.jpg "avatar")
Abstract
Objectives:
This study was conducted to assess the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the overall anxiety severity and impairment scale (OASIS), a measure designed to evaluate the severity and functional impairments associated with clinical and subsyndromal anxiety.Methods:
Using a descriptive-analytic framework, first, the OASIS was translated into Persian according to the forward-backward translation guidelines. Then, a total of 463 students of Guilan University of Medical Sciences in the academic year 2017 - 18 were selected using the convenience sampling method. Participants completed seven measures (i.e., OASIS, anxiety and stress subscales of depression anxiety stress scales-21, Beck anxiety inventory, openness subscale of NEO five-factor inventory, positive affect and negative affect scales, Connor-Davidson resilience scale, and state subscale of state-trait anxiety inventory), and the data were analyzed by SPSS V. 20.0 for windows and Lisrel V. 8.80.Results:
Internal consistency reliability of the OASIS was acceptable (Cronbach’s α = 0.877). The exploratory factor analysis indicated that all items were loaded on a single factor (loadings = 0.799 - 0.849). The confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the single-factor model has resulted in an adequate model fit. The OASIS was positively correlated with the anxiety- and negative affect-related scales, whereas it was negatively correlated with the resilience- and positive affect-related scales. Correlations with the openness subscale were not significant.Conclusions:
In line with previous studies, the findings showed that the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the OASIS are acceptable. Therefore, it seems that the measure can be used in clinical practices and research studies in Iran.Keywords
Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale Psychometric Properties Students
1. Background
Similar to other countries, anxiety-related disorders are common in Iran (1, 2). According to the findings of the Iranian Mental Health Survey (1), the 12-month prevalence of anxiety disorder is 15.6%. The 12-month and lifetime prevalence estimates of anxiety disorders in the United States are 18.1 (3) and 28.8% (4), respectively. While in 6 European countries (Belgium, France, Italy, Germany, Netherlands, and Spain) these were around 6.4 and 13.6%, respectively (2). Anxiety disorders, on the one hand, have long-term effects on functional areas, and, on the other, often co-occur with other psychiatric and medical diseases (5, 6). Considering the high prevalence of anxiety disorders and their functional consequences (7), measures are needed in an assessment-based manner to evaluate anxiety disorders in various clinical and research settings (8, 9).
Validated measures are often needed in a comprehensive assessment of anxiety (10). Multiple measures have been developed and validated for assessing anxiety during the last decades (10). Many of these measures assess the severity of anxiety based on the frequency of related symptoms, and enough attention is not paid to the functional impairments caused by anxiety. Simultaneously, it is important to monitor how anxiety affects the patient’s daily activities (11).
Insufficient attention to functional impairments caused by anxiety may decrease the utility of scales for measuring the global effects of treatment (12). Therefore, measures are needed to evaluate both severity and functional impairment. Meanwhile, measures should be short enough to be used in busy clinical settings. In recent decades, a number of well-known self-report measures of anxiety have been validated in Iran, including the Beck anxiety inventory (BAI) (13) and state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI) (14). Most of their items ask subjects about the presence of the symptoms and do not explore the functional impairments caused by anxiety-related symptoms. In addition to the above measures, other measures have also been validated that are related to functional impairment, such as the work and social adjustment scale (WSAS) (15) and Sheehan disability scale (SDS) (16). These measures exclusively ask subjects about functional impairment or disability and have no item about the frequency or severity of the experienced symptoms.
Recently, Norman and colleagues (11) have developed the overall anxiety severity and impairment scale (OASIS). The OASIS is a 5-item self-report scale designed to assess functional impairment caused by anxiety symptoms as well as their frequency and severity. Specifically, the OASIS was developed to meet the need for an anxiety measure that could (a) measure directly the clinical severity and functional impairment, (b) report transdiagnostically the severity of any anxiety disorder, and (c) be short enough (17). To date, this scale has been translated into Japanese (18), Spanish (19, 20), and Dutch (12), and its psychometric properties have been investigated in three studies on the college student populations (8, 11, 21) and in eight studies on the outpatient populations (8, 12, 17-20, 22, 23). These studies supported its one-factor structure and showed that it has robust reliability and validity. The applicability of this scale for various clinical and subclinical levels of anxiety and its specific emphasis on the functional impairment caused by anxiety symptoms distinguish it from the more conventional, longer anxiety measures (11, 12).
2. Objectives
Considering the high prevalence of anxiety disorders in Iran (1), this research aims to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the OASIS in a non-clinical population (students of university) in Iranian society.
3. Methods
3.1. Study Design, Participants, and Procedure
This research aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the OASIS in an Iranian student population using a descriptive-analytic study framework. The statistical population included all students of Guilan University of Medical Sciences in the academic year 2017 - 18, and the research sample (n = 463) was selected using the consecutive, convenience sampling method. The students were included if they were interested in participating in the research, and were excluded if they had auditory and/or visual deficits resulting in poor participation. According to the ethical considerations, participation in the research was voluntary and subject to the informed consent, and necessary information was provided to the participants. Ethical approval was obtained from the Iran University of Medical Sciences Research Ethics Committee (ethical approval code: IR.IUMS.REC.1397.132). The order of the implementation of research instruments was random.
The first step was to validly translate the English version to the Persian. So the following steps were taken based on the guidelines of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures (24): (a) forward-translating the English version of the OASIS by two clinical psychologists; (b) integrating the forward-translations of the English version of the OASIS by a third clinical psychologist (common-translation version); (c) back-translating the common-translation version by a specialist to the English language; (d) interviewing with 10 students to ascertain to what extent is the Persian version of the OASIS understandable in Iranian culture. Ultimately, the final version was prepared for psychometric evaluations.
3.2. Measures
3.2.1. Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale
The OASIS is developed by Norman et al. (11) to specifically measure the severity and functional impairments caused by anxiety disorders and/or frequency and intensity of anxiety; interference with work, school, and social life; and impairment due to avoidance from situations, objects, and activities (11). This scale consists of 5 items, and each item contains 5 options, which are scored 0 to 4 and summed to obtain a total score. To date, this measure has been translated into Japanese (18), Spanish (19, 20), and Dutch (12), and its one-factor structure and robust reliability (internal consistency and test-retest reliability), and validity (convergent and divergent validity) have been demonstrated in three studies on the college student population (8, 11, 21) and in eight studies on the outpatient population (8, 12, 17-20, 22, 23).
3.2.2. Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21, Anxiety, and Stress Subscales
Depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) uses a dimensional approach to evaluate depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms (25). Many studies are conducted on evaluating its psychometric properties (26, 27). Also, studies performed in Iran (28, 29) have supported its psychometric characteristics.
3.2.3. Beck Anxiety Inventory
Beck anxiety inventory (BAI) is one of the most widely used anxiety measures, which is investigated in many studies (30). In Iran, Kaviani and Mousavi (13) reported its validity as 0.72, test-retest reliability 0.83, and internal consistency 0.92 for BAI.
3.2.4. NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI), Openness Subscale
The NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) is used to assess the big five personality traits (neuroticism, extroversion, openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness) based on the factor analysis approach (31). Neo-FFI’s reliability is excellent, and its convergent and discriminant validity has been confirmed (31). In Iran, acceptable psychometric properties have been reported on NEO-FFI (32).
3.2.5. Positive Affect and Negative Affect Scales
The positive affect and negative affect scales (PANAS) has been developed to independently measure both positive affect (PA) and negative affect (NA) (33). Desirable psychometric properties have been reported on PANAS in the United States (33) and Iran (34).
3.2.6. Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale
This is a 25-item self-report measure on the ability to cope stress. Its psychometric properties have been supported in some studies in the United States (35) and Iran (36).
3.2.7. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, State Scale
The state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI) consists of two 20-item measures of trait and state anxiety. The State subscale assesses how respondents feel at the present moment (37). The psychometric properties of this scale have been confirmed in Iran (14).
3.3. Statistical Analysis
The psychometric properties of the OASIS were evaluated by assessing internal consistency and determining the face, construct, convergent, and discriminant validity. Analyses were performed using SPSS version 20.0 and Lisrel version 8.80.
4. Results
Descriptive statistics for demographic characteristics, the total score of the OASIS, and the total score of other measures are presented in Table 1. For 463 students who participated in this study, the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of age was 22.82 ± 3.28. 69/8% of participants were female and most of them (89/3%) were single. The mean ± SD of the OASIS score was 4.83 ± 3.68.
Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of 463 Students
| Variables | No. (%)/Mean ± SD |
|---|---|
| Sex | |
| Male | 136 (29.6) |
| Female | 323 (69.8) |
| Marital status | |
| Single | 410 (89.3) |
| Married | 49 (10.7) |
| Location | |
| Private house | 328 (71.5) |
| Leased house | 131 (28.5) |
| Age | 22.82 ± 3.28 |
| Symptom severity | |
| OASIS | 4.83 ± 3.68 |
| BAI | 9.19 ± 8.87 |
| STAI-State | 40.20 ± 10.93 |
| CDRISC | 60.20 ± 17.83 |
| NEO-Openness | 21.02 ± 5.51 |
| DASS-Anxiety | 3.69 ± 3.60 |
| DASS-Stress | 7.09 ± 4.46 |
| PANAS-P | 31.73 ± 9.22 |
| PANAS-N | 18.83 ± 6.85 |
The internal consistency of the OASIS was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. An α ≥ 0.70 was considered as an acceptable internal consistency (38). As shown in Table 2, the internal consistency reliability of the OASIS was acceptable; Cronbach’s α for the five items of the OASIS was 0.877 and it was more than 0.841, if each of the items were omitted. The correlations between five items and between each item and the total score were statistically significant at the .01 level. Moreover, its face validity was evaluated by gathering views of 10 students from the University of Guilan.
Factor Analysis, Cronbach’s Alpha if Item Omitted, and Correlation Between Items for the OASIS
| Cronbach’s α if Item Omitted | Factor Loading | Item 1 | Item 2 | Item 3 | Item 4 | Item 5 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Item 1. In the past week, how often have you felt anxious? | 0.856 | 0.799 | 1 | |||||
| Item 2. In the past week, when you have felt anxious, how intense or severe was your anxiety? | 0.844 | 0.835 | 0.738a | 1 | ||||
| Item 3. In the past week, how often did you avoid situations, places, objects, or activities because of anxiety or fear? | 0.856 | 0.801 | 0.738a | 0.546a | 1 | |||
| Item 4. In the past week, how much did your anxiety interfere with your ability to do the things you needed to do at work, at school, or at home? | 0.841 | 0.849 | 0.565a | 0.565a | 0.586a | 1 | ||
| Item 5. In the past week, how much anxiety has interfered with your social life and relationships? | 0.854 | 0.809 | 0.518a | 0.495a | 0.556a | 0.653a | 1 | |
| Total | 0.877 | - | 0.815a | 0.849a | 0.756a | 0.795a | 0.742a | 1 |
The construct validity was evaluated using the EFA and the CFA. The model fit was determined using the chi-square test, the goodness of fit index (GFI), comparative fit index (CFI), non-norm fit index (NNFI), the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), and standardized root mean square residual (SRMR). The above indices were interpreted based on the following proposed cutoff criteria (39-41): Chi-square/df test between 2 and 5, GFI > 0.9, CFI > 0.90, NNFI > 0.90, RMSEA < 0.06, and SRMR < 0.08. The EFA showed that all items loaded on a single factor (eigenvalue = 3.352, loadings = 0.799 - 0.849) and accounted for 67% of the variance (Table 2). The CFA revealed that a single-factor model resulted in an adequate model fit: χ2/df = 3.05, P > 0.01; GFI = 0.91; SRMR = 0.06; RMSEA = 0.20, 90% CI (0.09, 0.33); CFI = 0.92. Factor loadings showed that all items were strongly related to this factor, with values ranging from 0.42 to 0.72. All were significant P < 0.05 (Figure 1).
Confirmatory factor analysis model for the OASIS
Based on the literature (8, 11, 12, 17, 19-21), the positive correlation of the Persian version of the OASIS with BAI, Anxiety and Stress subscales of DASS-21, State subscale of STAI and the Negative Affect subscale of PANAS was used to evaluate the convergent validity, and its negative correlation with Positive Affect subscale of PANAS, Openness subscale of NEO and Connor-Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC) was used to determine the discriminant validity of the OASIS. Studies have shown that those with low levels of openness are often prone to chronic negative moods (42).
The results of the convergent and discriminant validity of the OASIS are reported in Table 3. The OASIS was positively correlated with the BAI (r = 0.546), state subscale of the SATI (r = 0.555), anxiety subscale of the DASS (r = 0.503), stress subscale of the DASS (r = 0.565), and negative affect subscale of the PANAS (r = 0.458), whereas negatively correlated with the CD-RISC (r = -0.428) and positive affect subscale of the PANAS (r = -0.368). The correlation with the openness subscale of the NEO-FFI (r = -0.082) was not significant.
Intercorrelations for Validity of the OASIS
| OASIS | CDRISC | BAI | STAI-State | NEO-Openness | DASS- Anxiety | DASS- Stress | PANAS-P | PANAS-N | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OASIS | 1 | ||||||||
| CDRISC | -0.428a | 1 | |||||||
| BAI | 0.564a | -0.445a | 1 | ||||||
| STAI-State | 0.555a | -0.640a | 0.530a | 1 | |||||
| NEO-Openness | -0.082 | -0.129 | -0.002 | -0.124 | 1 | ||||
| DASS- Anxiety | 0.503a | -0.445a | 0.623a | 0.551a | -0.147b | 1 | |||
| DASS-Stress | 0.565a | -0.525a | 0.581a | 0.628a | -0.139b | 0.691a | 1 | ||
| PANAS-P | -0.368a | -0.581a | -0.262a | -0.552a | -0.085 | -0.220a | -0.376a | 1 | |
| PANAS-N | 0.458a | -0.277a | 0.485a | 0.474a | -0.078 | 0.352a | 0.435a | -0.012 | 1 |
5. Discussion
The current study aimed to determine the psychometric properties of the OASIS in the Iranian student population. Previous studies have reported good validity and reliability of the OASIS in clinical (both primary care and psychiatric) populations (8, 12, 17-23). This study, in line with the two previous studies (11, 21), showed acceptable psychometric properties of the OASIS in the university students.
Our results provided some support for the reliability of the OASIS. We obtained high Cronbach’s α (0.877) for the internal consistency reliability of the OASIS. This finding is in agreement with the results of the two previous research on university students. Also, this finding is very close to the findings of other studies conducted on clinical populations (8, 12, 22, 23). Regarding construct validity, in line with previous studies (8, 11, 12, 17-23) that had demonstrated the one-factor structure of the OASIS, the current study revealed its unidimensionality. Specifically, we reached the factor loadings of 0.799 - 0.849, which were very close to the loadings reported in previous studies. We found that a single-factor model gave the best fit for the data. The one-factor structure of the OASIS suggested using total score (computed by summing the five items) when it is to be used in clinical and/or research situations (17).
This research provided adequate support for the convergent validity of the OASIS. As we expected, it showed correlations with well-established measures of anxiety. Positive correlations of the OASIS with BAI, State subscale of STAI, and Anxiety and Stress subscales of DASS are frequently replicated in previous research (8, 11, 12, 17-23). Also, as repeatedly reported in the literature, the OASIS showed convergent validity in correlation with the negative affect subscale of PANAS, a construct that overlaps markedly with the anxiety (17).
On the other hand, discriminant validity was supported by the negative correlations of the OASIS with CD-RISC and positive affect subscale of PANAS, these findings are well-documented in previous research (17, 19, 20). Resilience, a core construct of the CD-RISC, often is referred to as the reverse construct of anxiety and general distress, and as it increases, the anxiety subsides (43). Besides, having positive emotions has often been reported as a strong protective characteristic against anxiety and depression (44). We expected that the OASIS will show a negative correlation with the openness subscale of NEO as with CD-RISC and positive affect subscale of PANAS, although it had only a non-significant association. This finding also was reported by Norman and colleagues (11). This finding suggests that although in some studies (44) openness is reported to be positively correlated with positive emotions, being prone to it is not necessarily associated with reduced anxiety. Altogether, these data demonstrated that the OASIS has adequate reliability, construct validity, and convergent and discriminant validity in a non-clinical population, and can be used for measuring the severity and impairments related to various levels of anxiety.
5.1. Limitations
There were some limitations to this study. First, the age and educational range of the study sample were very limited, which may have limited the generalizability of the results to other people in the older age range or those with lower education. Second, only self-report measures were used for assessing convergent validity. Therefore, the results may be affected by the method effect. Third, the inclusion of non-clinical samples in this study may have limited the generalizability of the results to clinical groups. Future studies on the OASIS should be designed to include a wider age and educational range, using clinician-administered tools or behavioral assessments in addition to self-report measures, and including samples with clinical and/or subclinical levels of anxiety.
5.2. Conclusions
In summary, the results demonstrate that the OASIS has adequate reliability and validity to assess the severity and functional impairments associated with the anxiety in the university student population. These findings complement the results of studies conducted on the OASIS in the clinical populations. Given that assessment of functional impairment is an integral component of the screening, diagnosing, and treating mental disorders and the OASIS is the only measure specifically designed for assessing functional impairments caused by anxiety (11), its psychometric properties, along with its brevity, seem to enhance its usefulness to be used in a variety of clinical and non-clinical settings for measuring the anxiety-related severity and functional impairments.
References
-
1.
Sharifi V, Amin-Esmaeili M, Hajebi A, Motevalian A, Radgoodarzi R, Hefazi M, et al. Twelve-month prevalence and correlates of psychiatric disorders in Iran: the Iranian Mental Health Survey, 2011. Arch Iran Med. 2015;18(2):76-84. [PubMed ID: 25644794].
-
2.
Alonso J, Angermeyer MC, Bernert S, Bruffaerts R, Brugha TS, Bryson H, et al. Prevalence of mental disorders in Europe: results from the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 2004;(420):21-7. [PubMed ID: 15128384]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0047.2004.00327.x.
-
3.
Kessler RC, Chiu WT, Demler O, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62(6):617-27. [PubMed ID: 15939839]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2847357]. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.617.
-
4.
Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62(6):593-602. [PubMed ID: 15939837]. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593.
-
5.
Mojtabai R, Stuart EA, Hwang I, Eaton WW, Sampson N, Kessler RC. Long-term effects of mental disorders on educational attainment in the National Comorbidity Survey ten-year follow-up. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015;50(10):1577-91. [PubMed ID: 26082040]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4964966]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-015-1083-5.
-
6.
Mojtabai R, Stuart EA, Hwang I, Susukida R, Eaton WW, Sampson N, et al. Long-term effects of mental disorders on employment in the National Comorbidity Survey ten-year follow-up. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015;50(11):1657-68. [PubMed ID: 26211661]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4618045]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-015-1097-z.
-
7.
Alonso J, Liu Z, Evans-Lacko S, Sadikova E, Sampson N, Chatterji S, et al. Treatment gap for anxiety disorders is global: Results of the World Mental Health Surveys in 21 countries. Depress Anxiety. 2018;35(3):195-208. [PubMed ID: 29356216]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6008788]. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22711.
-
8.
Norman SB, Allard CB, Trim RS, Thorp SR, Behrooznia M, Masino TT, et al. Psychometrics of the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) in a sample of women with and without trauma histories. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2013;16(2):123-9. [PubMed ID: 23296334]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-012-0325-8.
-
9.
Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Monahan PO, Lowe B. Anxiety disorders in primary care: prevalence, impairment, comorbidity, and detection. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(5):317-25. [PubMed ID: 17339617]. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-146-5-200703060-00004.
-
10.
Antony MM, Orsillo SM, Roemer L. Practitioner's guide to empirically based measures of anxiety. Springer Science & Business Media; 2001.
-
11.
Norman SB, Cissell SH, Means-Christensen AJ, Stein MB. Development and validation of an Overall Anxiety Severity And Impairment Scale (OASIS). Depress Anxiety. 2006;23(4):245-9. [PubMed ID: 16688739]. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20182.
-
12.
Hermans M, Korrelboom K, Visser S. A Dutch version of the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS): Psychometric properties and validation. J Affect Disord. 2015;172:127-32. [PubMed ID: 25451406]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2014.09.033.
-
13.
Hossein Kaviani H; Mousavi A S. [Psychometric properties of the Persian versionADDIN EN.CITE.DATAof Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)]. Tehran Univ Med J. 2008;66(2):136-40. Persian.
-
14.
Mehran B. Spielberger test standardization in Mashhad [dissertation]. Tehran: Allameh Tabatabaei University; 1995.
-
15.
Mohammadi A, Birashk B, Gharaie B. Comparison of the effect of group transdiagnostic therapy and group cognitive therapy on anxiety and depressive symptoms. Iran J Public Health. 2013;42(1):48-55. [PubMed ID: 23514901]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3595628].
-
16.
Amin-Esmaeili M, Motevalian A, Rahimi-Movaghar A, Hajebi A, Hefazi M, Radgoodarzi R, et al. The translation and psychometric assessment of the persian version of the sheehan disability scale. Iran J Psychiatry. 2014;9(3):125-32. [PubMed ID: 25561951]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4277800].
-
17.
Campbell-Sills L, Norman SB, Craske MG, Sullivan G, Lang AJ, Chavira DA, et al. Validation of a brief measure of anxiety-related severity and impairment: the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS). J Affect Disord. 2009;112(1-3):92-101. [PubMed ID: 18486238]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2629402]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2008.03.014.
-
18.
Ito M, Oe Y, Kato N, Nakajima S, Fujisato H, Miyamae M, et al. Validity and clinical interpretability of Overall Anxiety Severity And Impairment Scale (OASIS). J Affect Disord. 2015;170:217-24. [PubMed ID: 25259673]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2014.08.045.
-
19.
Gonzalez-Robles A, Mira A, Miguel C, Molinari G, Diaz-Garcia A, Garcia-Palacios A, et al. A brief online transdiagnostic measure: Psychometric properties of the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) among Spanish patients with emotional disorders. PLoS One. 2018;13(11). e0206516. [PubMed ID: 30383797]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6211825]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206516.
-
20.
Osma J, Quilez-Orden A, Suso-Ribera C, Peris-Baquero O, Norman SB, Bentley KH, et al. Psychometric properties and validation of the Spanish versions of the overall anxiety and depression severity and impairment scales. J Affect Disord. 2019;252:9-18. [PubMed ID: 30953927]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2019.03.063.
-
21.
Norman SB, Campbell-Sills L, Hitchcock CA, Sullivan S, Rochlin A, Wilkins KC, et al. Psychometrics of a brief measure of anxiety to detect severity and impairment: the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS). J Psychiatr Res. 2011;45(2):262-8. [PubMed ID: 20609450]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2970755]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.06.011.
-
22.
Moore SA, Welch SS, Michonski J, Poquiz J, Osborne TL, Sayrs J, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the Overall Anxiety Severity And Impairment Scale (OASIS) in individuals seeking outpatient specialty treatment for anxiety-related disorders. J Affect Disord. 2015;175:463-70. [PubMed ID: 25679201]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2015.01.041.
-
23.
Bragdon LB, Diefenbach GJ, Hannan S, Tolin DF. Psychometric properties of the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) among psychiatric outpatients. J Affect Disord. 2016;201:112-5. [PubMed ID: 27195516]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.05.005.
-
24.
Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(24):3186-91. [PubMed ID: 11124735]. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.
-
25.
Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995;33(3):335-43. [PubMed ID: 7726811]. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-u.
-
26.
Antony MM, Bieling PJ, Cox BJ, Enns MW, Swinson RP. Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychol Assess. 1998;10(2):176-81. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.10.2.176.
-
27.
Crawford JR, Henry JD. The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS): normative data and latent structure in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol. 2003;42(Pt 2):111-31. [PubMed ID: 12828802]. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466503321903544.
-
28.
Asghari Moghaddam MA, Saed F, Dibajnia P, Zangeneh J. [A preliminary validation of the depression, anxiety and stress scales (dass) in non-clinical sample]. Daneshvar raftar. 2008;1(31):23-38. Persian.
-
29.
Sahebi A, Asghari MJ, Salari RS. Validation of depression anxiety and stress scale (DASS-21) for an Iranian population. Iranian Psychologists. 2005;4(1):299-313. Persian.
-
30.
Beck AT, Epstein N, Brown G, Steer RA. An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988;56(6):893-7. [PubMed ID: 3204199]. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.56.6.893.
-
31.
Costa Jr PT, McCrae RR. The Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R). Sage Publications, Inc; 2008.
-
32.
Garousi FM, Mehryar A, Ghazi TM. [Application of the neop ir test and analytic evaluation of it]. Journal of humanities. 2001;11(39):173-98. Persian.
-
33.
Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54(6):1063-70. [PubMed ID: 3397865]. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063.
-
34.
Bakhshipour R, Dezhkam M. [A confirmatory factor analysis of the positive affect and negative affect scales (PANAS)]. J psychol. 2006;9(4 (36)). Persian.
-
35.
Connor KM, Davidson JR. Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depress Anxiety. 2003;18(2):76-82. [PubMed ID: 12964174]. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.10113.
-
36.
Khoshouei MS. Psychometric Evaluation of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) Using Iranian Students. International Journal of Testing. 2009;9(1):60-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305050902733471.
-
37.
Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene RE, Vagg PR, Jacobs GA. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Adults: Sampler set: Manual. Test, Scoring Key. 1983.
-
38.
Kline P. Handbook of psychological testing. Routledge; 2013.
-
39.
Kline RB. Principles and prac ce of structural equa on modeling. 2nd ed. New York: The Guilford Press; 2005.
-
40.
Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen M. Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Articles. 2008;2.
-
41.
Marsh HW, Hau K, Wen Z. In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing hu and bentler's (1999) findings. Struct Equ Modeling. 2004;11(3):320-41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2.
-
42.
Takahashi M, Shirayama Y, Muneoka K, Suzuki M, Sato K, Hashimoto K. Low openness on the revised NEO personality inventory as a risk factor for treatment-resistant depression. PLoS One. 2013;8(9). e71964. [PubMed ID: 24019864]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3760870]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071964.
-
43.
Feder A, Fred-Torres S, Southwick SM, Charney DS. The Biology of Human Resilience: Opportunities for Enhancing Resilience Across the Life Span. Biol Psychiatry. 2019;86(6):443-53. [PubMed ID: 31466561]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.07.012.
-
44.
Spinhoven P, Elzinga BM, Hovens JG, Roelofs K, van Oppen P, Zitman FG, et al. Positive and negative life events and personality traits in predicting course of depression and anxiety. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2011;124(6):462-73. [PubMed ID: 21848705]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2011.01753.x.