Edipeak and Edimin values tended to increase after caffeine citrate loading-dose administration. Edi values were dependent on whether neural breathing was intact, presenting an increasing trend when the nRR was ≥ 30, compared with lower rates. The Edi values showed characteristic trends depending on several perinatal and postnatal factors such as gestational age, postnatal lung condition, or ventilatory modes/settings applied. Moreover, PMA at caffeine citrate discontinuation seemed to affect Edipeak in different directions.
The mechanism of action of caffeine citrate includes stimulation of the respiratory center in the medulla, increasing sensitivity to carbon dioxide, increasing skeletal muscle tone, and enhancing diaphragmatic contractibility (
7). Few studies (
8,
9) have reported on the use of dEMG to measure the electrical activity of the diaphragm after caffeine citrate administration in neonates. Williams et al. (
8) observed that the dEMG amplitude peaked at 20 minutes after caffeine citrate loading-dose administration in preparation for extubation, in preterm infants born at < 34-week gestation. However, according to van Leuteren et al. (
10), the dEMG values in preterm infants can yield variable results depending on the location of device attachment and the respiratory rate of the infant, thus limiting the accuracy of dEMG-derived measurements.
In comparison, NAVA, which uses an Edi catheter that senses the electrical stimulation arousing diaphragmatic contraction, enables direct observation of the electrical signal from the respiratory center (
18) in both invasive (intubated) and non-invasive (non-intubated) modalities (
19-
21). Guidance in assessing the location where the electrical signal has been sensed is available, enabling frequent confirmation of the adequacy of catheter-insertion depth, which enhances the reliability of the Edi measurements obtained. Only one study to date has reported on the effect of caffeine citrate loading-dose administration in central apnea using the Edi technology in NAVA-mounted ventilators; however, the loading dose was administered at a later age (mean age of 3 postnatal days) and the effect of maintenance dose(s) administration or agent cessation was not analyzed compared with our study (
22).
In the present study, Edi
peak and Edi
min values were within the previously described ranges (
12,
23). Overall, both increased after administration of the caffeine citrate loading dose. When the nRR is ≥ 30/min, increases in Edi
peak, Edi
min, and phasic Edi, with a decrease in BU%, can be interpreted as a result of increased respiratory drive and effort to breathe due to the effects of caffeine. Despite statistical insignificance in a predominant portion of our study results due to the small sample size, they are consistent with previous studies that demonstrated increasing diaphragmatic activity via ultrasound (
24) or Edi technology after caffeine citrate administration (
8,
22). This trend may be attributed to the respiratory center-stimulatory action of caffeine citrate, resulting in increased neural respiratory drive and diaphragmatic activation. This phenomenon seems to be better observed in infants born at < 28-week gestation or those with birthweights < 1250 g, possibly due to the underlying respiratory prematurity with insufficient respiratory drive which is stimulated by the action of caffeine citrate.
The Edi values tended to increase after caffeine citrate administration in infants on invasive NAVA support, which could be attributed to the fact that those who have more unfavorable postnatal lung conditions necessitating intubation would likely have been more premature and of lesser weight.
The Edi levels tended to increase after caffeine citrate loading-dose administration when the PEEP was set at ≥ 6 cmH
2O or the NAVA level was set at ≥ 1.5. This may imply that appropriate ventilator settings may not only provide the set respiratory support, but also possibly maximize the action of the medication used. Although optimal PEEP levels in preterm infants have not been established due to insufficient evidence (
25), some expert opinions and research mention the importance of a PEEP sufficiently high to recruit alveoli (
26,
27) and maintain functional residual capacity. Provision of appropriate PEEP levels may not only be important for preventing alveolar collapse to reduce diaphragmatic tension, but also for maximizing the inspiratory contraction activity via the effect of caffeine citrate.
Regarding the Edi values after caffeine citrate discontinuation, the Edi
peak showed an increasing trend regardless of the duration or cumulative dose of caffeine citrate administered. On discontinuation of caffeine citrate, which stimulates the central respiratory system, its effects gradually diminish over time, leading to an increase in apnea and hypoxemic episodes. Since the half-life of caffeine citrate in preterm infants can extend from 48 to 96 hours (
16,
17), its effects would have waned by 24 - 48 hours after discontinuation compared to the first 24 hours. Consequently, a rebound in apnea/desaturation episodes may occur more frequently during this later period. The increased respiratory effort in response may have been reflected in the rise of Edi
peak values in the later hours of drug discontinuation. Meanwhile, a similar result was observed only in infants who stopped the medication before a PMA of 36 weeks but not in those who stopped at a PMA of ≥ 36 weeks. This trend may be attributed to the different maturational status of respiratory muscles depending on the PMA of preterm infants. While it may be an indicator of active diaphragmatic contraction, it may also be attributed to a greater breathing workload. Our findings are insufficient to determine the age at which discontinuation of caffeine administration is safe, and considering the wide variation in policy for the time point of caffeine citrate discontinuation in different institutes (
28), monitoring the number of episodes of bradycardia and/or apnea for an increasing trend after caffeine citrate discontinuation is important, particularly if it occurs prior to term-equivalent age or depending on the level of respiratory support provided.
This study has some limitations. First, the small sample size resulted in a restricted analysis largely based on trends and not strict statistical significance. Because the patients did not undergo randomization for the study, we tried to reduce selection bias by using the consecutive sampling method. However, only two ventilators were equipped with NAVA software programs, and the infants stayed on NAVA support even after the initial measurements for the study were completed, throughout the time the physician deemed it necessary, since it would be unethical to withhold required ventilatory support for the infants. Hence, only limited number of patients could be enrolled due to the lack of ventilator availability. Second, although we sought to assess the effect of caffeine citrate on Edi changes, the infants enrolled in our study were administrated the medication relatively early during the postnatal period compared with previous studies (
8,
22). Since various dynamic changes due to active procedures and treatment (such as surfactant replacement) occurred during these hours, in addition to normal neural respiratory transition (
23), they may have conferred confounding effects, making it more challenging to yield significant results. Third, whether the caffeine citrate levels were within the therapeutic range when the Edi values were obtained was not assessed in this study. As most enrolled patients were very preterm infants, repetitive blood-sample collection from this vulnerable population was considered invasive. Moreover, other means of measurement (such as saliva) (
29) were technologically limited. Finally, we defined the point of caffeine discontinuation as a range and not one time point. This was based on the observation that the half-life of caffeine citrate is variable (
16,
17). Furthermore, when considering the working environment of the NICU, the Edi catheter re-insertion was deemed safer under the supervision of a study team member for the purpose of measurement and not for urgent respiratory support as in the immediate postnatal period. However, long-term measurements beyond the predetermined range were not included in the study protocol to maximize the ventilator availability for future patients, which resulted in our inability to assess the sustained effects of drug cessation.
Despite the lack of definitive statistical significance due to the limited sample size, this study provides valuable insights on the effects of caffeine citrate on diaphragmatic activity in preterm infants, as reflected in increased Edi
peak and Edi
min values following caffeine administration. These changes, particularly prominent in infants with greater respiratory immaturity and on invasive NAVA support, highlight the role of caffeine in enhancing respiratory drive. The influence of ventilatory settings such as PEEP on Edi values suggests that appropriate respiratory support may augment the effects of caffeine. The rebound in Edi
peak values after caffeine cessation, especially in infants with lower PMA, underscores the need for close monitoring post-discontinuation, which has not been concretely discussed in previous studies. Although limited by statistical power, these findings provide preliminary data on the impact of caffeine on neonatal respiratory function, based on Edi values and possibly offer a foundation for future research to optimize treatment strategies. The small sample size was determined by practical constraints rather than by a priori power analysis. Consequently, the power of the study may not have been sufficient to detect statistically significant differences. Nonetheless, the trends observed in the Edi values in relation to caffeine administration/cessation suggest clinically relevant changes that warrant further investigation in larger, adequately powered studies. Additionally, a tailored design may provide more conclusive results and suggest an optimal administration timing and dose range, which remain unclear (
30,
31), to maximize therapeutic effects while minimizing side effects. The scope of future studies could be extended to delineating diaphragmatic activity changes impacted by not only caffeine citrate, but other agents (such as endotracheal surfactant therapy) or treatment modalities (such as different ventilator modes/settings or weaning protocols) for improving respiration.
5.1. Conclusions
Edipeak and Edimin, which show variable values depending on intact neural breathing, tended to increase following caffeine citrate loading-dose administration. The Edi values showed different trends depending on perinatal factors and ventilatory support settings. Moreover, our study indicates that it may be particularly prudent to monitor changes in clinical symptoms in infants with near-term PMA after caffeine citrate cessation.