Assessment of Febrile Neonates According to Low Risk Criteria for Serious Bacterial Infection

Tahereh Rostami; Mohammad Momtazbakhsh; Houman Hashemian; Marjaneh Zarkesh

Innovative Journal of Pediatrics

The Scientific Journal of Growth & Development Research Center

Outlines

Abstract
References
Copyright

Assessment of Febrile Neonates According to Low Risk Criteria for Serious Bacterial Infection

Author(s):

Tahereh Rostami¹,

Mohammad Momtazbakhsh¹,

Houman Hashemian¹,

Marjaneh Zarkesh^2,*

1Department of Pediatrics, 17 Shahrivar Children's Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran

2Department of Pediatrics, 17 Shahrivar Children's Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht,, Iran

Innovative Journal of Pediatrics:Vol. 21, issue 4; 436-440

Published online:Dec 31, 2011

Article type:Research Article

Received:May 29, 2010

Accepted:Feb 11, 2011

How to Cite:Rostami T, Momtazbakhsh M, Hashemian H, Zarkesh M, Assessment of Febrile Neonates According to Low Risk Criteria for Serious Bacterial Infection.Inn J Pediatr.2011;21(4):436-440.

Abstract

Objective: It is propounded that febrile neonates with low risk criteria (LRC) can be carefully observed without parenteral antimicrobial therapy; but yet, reliability of LRC to exclude serious bacterial infection (SBI) is uncertain.
Methods: The records of all febrile term neonates, seen in the emergency room and admitted in neonatal ward of 17 Shahrivar children's hospital of Rasht, Iran from January 2004 to January 2009 were reviewed. All of them underwent full sepsis workup. The prevalence of SBI in total population and LRC positive and negative neonates were calculated
Findings: A total of 202 records of previously healthy febrile neonates were evaluated. SBI was shown in 38 (18.8%). The most common type of SBI was urinary tract infection (UTI). Sixty-two (31%) neonates had LRC, and only one (1.6%) had SBI (UTI with E. coli). SBI was significantly more common in neonates without LRC (26.6% versus 1.6%, P<0.001). The negative predictive value (NPV) of LRC to exclude SBI was 98.4% (95%confidence interval: 96.7% to 100%).
Conclusion: These findings suggest that LRC may be relied upon to exclude SBI in febrile neonates. We propose that all febrile neonates be admitted, ill or LRC negative neonates should undergo a full sepsis work up and be administered systemic antibiotics immediately. LRC positive neonates should be under close observation.

Keywords

Low-risk criteria

Neonate

Serious bacterial infection

Fulltext

Click here to download PDF.

References

1.
References are available in PDF.

comments