3.2. Participants
This study was conducted in specific settings that granted access to family caregivers of children with ASD. The Autism Spectrum Disorder Association in Hamedan province, Iran, was chosen as the research environment to recruit participants for this study. The study population comprised family caregivers who were responsible for caring for children diagnosed with ASD. The participants were selected using a targeted method. Maximum variation in terms of age, gender, religion, socioeconomic status, level of education, and area of residence was also applied in the sampling process.
In the current study, a predetermined number of participants was not available. The researcher decided on data saturation and reaching a comprehensive understanding of the intended concept (with judgment and consultation within the research team) by considering a combination of repetitive codes, paying attention to receiving fresh data after conducting new interviews and ensuring a minimum of nine family caregivers and a maximum number of participants (more than nine) to be interviewed. The researcher continued the study until reaching data saturation and achieving a comprehensive understanding. Ultimately, a total of 14 participants, including 9 mothers and 5 fathers, were included in the sampling process using purposeful sampling. The inclusion criteria for the participants in this study were carefully established. First, the participants were required to have a child diagnosed with ASD, as confirmed by a specialist in the field. Additionally, caregivers who actively sought rehabilitative services for their autistic child at the Autism Association Center in Hamedan were eligible to participate. The age of the child with autism needed to be under 14 years. Finally, caregivers were expected to possess the ability to establish effective communication and express themselves well.
Autism spectrum disorder is classified into three levels based on a doctor’s diagnosis. These levels, ranging from level 1 to level 3, are based on the amount of support individuals with ASD require and the impact of their symptoms on their daily functioning. Level 1 represents individuals who require some support (mild), level 2 indicates those who need substantial support (moderate), and level 3 encompasses individuals who require very substantial support in various areas of their lives (severe). Sampling continued until data saturation was achieved. Data saturation occurs when the researcher reaches a point where no new information is obtained from further data (
15) (
Table 1).
| Row | Gender | Age (y) | Marital Status | Occupation | Income Level | Relation to the Child | Number of Family Members | Caregiver’s Education Level | Child’s Age | Child’s Gender | Medical History | Level of Autism Diagnosed by a Specialist | Length of Interview |
|---|
| 1 | Female | 42 | Married | Housewife | No problem | Mother | 4 | B.A. | 8 | Female | No | Mild | 55 |
| 2 | Female | 30 | Married | Housewife | Acceptable | Mother | 3 | Diploma | 4 | Male | No | In between | 50 |
| 3 | Female | 47 | Married | Housewife | Not sufficient | Mother | 4 | Diploma | 7 | Male | No | Mild | 53 |
| 4 | Female | 32 | Married | Housewife | Not sufficient | Mother | 3 | Under diploma | 5 | Male | Impaired concentration and attention | Mild | 57 |
| 5 | Female | 38 | Married | Housewife | Not sufficient | Mother | 3 | Diploma | 6 | Male | Mental disorder, hyperactivity | Severe | 45 |
| 6 | Female | 35 | Married | Housewife | Not sufficient | Mother | 3 | Under diploma | 8 | Male | Hyperactivity, epilepsy | In between | 50 |
| 7 | Female | 47 | Married | Housewife | Not sufficient | Mother | 5 | Under diploma | 2 | Male | Hypothyroidy | Severe | 52 |
| 8 | Female | 33 | Married | Housewife | Not sufficient | Mother | 3 Pregnant | Diploma | 8 | Male | Mental disorder, muscular dystrophy, epilepsy | Severe | 55 |
| 9 | Male | 45 | Married | Music instructor | Acceptable | Father | 3 | Diploma | 6 | Male | Impaired concentration and attention | Mild | 50 |
| 10 | Female | 40 | Married | Housewife | No problem | Mother | 2 | B.A. | 4 | Male | Gastrointestinal disorders | In between | 51 |
| 11 | Male | 43 | Married | Driver | Not sufficient | Father | 3 | Under diploma | 6 | Female | Epilepsy, mental disorder | Severe | 45 |
| 12 | Male | 38 | Married | Teacher | No problem | Father | 3 | B.A. | 5 | Female | Hyperactivity, mental disorder | Severe | 40 |
| 13 | Male | 38 | Married | Unemployed | Not sufficient | Father | 2 | B.A. | 5 | Male | Hyperactivity | In between | 47 |
| 14 | Male | 42 | Married | Engineer | Not sufficient | Father | 1 | B.A. | 7 | Male | Gastrointestinal disorders | In between | 50 |
3.3. Data Collection
For this study, an ethics code was obtained from the National Committee for Ethics in Biomedical Research at the School of Pharmacy, Nursing, and Midwifery in Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Furthermore, sampling permission was granted by the Vice-Chancellor for Research and Technology of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, and then they were submitted to the Vice-Chancellor for Research and Technology of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences to obtain the contact number of participants and interview them for the study. The sampling started on 26.09.2020 and ended on 19.03.2021.
Data collection involved conducting semi-structured, in-depth interviews with the family caregivers to gather information. In this study, the researcher was the interviewer. Open-ended questions were used during the interviews to allow the caregivers to freely express their experiences and perspectives. The average duration of these interviews was between 40 and 55 minutes. Due to the limitations imposed by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, all interviews were conducted over the telephone. Additionally, three complementary interviews were conducted via e-mail in a written format. Informed consent was obtained from all participants who received consent forms via e-mail or letter. They signed the forms to indicate their willingness to participate in the research and returned them to the researcher. Before each interview, the researcher began with general questions, allowing the participants to speak freely about their experiences. The researcher then directed the interview to clarify the concept under study by asking follow-up questions. These follow-up questions were based on the information provided by the interviewees and included in-depth interview questions, such as “can you explain more?”, “what do you mean?” and “can you give an example so that I can better understand what you mean?”. All conversations during the interviews were recorded, and the confidentiality of the conversations was explained to the participants. The participants were informed that they could ask for clarification if they did not understand a question.
Demographic information, including age, gender, marital status, relationship to the child, child’s age, level of autism, caregiver’s occupation, child’s history of other illnesses, number of family members, and child’s gender and age, was recorded for the participants. The order of the interview questions was not fixed and could be adjusted based on the interview process and participant conditions.
During the interviews, a brief and general introductory conversation was conducted to create a sense of comfort for the participants. Open-ended questions related to the research topic were used to facilitate the discussion and allow for broad responses. For example, family caregivers were asked to describe a typical day of caring for their child. Follow-up questions were asked to delve deeper into the details provided in the initial response. Exploratory questions were used to obtain more in-depth information, such as requesting further elaboration, examples, and explanations based on the participants’ experiences. Some techniques, such as silence, echoing the participant’s statements, and using affirming words, were employed to enhance the quality of the interview. At the end of each interview, the participants were given the opportunity to share any additional thoughts or topics they wished to discuss. They were also informed about the possibility of follow-up interviews or the need for further clarification if necessary.
After each interview, the recorded audio was carefully listened to, transcribed word by word, and coded using MAXQDA 10 software at the earliest possible opportunity.
The following main questions were asked from family caregivers:
- What problems do you encounter when caring for an autistic child?
- In which part of your life do you feel caring pressure the most?
- Can you describe a day of caring for your child?
The following follow-up questions were asked from family caregivers:
- What effect has caring had on your health and your family?
- How has caring affected different aspects of your life?
3.5. Trustworthiness
For the robustness of the study, the four criteria of credibility, dependability, confirmability, transferability, and authenticity were used. Several techniques, such as long-term researcher’s interaction with data and participants and control by members, were used. For this purpose, after coding, the interviews were given to the participants to review and confirm the researcher’s interpretation. The process of data analysis and category extraction was reviewed and approved by the members of the research team (second and third authors), who are members of the nursing faculty and experts in qualitative research. The selection of participants was performed with maximum sampling variance in terms of gender, level of autism, income, and education (
Table 1) and continued until data saturation. Moreover, to increase confirmability, all stages of the study, including data collection, coding and analysis, and access to the main categories, were recorded in writing (
17).