients.
2. Objectives
The current study aimed to investigate the effects of nettle supplementation on the glycemic parameters of patients with T1DM.
3. Methods
This study is a single-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial with a parallel design. This study enrolled T1DM patients aged 12 - 18 years treated with insulin having inadequate blood sugar control (HbA1c more than 6.5 mg/dL) referred to 17th Shahrivar Hospital, Rasht, Iran, from April to October 2020, with BUN < 20 mg/dL and SCr < 1.5 mg/dL. Patients were excluded if they had a history of previous allergy to nettle food products, had a change of more than 0.3 units in SCr during the study, used medications such as lithium, warfarin, and blood pressure-lowering drugs due to drug interactions, and were unwilling to participate.
For calculating the sample size, we considered the statistical power of 90%, error level of 0.05, d of 1.41, and standard deviation of 0.62 in the intervention group and 1.9 in the control group. The sample size obtained for each group, including a 10% drop rate, was equivalent to a minimum of 23.44, which was rounded up to 24.
The block randomization method with the size of four was used on the following website (Sealedenvelope) to provide a randomization sequence. The numbered sealed and opaque envelopes were used sequentially to hide the random allocation.
Fifty patients were randomly assigned to the intervention and control groups. Patients in the intervention group received 5 mL of nettle syrup twice daily. According to the manufacturer's information, the syrup contained the active ingredient quercetin, with a minimum concentration of 0.04 mg/mL of chlorogenic acid. Along with the nettle syrup, these patients also received insulin. On the other hand, patients in the control group received insulin monotherapy for a duration of 12 weeks. The administered insulin dose in each group was 0.4 - 0.5 units per weight, consisting of one-third subcutaneous glargine once a day and two-thirds subcutaneous as part three times a day. The insulin dose in both groups increased or decreased according to blood sugar during the study. All patients were trained regarding the number of carbohydrate units received and the frequency of testing blood sugar at home. In case of blood sugar drop to less than 70 mg/dL, glucagon ampoules were injected.
Nettle extract was purchased from Zardband® Company, Tehran, Iran, with certified botanical origin in the form of syrup. Due to a lack of data regarding weight-based nettle dose, we omitted younger children for safety issues and dosed the nettle based on the manufacturer's recommendation.
The primary outcome was the changes in FBS, and the secondary outcomes were changes in HbA1c, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and SCr. Data including the following parameters were gathered: Age, sex, weight, underlying disease, use of other medications, rapid-acting and long-acting insulin dose, total insulin dose, FBS, HbA1c, BUN, and SCr. They were checked at the beginning of the study in both groups of patients. After four and eight weeks from the start of the study, FBS and kidney function parameters (BUN and SCr) were rechecked in both groups. At the end of the study period (after 12 weeks), FBS, HbA1c, received insulin dose, and renal function parameters were rechecked.
During the study period, patients were checked for side effects. In case of severe side effects or the patient's intolerance or disinclination, the patient was excluded from the study. Considering the difference in eating habits of the child and family, the frequency of consumption, the child's inclinations, and combining meals, a diet that consisted of 55% carbohydrates, 30% fat (10% saturated and 20% unsaturated), and 15% protein was indicated with the help of a nutritionist. Regarding the potential effect of physical activity on glucose control, the pediatric endocrinologist recommended moderate physical activity three times a week, for at least half an hour each time for both groups.
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Guilan University of Medical Sciences (number: IR.GUMS.REC.1401.113 date: 2022-06-01), and the study protocol was registered (IRCT20220516054879N2). A written informed consent letter was obtained from all patients, parents, or guardians in this study.
3.1. Statistical Analysis
Frequency and percentage were used to describe qualitative data and mean and standard deviation were used for quantitative data. For this purpose, the Shapiro-Wilk test was used to check the normality. If the relevant assumptions were established for quantitative variables, independent t-test, paired t-test, and repeated measures tests, and if the assumptions were not established, the Mann-Whitney test, Wilcoxon test, and Friedman test were used. The chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were used to check the qualitative variables. The generalized estimating equations test was used to adjust the effects of confounding variables if the relevant assumptions were established. If the assumptions were not established, suitable transformations were used on the data to normalize or establish homogeneity of variance. The software used was IBM SPSS version 26. The significance level was considered below 0.05.
4. Results
From April 2020 to October 2020, a total of 83 patients were evaluated for eligibility, and finally, 50 patients were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to either the insulin and nettle (n = 25) or insulin monotherapy (n = 25) groups. After study completion, 24 patients in the insulin and nettle group and 25 in the insulin monotherapy group were analyzed (Figure 1).
The consort flow diagram
Table 1 shows the patients' baseline characteristics in the two groups. Patients' mean age, sex, and weight did not significantly differ between the two groups.
Baseline Characteristics of Two Groups a
Seventeen patients in the control group (68%) and nineteen in the intervention group (79.1%) had no underlying disease. Eighteen patients in the control group (72%) and twenty in the intervention group (83.3%) did not take any other medications. Comparing the frequency of comorbidities (P = 0.530) and the use of other medications (P = 0.564) in the control and intervention groups using Fisher's exact test showed no significant difference between the two groups.
There was no significant difference in FBS, HbA1c, mean dose of rapid-acting and long-acting insulin, and mean total insulin dose in the intervention and control groups at the beginning of the study. As shown in Table 2, changes in FBS, HbA1c, mean dose of rapid-acting and long-acting insulin, and mean total insulin dose were significant in both groups over time. Besides, the patients in the intervention group experienced a lower increase in mean total insulin dose compared to the control group over time (P = 0.002).
Amount of Fasting Blood Sugar, HbA1c, Rapid-acting, and Long-acting Insulin Dose, and Total Insulin Dose at Baseline, Four, Eight, and Twelve Weeks a
| Variables | Baseline | 4 Weeks | 8 Weeks | 12 Weeks | P-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBS | |||||
| Intervention | 215.32 ± 37.118 | 178.16 ± 31.474 | 158.38 ± 33.988 | 138.04 ± 20.544 | < 0.001 |
| Control | 218.64 ± 43.998 | 180.00 ± 37.859 | 159.00 ± 24.656 | 134.00 ± 16.862 | < 0.001 |
| P-value | 0.873 | 0.933 | 0.357 | ||
| HbA1c | |||||
| Intervention | 8.43 ± 0.649 | 7.74 ± 0.704 | < 0.001 | ||
| Control | 8.20 ± 0.629 | 7.59 ± 0.624 | < 0.001 | ||
| P-value | 0.332 | ||||
| Dose of rapid-acting insulin | |||||
| Intervention | 17.40 ± 5.115 | 24.50 ± 7.071 | < 0.001 | ||
| Control | 15.80 ± 4.916 | 24.68 ± 6.524 | < 0.001 | ||
| P-value | 0.101 | ||||
| Dose of long-acting insulin | |||||
| Intervention | 8.80 ± 2.769 | 14.83 ± 4.420 | 0.007 | ||
| Control | 8.08 ± 2.812 | 15.92 ± 4.760 | 0.002 | ||
| P-value | 0.10 | ||||
| Total insulin dose | |||||
| Intervention | 26.24 ± 7.790 | 37.96 ± 9.724 | < 0.001 | ||
| Control | 23.88 ± 7.645 | 40.60 ± 10.161 | < 0.001 | ||
| P-value | 0.002 |
The mean number of hypoglycemic episodes was not significantly different between the intervention and control groups (P = 0.556), so the patients in the intervention group experienced an average of 0.04 ± 0.20 episodes, and the control group experienced 0.08 ± 0.28 episodes.
Despite the bad odor and taste of nettle syrup, all patients except one tolerated it well, and none reported any significant complications. The trend of BUN and SCr changes was not significant over time (P = 0.532 and P = 0.785, respectively).
5. Discussion
This study evaluated the antihyperglycemic effects of Urtica dioica L. in combination with insulin on the blood glucose level in T1DM pediatric patients. The results indicated no significant difference in glycemic control between the two groups at the end of the study, but mean total insulin doses were significantly lower in the intervention group. Considering the lack of adequate evidence about the antihyperglycemic effects of Urtica dioica L. in T1DM, the authors compared the current results with previous semi-similar animal and human studies in T1DM and T2DM patients.
Amiri Behzadi et al. (27), who evaluated 50 women with T2DM for eight weeks, noted a significant reduction in FBS. Furthermore, Ghalavand et al. (28), in 40 males with T2DM, declared a significant FBS decrease after eight weeks by 10 g/day of nettle extract. Besides, in a case report by Hailemeskel and Fullas (29), a man with T2DM was reported who achieved glycemic control by using nettle despite stopping anti-diabetic medication.
Moreover, Kianbakht et al. (30) administered 500 mg/TDS nettle for three months to patients with T2DM and concluded that this extract significantly decreased blood sugar, postprandial blood sugar, and HbA1c but did not affect SCr and AST.
Ziaei et al., in a systematic review, evaluated five RCTs on nettle supplementation success rate in T2DM and suggested that it may be effective in controlling FBS, HbA1c, and insulin resistance in T2DM patients (19). These results are inconsistent with ours regarding no significant differences in FBS and HbA1c between insulin monotherapy and nettle concomitant use. This may result from assessing different types of diabetes or the effect of diverse inclusion criteria.
Although most studies recommend further clinical trials to determine the efficacy of Urtica dioica L., these studies have shown a significant decrease in blood glucose levels and complications of diabetes through the use of Urtica dioica L. This may be due to its effects on both pancreatic and extra-pancreatic pathways. Additionally, Urtica dioica L. exhibits several pharmacological activities, including anti-inflammatory, hypoglycemic, and anti-oxidative activities (31, 32).
Riazi et al. assessed a study on 24 rats and eight patients between 7 and 24.6 years and concluded that nettle, a glucose-lowering agent for treating T1DM, could reduce blood sugar without increasing insulin secretion (33).
Mobasseri et al. (34) reported that the decrease in blood glucose levels with nettle is attributed to glycogenesis, the blocking of potassium channels in pancreatic beta cells, and its involvement in glucose absorption from the intestinal wall. Most of these effects are similar to those of insulin. On the other hand, nettle extract can reduce blood glucose levels in diabetic mice due to GLUT-2 gene expression in mice's liver (10, 34, 35). Mobasseri et al. (36) mentioned inconsistent results that the alcoholic extract of nettle could not enhance glucose utilization directly or by increasing the insulin sensitivity in muscle cells (29, 36).
These results are consistent with Tarighat Esfanjani et al. (37) and Tabrizi et al. (38), who believed the hydroalcoholic extract of nettle reduced FBS and HbA1c after eight weeks of intervention in patients with T2DM (37, 38). Because of these reasons, the effectiveness of insulin improves, and the units of short-acting and long-acting insulin decrease. These may explain our study findings that mean total insulin dose was lower in the intervention group after 12 weeks.
Regarding the side effects of nettle, Goorani et al. (39) tried different doses of nettle in a study on 60 rats with STZ-induced DM and found that it could decrease blood sugar and prevent kidney hypertrophy. Ahangarpour et al. (40) mentioned increased AST and ALT after nettle use. In the study by Kianbakht et al. in 2013, after eight weeks of using nettle extract, it was observed that SCr was not different between the intervention and control groups. Nettle does not show toxic effects on the kidneys (30). However, according to our study, the slight but not significant increase in SCr after nettle consumption shows that a study with larger sample size and longer follow-up duration should be performed to investigate these side effects thoroughly.
This study had the following limitations. The small sample size and single-center design of the study reduced statistical power and generalizability. We did not measure endogenous insulin levels or c-peptide. Regarding the shortage of evidence on the optimal weight-based dose of nettle, we administered a single fixed dose. Therefore, performing larger multicenter trials with longer follow-up, measuring insulin levels, assessing optimal dosing, monitoring additional outcomes, and studying diabetes complications is recommended.
5.1. Conclusions
Our study showed that both groups had decreased levels of FBS and HbA1c. However, we found lower total insulin dose in the intervention group that may emphasize this positive effect through insulin-sensitizing mechanism or increasing insulin secretion.
Based on the shortage of evidence on the optimal dose of nettle in patients with T1DM, we recommended larger multicenter studies with large sample sizes over long periods.
Acknowledgements
References
-
1.
Magnus MC, Olsen SF, Granstrom C, Joner G, Skrivarhaug T, Svensson J, et al. Infant Growth and Risk of Childhood-Onset Type 1 Diabetes in Children From 2 Scandinavian Birth Cohorts. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(12):e153759. [PubMed ID: 26642117]. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.3759.
-
2.
Pan X, Kaminga AC, Kinra S, Wen SW, Liu H, Tan X, et al. Chemokines in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. Front Immunol. 2021;12:690082. [PubMed ID: 35242125]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8886728]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.690082.
-
3.
Musso G, Gambino R, Cassader M, Paschetta E. Efficacy and safety of dual SGLT 1/2 inhibitor sotagliflozin in type 1 diabetes: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2019;365:l1328. [PubMed ID: 30967375]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6454301]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l1328.
-
4.
Chang TT, Chen JW. Emerging role of chemokine CC motif ligand 4 related mechanisms in diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease: friends or foes? Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016;15(1):117. [PubMed ID: 27553774]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4995753]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-016-0439-9.
-
5.
Kilpatrick ES, Rigby AS, Atkin SL. Insulin resistance, the metabolic syndrome, and complication risk in type 1 diabetes: "double diabetes" in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(3):707-12. [PubMed ID: 17327345]. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc06-1982.
-
6.
Dowarah J, Singh VP. Anti-diabetic drugs recent approaches and advancements. Bioorg Med Chem. 2020;28(5):115263. [PubMed ID: 32008883]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2019.115263.
-
7.
Tran N, Pham B, Le L. Bioactive Compounds in Anti-Diabetic Plants: From Herbal Medicine to Modern Drug Discovery. Biology (Basel). 2020;9(9):252. [PubMed ID: 32872226]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7563488]. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology9090252.
-
8.
Pandey A, Tripathi P, Pandey R, Srivatava R, Goswami S. Alternative therapies useful in the management of diabetes: A systematic review. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2011;3(4):504-12. [PubMed ID: 22219583]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3249697]. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.90103.
-
9.
Bhusal KK, Magar SK, Thapa R, Lamsal A, Bhandari S, Maharjan R, et al. Nutritional and pharmacological importance of stinging nettle (Urtica dioica L.): A review. Heliyon. 2022;8(6):e09717. [PubMed ID: 35800714]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9253158]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09717.
-
10.
Samakar B, Mehri S, Hosseinzadeh H. A review of the effects of Urtica dioica (nettle) in metabolic syndrome. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2022;25(5):543-53. [PubMed ID: 35911652]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9282742]. https://doi.org/10.22038/IJBMS.2022.58892.13079.
-
11.
Haj Said AA, El Otmani IB, Derfoufi S, Benmoussa A. Highlights on nutritional and therapeutic value of stinging nettle (Urtica dioica). Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2015;7(10):8-14.
-
12.
Bakhshaee M, Mohammad Pour AH, Esmaeili M, Jabbari Azad F, Alipour Talesh G, Salehi M, et al. Efficacy of Supportive Therapy of Allergic Rhinitis by Stinging Nettle (Urtica dioica) root extract: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- Controlled, Clinical Trial. Iran J Pharm Res. 2017;16(Suppl):112-8. [PubMed ID: 29844782]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5963652].
-
13.
Yang CL, Or TC, Ho MH, Lau AS. Scientific basis of botanical medicine as alternative remedies for rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2013;44(3):284-300. [PubMed ID: 22700248]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12016-012-8329-8.
-
14.
Meral I, Kanter M. Effects of Nigella sativa L. and Urtica dioica L. on selected mineral status and hematological values in CCl4-treated rats. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2003;96(1-3):263-70. [PubMed ID: 14716106]. https://doi.org/10.1385/BTER:96:1-3:263.
-
15.
Akbari H, Fatemi MJ, Iranpour M, Khodarahmi A, Baghaee M, Pedram MS, et al. The healing effect of nettle extract on second degree burn wounds. World J Plast Surg. 2015;4(1):23-8. [PubMed ID: 25606473]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4298861].
-
16.
Simsek C, Selek S, Koca M, Haznedaroglu IC. Proteomic and transcriptomic analyses to explain the pleiotropic effects of Ankaferd blood stopper. SAGE Open Med. 2017;5. [PubMed ID: 28839937]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5536373]. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312117722569.
-
17.
Zhang H, Li N, Li K, Li P. Protective effect of Urtica dioica methanol extract against experimentally induced urinary calculi in rats. Mol Med Rep. 2014;10(6):3157-62. [PubMed ID: 25310585]. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2014.2610.
-
18.
Lichius JJ, Renneberg H, Blaschek W, Aumuller G, Muth C. The inhibiting effects of components of stinging nettle roots on experimentally induced prostatic hyperplasia in mice. Planta Med. 1999;65(7):666-8. [PubMed ID: 10575383]. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-960844.
-
19.
Ziaei R, Foshati S, Hadi A, Kermani MAH, Ghavami A, Clark CCT, et al. The effect of nettle (Urtica dioica) supplementation on the glycemic control of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Phytother Res. 2020;34(2):282-94. [PubMed ID: 31802554]. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.6535.
-
20.
Altamimi MA, Abu-Reidah IM, Altamimi A, Jaradat N. Hydroethanolic Extract of Urtica dioica L. (Stinging Nettle) Leaves as Disaccharidase Inhibitor and Glucose Transport in Caco-2 Hinderer. Molecules. 2022;27(24):8872. [PubMed ID: 36558005]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9784853]. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27248872.
-
21.
Boscaro V, Rivoira M, Sgorbini B, Bordano V, Dadone F, Gallicchio M, et al. Evidence-Based Anti-Diabetic Properties of Plant from the Occitan Valleys of the Piedmont Alps. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(11):2371. [PubMed ID: 36365189]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9693256]. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14112371.
-
22.
Golalipour MJ, Ghafari S, Kouri V, Kestkar AA. Proliferation of the b -Cells of Pancreas in Diabetic Rats Treated with Urtica Dioica. Int J Morphol. 2010;28(2):399-404. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-95022010000200011.
-
23.
Asadi-Samani M, Moradi MT, Mahmoodnia L, Alaei S, Asadi-Samani F, Luther T. Traditional uses of medicinal plants to prevent and treat diabetes; an updated review of ethnobotanical studies in Iran. J Nephropathol. 2017;6(3):118-25. [PubMed ID: 28975089]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5607970]. https://doi.org/10.15171/jnp.2017.20.
-
24.
Sahraki MR, Mirshekari H, Sahraki AR, Shafigh E. Effect of Urtica Dioica Decoction on Serum Glucose and Lipid Profile in Stereptozotocin Induced Diabetic Male Rats. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2013;15(11):15-8.
-
25.
Farinha JB, Ramis TR, Vieira AF, Macedo RCO, Rodrigues-Krause J, Boeno FP, et al. Glycemic, inflammatory and oxidative stress responses to different high-intensity training protocols in type 1 diabetes: A randomized clinical trial. J Diabetes Complications. 2018;32(12):1124-32. [PubMed ID: 30270019]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2018.09.008.
-
26.
Donga E, Dekkers OM, Corssmit EP, Romijn JA. Insulin resistance in patients with type 1 diabetes assessed by glucose clamp studies: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;173(1):101-9. [PubMed ID: 25899581]. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-14-0911.
-
27.
Amiri Behzadi A, Kalalian-Moghaddam H, Ahmadi AH. Effects of Urtica dioica supplementation on blood lipids, hepatic enzymes and nitric oxide levels in type 2 diabetic patients: A double blind, randomized clinical trial. Avicenna J Phytomed. 2016;6(6):686-95. [PubMed ID: 28078249]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5206926].
-
28.
Ghalavand A, Motamedi P, Delaramnasab M, Khodadoust M. The Effect of Interval Training and Nettle Supplement on Glycemic Control and Blood Pressure in Men WithType 2 Diabetes. Int J Basic Sci Med. 2017;2(1):33-40. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijbsm.2017.08.
-
29.
Hailemeskel B, Fullas F. The Use of Urtica dioica (Stinging Nettle) as a Blood Sugar Lowering Herb: A Case Report and a Review of the Literature. Diabetes Res Open J. 2015;1(5):123-7. https://doi.org/10.17140/droj-1-119.
-
30.
Kianbakht S, Khalighi-Sigaroodi F, Dabaghian FH. Improved glycemic control in patients with advanced type 2 diabetes mellitus taking Urtica dioica leaf extract: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial. Clin Lab. 2013;59(9-10):1071-6. [PubMed ID: 24273930]. https://doi.org/10.7754/clin.lab.2012.121019.
-
31.
Mehri A, Hasani-Ran S, Larijani B, Abdollahi M. A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety of Urtica dioica in the Treatment of Diabetes. Int J Pharmacol. 2011;7(2):161-70. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijp.2011.161.170.
-
32.
Goswami NG, Koli M, Singh A, Giri D. Urtica dioica: An undervalued herb a comprehensive review. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2022;11(3):169-73.
-
33.
Riazi GH, Razzaghy-Azar M, Taghikhani M, Karimai M, Shaabani M, Hasani Komeleh SH, et al. Metabolic Effects of Glucose Lowering Substance of Urtica Dioica on Normal and Diabetic Mice, and Patients with Type I Diabetes Mellitus. J Compr Ped. 2007;1(2):e93732.
-
34.
Mobasseri M, Bahrami A, Zargami N, Aliasgarzadeh A, Rhmati M, Delazar A, et al. [Effect of Total Extract of Urtica Dioica on Insulin and C-Peptide Secretion From Rat (RIN5F) Pancreatic β Cells and Glucose Utilization by Human Muscle Cells]. Iran J Endocrinol Metab. 2009;11(6):721-7. Persian.
-
35.
Ahmadi S, Awliaei H, Haidarizadeh M, Rostamzadeh J. The Effect of Ethanolic Extract of Urtica dioica Leaves on High Levels of Blood Glucose and Gene Expression of Glucose Transporter 2 (Glut2) in Liver of Alloxan-Induced Diabetic Mice. Gene Cell Tissue. 2015;2(3):e30355. https://doi.org/10.17795/gct-30355.
-
36.
Mobasseri M, Aliasgarzadeh A, Bahrami A, Zargami N, Tabrizi A. Efficacy of the Total Extract of Urtica Dioica on the glucose utilization by the Human Muscle Cells. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2012;6(3):437-40.
-
37.
Tarighat Esfanjani A, Namazi N, Bahrami A, Ehteshami M. [Effect of Hydroalcoholic extract of Nettle (Urtica Dioica) on Glycemic Index and Insulin Resistance Index in Type 2 Diabetic Patients]. Iran J Endocrinol Metab. 2012;13(6):561-8. Persian.
-
38.
Tabrizi R, Sekhavati E, Nowrouzi-Sohrabi P, Rezaei S, Tabari P, Ghoran SH, et al. Effects of Urtica dioica on Metabolic Profiles in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2022;22(3):550-63. [PubMed ID: 34587883]. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389557521666210929143112.
-
39.
Goorani S, Shariatfar N, Zangeneh MM, Zangeneh A, Hosseini F. Stereological and biochemical studies of kidney in diabetic mice treated with ethanolic extract of Urtica dioica L.: Introducing an anti-diabetic and nephroprotective agent. Iranian J Pharmacol Ther. 2019;17(1):1-9.
-
40.
Ahangarpour A, Mohammadian M, Dianat M. Antidiabetic effect of hydroalcholic urticadioica leaf extract in male rats with fructose-induced insulin resistance. Iran J Med Sci. 2012;37(3):181-6. [PubMed ID: 23115450]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3470082].