Dextran-based Nanomicelle System with Directly Ester-bound Gadolinium Chelates as a Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agent for Tumor Detection

authors:

avatar Lirong Ma a , 1 , avatar Weiyu Yang a , 1 , avatar Dingmei Wu a , avatar Mengmeng Jiang b , avatar Xiuzhong Yao b , * , avatar Weiyu Weng a , c , *

Engineering Research Center of Pharmaceutical Process Chemistry, Ministry of Education, School of Pharmacy, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, PR China.
Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, PR China.
Shanghai Key Laboratory of New Drug Design, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, PR China.
M l. and Y w. contributed equally to this work.
Corresponding Authors:

how to cite: Ma L, Yang W, Wu D, Jiang M, Yao X, et al. Dextran-based Nanomicelle System with Directly Ester-bound Gadolinium Chelates as a Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agent for Tumor Detection. Iran J Pharm Res. 2020;19(3):e124394. https://doi.org/10.22037/ijpr.2020.113068.14094.

Abstract

There is a strong need to develop MRI contrast agents (CAs) with lower in-vivo retention, stronger signal enhancement, and more specific imaging. Here, we report a novel dextran (DEX)-based nanomicelle system as an MRI CA with superior tumor imaging and relatively short intravascular persistence. Gadolinium (Gd)-chelate (DTPA-Gd) was conjugated directly to DEX hydroxyl via a degradable ester bond. DEX-DTPA-Gd was then modified with dodecylsuccinic anhydride to obtain the amphiphilic derivative, 2-dodecylsuccinic acid (DSA)-grafted DEX-DTPA-Gd. Nanomicelles were prepared by dissolving DSA-DEX-DTPA-Gd in water using ultrasonication. The physicochemical properties, cytotoxicity, and MRI efficiency of the synthesized CA were evaluated. The synthesized DSA-DEX-DTPA-Gd self-assembled into nanomicelles with an average diameter of 67.80 ± 5.21 nm. Within the given Gd concentration range, DSA-DEX-DTPA-Gd and Magnevist® exhibited similar cytotoxicity. DEX-based CAs resulted in a greater contrast enhancement of T1-weighted signal intensity in the tumor region than Magnevist®, and the tumors were clearly defined for at least 3 h. Simultaneously, the ester bond in DSA-DEX-DTPA-Gd facilitated the elimination of Gd chelates, compared with the relatively more stable amide linker. The DEX-based nanomicelle system with directly ester-bound DTPA-Gd may serve as an MRI CA with superior tumor imaging and relatively rapid elimination.

Introduction

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a powerful tool available for clinicians and scientists to acquire in-vivo images of anatomy and physiology. Images are produced based on the relaxation process of protons, the positively charged hydrogen atoms that are abundant in tissues containing water and fat (1). To improve diagnostic accuracy through enhanced image contrast, exogenous contrast agents (CAs) are often needed to alter the relaxation rate of the surrounding hydrogen atoms (2). Paramagnetic metal ions and superparamagnetic iron oxide have been employed as CAs, among which gadolinium (Gd)-based CAs are the most widely used (3). Currently, all Gd-based CAs approved by the FDA are low-molecular-weight Gd complexes (LMGCs) (4), but there are limitations related to rapid clearance and nonspecific distribution in the body (5).

To overcome the drawback of traditional LMGCs, numerous studies have focused on the development of macromolecular and nanoscale Gd complexes (MNGCs) over the past few years. MNGCs offer several advantages over LMGCs including prolonged circulation time, high relaxivities, and tumor targeting via enhanced permeability and retention effects (5, 6). However, the clinical applications of MNGCs has been hindered by biosafety concerns (7) because the prolonged circulation time increases the probability that highly toxic free Gd3+ ions will be released (8). Two strategies have been employed to decrease the potential toxicity of MNGCs: the design of novel ligands able to increase thermodynamic stability of Gd complexes in MNGCs (9) and the use of biodegradable MNGCs to facilitate the rapid clearance of Gd complexes (10). Compared with the design of novel ligands, the use of biodegradable MNGCs is a more practical approach as various degradable linkages such as ester, disulfide, and amide bonds, have been successfully used for the development of pro-drugs and biodegradable polymers (11).

Dextrans (DEXs) are polysaccharides that have been in routine clinical use for decades, and have recently been used for the delivery of drugs, proteins, and imaging agents (12). Various DEX-based Gd CAs have been described (13-21); however, almost all the studies focused on the development of DEX-based CAs with long intravascular retention by using relatively stable linkages, which may increase the risk of the release of free Gd3+ ions, as mentioned above.

Herein, we report a DEX-based nanomicelles system as an MRI CA with high relaxivities, superior tumoral signal enhancement, and relatively short intravascular persistence. Gd-chelates (DTPA-Gd) were conjugated directly to DEX hydroxyls via an easily degradable ester bond to facilitate Gd-chelate release and elimination (22). DEX-DTPA-Gd was then modified with dodecylsuccinic anhydride to obtain the amphiphilic derivative, 2-dodecylsuccinic acid (DSA)-grafted DEX-DTPA-Gd, self-assembled into nanomicelles in aqueous medium. The physicochemical properties, complex stability, and cytotoxicity of the novel CA were characterized. The MRI efficiency of the new CA was evaluated by using Magnevist® and DSA-DEX-NH-DTPA-Gd as references. DSA-DEX-NH-DTPA-Gd is a nanoscale CA, in which DTPA-Gd is linked to DEX hydroxyl via a relatively more stable amide linker.

Experimental

Materials

DEX (average MW 20 kDa), diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid dianhydride (DTPA-dianhydride), 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP), anhydrous DMSO, and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) were purchased from Shanghai Aladdin Bio-chem Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Dodecylsuccinic anhydride, gadolinium chloride hexahydrate (GdCl3·6H2O), fetal bovine serum (FBS), and Leibovitz’s L-15 medium were purchased from Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist®) was obtained from Bayer Vital GmbH (Leverkusen, Germany). Human pancreatic cancer cell line SW 1990 was obtained from Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). All other reagents were of analytical grade.

Five-week-old female nude mice, with a body weight of 18 ± 3 g were purchased from Shanghai Slake Experimental Animal Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. The animals were allowed free access to food and water throughout the study. Animal experimental protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhongshan Hospital affiliated to Fudan University. All animal studies were performed in accordance with the “National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals”.

Synthesis of DEX-DTPA

DEX-DTPA was synthesized following the procedure described in the literature (23), with some modifications. DTPA-dianhydride (3.31 g, 9.26 mmol) and DMAP (1.13 g, 9.26 mmol) were dissolved in 30 mL of dry DMSO, to which a solution of DEX (3.0 g, containing approximately 18.52 mmol glucose units) in DMSO (30 mL) was added. The mixture was stirred at 75 °C for 24 h, and dialyzed (MW cutoff of 3.5 kDa) in water for 5 days. The resulting solution was filtered and freeze-dried. The nitrogen content of the product was determined by elemental analysis, and then the substitution degree of DTPA in DEX-DTPA (DSDTPA) was calculated from the following equation.

3×DSDTPA162+357×DSDTPA=MolNMsample

Equ. 1

Where 162 is the molecular weight of dehydrated glucose, 357 is the molecular weight of DTPA-dianhydride, MolN is the measured molar number of nitrogen, and Msample is the mass of the measured sample.

Synthesis of DSA-DEX-DTPA

DSA-DEX-DTPA was synthesized in accordance with the described procedure in the literature (24), but with some modifications. DEX-DTPA (1.60 g, containing approximately 6.37 mmol glucose units) was dissolved in 50 mL of dry DMSO, to which a solution of dodecylsuccinic anhydride (0.65 g, 0.24 mmol) in DMSO (10 mL) was added. The mixture was stirred at 75 °C for 24 h, and dialyzed (MW cutoff of 3.5 kDa) in water for 3 days. The resulting solution was filtered and freeze-dried. The DS of DSA in DSA-DEX-DTPA (DSDSA) was determined by using 1H NMR (D2O) analysis from the following equation (25).

DSDSA=A-CH3A-CHO_×3×100%

Equ. 2

Where A-CH3 is the intensity of the peak at δ 0.81 arising from the methyl group of DSA, and A-CHO- is the intensity of the peak at δ 4.89 arising from the hydroxyl group of DEX.

Synthesis of DSA-DEX-DTPA-Gd

DSA-DEX-DTPA (0.90 g, containing approximately 0.85 mmol DTPA) was dissolved in 30 mL of water, and the pH value was adjusted to approximately 6.5 with NaOH (1 mol/L), followed by the dropwise addition of GdCl3·6H2O (356.1 mg, 0.96 mmol) in water (5 mL). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h, and dialyzed (MW cutoff of 3.5 kDa) in water for 3 days. The resulting solution was filtered and freeze-dried. The Gd3+ content of the product was measured by using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry.

Synthesis of DSA-DEX-NH-DTPA-Gd

The synthesis of DSA-DEX-NH-DTPA-Gd is presented in the supplementary materials.

Preparation and characterization of self-assembled nanomicelles

To prepare self-assembled nanomicelles, 100 mg of DSA-DEX-DTPA-Gd was dissolved in 10 mL of water, ultrasonicated for 15 min in an ice bath using a probe-type sonicator (JY92–2; Scientz, Ningbo, China), and filtered through a 0.22 μm microporous membrane. The critical micelle concentration (CMC) of the nanomicelles was determined by using pyrene as a fluorescent probe (26). The particle size and surface charge of the nanomicelles were determined by dynamic light scattering and electrophoretic mobility measurements using a Zetasizer Nano ZS90 (Malvern, Worcestershire, UK). Each measurement was performed in triplicate and presented as the mean ± standard deviation.

Evaluation of complex stability of DEX-based CAs in serum

The complex stability of the DEX-based CAs was described by the fractions of Gd released after incubation of the CAs in serum. The Gd dissociation was determined as previously described in details (27, 28) with some modifications. Briefly, DSA-DEX-DTPA-Gd and DSA-DEX-NH-DTPA-Gd were dissolved in FBS to obtain solutions with a Gd concentration of 1 mmol/L. To prevent microbial growth, gentamicin sulfate was added to the serum to obtain a concentration of 0.02%. Aliquots of 0.5 mL were withdrawn at the 15th day. The samples were transferred onto a metal chelate column (1-mL Chelating Sepharose column), which was then washed with 10 mL of Bis-Tris buffer (pH 6). Free Gd3+ ions were eluted with 20 ml of nitric acid (10 mmol/L) and subjected to ICP-OES analysis.

Cytotoxicity assay

The cytotoxicity of DSA-DEX-DTPA-Gd and Magnevist® was assessed by using the MTT assay. SW 1990 cells were seeded in 96-well plates with L-15 medium at a density of 1×104 cells/well and allowed to adhere for 12 h prior to the assay. The cells were then treated with DSA-DEX-DTPA-Gd nanomicelles and Magnevist® to give final Gd3+ concentrations of 0.05-1.25 mmol/L in a total volume of 100 µL at 37 °C for 48 h. Untreated cells were used as controls. After incubation, the medium was discarded, the wells were thoroughly washed with cell culture medium, and 80 µL of fresh medium was added per well. Subsequently, 20 µL of MTT reagent (5 mg/mL) was added to each well. The plate was then incubated for another 4 h at 37 ºC. The medium was removed and 100 µL DMSO was added to each well to solubilize the formed formazan crystals. The optical density of the solution at a wavelength of 490 nm in each well was immediately determined. The percentage viability of the cells was calculated from the following equation.

Cell visibility%=ODsample-OD0ODcontrol-OD0×100%

Equ. 3

Where ODsample is the optical density of the sample wells, ODcontrol is the optical density of the control wells, and OD0 is the optical density of blank wells without cells.

In-vitro relaxivity measurement

In-vitro T1 relaxivities (r1) of Magnevist®, DSA-DEX-DTPA-Gd, and DSA-DEX-NH-DTPA-Gd were measured by using a Magnetom Verio 3.0 T MRI scanner equipped with a 12-channel receive-only head coil and Syngo MR B17 software (Siemens AG, Healthcare Sector, Erlangen, Germany). T1 was quantified using a 3D VIBE sequence with an echo time (TE) of 1.73 ms, repetition time (TR) of 400 ms, FOV of 300 mm, slice thickness of 1.5 mm, first flip angle of 2°, second flip angle of 14°, and voxel size of 0.5 × 0.4 × 1.5 mm3. The r1 value was calculated from the following equation (10).

1(T1)obsd=1(T1)w+r1+[C]

Equ. 4

Where (T1)obs is the observed longitudinal relaxation time of CA (ms), (T1)w is the observed longitudinal relaxation time of water (ms), [C] is the concentration of Gd3+ (mmol/L), and r1 is the longitudinal relaxivity of CA (mM−1 s−1).

In-vivo MR imaging

Twelve nude mice were used for the in-vivo imaging study with three animals in each group. SW 1990 pancreatic cancer cells (1 × 106) were injected into the pancreas of each mouse. MRI studies were initiated after tumor growth for 4 weeks. The diameter of the tumors is within the range of 5–12 mm. The mice were anesthetized with 1% nembutal sodium solution (50 mg/kg, i.p.). Magnevist®, DSA-DEX-DTPA-Gd, and DSA-DEX-NH-DTPA-Gd were dissolved in sterile saline to obtain solutions with a Gd concentration of 12.5 mmol/L. These solutions were administered to anesthetized mice via tail vein injection at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg Gd3+. Mice were oriented in a supine position on the MRI system slider bed. T1-weighted MR images were acquired by using the Magnetom Verio 3.0 T MRI scanner equipped with a four-channel mouse coil, before injection and during the indicated time points. The following imaging parameters were used: TE of 12 ms, TR of 5.32 ms, FOV of 100 mm, slice thickness of 1.2 mm, and voxel size of 0.5 × 0.4 × 1.2 mm3. The MR images were analyzed by using Syngo MR B17. Regions of interest were manually set as the tumor, bladder, inferior vena cava, liver, heart, and kidney of each mouse. The data were presented as the change in R1, defined as 1/T1, from baseline (ΔR1).

Results and Discussion

Synthesis and characterization of DSA-DEX-DTPA-Gd nanomicelles

The synthesis of DSA-DEX-DTPA-Gd was performed in three steps (Figure 1). Firstly, DTPA was directly linked to DEX by an esterification reaction between the OH group of DEX and DTPA-dianhydride in anhydrous DMSO to form an ester bound, allowing the second unreacted anhydride ring to open through reaction with water (Figure 1a). Theoretically, the second anhydride ring can also react with another OH group of the DEX leading to the formation of a diester linkage (29). However, by conducting the esterification reaction in relatively dilute solution (23) and by decreasing the amount of DTPA-dianhydride added (29), the formation of the diester linkage will be most likely inhibited.

Subsequently, DSAs were introduced to the residual OH groups of DEX-DTPA by an esterification reaction using dodecylsuccinic anhydride as an esterifying agent (Figure 1b). The structure of dodecylsuccinic anhydride is similar to dodecenyl succinic anhydride, which has been frequently used in the modification of proteins and polysaccharides for versatile applications from pharmaceuticals to foods (30). The advantage of dodecylsuccinic anhydride over dodecenyl succinic anhydride is its chemical stability due to the saturated alkyl chain. Recently, dodecylsuccinic anhydride has been used in foodstuffs as an esterifying agent to modify starch (31). In the present study, dodecylsuccinic anhydride was used to synthesize amphiphilic DEX derivative for the first time. Because of the high reactivity of the succinic anhydride group, no catalyzer was needed for the esterification reaction. The 1H NMR (D2O) spectra of DEX, DTPA, and DSA-DEX-DTPA are shown in Figure 2.

Finally, Gd3+ was chelated to DTPA to obtain DSA-DEX-DTPA-Gd (Figure 1c). The content of Gd3+, and the DSs of DTPA and DSA of the product are shown in Table 1.

Nanomicelles were prepared by dispersing DSA-DEX-DTPA-Gd in distilled water using a probe-type ultrasonic treatment. The CMC value of DSA-DEX-DTPA-Gd was 27.4 μg/mL, implying that the synthesized DSA-DEX-DTPA-Gd can self-assemble into nanomicelles in aqueous solution. The Average hydrodynamic diameter, polydispersity index, and zeta potential of the nanomicelles are shown in Table 1. Generally, a PDI of ≤0.1 can be considered monodispersed, while systems with a PDI of 0.1–0.4 are considered moderately polydispersed (32). Therefore, both of the DEX-based CAs are moderately polydispersed nanomicelles.

Complex stability of DEX-based CAs in serum

Many attempts have been made to assess the stability of Gd-loaded CAs in biologic fluids, among which the assessment of Gd3+ dissociation in serum is one of the most accurate methods to reflect the in-vivo situation (27). After 15 days, almost identical amounts of the total Gd3+ (5.0% ± 1.2% vs 4.5% ± 0.8%) had been released from DSA-DEX-DTPA-Gd and DSA-DEX-NH-DTPA-Gd, respectively. The result indicated that both DEX-based CAs were less stable than Magnevist (1.9% Gd3+ release after 15 days), but much more stable than those marketed nonionic linear Gd complexes (27).

Cytotoxicity of DSA-DEX-DTPA-Gd

The in-vitro cytotoxicity of DSA-DEX-DTPA-Gd was examined in SW 1990 cells by MTT assay compared with Magnevist®, the first approved intravenous CA for clinical imaging, as a reference. The recommended dose of Magnevist® for human is 0.1 mmol/kg and the human plasma volume is approximately 80 mL/kg, therefore, the maximum Gd concentration following intravenous injection is not more than 1.25 mmol/L. As illustrated in Figure 3, there was no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) in the cytotoxic effects of DSA-DEX-DTPA-Gd and Magnevist® within the given Gd concentration range.

In-vitro relaxivities

The potential of DSA-DEX-DTPA-Gd as an MRI CA was evaluated by measuring its relaxivity (r1) using a 3 T MRI scanner. On a per Gd basis, DSA-DEX-DTPA-Gd has an r1 value of 9.42 mM−1s−1, which is superior to the r1 value of Magnevist® (5.25 mM−1s−1). The relaxivities of DSA-DEX-NH-DTPA-Gd was 11.20. The result confirmed that MNGCs present the advantage of high relaxivities over LMGCs. The enhanced r1 values for DEX-based CAs can be attributed to the slow global rotational motion of MNGCs that improves the relaxation effectiveness of each Gd3+ paramagnet (33).

In-vivo tumor imaging

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth most common cause of cancer death. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is now a second-line modality for pancreatic cancer detection (34). CAs with stronger signal enhancement and more specific distribution can help improving the sensitivity of MRI for pancreatic cancer detection. The imaging efficiency of the DEX-based CAs was evaluated in SW 1990-bearing mice. T1-weighted images of the tumor region before and after injection of Magnevist®, DSA-DEX-DTPA-Gd, and DSA-DEX-NH-DTPA-Gd at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg Gd3+ are shown in Figure 5. The temporal quantitative R1 changes relative to baseline (ΔR1) are shown in Figure 6. Before injection, the tumor tissue region showed low signal intensity on T1WI. After Magnevist® administration, a rapid and uneven enhancement was observed in the lesions. A significant contrast enhancement (ΔR1 ≈ 0.45 s−1) was observed in tumor periphery at 5 min, which then decreased rapidly. After the injection of DEX-based CAs, a significant and sustained ΔR1 elevation was observed at the tumor site. In the tumor boundaries, the increase in ΔR1 to a peak occurred within the time range of 30–60 min for DEX-based CAs, and the boundaries were clearly defined for at least 3 h (Figure 5). The prolonged enhancement duration will facilitate clinicians to obtain clear images and improve the diagnostic accuracy. These results demonstrate that fabricated DEX-based CAs are superior CAs for tumor MRI diagnostics.

DEX-based CAs also induced greater contrast enhancement in the tumor core than Magnevist® (Figure 6b); however, the tumor core displayed a smaller increase in R1 than the tumor periphery with all CAs. The preferential accumulation of CAs in the tumor periphery may be attributed to the elevated intra-tumoral interstitial fluid pressure that impedes the penetration of CAs into tumor tissues (35).

In-vivo elimination of CAs

The temporal quantitative ΔR1 profiles were used to reflect the in-vivo Gd3+ contents in the organs and blood, because R1 maps provide a good quantitative measure of the CA distribution in the whole body, and good agreement between the ΔR1 values and organ Gd3+ contents has been reported (23).

As DTPA-Gd is essentially eliminated via the renal excretion pathway (36), the MRI intensity accumulation in the bladder and the attenuation in the inferior vena cava post injection reflect Gd clearance from the blood. The temporal quantitative ΔR1 at bladder region after injection of Magnevist® and DEX-based CAs is shown in Figure 6c. Magnevist® is cleared rapidly, as evidenced by strong bladder signal enhancement with a ΔR1 of 123.78 s−1 at 30 min, then the intensity decreased gradually, which might be due to animal urination. After the injection of DSA-DEX-NH-DTPA-Gd, only a slight enhancement was observed in the bladder, with a sustained ΔR1 elevation of 4.45 s−1 at 3 h, which indicated slow clearance from the body. Compared with DSA-DEX-NH-DTPA-Gd, DSA-DEX-DTPA-Gd resulted in rapid and strong signal intensities in the bladder after injection with the measured peak ΔR1 of 20.59 s−1 at 2 h. This result provided supporting evidence that conjugating Gd-chelates directly to DEX hydroxyls with an easily degradable ester bond facilitated the renal excretion of Gd chelates.

The temporal quantitative ΔR1 in the inferior vena cava, which can reflect the profile of CAs in the blood following injection of Magnevist® and DEX-based CAs, is shown in Figure 6d. This result again confirms that the elimination rate of Magnevist® was much greater than that of DEX-based CAs, and that the ester bond between DTPA and DEX facilitated the elimination of Gd chelates.

In-vivo organ imaging

The ΔR1 profiles in the heart, liver, and kidney are presented in Figure 6e-g, respectively. Compared with Magnevist®, all DEX-based CAs produced superior and prolonged contrast enhancement in the aforementioned organs. These results demonstrated that fabricated DEX-based CAs were also superior for body imaging. Hals et al. (22) reported that the stability of DEX-based CAs with a direct ester-bound DTPA-Gd may be insufficient for use as macromolecular blood pool CAs. They suggested using amide bonds instead of the ester bond. However, the results of our research showed that DEX-based CA with directly ester-bound DTPA-Gd was a superior CA with good contrast enhancement and relative shortly intravascular persistence.

Schematic of MRI contrast agent synthesis. (a) Synthesis of DEX-DTPA. (b) Synthesis of DSA-DEX-DTPA. (c) Synthesis of DSA-DEX-DTPA-Gd
1H NMR spectra of A) DEX, B) DTPA, and C) DSA-DEX-DTPA in D2O
In-vitro cytotoxicity of DSA-DEX-DTPA-Gd and Magnevist® to SW 1990 cells in culture exposed for 48 h (n = 5).
In-vitro T1-weighted MR pcolor (pseudo color) images of Magnevist®, DSA-DEX-DTPA-Gd, and DSA-DEX-NH-DTPA-Gd
T1-weighted images of pancreatic tumors generated by using Magnevist®, DSA-DEX-DTPA-Gd, and DSA-DEX-NH-DTPA-Gd (arrows indicate in-situ pancreatic tumors).
Change in relaxation rates, ΔR1 following intravenous injection of Magnevist®, DSA-DEX-DTPA-Gd, and DSA-DEX-NH-DTPA-Gd
Table 1

Physicochemical properties of DEX-based contrast agents

DSA-DEX-DTPA-GdDSA-DEX-NH-DTPA-Gd
Gd content (%)9.26.4
DSs of DTPA (%)25.09.3
DS of DSA (%)2.52.3
Hydrodynamic diameter (nm)67.8 ± 5.296.2 ± 3.5
Polydispersity index (PDI)0.35 ± 0.080.36 ± 0.11
Zeta potential (mV)-6.8 ± 0.5-2.9 ± 0.4

Conclusion

In the present study, a novel DEX-based nanomicelle system was fabricated as an MRI CA with high relaxivities, superior tumoral signal enhancement, and relatively short intravascular persistence. Gd-chelates were conjugated to DEX hydroxyls with an easily degradable ester bond to facilitate Gd-chelate elimination, and hydrophobic DSAs were grafted to DEX to obtain the amphiphilic DEX derivative. The synthesized DSA-DEX-DTPA-Gd self-assembled into nanomicelles in aqueous medium. Compared with Magnevist®, DSA-DEX-DTPA-Gd exhibited superior T1 relaxivity and tumoral signal enhancement, reflecting the advantages of nanosized CAs. Meanwhile, compared with the relatively more stable amide linker, the ester bond in DSA-DEX-DTPA-Gd facilitated the renal excretion of Gd chelates, which could decrease the toxicity of Gd-based nanosized CAs. After comprehensive consideration of relaxivities, in-vivo persistence, and tumoral signal enhancement, we believe that DSA-DEX-DTPA-Gd is a potential CA for tumor MRI.

Acknowledgements

References

  • 1.

    Edelman RR, Warach S. Magnetic resonance imaging. N. Engl. J. Med. 1993;328:708-16. [PubMed ID: 8433731].

  • 2.

    Geraldes CF, Laurent S. Classification and basic properties of contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging. Contrast Media Mol. Imaging. 2009;4:1-23. [PubMed ID: 19156706].

  • 3.

    Xiao YD, Paudel R, Liu J, Ma C, Zhang ZS, Zhou SK. MRI contrast agents: classification and application (Review). Int. J. Mol. Med. 2016;38:1319-26. [PubMed ID: 27666161].

  • 4.

  • 5.

    Pellico J, Ellis CM, Davis JJ. Nanoparticle-based paramagnetic contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging. Contrast Media Mol. Imaging. 2019;2019:1845637. [PubMed ID: 31191182].

  • 6.

    Huang CH, Tsourkas A. Gd-based macromolecules and nanoparticles as magnetic resonance contrast agents for molecular imaging. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2013;13:411-21. [PubMed ID: 23432004].

  • 7.

    Mohs AM, Lu ZR. Gadolinium (III)-based blood-pool contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging: status and clinical potential. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2007;4:149-64. [PubMed ID: 17335412].

  • 8.

    WeinmannHJ, Brasch RC, PressWR, Wesbey GE. Characteristics of gadolinium-DTPA complex: a potential NMR contrast agent. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1984;142:619-24. [PubMed ID: 6607655].

  • 9.

    Clough TJ, Jiang L, Wong KL, Long NJ. Ligand design strategies to increase stability of gadolinium-based magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:1420. [PubMed ID: 30926784].

  • 10.

    Xin C, Yao X, Du B, Yang W, Wang L, Ma L, Weng W. Stearic Acid-grafted chitooligosaccharide nanomicelle system with biocleavable gadolinium chelates as a multifunctional agent for tumor imaging and drug delivery. Pharm. Res. 2018;36:10. [PubMed ID: 30411214].

  • 11.

    West KR, Otto S. Reversible covalent chemistry in drug delivery. Curr. Drug Discov. Technol. 2005;2:123-60. [PubMed ID: 16472224].

  • 12.

    Mehvar R. Dextrans for targeted and sustained delivery of therapeutic and imaging agents. J. Control. Release. 2000;69:1-25. [PubMed ID: 11018543].

  • 13.

    Wang SC, Wikström MG, White DL, Klaveness J, Holtz E, Rongved P, Moseley ME, Brasch RC. Evaluation of Gd-DTPA-labeled dextran as an intravascular MR contrast agent: imaging characteristics in normal rat tissues. Radiology. 1990;175:483-8. [PubMed ID: 1691513].

  • 14.

    Meyer D, Schaefer M, Chambon C, Beaute S. Paramagnetic dextrans as magnetic resonance blood pool tracers. Invest. Radiol. 1994;29 Suppl 2:S90-2. [PubMed ID: 7523330].

  • 15.

    Rebizak R, Schaefer M, Dellacherie E. Macromolecular contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging Influence of polymer content in ligand on the paramagnetic properties. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 1999;7:243-8. [PubMed ID: 9845812].

  • 16.

    Rebizak R, Schaefer M, Dellacherie E. Polymeric conjugates of Gd(3+)-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid and dextran Synthesis characterization and paramagnetic properties. Bioconjug. Chem. 1997;8:605-10. [PubMed ID: 9258461].

  • 17.

    Rebizak R, Schaefer M, Dellacherie E. Polymeric conjugates of Gd(3+)-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid and dextran Influence of spacer arm length and conjugate molecular mass on the paramagnetic properties and some biological parameters. Bioconjug. Chem. 1998;9:94-9. [PubMed ID: 9460551].

  • 18.

    Daldrup-Link HE, Link TM, Möller HE, Wiedermann D, Bonnemain B, Corot C, Rummeny EJ. Carboxymethyldextran-A2-Gd-DOTA enhancement patterns in the abdomen and pelvis in an animal model. Eur. Radiol. 2001;11:1276-84. [PubMed ID: 11471624].

  • 19.

    Sirlin CB, Vera DR, Corbeil JA, Caballero MB, Buxton RB, Mattrey RF. Gadolinium-DTPA-dextran: a macromolecular MR blood pool contrast agent. Acad. Radiol. 2004;11:1361-9. [PubMed ID: 15596374].

  • 20.

    Agudelo CA, Tachibana Y, Noboru T, Iida H, Yamaoka T. Long-term in-vivo magnetic resonance imaging tracking of endothelial progenitor cells transplanted in rat ischemic limbs and their angiogenic potential. Tissue Eng. Part A. 2011;17:2079-89. [PubMed ID: 21466415].

  • 21.

    Lu B, Wang H, Lu Q, Tang Z, Dou H, Dai T, Li S. Novel Hybrid dextran-gadolinium nanoparticles as high-relaxivity T1 magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent for mapping the sentinel lymph node. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 2019;43:350-357. [PubMed ID: 30875338].

  • 22.

    Hals PA, Sontum PC, Holtz E, Klaveness J, Rongved P. In-vivo cleavage rate of a dextran-bound magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent: preparation and intravascular pharmacokinetic characteristics in the rabbit. Curr. Drug. Deliv. 2013;10:134-43. [PubMed ID: 22452401].

  • 23.

    Shalviri A, Foltz WD, Cai P, Rauth AM, Wu XY. Multifunctional terpolymeric MRI contrast agent with superior signal enhancement in blood and tumor. J. Control. Release. 2013;167:11-20. [PubMed ID: 23353806].

  • 24.

    Sun Y, Gu J, Tan H, Zhang Y, Huo P. Physicochemical properties of starch adhesives enhanced by esterification modification with dodecenyl succinic anhydride. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018;112:1257-63. [PubMed ID: 29454955].

  • 25.

    Du YZ, Weng Q, Yuan H, Hu FQ. Synthesis and antitumor activity of stearate-g-dextran micelles for intracellular doxorubicin delivery. ACS Nano. 2010;4:6894-902. [PubMed ID: 20939508].

  • 26.

    Molina-Bolívar JA, Hierrezuelo JM, Carnero RC. Self-assembly, hydration, and structures in N-decanoyl-N-methylglucamide aqueous solutions: effect of salt addition and temperature. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2007;313:656-64. [PubMed ID: 17532330].

  • 27.

    Frenzel T, Lengsfeld P, Schirmer H, Hütter J, Weinmann HJ. Stability of gadolinium-based magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents in human serum at 37 degrees C. Invest. Radiol. 2008;43:817-28. [PubMed ID: 19002053].

  • 28.

    Wang Q, Chen J, Sun M, Chen Y, Yang F. Determination of the content of Gd3+ in gadoteric acid meglumine salt injection by ICP-MS method. J. Pharm. Pract. 2020;38:124-128.

  • 29.

    Buffa R, Běťák J, Kettou S, Hermannová M, Pospíšilová L, Velebný V. A novel DTPA cross-linking of hyaluronic acid and metal complexation thereof. Carbohydr. Res. 2011;346:1909-15. [PubMed ID: 21621751].

  • 30.

    Shah NN, Soni N, Singhal RS. Modification of proteins and polysaccharides using dodecenyl succinic anhydride: synthesis, properties and applications-A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018;107:2224-33. [PubMed ID: 29051094].

  • 31.

    Korma SA, Alahmad K, Niazi S, Ammar AF, Zaaboul F, Zhang T. Chemically modified starch and utilization in food stuffs. Int. J. Nutr. Food Sci. 2016;5:264-72.

  • 32.

    Sourav Bhattacharjee. DLS and zeta potential – What they are and what they are not? J. Control. Release. 2016;235:337-351.

  • 33.

    Rudovský J, Botta M, Hermann P, Hardcastle KI, Lukes I, Aime S. PAMAM dendrimeric conjugates with a Gd-DOTA phosphinate derivative and their adducts with polyaminoacids: the interplay of global motion, internal rotation, and fast water exchange. Bioconjug. Chem. 2006;17:975-87. [PubMed ID: 16848405].

  • 34.

    Chu LC, Goggins MG, Fishman EK. Diagnosis and Detection of Pancreatic Cancer. Cancer J. 2017;23:333-42. [PubMed ID: 29189329].

  • 35.

    Padera TP, Stoll BR, Tooredman JB, Capen D, Di TE, Jain RK. Pathology: cancer cells compress intratumour vessels. Nature. 2004;427:695.

  • 36.