Participants were selected using the a priori approach in accordance with the clinical laboratory standards institute’s (CLSI) C28-A3 Standard. A total of 320 volunteers who were already scheduled to undergo minor surgical operations in elective cases that were carried out by pediatric surgery, urology, and otorhinolaryngology departments were included in the study. Of these, 188 were in the pediatric age group (0 - 17 years) and 132 were in the adult age group (18 - 65 years). The participants were divided into five groups according to age: 1 month - 1 year old (Group 1), 2 - 5 years (Group 2), 6 - 10 years (Group 3), 11 - 17 years (Group 4), and 18 - 65 years (Group 5). Approval from the Tepecik training and research hospital ethics committee was obtained for the study, and volunteers who participated in the study (or their legal guardians) signed informed consent forms. The study was realized in compliance with the declaration of Helsinki.
The inclusion criteria for volunteers were as follows: 1) volunteers who came to the pediatric surgery clinic for elective surgical operations such as circumcision, inguinal hernia repair, umbilical hernia repair, rectal polyp excision, anoplasty, diagnostic cystoscopy, posterior urethral valve resection and imperforate hymen opening, 2) volunteers who came to the otorhinolaryngology clinic for elective surgical operations such as tonsillectomy, adenoidectomy, septum deviation surgery and tympanoplasty, 3) volunteers who came to the urology clinic for elective surgical operations such as circumcision, cystoscopy, varicocele surgery, hydrocele surgery, prostate biopsy, and urodynamic interventions, 4) participants between 1 - 6 months who were born at term and had a birth weight of more than 2,500 grams, and 5) according to normal clinical practice, pediatric patients who were given 1 mg of intramuscular K vitamin in the delivery room. Each volunteer or relative of a volunteer was surveyed in order to exclude hemostatic system disorder.
Exclusion criteria for volunteers included the following: 1) undergoing anticoagulation treatment or using any drugs; 2) having the history of bleeding in patient or its family; 3) having a history of thromboembolic or hemorrhagic disease; 4) blood samples that were not at the desired level; 5) blood samples that were hemolyzed, icteric, or lipemic; and 6) hematocrit levels greater than 55%.
The volunteers’ blood samples were collected in BD Vacutainer tubes (Beckton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) containing 1 part 3.2% trisodium citrate for every 9 parts of blood. In order to prevent stasis, blood was collected using a light tourniquet, and if possible, from the antecubital vein with the help of a holder. If this was not possible, it was collected from the veins on the back of the hand using the broken needle technique. Blood samples were centrifuged at room temperature for 15 minutes at 1,500 g. The plasma was separated and stored at -80°C.
The following were used to analyze the samples: TriniCLOT PT HTF (Tcoag Ireland Ltd, Wicklow, Ireland), TriniCLOT aPTT HS (Tcoag Ireland Ltd, Wicklow, Ireland), TriniCLOT Fibrinogen (Tcoag Ireland Ltd, Wicklow, Ireland), TriniLIA D-Dimer (TcoagIreland Ltd, Wicklow, Ireland), and Destiny Plus (Trinity Biotech, Acton, USA). PT and aPTT were measured using magnetic identification and based on mechanical clot detection. The Clauss method was used to determine fibrinogen, and the agglutination method with polystyrene micro particles was used to determine D-dimer. Precision studies were performed in accordance with CLSI’s EP15-A3 protocol (
11). The maximum in-study coefficient of variations (CVs) at two different levels for PT, aPTT, fibrinogen, and D-dimer reagents were 2.8, 3.0, 2.3, and 5.9, respectively. The total CVs for PT, aPTT, fibrinogen, and D-dimer reagents were 4.8, 4.5, 3.7, and 7.0, respectively. The CV values were within the expected limits claimed by the manufacturer.
The data obtained were evaluated using the MedCalc software program (MedCalc, Mariakerke, Belgium). Extreme values were excluded according to the Dixon D/R rule: D = most extreme value–adjacent value, R = range value between all data. When D/R > 0.33, the most extreme value was excluded from the calculation. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to analyze normal distribution. Differences between the subgroups, which were created in accordance with information found in the literature, were analyzed using the Mann Whitney-U test. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Where there were no statistically significant differences between the groups, they were combined and reanalyzed. The reference range was established using the nonparametric method on obtained data according to the C28-A3 standard (
1). Using the nonparametric method, the reference range and the upper and lower limits covering 95% of the distribution (corresponding to 2.5% - 97.5%) were calculated. For groups including less than 120 data, confidence ranges for the upper and lower limits of the reference range were calculated using bootstrapping via the robust method (
12).