Various reasons such as pleural effusion, malnutrition, immune deficiency, irregular antibiotic therapy, delayed diagnosis of pneumonia, contamination during thoracentesis, and disappearance of the signs and symptoms of pneumonia cause nonspecific bacterial pneumonia to develop to empyema (
1). The treatment time of a patient with empyema in the hospital is longer than that of a parapneumonic effusion. Decortication is the preferred method of treatment if untreated empyema quickly acquires a fibrinopurulent feature and produces more fibrin deposits in the pleural region. Aspiration, if the treatments delayed, often fails in empyema treatment (
6) as it was confirmed in this study. Most of the patients did not receive pneumonia treatment in the period prior to being brought to our clinic, and if they did, it was unsatisfying. Therefore, most patients had pleural effusion with viscous pus. As a conclusion, the success rate of aspiration treatment is extremely low. It is sometimes difficult to obtain pleural effusion with thoracentesis even with a large needle.
This study shows a significant clinical difference regarding post-intervention length of hospitalization between chest tube drainage, percutaneous chest drains and intrapleural fibrinolysis and primary VATS in empyema treatment of children. While there are many case series comparing surgical interventions with fibrinolytic treatment, none of them are controlled randomized studies. The goal of giving fibrinolytic agents to the pleural space is to improve drainage by clearing the fibrin filaments and lymphatic pores (
7,
8). As the success rate of tube thoracostomy for local empyema is low, alternative approaches have been developed.
Many studies have documented successful drainage of multi-loculated empyema using streptokinase and urokinase administered via a single chest tube (
9,
10). Intra-pleural fibrinolysis applied with alteplase, besides the administration of streptokinase and urokinase, has been found to safely enhance pleural drainage and reduce the volume of pleural inflammatory debris (
11). However, this study was performed only in a localized clinic. The success rate of fibrinolytic agents administration with open thoracotomy and decortication in multi-loculated cases was 90% in fibrinolytics, but 100% in decortication. In a similar study, two and five patients with urokinase instillation for empyema drainage underwent incomplete drainage of sepsis and decortication, respectively (three recovered, and two died after surgery). More than 45% of patients had to have more than one drain. The average length of hospitalization was 20 days (
12). In this research, one (1.2%) child died from hemorrhage in the fibrinolytic group. The partial response rate was 9.8%. The post-intervention average length of hospitalization was 19.5 days. There was no death observed among the patients who were decorticated after fibrinolytic instillation.
VATS rates for primary treatment of empyema in children have gained popularity during the last 15 years. The researchers asserting the application of VATS argue that it has a potential advantage when compared to open surgery to limit morbidity on the skin, nerves, muscle and backbone structures that arise after a major surgical incision (
13). However, this causes infection, pain, cosmetic scarring and limitation of movement. Also, cytokine responses may be reduced by VATS as compared to what conventional surgery does (
14). But these statements are based on clinical experience rather than carefully conducted studies. The fact that it is heavily based on the surgeon’s skill is the most considerable limitation of VATS. In some centers, researchers have reported poor results (
15) because surgical expertise to apply pediatric VATS is confined to several well-equipped centers (
16,
17). Angelillo Mackinlay et al. compared 31 patients with 33 patients treated with thoracotomy in the VATS-treated fibrinopurine phase (
18). They noted that success rates of VATS treatment and open thoracotomy are the same, yet VATS treatment offers significant advantages when compared to thoracotomy considering solving the disease, length of hospitalization, and cosmetic results.
VATS has been implemented in our clinic for years. The positive results were achieved for most of the cases encountered in this clinic. It is recommended by this study primarily in the fibrinopurine phase. This work was not designed as an equivalent study because hospital stay in this study is longer than that reported in previous studies. Regarding the essential features, six treatment groups in the study were well matched. The length of hospitalization after the intervention for the six groups was detected to be different.
A literature search of randomized and retrospective studies that pinpoint methods of evaluation and treatment of PPE was carried out in Medline and Scopus databases. Small uncomplicated effusions resolve with antibiotics alone, larger ones require small-bore chest tube drainage and in case of complicated loculated PPE, fibrinolysis or VATS should be considered. Both methods promote faster drainage, reduce hospital stay and obviate the need for further interventions when used as first-line approach. However, primary treatment with VATS is not advised by the majority of studies as a first choice intervention, unless medical treatment has failed (
19).
The average length of hospital stay before decortication, including other treatment time, was 11.6 days. It was 9.9 days after decortication. The total length of hospital stay was 21.5 days for whom decortication was applied. Compared to other studies the average length of hospital stay in this study was longer. This may be correlated with the requirements of longer preparation and observation times and a relatively high number of multi-loculated chronic cases.
Sonnappa et al. suggested that in the case of examination of the pleural space and the application of thoracoscopic decortication if the surgeon considers VATS in appropriate (prevention of lung enlargement because of thick cortex), the procedure should be converted into mini-thoracotomy. This means that VATS has failed (
20). There are no healing or therapeutic benefits considering fibrinolysis and VATS in empyema therapy, whereas VATS is causing a considerable amount of cost. Fibrinolysis may reduce the risk of acute clinical deterioration and in some children with empyema it should be the first-line treatment (
17,
21).
Fibrinolytic use is recommended in potential decortication individuals (
22). However, surgical morbidity is low, and the mortality rate is infrequent. Unlike studies in agreement with intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy, streptokinase and urokinase in an experimental animal model have not been found to be valid for liquefying thick pleural fluids (
23,
24).
Demirhan et al. suggest that chest tube drainage is an effective and safe primary treatment for postpneumonic pediatric empyema. In cases that it is not satisfactory, decortication can be successfully performed with thoracotomy resulting in low mortality and morbidity (
25).
Only one small randomized study (
26) comparing drainage methods with surgical methods directly achieved an advantage of significant treatment success in the surgical treatment group (44% versus 91%). However, promoting surgical procedures as the first-line treatment will be a disadvantage with the use of more invasive methods in many patients who will be healed with only simple drainage.
The presence of the trapped lung and a thick cortex is an indication for surgery and decortication (
3,
22). The removal of fibrinous debris through chest tube also necessitates decortication. If drainage is not practical, decortication should be conducted as soon as possible. The tube may be the initial treatment instead of spending time for thoracostomy. All the patients in group F have been surgically intervened. This approach is recommended in this study when the condition of the patient is appropriate for surgery because of reduced mortality and morbidity, reduced length of hospital stay and quick discharge of the patient. In clinical experience of the researchers in this study, the mortality of decortication is extremely low. This finding supports the view that mortality is superiority in early and limited thoracotomies.
5.1. Conclusions
Especially in children, fibrinolytic therapy cannot be said to be an alternative to surgery in empyema. But in each case of the fibrinopurulent phase empyema that does not respond to closed chest tube drainage, it should be tested. Such treatments increase the success of conservative treatment. VATS or open thoracotomy should continue to be the preferred treatment for complete lung decortication in localized cases.