Logo
Inn J Pediatr

Image Credit:Inn J Pediatr

Association Between UGT1A1 Gene Polymorphisms and Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia

Author(s):
Mahmoud ImaniMahmoud ImaniMahmoud Imani ORCID1, Seyed Alireza HosseiniSeyed Alireza Hosseini1, Mohamad HashemiMohamad HashemiMohamad Hashemi ORCID2, Gholamreza BahariGholamreza BahariGholamreza Bahari ORCID2,*
1Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
2Department of Clinical Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran

Innovative Journal of Pediatrics:Vol. In Press, issue In Press; e162929
Published online:Jul 14, 2025
Article type:Research Article
Received:May 21, 2025
Accepted:Jun 24, 2025
How to Cite:Imani M, Hosseini S A, Hashemi M, Bahari G. Association Between UGT1A1 Gene Polymorphisms and Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia.Inn J Pediatr.2025;In Press(In Press):e162929.https://doi.org/10.5812/ijpediatr-162929.

Abstract

Background:

Uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) is a critical enzyme involved in bilirubin conjugation. The UGT1A1 gene, located on chromosome 2q37, encodes this enzyme. Polymorphisms within the coding region or promoter of the gene may lead to reduced enzyme activity, resulting in elevated levels of unconjugated serum bilirubin.

Objectives:

The present study aimed to evaluate the association between the UGT1A1 rs3755319 and rs201295078 polymorphisms and neonatal hyperbilirubinemia.

Methods:

This case–control study was conducted on 110 newborns with hyperbilirubinemia and 112 healthy newborns without the condition. Genomic DNA was extracted using the salting-out method. Genotyping of the rs3755319 A/C and rs201295078 (14-bp I/D) polymorphisms was performed using tetra-primer amplification refractory mutation system-polymerase chain reaction (T-ARMS-PCR) and conventional PCR, respectively.

Results:

The results demonstrated that the rs3755319 AA genotype, as well as the A allele, significantly increased the risk of hyperbilirubinemia compared to the CC genotype (OR = 8.23, 95% CI = 2.31 - 25.18, P < 0.001 for AA vs. CC; and OR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.23 - 2.62, P = 0.002 for A vs. C). However, no significant association was observed between the rs201295078 (14-bp I/D) polymorphism and the risk of hyperbilirubinemia.

Conclusions:

In conclusion, our findings indicate a significant association between the rs3755319 variant of the UGT1A1 gene and an increased risk of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia.

1. Background

Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia (NH), a common condition in newborns, occurs in up to 60% of healthy full-term infants (1). This clinical issue arises when the total serum bilirubin (TSB) level exceeds 5 mg/dL, potentially progressing to severe neonatal jaundice (2). In such cases, NH can lead to neurodevelopmental complications, including hearing loss, cognitive impairment, and athetosis. In its most severe form, it may result in seizures, coma, or death.

It has been proposed that genetic, demographic, and environmental factors contribute to the risk of NH (3, 4). Genetic variations, in combination with other icterogenic factors, may significantly increase susceptibility to NH (5, 6). Among these genetic contributors, uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) has been strongly associated with NH (7, 8). UGT1A1 plays a crucial role in bilirubin conjugation (9). The gene is located on chromosome 2q37, and polymorphisms within its coding region or promoter can lead to reduced enzyme activity. This enzymatic deficiency results in elevated levels of unconjugated serum bilirubin, which manifests clinically as hyperbilirubinemia-related conditions such as Gilbert’s syndrome (GS) and Crigler-Najjar syndrome (CNS) (9-11).

Several polymorphisms of UGT1A1 have been identified in GS and CNS, including Gly71Arg and variants in the TATA-box promoter region (12, 13). In addition to these well-known mutations, other polymorphisms such as rs3755319 A/C and rs201295078 (14-bp insertion/deletion, I/D) also exist within the UGT1A1 gene. Associations between the rs3755319 polymorphism and conditions such as congenital heart disease (14), colorectal cancer (15), and tuberculosis (16) have been explored in previous studies.

While the roles of the UGT1A1 Gly71Arg and TATA promoter polymorphisms in NH have been widely studied across various populations and ethnic groups (1, 17-20), no published case–control study has yet evaluated the association between UGT1A1 rs3755319 and rs201295078 variants and susceptibility to NH.

2. Objectives

In the current case–control study, we aimed to explore the correlation between UGT1A1 rs3755319 and rs201295078 gene polymorphisms and neonatal hyperbilirubinemia (NH) in an Iranian population.

3. Methods

3.1. Subjects

This case–control investigation was conducted on 110 newborns with hyperbilirubinemia (cases) and 112 healthy newborns (controls) at Ali-Ebne-Abitaleb Hospital, affiliated with Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran. The study received ethical approval from the local Ethics Committee of Zahedan University of Medical Sciences (IR.ZAUMS.REC.1391.5795). Prior to participation, written informed consent was obtained from the parents of all subjects. As previously described, genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral blood samples (21).

3.2. Genotyping

To genotype the rs3755319 A/C polymorphism, the tetra-primer amplification refractory mutation system polymerase chain reaction (T-ARMS-PCR) method was employed. Primer sequences are listed in Table 1. The product sizes were 192 bp for the A allele, 254 bp for the C allele, and 390 bp for the two outer primers (control band) (Figure 1). Each 20 μL PCR reaction contained 1 μL of DNA (approximately 100 ng/μL), 1 μL of each primer, 10 μL of 2X Prime Taq Premix, and 5 μL of double-distilled water (ddH2O were added. The conditions for PCR cycling were determined as follows: Five minutes initial denaturation at 95°C, followed by 30 cycles consisting 30 seconds denaturation at 95°C, 30 seconds annealing at 57°C, and 30 seconds at 72°C for extension. A final extension was established at 72°C for 5 minutes. In order to analyze the PCR results, electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel supplemented with ethidium bromide was used. Subsequently results were visualized under UV).

Table 1.The Primers Used for Detection of UGT1A1 rs3755319 and rs201295078 Gene Polymorphisms
PolymorphismPCR primers (5'→3')Method
UGT1A1 (rs3755319)T-ARMS-PCR
FOTGGGATCTGTGCAGTTATCTTGGAATTG
ROCCTTGTGTTCTGTGGAACTCACCTTCAT
FI (C allele)TGCTCATCTTTCCCTTTTGACTTCGAC
RI (A allele)AGGCATTTGGGGAAATTCTGATGACTAAT
UGT1A1 (rs201295078 14-bp I/D)PCR
FATCGTGTGGGTCCTGAATTGG
RTATTCCCAGTCAGAGGCGCTA

The Primers Used for Detection of UGT1A1 rs3755319 and rs201295078 Gene Polymorphisms

Tetra amplification refractory mutation system-polymerase chain reaction (T-ARMS-PCR) for detection of rs3755319 A/C polymorphisms of the <i>UGT1A1</i> gene (M = DNA marker, AA = 192 bp, CC = 254 bp, control = 390 bp).
Figure 1.

Tetra amplification refractory mutation system-polymerase chain reaction (T-ARMS-PCR) for detection of rs3755319 A/C polymorphisms of the UGT1A1 gene (M = DNA marker, AA = 192 bp, CC = 254 bp, control = 390 bp).

The PCR cycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 minutes, followed by 30 cycles of 30 seconds at 95°C (denaturation), 30 seconds at 57°C (annealing), and 30 seconds at 72°C (extension). A final extension step was performed at 72°C for 5 minutes. PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide, and bands were visualized under UV illumination.

3.3. PCR Conditions for rs201295078

The rs201295078 (14-bp insertion/deletion, I/D) polymorphism was detected using a conventional PCR method. PCR cycling conditions included an initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 minutes, followed by 30 cycles of 30 seconds at 95°C (denaturation), 27 seconds at 66°C (annealing), and 30 seconds at 72°C (extension), with a final extension at 72°C for 10 minutes. The resulting fragment sizes were 114 bp for the insertion allele and 100 bp for the deletion allele (Figure 2).

Amplification refractory mutation system-polymerase chain reaction (ARMS-PCR) for detection of rs201295078 (14-bp I/D) polymorphisms of the <i>UGT1A1</i> gene (M = DNA marker, Ins = 114 bp and Del = 100 bp).
Figure 2.

Amplification refractory mutation system-polymerase chain reaction (ARMS-PCR) for detection of rs201295078 (14-bp I/D) polymorphisms of the UGT1A1 gene (M = DNA marker, Ins = 114 bp and Del = 100 bp).

3.4. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 21.0. The independent samples t-test was used to analyze continuous variables, and the chi-square (χ2) test was employed for categorical data. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between UGT1A1 rs3755319 and rs201295078 polymorphisms and the risk of NH by calculating odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3.5. In Silico Analysis

TFBIND was utilized to assess the potential impact of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on transcriptional regulation. This tool predicts transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) within a DNA sequence by comparing it to known consensus motifs. The output includes the predicted transcription factor name, binding position, strand orientation, and a similarity score ranging from 0 to 1. Higher similarity scores indicate a stronger match between the input sequence and the TFBS consensus, suggesting a greater likelihood of transcription factor binding. By comparing the scores of wild-type and mutant alleles, one can infer whether a specific SNP enhances or disrupts transcription factor binding, potentially influencing gene expression (22).

4. Results

Totally 222 neonates including 110 neonates (ages: 6.1 ± 2.1days; male/female = 54/56) with and 112 without hyperbilirubinemia (ages: 6.8 ± 2.9 days; male/female = 54/58) enrolled in the study. No significant difference was detected in age and gander across the groups (P = 0.378 and 0.793, respectively). Genotypes and allelic frequencies of the variants are shown in Table 2. The results of this study showed that the UGT1A1 rs3755319 increased the risk of hyperbilirubinemia within codominant (OR = 8.23, 95%CI = 2.31 - 25.18, P < 0.001, AA vs CC), recessive (OR = 4.25, 95% CI = 4.87 - 41.65, P < 0.001, AA vs CC+CA) genetic model. The A allele is associated with increased risk of hyperbilirubinemia (OR = 1.80, 95%CI = 1.23 - 2.62, P = 0.002) in compared to C allele.

Table 2.Genotype and Allele Frequency of UGT1A1 Gene Variants in Newborns with Hyperbilirubinemia and Control Subjects
UGT1A1 VariantsCaseControlOR (95%CI)P-Value
rs3755319
Codominant
CC15 (13.6)13 (11.6)1.00-
CA57 (51.8)95 (84.8)0.52 (0.23 - 1.14)0.142
AA38 (34.6)4 (3.6)8.23 (2.31 - 25.18)< 0.001
Dominant
CC15 (13.6)13 (11.6)1.00
CA+AA95 (86.4)99 (88.4)0.83 (0.38 - 1.84)0.689
Recessive
CC+CA72(65.4)108(96.4)1.00-
AA38 (34.6)4 (3.6)4.25 (4.87 - 41.65)< 0.001
Allele
C87 (39.5)121 (54.0)1.00-
A133 (60.5)103(46.0)1.80 (1.23 - 2.62)0.002
rs201295078
Codominant
ins/ins80 (72.7)79 (70.5)1.00-
ins/del28 (25.5)30 (26.8)0.92 (0.51 - 1.68)0.790
del/del2 (1.8)3 (2.7)0.66 (0.11 - 4.05)0.652
Dominant
ins/ins80 (72.7)79 (70.5)1.00
ins/del+del/del30 (27.3)33 (29.5)0.90 (0.50 - 1.61)0.767
Recessive
ins/ins+ins/del108(98.2)109(97.3)1.00
del/del2 (1.8)3 (2.7)0.67(0.11 - 4.11)0.666
Allele
Ins188 (85.5)188 (83.9)1.00-
del32 (14.5)36 (16.1)0.89(0.53 - 1.49)0.693

Genotype and Allele Frequency of UGT1A1 Gene Variants in Newborns with Hyperbilirubinemia and Control Subjects

It was revealed through our analysis that neither the overall chi-square comparison (χ2 = 2.37, P = 0.123) nor the logistic regression analysis within codominant (OR = 0.92, 95%CI = 0.51 - 1.68, P = 0.790; ins/del vs ins/ins; OR = 0.66, 95%CI = 0.11 - 4.05, P = 0.652; del/del vs ins/ins), dominant (OR = 0.90, 95%CI = 0.50 - 1.61, P = 0.767; ins/del+del/del vs ins/ins), recessive (OR = 0.67, 95%CI = 0.11 - 4.11, P = 0.666; del/del vs ins/ins+ ins/del) showed any correlation between UGT1A1 rs201295078 polymorphism and hyperbilirubinemia (Table 2). The results showed that rs201295078 del allele is not associated with hyperbilirubinemia in comparison with insertion allele (OR = 0.89, 95%CI = 0.53 - 1.49, P = 0.693).

The correlation between UGT1A1 genotypes and serum bilirubin levels is shown in Table 3. No statistically significant associations were observed between serum bilirubin concentration and any of the UGT1A1 gene polymorphisms.

Table 3.Relationship Between Genotypes of UGT1A1 Gene Polymorphisms and Serum Bilirubin Levels
Parametersrs3755319P-Valuers201295078P-Value
AAACCCIns/InsIns/DelDel/Del
Total bilirubin 19.22 ± 5.4719.34 ± 5.8219.23 ± 4.730.99319.05 ± 5.7719.84 ± 4.8920.75 ± 4.030.745
Direct Bilirubin0.63 ± 0.240.62 ± 0.220.61 ± 0.230.9630.62 ± 0.230.66 ± 0.220.55 ± 0.350.620
Indirect Bilirubin18.58 ± 5.3718.72 ± 5.7218.62 ± 4.60.99218.44 ± 5.6619.19 ± 4.8420.20 ± 3.680.749

Relationship Between Genotypes of UGT1A1 Gene Polymorphisms and Serum Bilirubin Levels

In silico analysis using TFBIND revealed that the rs3755319 SNP may alter transcription factor (TF) binding. A comparison of wild-type and mutant alleles showed that several TFs — including CAAT, CDPCR1, GFI1, OCT, OCT1, and PBX1 — were predicted to bind to the wild-type sequence but lost their binding affinity in the presence of the mutant allele. This loss suggests a potential disruption in transcriptional regulation mediated by these factors. For example, OCT1 is known to modulate gene activation or repression depending on the biological context, while PBX1 is frequently implicated in the regulation of genes involved in cellular differentiation and development (23, 24).

Conversely, TFs such as ATF, ELK1, TAXCREB, VMAF, and ZID, which were not predicted to bind to the wild-type sequence, were identified as putative binding factors in the mutant allele. These newly introduced TF binding motifs may influence gene expression. For instance, ELK1, a transcription factor activated by cellular stress and the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway, typically functions as a transcriptional activator and may contribute to increased gene expression (25, 26) (Figure 3).

Output of TFBIND for both the wild-type and mutant alleles of rs3755319, transcription factors (TFs) that displayed differential binding due to the presence of the SNP were identified.
Figure 3.

Output of TFBIND for both the wild-type and mutant alleles of rs3755319, transcription factors (TFs) that displayed differential binding due to the presence of the SNP were identified.

5. Discussion

Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia is a common clinical condition affecting newborns (27). The NH results from imbalances in bilirubin synthesis and conjugation, which are primarily due to the immaturity of hepatic metabolic pathways. This leads to increased bilirubin production, impaired hepatic uptake, deficient conjugation, and enhanced enterohepatic circulation. Despite these known factors, the precise etiology of NH remains unclear (28).

Previous research has shown that the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase enzyme plays a crucial role in bilirubin metabolism. This enzyme is encoded by the UGT1A1 gene (29, 30). Genetic polymorphisms in UGT1A1 may occur in various genomic regions, including the promoter, introns, coding exons, splice sites, and distal enhancer elements (31).

Although many studies have evaluated the association between UGT1A1 polymorphisms and NH risk, most of them have focused on two well-known variants: Gly71Arg and the TATA-box promoter polymorphism. Therefore, in the current study, we investigated the correlation between two other UGT1A1 polymorphisms — rs3755319 (A/C) and rs201295078 (14-bp I/D) — and the risk of NH.

Our findings revealed a significant association between the rs3755319 variant and increased susceptibility to hyperbilirubinemia. However, no association was found between rs201295078 and NH. Furthermore, neither polymorphism showed any correlation with serum bilirubin levels.

As previously mentioned, earlier studies have concentrated primarily on the Gly71Arg and TATA-box promoter variants. Some of these investigations found positive associations with NH risk, while others reported no significant findings. In addition to case–control studies, several meta-analyses have been conducted on this topic.

A meta-analysis by Wang et al. included 34 studies — 21 evaluating the Gly71Arg variant and 13 assessing the TATA promoter variant. The results indicated that Gly71Arg was associated with increased NH risk in Asian and African populations, while the TATA promoter variant was linked to NH in Asian and European populations (32).

Similarly, a meta-analysis by Yu et al. identified 32 eligible studies (24 on Gly71Arg and 19 on TATA promoter variants). Their analysis confirmed a significant association between both variants and increased NH susceptibility (33). However, in contrast to these findings, Li and colleagues conducted a meta-analysis that included four studies and found no significant association between the TATA promoter variant and NH risk across allelic, codominant, dominant, or recessive genetic models (34).

Mehrad-Majd et al. (2019) also performed a meta-analysis focusing on the Gly71Arg variant. They included 32 studies and reported that this polymorphism was significantly associated with NH in all genetic models — codominant, dominant, recessive, and allelic. A similar association was confirmed in a subgroup analysis of Asian populations (28).

The rs3755319 polymorphism has also been studied in relation to other diseases. Tao et al. assessed its effect in congenital heart diseases, evaluating four maternal UGT1A1 variants, including rs3755319, and found no significant association (14). Xiao-ling et al. investigated rs3755319 in a study involving 690 colorectal cancer patients and 431 controls, and also reported no significant correlation (15). In contrast, Chen et al. conducted a meta-analysis evaluating UGT polymorphisms and the risk of anti-tuberculosis drug-induced liver injury. Their pooled results demonstrated a significant association between rs3755319 and increased susceptibility to this condition (35).

5.1. Conclusions

Our findings support a significant association between the rs3755319 variant of the UGT1A1 gene and the risk of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. To validate these results, further studies with larger sample sizes and diverse ethnic groups are recommended. Future research should also explore the role of transcriptional regulatory elements and the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway in the pathogenesis of NH.

Footnotes

References

  • 1.
    Atasilp C, Kanjanapipak J, Vichayaprasertkul J, Jinda P, Tiyasirichokchai R, Srisawasdi P, et al. Associations between UGT1A1 and SLCO1B1 polymorphisms and susceptibility to neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in Thai population. BMC Pediatr. 2022;22(1):243. [PubMed ID: 35501760]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9059389]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03311-4.
  • 2.
    Porter ML, Dennis BL. Hyperbilirubinemia in the term newborn. Am Fam Physician. 2002;65(4):599-606. [PubMed ID: 11871676].
  • 3.
    Maisels MJ. Risk assessment and follow-up are the keys to preventing severe hyperbilirubinemia. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2011;87(4):275-6. [PubMed ID: 21842108]. https://doi.org/10.2223/JPED.2120.
  • 4.
    Watchko JF, Tiribelli C. Bilirubin-induced neurologic damage--mechanisms and management approaches. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(21):2021-30. [PubMed ID: 24256380]. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1308124.
  • 5.
    Agrawal SK, Kumar P, Rathi R, Sharma N, Das R, Prasad R, et al. UGT1A1 gene polymorphisms in North Indian neonates presenting with unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia. Pediatr Res. 2009;65(6):675-80. [PubMed ID: 19430380]. https://doi.org/10.1203/PDR.0b013e31819ed5de.
  • 6.
    Watchko JF, Lin Z, Clark RH, Kelleher AS, Walker MW, Spitzer AR, et al. Complex multifactorial nature of significant hyperbilirubinemia in neonates. Pediatrics. 2009;124(5):e868-77. [PubMed ID: 19858149]. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-0460.
  • 7.
    Watchko JF, Lin Z. Exploring the genetic architecture of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;15(3):169-75. [PubMed ID: 20022574]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2009.11.003.
  • 8.
    Wong FL, Wang MK, Boo NY, Hamidah NH, Ainoon BO. Rapid detection of the UGT1A1 single nucleotide polymorphism G211A using real-time PCR with Taqman minor groove binder probes. J Clin Lab Anal. 2007;21(3):167-72. [PubMed ID: 17506482]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6648959]. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.20177.
  • 9.
    Gong QH, Cho JW, Huang T, Potter C, Gholami N, Basu NK, et al. Thirteen UDPglucuronosyltransferase genes are encoded at the human UGT1 gene complex locus. Pharmacogenetics. 2001;11(4):357-68. [PubMed ID: 11434514]. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008571-200106000-00011.
  • 10.
    Kraemer D, Klinker H. Crigler-Najjar syndrome type II in a caucasian patient resulting from two mutations in the bilirubin uridine 5'-diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT1A1) gene. J Hepatol. 2002;36(5):706-7. [PubMed ID: 11983459]. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-8278(02)00034-x.
  • 11.
    Kadakol A, Ghosh SS, Sappal BS, Sharma G, Chowdhury JR, Chowdhury NR. Genetic lesions of bilirubin uridine-diphosphoglucuronate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT1A1) causing Crigler-Najjar and Gilbert syndromes: correlation of genotype to phenotype. Hum Mutat. 2000;16(4):297-306. [PubMed ID: 11013440]. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-1004(200010)16:4.
  • 12.
    Huang CS, Chang PF, Huang MJ, Chen ES, Hung KL, Tsou KI. Relationship between bilirubin UDP-glucuronosyl transferase 1A1 gene and neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Pediatr Res. 2002;52(4):601-5. [PubMed ID: 12357057]. https://doi.org/10.1203/00006450-200210000-00022.
  • 13.
    Ferraris A, D'Amato G, Nobili V, Torres B, Marcellini M, Dallapiccola B. Combined test for UGT1A1 -3279T-->G and A(TA)nTAA polymorphisms best predicts Gilbert's syndrome in Italian pediatric patients. Genet Test. 2006;10(2):121-5. [PubMed ID: 16792515]. https://doi.org/10.1089/gte.2006.10.121.
  • 14.
    Tao J, Li N, Liu Z, Deng Y, Li X, Luo F, et al. Polymorphisms in gene UGT1A1 modify the association of prenatal exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with congenital heart diseases risk. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2023;36(1):2183743. [PubMed ID: 36878495]. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2023.2183743.
  • 15.
    Xiao-ling KONG, Wei-wei HONG, Xiao-mei ZHANG. [Relationship between polymorphism of mismatch repair and metabolic enzyme genes and colorectal cancer]. Chinese Journal of Public Health. 2020;36(3):359-63.
  • 16.
    Naidoo A, Ramsuran V, Chirehwa M, Denti P, McIlleron H, Naidoo K, et al. Effect of genetic variation in UGT1A and ABCB1 on moxifloxacin pharmacokinetics in South African patients with tuberculosis. Pharmacogenomics. 2018;19(1):17-29. [PubMed ID: 29210323]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5753622]. https://doi.org/10.2217/pgs-2017-0144.
  • 17.
    Zhou J, Yang C, Zhu W, Chen S, Zeng Y, Wang J, et al. Identification of Genetic Risk Factors for Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia in Fujian Province, Southeastern China: A Case-Control Study. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:7803175. [PubMed ID: 30298137]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6157199]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7803175.
  • 18.
    Halis H, Ergin H, Koseler A, Atalay EO. The role of UGT1A1 promoter polymorphism and exon-1 mutations in neonatal jaundice. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(22):2658-64. [PubMed ID: 27842454]. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2016.1261105.
  • 19.
    Travan L, Lega S, Crovella S, Montico M, Panontin E, Demarini S. Severe neonatal hyperbilirubinemia and UGT1A1 promoter polymorphism. J Pediatr. 2014;165(1):42-5. [PubMed ID: 24726540]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.03.013.
  • 20.
    Tiwari PK, Bhutada A, Agarwal R, Basu S, Raman R, Kumar A. UGT1A1 gene variants and clinical risk factors modulate hyperbilirubinemia risk in newborns. J Perinatol. 2014;34(2):120-4. [PubMed ID: 24232666]. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2013.140.
  • 21.
    Hashemi M, Moazeni-Roodi AK, Fazaeli A, Sandoughi M, Bardestani GR, Kordi-Tamandani DM, et al. Lack of association between paraoxonase-1 Q192R polymorphism and rheumatoid arthritis in southeast Iran. Genet Mol Res. 2010;9(1):333-9. [PubMed ID: 20198589]. https://doi.org/10.4238/vol9-1gmr728.
  • 22.
    Tsunoda T, Takagi T. Estimating transcription factor bindability on DNA. Bioinformatics. 1999;15(7-8):622-30. [PubMed ID: 10487870]. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/15.7.622.
  • 23.
    Shakya A, Kang J, Chumley J, Williams MA, Tantin D. Oct1 is a switchable, bipotential stabilizer of repressed and inducible transcriptional states. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(1):450-9. [PubMed ID: 21051540]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3013004]. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.174045.
  • 24.
    Crisafulli L, Brindisi M, Liturri MG, Sobacchi C, Ficara F. PBX1: a TALE of two seasons-key roles during development and in cancer. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024;12:1372873. [PubMed ID: 38404687]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10884236]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2024.1372873.
  • 25.
    Bahrami S, Drablos F. Gene regulation in the immediate-early response process. Adv Biol Regul. 2016;62:37-49. [PubMed ID: 27220739]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbior.2016.05.001.
  • 26.
    Shan J, Dudenhausen E, Kilberg MS. Induction of early growth response gene 1 (EGR1) by endoplasmic reticulum stress is mediated by the extracellular regulated kinase (ERK) arm of the MAPK pathways. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2019;1866(3):371-81. [PubMed ID: 30290239]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6311436]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2018.09.009.
  • 27.
    Dennery PA, Seidman DS, Stevenson DK. Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(8):581-90. [PubMed ID: 11207355]. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200102223440807.
  • 28.
    Mehrad-Majd H, Haerian MS, Akhtari J, Ravanshad Y, Azarfar A, Mamouri G. Effects of Gly71Arg mutation in UGT1A1 gene on neonatal hyperbilirubinemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(10):1575-85. [PubMed ID: 29179591]. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1410789.
  • 29.
    Sato H, Uchida T, Toyota K, Nakamura T, Tamiya G, Kanno M, et al. Association of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in breast-fed infants with UGT1A1 or SLCOs polymorphisms. J Hum Genet. 2015;60(1):35-40. [PubMed ID: 25391605]. https://doi.org/10.1038/jhg.2014.98.
  • 30.
    Chen S, Tukey RH. Humanized UGT1 Mice, Regulation of UGT1A1, and the Role of the Intestinal Tract in Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia and Breast Milk-Induced Jaundice. Drug Metab Dispos. 2018;46(11):1745-55. [PubMed ID: 30093417]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6199628]. https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.118.083212.
  • 31.
    Liu D, Yu Q, Ning Q, Liu Z, Song J. The relationship between UGT1A1 gene & various diseases and prevention strategies. Drug Metab Rev. 2022;54(1):1-21. [PubMed ID: 34807779]. https://doi.org/10.1080/03602532.2021.2001493.
  • 32.
    Wang J, Yin J, Xue M, Lyu J, Wan Y. Roles of UGT1A1 Gly71Arg and TATA promoter polymorphisms in neonatal hyperbilirubinemia: A meta-analysis. Gene. 2020;736:144409. [PubMed ID: 32007587]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2020.144409.
  • 33.
    Yu Z, Zhu K, Wang L, Liu Y, Sun J. Association of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia with UGT1A1 gene polymorphisms: A meta-analysis. Medical science monitor: international medical journal of experimental and clinical research. 2015;21:3104. [PubMed ID: 26467199]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4612146]. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.894043.
  • 34.
    Li H, Zhang P. UGT1A1*28 gene polymorphism was not associated with the risk of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia: a meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021;34(24):4064-71. [PubMed ID: 31818155]. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1702962.
  • 35.
    Chen X, Hao Z, Wang N, Zhu J, Yi H, Tang S. Genetic Polymorphisms of UDP-Glucuronosyltransferases and Susceptibility to Antituberculosis Drug-Induced Liver Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Trop Med. 2023;2023:5044451. [PubMed ID: 37868740]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10586897]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5044451.

Crossmark
Crossmark
Checking
Share on
Cited by
Metrics

Purchasing Reprints

  • Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) handles bulk orders for article reprints for Brieflands. To place an order for reprints, please click here (   https://www.copyright.com/landing/reprintsinquiryform/ ). Clicking this link will bring you to a CCC request form where you can provide the details of your order. Once complete, please click the ‘Submit Request’ button and CCC’s Reprints Services team will generate a quote for your review.
Search Relations

Author(s):

Related Articles