The present study aimed to assess the potential correlations between umbilical cord blood Zn concentrations and neonatal anthropometric parameters. Although the beneficial effects of micronutrients like Zn on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes have been reported by previous evidence (
27-
29), our results align with the results of a meta-analysis (
19) suggesting that cord blood Zn levels may not exert a significant influence on neonatal growth outcomes.
The mean cord blood Zn level was found to be 107.7 µg/dL, with none of the neonates showing Zn deficiency, suggesting that maternal supplementation during pregnancy was effective in maintaining adequate Zn status in newborns. Fortunately, most pregnant women in our center received prenatal care from the first trimester of gestation. Supplements, including folic acid and iron, were administered to them based on the national protocol. In addition, during the second and third trimesters, pregnant women routinely took prenatal multivitamins containing vitamins and minerals. While this aligns with studies that emphasize the benefits of maternal Zn supplementation for fetal health (
30,
31), the lack of a significant association between cord blood Zn and neonatal anthropometric measures may indicate that Zn’s role in fetal growth is complex. It is possible that Zn may play a more prominent role in postnatal growth and development (
30), rather than exerting measurable effects on birth parameters. It also seems that larger sample sizes, through affecting variables, may influence the results.
The results of this study were in agreement with the results of Daniali et al. (
22), who, through a cross-sectional study, evaluated the relationships between cord blood Zn concentrations and anthropometric measures in 226 neonates. The authors demonstrated no significant correlations between cord blood Zn levels and neonate height (P = 0.792), head circumference (P = 0.697), abdominal circumference (P = 0.785), chest circumference (P = 0.498), sex (P = 0.632), or Apgar score (P = 0.673). However, cord blood Zn level was significantly correlated with the neonate’s birth weight (β = 0.178; P = 0.02). In accordance with our findings, the results of a systematic review (
32) have shown that maternal Zn supplementation did not significantly improve neonatal outcomes.
Amini et al. (
23) demonstrated an inverse correlation between cord blood Zn levels and neonate birth weight (P = 0.008); however, no significant relationships were observed between blood Zn concentrations and other anthropometric measures like length or head circumference (P > 0.05). In contrast to our findings, several studies have shown diverse results. A systematic review (
33) delineated a significant correlation between maternal Zn supplementation and neonate birth weight or length in 3 out of 9 included studies, while these findings were not confirmed by the other 6 studies. The results of a systematic review and meta-analysis (
15) also demonstrated a significant correlation between cord blood Zn and neonate birth weight. Bayomy et al. (
34) showed a significant and positive correlation between serum Zn levels and term neonate anthropometric measures, including weight, height, and head circumference.
Gomez et al. (
13), in a case-control study, evaluated umbilical cord blood Zn levels in 123 neonates with different gestational ages and birth weights. The results of their study indicated significant correlations between umbilical cord Zn status and neonate birth weight and gestational age. Seriana et al. (
35) showed significant relationships between Zn status at term pregnancy and the neonate’s height (P = 0.026) and head circumference (P = 0.012). On the other hand, this significant correlation was not observed with the neonate’s birth weight. Nanbakhsh and Tabrizi (
16) also evaluated umbilical cord blood Zn levels in pregnant women. According to their findings, mothers with Zn levels > 70 µg/dL had neonates with birth weights > 3500 g, while mothers with Zn levels < 60 µg/dL had neonates with birth weights < 3000 g. Their results also showed that the mean Zn level in low-birth-weight neonates was significantly lower than in their normal-birth-weight counterparts.
These diverse results across studies might relate to differences in sample size, study design, including Zn assessment methods, study population, Zn metabolism, genetic factors, supplementation status, or participants’ gestational age. It is suggested that more investigations with larger sample sizes, considering more variables like prenatal supplementation status, maternal underlying diseases, perinatal complications, placental abnormalities, neonates’ gestational age, and health status, are needed.
According to the results, cord blood Zn level was not correlated with neonates' sex, Apgar scores, blood pH, or base excess. However, this also underscores the need for further research.
One of the confounding factors in the present study might be related to the use of supplements from different commercial brands. We assessed the available prenatal supplements in the market and found that the level of zinc was consistent (25 mg Zn). The study results should be interpreted with consideration of its limitations, such as the cross-sectional study design and relatively homogeneous population. Since non-supplemented mothers were not included in the study and the results showed no Zn-deficient mothers, we could not compare the neonates’ growth parameters in Zn-sufficient and Zn-deficient mothers.
Case-control studies with larger sample sizes and longitudinal follow-up are recommended to provide more informative insights into post-natal growth and development. Moreover, including multiple gestations and preterm neonates, as well as maternal lifestyle habits (nutritional and smoking status), biomarkers related to Zn metabolism, hematologic disorders like anemia, and placental complications, are factors that may influence the findings. Future investigations including such variables are suggested.
5.1. Conclusions
Although adequate Zn levels were observed in all neonates, these levels did not significantly influence neonatal anthropometric measures or immediate health indicators. Further studies with larger sample sizes are recommended to provide more comparative data, particularly regarding long-term growth outcomes.