Abstract
Background:
Hyperphenylalaninemia (HPA) and Phenylkeonuria (PKU) are metabolic errors caused by deficiency of phenylalanine hydroxylase enzyme, which results in increased level of phenylalanine. This increase is toxic to the growing brain.Objectives:
The purpose of this study was to compare the intellectual and developmental status in HPA and PKU children with normal population in national screening program.Patients and Methods:
In a historical cohort study, 41 PKU patients who had the inclusion criteria and 41 healthy children were evaluated. Wechsler preschool and primary scale of intelligence-3rd edition (WPPI-3) was used in order to assess the intellectual status of children 4 years and older and Ages and stages questionnaire (ASQ) was used to assess the developmental status of children 5 years and younger.Results:
In intellectual test comparison, the two groups showed significant difference in Wechsler’s performance intelligence score and some performance subscales (P-value < 0.01). In comparison of developmental status, no significant difference was observed between the two groups (P-value > 0.05).Conclusions:
Even with early diagnosis and treatment of PKU patients, these children show some deficiencies intellectually compared to normal children. This study emphasizes on necessity for screening intellectual and developmental status of PKU patients so that effective medical or educational measures can taken in case of deficiencies.Keywords
1. Background
HPA and PKU are metabolic errors caused by deficiency of the phenylalanine hydroxylase enzyme. This enzyme deficiency leads to defective metabolism of dietary proteins especially conversion of phenylalanine to tyrosine. Increasing phenylalanine is toxic for growing brain and causes disconnection of brain white matter pathways. Early diagnosis and ongoing and timely treatment (by restriction of phenylalanine diet) helps normalization of IQ (1-4).
It is observed that children with PKU who have high levels of phenylalanine (more than 6.6 milligrams per deciliter) and poor diet control have worse intellectual and functional status compared to those who have suitable diet (5, 6).
Following the diagnosis, metabolic center staffs are bound to support these patients, including their feeding program. Program setting should be coordinated by a physician and nutrition expert, and periodic testing of phenylalanine level and evaluation of nutritional status should be done during the life. It is better to evaluate these children weekly within the first year, and then monthly from one to five years old (7).
During the first six years, phenylalanine level is inversely proportional to intelligence, cognitive function and development. It is observed that PKUs under diets are lower than normal in terms of cognitive function and IQ (8). That is, early and continuous treatment does not necessarily cause normal IQ (9-11).
Screening helps provide early diagnosis and timely intervention (7) and it is emphasized that good metabolic control, especially during the first six years of life, is essential for prevention of defects in cognitive function and intelligence (8-15).
PKU screening program in Iran was initiated in 2006 and blood samples were taken from all newborns in third to fifth day of birth for the colorimetric screening. And those with phenylalanine as 4 mg/dL or above levels were referred to confirm the diagnosis by HPLC testing. Then, regular follow-ups are done for those who have phenylalanine levels of equal or more than 4 mg/dL and if the level of phenylalanine levels is 7 mg/dl and more, phenylalanine restriction diet starts (16), dietary supplements of iron, zinc, selenium, carnitine, vitamins and essential fatty acids are prescribed for all children with HPA and PKU up to 2 years of age, as the beneficial role of these materials in improvement of intellectual and functional status of these children has been proven (3, 17-25).
2. Objectives
This study compared intelligence and developmental status of children with PKU and HPA within the national screening program with normal population in Children’s medical center in Tehran.
4. Results
Overall 46 patients were investigated in case group, 5 of whom were excluded due to the non-classical PKU. In control group 50 children were investigated, 10 of whom were excluded due to the acute disease and use of drug. Finally, data from 41 patients in case and 41 children in control group was analyzed.
In the patient group, 21 (51.2%) were female and 20 (48.8%) were male, and in control group, 25 (61%) were female and 16 (39%) were male (P = 0.3).
Mean age in patient group was 37.5 ± 20 months and 37.3 ± 19 months in control group (P = 0.9). The differences between two groups in terms of age and gender were not statistically significant.
Mean level of phenylalanine in the patient group was 4.7 ± 3.1 mg/dL.
Results of Wechsler test for comparison of intelligence for two groups are shown in Table 1.
Results of Wechsler Test for Comparison of Intelligence in Case And Control Groupa
| Variables (Subtests) | Case | Control | P-Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9.4 ± 3.09 | 11.3 ± 3.4 | 0.12 | |
| 12.2 ± 5.1 | 13.8 ± 3.4 | 0.33 | |
| 10.13 ± 4.2 | 11.06 ± 3.03 | 0.49 | |
| 11.4 ± 4.8 | 12.6 ± 3.5 | 0.44 | |
| 11.4 ± 5.8 | 12.5 ± 3.3 | 0.54 | |
| 8.2 ± 5.01 | 12.8 ± 1.6 | 0.002 | |
| 10.6 ± 2.8 | 13.5 ± 2.1 | 0.004 | |
| 9.9 ± 2.9 | 12 ± 1.4 | 0.02 | |
| 9.4 ± 1.9 | 10.2 ± 2.04 | 0.32 | |
| 10.9 ± 4.1 | 13.8 ± 2.9 | 0.03 | |
| 102.9 ± 24.07 | 116 ± 12.2 | 0.05 | |
| 102.6 ± 36.4 | 115.2 ± 18.07 | 0.24 | |
| 99.06 ± 20.2 | 116.6 ± 9.1 | 0.005 |
Significant difference was observed between the two groups in the sub-tests of Animal House (P = 0.002), and picture completion (P = 0.004), as well as in total IQ score (P = 0.05) and performance IQ score (P = 0.005).
Comparison results of ASQ to assess the developmental status for two groups are shown in Table 2. No significant differences were found between the two groups (P > 0.05).
Results of ASQ Comparison Between Case and Control Groupsa
| Variables | Case | Control | P-Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 53.8 ± 9.7 | 55.2 ± 8.7 | 0.52 | |
| 55.8 ± 7.7 | 53.9 ± 12.2 | 0.43 | |
| 52.9 ± 10.08 | 49.9 ± 11.22 | 0.25 | |
| 54.4 ± 9.3 | 54.3 ± 7.04 | 0.96 | |
| 55.7 ± 7.1 | 54.6 ± 7.4 | 0.54 |
5. Discussion
The purpose of this study was to compare in framework of national screening program the intellectual and developmental status in HPA and PKU children with normal population. Current study is important because it investigated subtest of intelligence and developmental indexes in a group of PKU patients.
Our hypothesis was that PKU and HPA group is lower in terms of intelligence and development compared to the normal population. Current study showed that while significant differences were not found between the two groups in developmental indexes based on ASQ, the total IQ score was lower than normal in PKU group, and there were significant differences between them (P = 0.05). The performance IQ score in PKU group showed significant difference with the control group (P = 0.005). In relation with the sub-tests of performance IQ, animal house (P = 0.002) and Picture Completion (P = 0.004) tests showed significant difference between the 2 groups. The total score of verbal IQ and its sub-tests showed no significant difference between the two groups. Similar studies by other researchers showed a problem in the executive functions in this group of children.
Sherman and Rachael in a cohort study on 13 children with PKU, observed some mild defects in executive function. Half of these children showed defects in visuospatial skill and they had also a clear cut of the language understanding skills from age 6 to adolescence (4).
In the study by Leuzzi et al. 14 children with PKU were compared with 14 normal children by Wechsler test. All of them were normal in terms of IQ score. In order to evaluate executive functions (EF), subtests were also completed. All PKU patients showed lower scores than control group, which included sorting category, problem solving, planning, set shifting, attention and concentration (5).
Gassio et al. observed that PKU patients had significantly lower levels of spatial vision, visual memory, motor function and executive function compared to the control group (8).
In a study, 57 children with PKU were compared to normal population using Wechsler. Significant difference was observed in Wechsler sub-tests comparison between PKU group and normal group in terms of information, picture completion, object assembly, picture arrangement and coding. In other cases, i.e. the similarities, arithmetic, vocabulary and comprehension were not significantly different. In short, the two groups showed significant differences in performance sub-tests, but they showed no difference in verbal test except for information (9). The results of our study are almost in agreement with those of others.
Sajedi et al. compared problem-solving skills (related to ASQ) in the early treated PKU children with the control group, and showed a significant difference between the two groups regarding developmental indexes (17).
In another study by Nazi et al. (18), development of motor skills in 1 - 4 years old Iranian children with early treated PKU were studied. 70 early diagnosed children were compared to 100 healthy children. This study showed that in the area of fine and gross motor, there was a significant difference between the two groups; the difference was more obvious in the fine motor area. The peabody developmental motor scales (PDMS-2) was used. There are some differences in the results of our study on the developmental skills with other studies which may be due to low sample size in our study or possible weaknesses in the related test.
Small number of subjects is one of the limitations of this study, since it was conducted on children in national screening program referred to Children’s Medical Center. It is suggested that future studies will be done on a larger level, for example in the metropolis of Tehran to obtain more generalized results. Confounding factors also were involved in the study like in any other study. Weaknesses of intelligence and development tests is also undeniable.
Even with early diagnosis and proper diet, some defects are observed in intellectual status such as performance IQ score in children with PKU and HPA. Thus, it is recommended that with implementing screening programs for development and intelligence, timely detection of weaknesses in children with PKU is possible and useful medical and educational measures will be provided.
Acknowledgements
References
-
1.
Scriver CR. The PAH gene, phenylketonuria, and a paradigm shift. Hum Mutat. 2007;28(9):831-45. [PubMed ID: 17443661]. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.20526.
-
2.
Sarkissian CN, Gámez A, Scriver CR. What we know that could influence future treatment of phenylketonuria. J Inherit Metabol Dis. 2008;32(1):3-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10545-008-0917-7.
-
3.
van Spronsen FJ, Enns GM. Future treatment strategies in phenylketonuria. Mol Gene Metabol. 2010;99:S90-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgme.2009.10.008.
-
4.
Sharman RR. Neuropsychological development in children with early and continuously treated phenylketonuria: association with biochemical markers. Queensland: Queensland University of Technology; 2011.
-
5.
Leuzzi V, Pansini M, Sechi E, Chiarotti F, Carducci C, Levi G, et al. Executive function impairment in early-treated PKU subjects with normal mental development. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2004;27(2):115-25. [PubMed ID: 15159642]. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BOLI.0000028781.94251.1f.
-
6.
Bouchlariotou S, Tsikouras P, Maroulis G. Undiagnosed maternal phenylketonuria: own clinical experience and literature review. J Matern Fetal Neonat Med. 2009;22(10):943-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767050902994697.
-
7.
Rouse B. Schedule of assessments for children with PKU, Galveston. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005;47(7):443-8.
-
8.
Gassio R, Artuch R, Vilaseca MA, Fuste E, Boix C, Sans A, et al. Cognitive functions in classic phenylketonuria and mild hyperphenylalaninaemia: experience in a paediatric population. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005;47(7):443-8. [PubMed ID: 15991863].
-
9.
Rocha JC, Almeida MF, Carmona C, Cardoso ML, Borges N, Soares I, et al. The use of prealbumin concentration as a biomarker of nutritional status in treated phenylketonuric patients. Ann Nutr Metab. 2010;56(3):207-11. [PubMed ID: 20215742]. https://doi.org/10.1159/000276641.
-
10.
Smith I, Beasley MG, Ades AE. Intelligence and quality of dietary treatment in phenylketonuria. Arch Dis Child. 1990;65(5):472-8. [PubMed ID: 2357082].
-
11.
Burgard P. Development of intelligence in early treated phenylketonuria. Eur J Pediatr. 2000;159(S2):S74-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00014388.
-
12.
Bodley JL, Austin VJ, Hanley WB, Clarke JT, Zlotkin S. Low iron stores in infants and children with treated phenylketonuria: a population at risk for iron-deficiency anaemia and associated cognitive deficits. Eur J Pediatr. 1993;152(2):140-3. [PubMed ID: 8444222].
-
13.
Soleymani Z, Keramati N, Rohani F, Jalaei S. Factors Influencing Verbal Intelligence and Spoken Language in Children with Phenylketonuria. Indian Pediatr. 2015;52(5):397-401. [PubMed ID: 26061925].
-
14.
Sharman R, Sullivan KA, Jones T, Young RM, McGill J. Executive Functioning of 4 Children With Hyperphenylalaninemia From Childhood to Adolescence. Pediatrics. 2015;135(4):e1072-4. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-4200.
-
15.
Huijbregts SC, Gassió R, Campistol J. Executive functioning in context: Relevance for treatment and monitoring of phenylketonuria. Mol Gene Metabol. 2013;110:S25-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgme.2013.10.001.
-
16.
PKU control scheme. 2015. Available from: http://www.arums.ac.ir/fa/ard-behdasht/PKU_2.pdf.
-
17.
Sajedi F, Nazi S, Rohani F, Biglarian A, Movallali G. Problem-Solving Skills in Children with Early Treated Phenylketonuria. Iran Rehabil J. 2013;11(18):41-5.
-
18.
Nazi S, Rohani F, Sajedi F, Biglarian A, Setoodeh A. Motor Development Skills of 1- to 4-Year-Old Iranian Children with Early Treated Phenylketonuria. JIMD Reports. 2013;12:85-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/8904_2013_248.
-
19.
Heird WC. Omega-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in older children. J Pediatr. 2007;150(5):457-9. [PubMed ID: 17452214]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.01.030.
-
20.
Aguiar A, Ahring K, Almeida MF, Assoun M, Belanger Quintana A, Bigot S, et al. Practices in prescribing protein substitutes for PKU in Europe: No uniformity of approach. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism. 2015;115(1):17-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgme.2015.03.006.
-
21.
Giovannini M, Verduci E, Salvatici E, Paci S, Riva E. Phenylketonuria: nutritional advances and challenges. Nutr Metabol. 2012;9(1):7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-7075-9-7.
-
22.
Strisciuglio P, Concolino D. New Strategies for the Treatment of Phenylketonuria (PKU). Metabolites. 2014;4(4):1007-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo4041007.
-
23.
Sitta A, Vanzin CS, Biancini GB, Manfredini V, de Oliveira AB, Wayhs CAY, et al. Evidence that l-Carnitine and Selenium Supplementation Reduces Oxidative Stress in Phenylketonuric Patients. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2010;31(3):429-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10571-010-9636-3.
-
24.
Taylor CJ, Moore G, Davidson DC. The effect of treatment on zinc, copper and calcium status in children with phenylketonuria. J Inherit Metab Dis. 1984;7(4):160-4. [PubMed ID: 6441863].
-
25.
Przyrembel H, Bremer HJ. Nutrition, physical growth, and bone density in treated phenylketonuria. Eur J Pediatr. 2000;159 Suppl 2:S129-35. [PubMed ID: 11043159].
-
26.
Hygiene Office of Tabriz University of Medical Science. 2015. Available from: www.eazphcp.tbzmed.ac.ir.
-
27.
Razavieh A, Shahim S. Retest reliability of the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence restandardized in Iran. Psychol Rep. 1990;66(3 Pt 1):865-6. [PubMed ID: 2377704]. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1990.66.3.865.