ERT with alglucosidase alfa which was approved by FDA in 2006 has the capability to decrease mortality and morbidity in IOPD. Various studies have been conducted on the effectiveness of ERT. A multi-center study on 18 patients with IOPD who received ERT up to 36 months, showed different results.
Their survival rate at age 24 months was 94.4% and at age 36 months it was 72%. Mean left ventricular mass of those patients progressively decreased. Eleven of the 18 patients had significant improvement in motor skills, but other 7 patients were unable to achieve sustained motor gains after 3 years of age (
14).
Another study has been performed on 21 IOPD patients who were treated with alglucosidase alfa for about 120 weeks. At the end of the study, 71% of the patients were alive, left ventricular mass improved or remained normal in all of them, and 62% achieved new motor milestones (
14).
A new article about different aspects of ERT in IOPD patients has concluded that factors that affect the outcome of IOPD patients include: age at start of ERT, genotype, muscle fiber type and multidisciplinary care (
15). However, the results from South of Iran are slightly different. Four out of six (67%) Pompe patients died during the first weeks of the treatment. The reason behind their death was severe respiratory infection; and the cause of another one’s death was acute cardiorespiratory collapse during receiving alglucosidase alfa, underlying reason of which was not truly recognized. Only two (33%) patients remained alive, who after 65 and 117 weeks, are perfectly in the age-related normal state in terms of cardiorespiratory and motor performance. Why is the survival rate of IOPD patients in our study poorer than in other studies?
It seems that inattention to infection control skills and multidisciplinary care resulted in death in 3 patients. We did not perform genetic study in some of the patients, therefore, poor survival of our patients can also be related to their genotype. Thus, it seems that to enhance IOPD patients' survival strict cardiorespiratory care and infection control techniques also must be applied during the first months of ERT. Moreover, special care should be observed not to get nosocomial infections during several hospitalizations in order to receive ERT.
In addition, one of the most important causes of poor response to ERT can be antibody production against the drug. Therefore, according to other studies, it is recommended to determine CRIM negative patients that are highly prone to antibody production, and use immune tolerance induction to diminish the antibody titer and increase the effectiveness of ERT (
16,
17).
Six patients were followed up. Two of them who remained alive only had cardiac involvement symptoms at the beginning and did not suffer from generalized hypotonia. However, the four patients who died had both heart muscle involvement and generalized hypotonia right from the beginning. Thus, it is probable that generalized hypotonia worsens the outcome in IOPD patients.
Moreover, since early diagnosis and fast treatment can improve prognosis, it is suggested that a widespread study be conducted to examine the cost-effectiveness of infantile screening for Pompe disease.
In spite of ERT in our patients with IOPD, their survival rate is poorer than in other studies. More attention to infection control skills and multidisciplinary care are needed to improve the outcome of the disease. Additionally, it seems that the patients with generalized hypotonia suffer from a much worse prognosis than the patients who do not show obvious generalized hypotonia.
The most important limitation of this study is the low sample size. According to the rarity of this disease, a multicenter study is needed to get more valuable results.
| 4 Months | 7 Months | 17 Months | 22 Months |
|---|
| IVSD, cm | 1.03 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.67 |
| IVSS, cm | 1.1 | 1.19 | 1.21 | 1.01 |
| IVID, cm | 2.37 | 2.95 | 3.05 | 2.99 |
| LVID, cm | 2.20 | 2.05 | 2.16 | 1.78 |
| LVPWD, cm | 0.57 | 0.67 | 0.53 | 1.01 |
| LVPWS, cm | 0.85 | 0.9 | 0.96 | 1.04 |
| EF, % | 41.7 | 59.5 | 57.3 | 72.6 |
Abbreviations: EF, ejection fraction; IVSD, intraventricular septum in diastole; IVSS, intraventricular septum in systole; LVIDP, left ventricular internal diameter in diastole; LVIDS, left ventricular internal diameter in systole; LVPWD, left ventricular posterior wall in diastole; LVPWS, left ventricular posterior wall in systole.
| 2 Months | 4 Months | 6 Months | 9 Months | 12 Months | 22 Months | 28 Months |
|---|
| IVSD, cm | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.81 | 0.89 | 0.99 |
| IVSS, cm | 0.7 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 0.99 | 1.24 | 0.81 | 0.93 |
| LVID, cm | 1.8 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.12 | 2.19 | 2.03 | 2.5 |
| LVID, cm | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.28 | 1.02 | 1.48 | 1.44 |
| LVPWD, cm | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.6 | 0.67 |
| LVPWS, cm | 0.9 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.95 | 1.17 | 0.87 | 0.71 |
| EF, % | 69 | 75 | 60 | 67 | 85 | 80.5 | 75.5 |
Abbreviations: EF, ejection fraction; IVSD, intraventricular septum in diastole; IVSS, intraventricular septum in systole; LVIDP, left ventricular internal diameter in diastole; LVIDS, left ventricular internal diameter in systole; LVPWD, left ventricular posterior wall in diastole; LVPWS, left ventricular posterior wall in systole.