Our Treatment Experience in Poisoning With Calcium Channel Blockers: A Series of Twelve Cases

authors:

avatar Mehmet Nur Talay ORCID 1 , avatar Özhan Orhan ORCID 1 , * , avatar Mehmet Nuri Ozbek ORCID 1 , avatar Murat Kanğın ORCID 2 , avatar Eşe Eda Turanlı ORCID 3

Mardin Artuklu University, Mardin, Turkey
Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
Diyarbakır Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital, Diyarbakır, Turkey

how to cite: Talay M N, Orhan Ö, Ozbek M N, Kanğın M, Turanlı E E. Our Treatment Experience in Poisoning With Calcium Channel Blockers: A Series of Twelve Cases. Iran J Pediatr. 2024;34(1):e137901. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijp-137901.

Abstract

Background:

Intoxications with cardiovascular system drugs constitute a small percentage of all poisoning cases. Calcium Channel Blockers (CCBs) are the most common drug poisoning in this group.

Objectives:

We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments for CCB poisoning and add to the current body of literature by outlining the clinical treatments we employ for bradyarrhythmia, hypotension, and resistant vasodilation resulting from CCB poisoning, as well as sharing our clinical insights in this field.

Methods:

Twelve patients, ranging in age from 1 month to 18 years, were admitted to the Tertiary Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) for treatment of medication poisoning related to the CCB group. Patients who ingested several drugs that caused CCB were not allowed to participate in the trial.

Results:

Twelve patients were followed up in the PICU due to poisoning with CCB group drugs. Of the patients, 7 were male and 5 were female. Five of the patients had taken CCB medication with the purpose of committing suicide, and 7 of them accidentally. All of the patients who received CCB to commit suicide had taken verapamil. Five patients whose hypotension and bradycardia continued were administered inotropes. In addition to PI, calcium gluconate, intravenous lipid, glucagon, insulin, bicarbonate, and methylene blue were given as therapy to our symptomatic patients. Plasmapheresis was applied to a patient who was hospitalized in the PICU due to a sudden loss of consciousness.

Conclusions:

In the management of patients with CCB poisoning, the use of hyperinsulinemia euglycemia, intravenous lipid emulsion treatment, glucagon treatments, and treatments including methylene blue and extracorporeal life support should be considered in cases of resistant hypotension, bradycardia, and coma in the early period.

1. Background

Poisoning with Calcium Channel Blockers (CCBs) should be considered in every patient admitted to the emergency department with bradycardia, hypotension, and shock. Intoxications with Cardiovascular System (CVS) drugs such as ENTs and/or beta-receptor antagonists (BB) constitute a small percentage of all poisoning cases (1). However, the most frequently observed drug intoxication among CVS agents encompasses CCBs (2).

Calcium channel blockers inhibit voltage-gated L-type calcium channels. As a result of the inhibition of these channels, the flow of calcium into the cells is directly inhibited, and the amount of calcium in the cytoplasm decreases. This results in muscle relaxation and arterial dilatation (3, 4). Besides, CCBs reduce systemic vascular resistance and almost always present with low blood pressure and resistant shock (5). Signs of lethargy or agitation, confusion, coma, convulsions, and multiple organ failure may occur due to insufficient organ perfusion as a result of hypotension or bradycardia (5, 6). Also, CCBs inhibit calcium channels in pancreatic islet cells, reducing insulin secretion and resulting in hyperglycemia and reduced cardiac glucose utilization (7).

Calcium channel blockers are mainly excreted by hepatic biotransformation, with around 5% excreted by the kidneys. In life-threatening poisonings, determining the pharmacokinetics of the drug taken, current approaches, and choosing the extracorporeal method are as important as knowing the drug taken (8). In the management of CCB poisonings, decontamination, hyperinsulinemia euglycemia (HIE), intravenous lipid emulsion (ILE) therapy, glucagon, IV calcium, positive inotropes (PI) such as dopamine and norepinephrine, pacemakers, levosimendan, and extracorporeal treatments such as plasmapheresis and dialysis are used (4).

Recently, ILE treatment has been used as an effective antidote in all lipophilic drug poisonings, especially those with local anesthetic drugs (9, 10). Lipids not only act with systemic toxicity but can also reduce drug levels. In one of their cases, French et al. reported a decrease in verapamil levels after lipid administration (11).

Methylene Blue (MB) has been used for treating CCB poisoning, post-cardiac surgery, septicemia, anaphylaxis, and drug-induced vasodilator shock. Also, MB cleans Nitric Oxide (NO) and inhibits NO synthesis (12).

2. Objectives

We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments for CCB poisoning and add to the current body of literature by outlining the clinical treatments we employ for bradyarrhythmia, hypotension, and resistant vasodilation resulting from CCB poisoning, as well as sharing our clinical insights in this field.

3. Methods

We enrolled 12 patients aged one month to 18 years who were followed up in the Tertiary Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) for poisoning with CCB group drugs between 01/01/2019 and 01/11/2022. Patients with CCB intake through multiple drug intake were excluded from the study. Patient files were obtained from the archives of Diyarbakır Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital. The patients' daily treatment charts, nurse observations with recorded vital signs, laboratory results, and clinical course were scanned retrospectively from the data in the patient files. Patient age, gender, and length of hospital stay were recorded as demographic data. The patients' arrival times at the hospital and the procedures performed in the emergency department were examined. The clinical course of the patients since their hospitalization was retrospectively scanned from the hospital data. The patients' age, first positive physical examination findings on admission to the PICU, GCS, PRISM scores, medical treatments, and inotropes they received were checked, and their Vasoactive Inotrope Scores (VIS) were calculated based on the highest doses.

VIS score = Dopamine dose (mcg/kg/min) (mcg/kg/min) + 100x Adrenaline dose (mcg/kg/min) + 10x Milrinone dose (mcg/kg/min) + 10000x Vasopressin dose (units/kg/min) + 100x Noradrenaline dose (mcg/kg/min) + Dobutamine dose (13).

3.1. Statistical Analysis

Mean, standard deviation, median, minimum, maximum, frequency, and ratio values were used as descriptive statistics. The distribution of variables was analyzed with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The Mann-Whitney U test was used in the analysis of quantitative independent data, and the chi-square test was used in the analysis of qualitative independent data. The effect level was analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Also, the SPSS 15.0 (IBM Corp. Armonk NY) program was used in the analysis. The P values <0.05 were considered significant.

3.2. Ethics Committee Approval

The approval dated 09/12/2022 and numbered 272 for the study was taken from the Good Clinical Practices Ethics Committee of Diyarbakır Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital. Consent was obtained from the families for the use of data in patient hospitalization files in academic studies.

4. Results

Twelve patients were followed up in the PICU between 01/01/2019 and 01/11/2022 due to poisoning with CCB drugs. The patients had a median of 52.5 (min: 21; max: 213) months old; 7 were male, and 5 were female. Five of the patients had taken CCB medication with the purpose of committing suicide, and 7 of them accidentally. The median age of 5 patients who took CCB with the purpose of committing suicide was 198 (min: 192; max: 213) months, and four of them were girls. Six of the patients received a CCB named verapamil, five received amlodipine, and one received benipin. All of the patients who received a CCB to commit suicide had taken verapamil.

The median time to hospital arrival was 120 minutes (min: 120; max: 210). Gastric lavage and activated charcoal were administered to seven patients in the emergency departments. On admission, 7 of the patients were asymptomatic. The median Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of the symptomatic patients was 10 (min: 10; max: 12), and the median PRISM Score was 18 (min: 9; max: 20) (Table 1). The most common findings of the patients on admission were hypotension, nausea and vomiting, dizziness, hypotension, and bradycardia in 5 patients, followed by confusion in 4 patients, hyperglycemia in 2 patients, and tachycardia in 1 patient, in order of frequency (Table 2).

Table 1.

Demographic Data of Patients

ParametersPatient Data
Age104.08 ± 87.92
Male/female5/7
Glasgow Coma Score13.25 ± 2.26
PRISM Score11.83 ± 4.43
Hospital arrival time, min120 + 42.3
Intensive care stay, h62.17 + 56.13
Hospitalization time, h93.67 + 58.48
Table 2.

Symptoms of Patients

VariablesNo. (%)
Asymptomatic7 (41.6)
Nausea-vomiting5 (41.6)
Dizziness5 (41.6)
Hypotension5 (41.6)
Bradycardia5 (41.6)
Confusion4 (33.3)
Hyperglycemia2 (16.7)
Tachycardia1 (8.3)

Normal Saline (NS) loading was applied to 6 patients with a capillary refill time of >3 seconds, and the symptoms of one of our patients improved after NS loading. In five patients whose hypotension and bradycardia continued, PI was started. Adrenaline, noradrenaline, and dopamine were administered as inotropes. The median Vasoactive Inotrope Score (VIS) in patients who took PI was 40 (min: 20; max: 70) (Table 1).

In addition to PI, calcium gluconate, intravenous lipid, glucagon, insulin, bicarbonate, and methylene blue were given as single or multiple therapy to our symptomatic patients. The patient, who experienced a sudden loss of consciousness, underwent plasmapheresis after being admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). Initially, the family did not report any drug intoxication. However, after obtaining a detailed medical history, it was discovered that the patient had ingested 4560 mg of verapamil. After 14 hours of intensive care monitoring, the patient regained consciousness, and bradycardia resolved after 36 hours (Table 3).

Table 3.

Treatments Given to Symptomatic Patients

VIS ScorePIIV CalciumgluconateILEGlucagonInsülinMetilen BlueSodiumbicarbonatePlasmapheresis
Case 170+++++--+
Case 240++++----
Case 320++++-++-
Case 430++-+----
Case 540++++++--

The median length of PICU stay was 72 (min: 40; max: 232) hours. The median duration of hospitalization was 120 (min: 120; max: 210) hours (Table 1). The patients were taken from the PICU to the pediatric ward 24 hours after their symptoms improved. None of our patients developed complications or died due to the treatment administered.

5. Discussion

In our study, six of the 12 patients followed up for CCB intoxication did not need any medical treatment. Since symptoms improved in one of our patients after NS loading, no additional treatment was required. The remaining five patients underwent medical treatments such as PI and calcium gluconate, and plasmapheresis was applied to one. None of our patients died.

In CCB poisonings, the mortality rate is high; cardiac conduction disorders, severe hypotension, cardiogenic shock, and pleural effusion may also occur (14). In patients with severe bradycardia, dopamine (10 - 20 µg/kg/min), which has a prominent tachycardic effect, can be used as the first choice as PI. It can be used in combination with norepinephrine and dobutamine in patients with acute pulmonary edema or severe ventricular dysfunction (14). There are also publications recommending adrenaline infusion (1 - 10 µg/min) for patients whose hypotension persists despite PI treatment (15). In our study, we administered dopamine, adrenaline, and noradrenaline as PI to 5 patients with severe bradycardia and hypotension. In patients who received PI, our median VIS value was 40.

Calcium gluconate was started as an antidote in all patients (Table 3). Calcium salts are recommended as antidotes as the first step in the treatment of CCB poisoning. Calcium chloride is preferred to calcium gluconate since it provides a higher concentration of ionized calcium. If the patient's hypotension persists despite calcium infusion and if the clinical response is inadequate, glucagon should be added to the treatment. Glucagon was added to the treatment of all of our patients who received PI and calcium gluconate, as none presented adequate response in the follow-up. Insulin was started in two of these patients since they did not present adequate clinical response. Another treatment applied is HIE. As known, HIE and glucagon therapy are recommended because they create positive chronotropic and inotropic effects on the heart and improve glucose utilization (16).

Akinci and Koylu published a case in which a patient whose hypotension continued despite maximum therapy was successfully resuscitated with ILE treatment (17). Montiel et al. reported that in a case of slow-release diltiazem poisoning with 3.6 g, the patient's need for pace and vasopressor disappeared with ILE treatment and HIE (18). For ILE treatment in CCB poisoning, the first bolus dose of 1.5 ml/kg, followed by an infusion of 0.25 - 0.5 ml/kg/hour, is recommended (19). A significant decrease in the need for positive inotrope was observed within an average of 2 - 4 hours after ILE treatment. The results regarding ILE treatment were observed to be similar to other studies.

Almost all CCB drugs are high in plasma protein binding and are also fat-soluble drugs. Since they are primarily metabolized in the liver, total plasma exchange (TPD) should always be considered in the treatment of patients unresponsive to medical therapy (20, 21). For one of our patients who presented with sudden loss of consciousness but no history of intoxication, plasmapheresis was performed at the fourth hour due to presenting hypotension and bradycardia unresponsive to PI. The patient regained consciousness at the 14th hour of follow-up, and the patient’s bradycardia regressed after approximately 36 hours. As seen in our case, plasmapheresis should be considered as an option in CCB intoxication.

Aggarwal et al. reported clinical improvement after the administration of MB in hypotension caused by vasodilator shock in cases of CCB poisoning resistant to inotropes (22). The recommended MB dose is 2 mg/kg/dose (13). Also, MB was administered to two of our patients who had loss of consciousness in addition to hypotension and bradycardia, were resistant to vasopressors, and did not respond to any other treatment; as a result, their bradycardia improved in 4 - 6 hours after MB administration.

In the management of patients with critical findings in CCB poisoning, decontamination, IV calcium, PI treatments, and other treatments should be applied by making quick decisions when necessary. In the management of patients with CCB poisoning, the use of HIE, ILE treatment, glucagon treatments, as well as treatments including methylene blue and extracorporeal life support should be considered in cases of resistant hypotension, bradycardia and coma in the early period. Studies in the literature are generally case reports (3, 7, 10, 18, 21, 22). We believe that the data presented regarding these 12 cases will provide an approach for physicians when encountering CCB intoxication.

Acknowledgements

References

  • 1.

    Gummin DD, Mowry JB, Beuhler MC, Spyker DA, Bronstein AC, Rivers LJ, et al. 2020 Annual Report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers' National Poison Data System (NPDS): 38th Annual Report. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2021;59(12):1282-501. [PubMed ID: 34890263]. https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2021.1989785.

  • 2.

    Yalçın Ş, Güntekin Ü, Sezen Y, Nacar H, Dalyan A. [Slow-Release Verapamil Intoxication]. J Med Sci. 2010;2:29-31. Turkish.

  • 3.

    Yılmaz M, Ay MO, Gökel Y, Kozacı N, Samanlıoğlu G, Atlı M, et al. Intrapleural and intraperitoneal free fluid in calcium channel blocker overdose. Eurasian J Emerg Med. 2016;15:82-5. https://doi.org/10.5152/eajem.2016.91300.

  • 4.

    St-Onge M, Dube PA, Gosselin S, Guimont C, Godwin J, Archambault PM, et al. Treatment for calcium channel blocker poisoning: a systematic review. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2014;52(9):926-44. [PubMed ID: 25283255]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4245158]. https://doi.org/10.3109/15563650.2014.965827.

  • 5.

    Benson BE, Spyker DA, Troutman WG, Watson WA, Bakhireva LN. Amlodipine toxicity in children less than 6 years of age: a dose-response analysis using national poison data system data. J Emerg Med. 2010;39(2):186-93. [PubMed ID: 19535212]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2009.02.016.

  • 6.

    AÇIkalin A, TaŞKin Ö, DİŞEl R. [Calcium Channel Blocker Poisoning]. Anatolian J Emerg Med. 2022;5(2):92-8. Turkish. https://doi.org/10.54996/anatolianjem.1070910.

  • 7.

    Patel NP, Pugh ME, Goldberg S, Eiger G. Hyperinsulinemic euglycemia therapy for verapamil poisoning: case report. Am J Crit Care. 2007;16(5):520. 518-9. [PubMed ID: 17724251].

  • 8.

    Wong A, Hoffman RS, Walsh SJ, Roberts DM, Gosselin S, Bunchman TE, et al. Extracorporeal treatment for calcium channel blocker poisoning: systematic review and recommendations from the EXTRIP workgroup. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2021;59(5):361-75. [PubMed ID: 33555964]. https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2020.1870123.

  • 9.

    Rothschild L, Bern S, Oswald S, Weinberg G. Intravenous lipid emulsion in clinical toxicology. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2010;18:51. [PubMed ID: 20923546]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2958894]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-18-51.

  • 10.

    Liang CW, Diamond SJ, Hagg DS. Lipid rescue of massive verapamil overdose: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2011;5:399. [PubMed ID: 21854635]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3169500]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-5-399.

  • 11.

    French D, Armenian P, Ruan W, Wong A, Drasner K, Olson KR, et al. Serum verapamil concentrations before and after Intralipid(R) therapy during treatment of an overdose. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2011;49(4):340-4. [PubMed ID: 21563913]. https://doi.org/10.3109/15563650.2011.572556.

  • 12.

    Lo JC, Darracq MA, Clark RF. A review of methylene blue treatment for cardiovascular collapse. J Emerg Med. 2014;46(5):670-9. [PubMed ID: 24508113]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.08.102.

  • 13.

    Gaies MG, Gurney JG, Yen AH, Napoli ML, Gajarski RJ, Ohye RG, et al. Vasoactive-inotropic score as a predictor of morbidity and mortality in infants after cardiopulmonary bypass. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010;11(2):234-8. [PubMed ID: 19794327]. https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181b806fc.

  • 14.

    Pichon N, Dugard A, Clavel M, Amiel JB, Francois B, Vignon P. Extracorporeal albumin dialysis in three cases of acute calcium channel blocker poisoning with life-threatening refractory cardiogenic shock. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;59(6):540-4. [PubMed ID: 21862178]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.07.029.

  • 15.

    St-Onge M, Anseeuw K, Cantrell FL, Gilchrist IC, Hantson P, Bailey B, et al. Experts Consensus Recommendations for the Management of Calcium Channel Blocker Poisoning in Adults. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(3):e306-15. [PubMed ID: 27749343]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5312725]. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000002087.

  • 16.

    Greene SL, Gawarammana I, Wood DM, Jones AL, Dargan PI. Relative safety of hyperinsulinaemia/euglycaemia therapy in the management of calcium channel blocker overdose: a prospective observational study. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33(11):2019-24. [PubMed ID: 17622512]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-007-0768-y.

  • 17.

    Akinci E, Koylu R. Verapamil Poisoning, the Importance of Intravenous Lipid Therapy: Case Report. J Acad Emerg Med Case Rep. 2013;4(3):130-2. https://doi.org/10.5505/jaemcr.2013.26349.

  • 18.

    Montiel V, Gougnard T, Hantson P. Diltiazem poisoning treated with hyperinsulinemic euglycemia therapy and intravenous lipid emulsion. Eur J Emerg Med. 2011;18(2):121-3. [PubMed ID: 21088599]. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32834130ab.

  • 19.

    Weinberg GL. Treatment of local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST). Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010;35(2):188-93. [PubMed ID: 20216036]. https://doi.org/10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181d246c3.

  • 20.

    Pfaender M, Casetti PG, Azzolini M, Baldi ML, Valli A. Successful treatment of a massive atenolol and nifedipine overdose with CVVHDF. Minerva Anestesiol. 2008;74(3):97-100.

  • 21.

    Ezidiegwu C, Spektor Z, Nasr MR, Kelly KC, Rosales LG. A case report on the role of plasma exchange in the management of a massive amlodipine besylate intoxication. Ther Apher Dial. 2008;12(2):180-4. [PubMed ID: 18387170]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-9987.2008.00567.x.

  • 22.

    Aggarwal N, Kupfer Y, Seneviratne C, Tessler S. Methylene blue reverses recalcitrant shock in beta-blocker and calcium channel blocker overdose. BMJ Case Rep. 2013;2013. [PubMed ID: 23334490]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3604019]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2012-007402.