Logo
homeHome
toggle_offCompany ProfilegroupsBoards & Staffsworkspace_premiumMemberships & PartnersschoolAcademy of Journalismperson_addCareerslinkBlog(EN)emailContact Us
list_altOur JournalslightbulbInstruction for AuthorsbookmarkBrieflands PolicieshandshakePublish My Researchplay_circleJournal Management Systemcredit_cardArticle Processing Chargeszoom_inOpen Peer ReviewimagePublishing Services
menu_bookPublish My Book

IJ Pharmaceutical Research

homeHome
play_arrowCurrent Issueformat_list_bulletedAll Issuesformat_indent_increaseIn Presscheck_boxAccepted Manuscripts
searchSearchqr_codeInstructions
bookmarkJournal InformationgroupsEditors & BoardsshareIndexing and Listing Sourceswaterfall_chartJournal Metricszoom_inOpen Peer Review (OPR)balancePublication Ethics and Malpractice Statementassignment_indReviewer and AE Registration FormemailSupportphoneContact Us
menuAPC
Authors GuideSubmit Manuscript

Outlines

https://doi.org/10.22037/ijpr.2020.112936.14038

PMSF Attenuates Morphine Antinociceptive Tolerance and Dependence in Mice: Its Association with the Oxidative Stress Suppression

Author(s):
Ehsan Asadi AkbarabadiEhsan Asadi Akbarabadia, Hossein Rajabi VardanjaniHossein Rajabi Vardanjanib, Shahrzad MolaviniaShahrzad Molaviniac, d, Marzieh PashmforooshMarzieh Pashmforooshe, Mohammad Javad KhodayarMohammad Javad Khodayarc, d,*
aStudent Research Committee, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
bMedical Plants Research Center, Basic Health Sciences Institute, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran.
cToxicology Research Center, Medical Basic Sciences Research Institute, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
dDepartment of Toxicology, School of Pharmacy, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
eBehbahan Faculty of Medical Sciences, Behbahan, Iran.
IJ Pharmaceutical Research:Vol. 20, issue 3; 300-309
Published online:Jul 31, 2021
Article type:Original Article
Received:Nov 30, 2019
Accepted:Oct 31, 2020
How to Cite:Asadi Akbarabadi E, Rajabi Vardanjani H, Molavinia S, Pashmforoosh M, Khodayar MJ. PMSF Attenuates Morphine Antinociceptive Tolerance and Dependence in Mice: Its Association with the Oxidative Stress Suppression. Iran J Pharm Res. 2021;20(3):e124503. doi: https://doi.org/10.22037/ijpr.2020.112936.14038

Abstract

Keywords
Morphine
Tolerance
Dependence
Oxidative stress
PMSF
Mice

Introduction

Drug addiction is a disorder characterized by changes in the central nervous system. It can be accompanied by intracellular alteration of specific brain neurons after frequent exposure to these drugs (1). Repeated exposure to opioids is limited because of tolerance and risk of dependence (2). It has been demonstrated that the compulsive desire for drug use such as morphine occurs due to the neuroadaptation during drug addiction processes which will afford the need for increasing doses to get favorable effects (3). The most common adverse effects occur after morphine dependence, including anxiety, restlessness, dilated pupils, excessive sweating, respiratory depression, hypertension, muscle pain, and digestive problems (4, 5). The development of morphine tolerance and dependence is associated with receptor-mediated neuronal activity caused by chronic exposure. The symptoms of tolerance are assessed by the classical method of evaluating antinociceptive activities. At the same time, signs of dependence are examined by assessing withdrawal after administration of the narcotic antagonist (6, 7). The mechanisms of tolerance and dependence involve one or more mechanisms, including desensitization and down-regulation of opioid receptors, uncoupling of opioid receptors-G protein, and up-regulation of the cAMP signaling (8, 9). Morphine can cause oxidative stress under certain conditions by increasing the formation of different kinds of free radicals, including superoxide radical anion and nitric oxide (NO) (10). Based on the previous reports, NO plays an important function in the development of tolerance and dependence of morphine via increasing the concentration of cGMP by activating guanylyl cyclase. (11–13). Some reports have indicated that the free radical scavenging agents could be potent ways to inhibit morphine tolerance and withdrawal syndrome (14). Fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH), which has been previously termed anandamide amidase, is an integral membrane enzyme that inactivates anandamide (partial CB1 agonist) (15). As a result, inhibition of FAAH increases anandamide levels and consequently potentiates endocannabinoid signaling (16, 17). It has been demonstrated that the enzymatic activity of FAAH is sensitive to inhibition by the serine protease inhibitor phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) (18, 19). PMSF is an inhibitor of the enzyme that inhibits some thiol proteases, non-protease enzymes, and acetylcholinesterase. PMSF reacts with serine residues that cause irreversible inhibition of the enzyme (20–22). This compound can enhance the level of anandamide by preventing its metabolism (23). Some behavioral and antinociceptive studies in animal models have been shown that FAAH inhibitors reduce symptoms of opioid withdrawal and enhance the antinociceptive properties of morphine (24, 25). These findings support the efficacy of inhibition of FAAH for the prevention of dependence and tolerance of drugs. Based on the above findings, we propose that FAAH as a therapeutic target on the morphine-related effects. Thus, in the present study, we examined the effect of FAAH inhibitor, PMSF on morphine antinociceptive tolerance and dependence in mice.

Experimental

Animals
Adult male mice (20–22 g) were obtained from the central animal house of Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences (Ahvaz, Iran). They were placed at 23 ± 2 °C and 12 h light/dark cycles (light from 7:00 to 19:00) with free access to water and food. Animals were randomly divided into groups of 8, acclimatized to the laboratory environment for at least one week before the experiments. The animals were used only once throughout the experiments. Animal care and experimental procedures were carried out in accordance with the standards of the Ethical Committee of Animal Experimentation of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences (IR.AJUMS.REC.1395.38). All behavioral tests were performed by a blinded investigator.
Drugs
Morphine sulfate (Darupakhsh Co, Tehran, Iran) and naloxone hydrochloride (Tolidaru Co, Tehran, Iran) were dissolved in physiological saline (0.9% NaCl). PMSF (Sigma, USA) was suspended in a physiological saline solution containing sesame oil. Morphine was administered subcutaneously (s.c.), and PMSF was administered intraperitoneally (i.p.).
The hot-plate test
This assay measures analgesic activity according to the study of Eddy et al. (26). All animals were placed on a 55 ± 1 °C hot plate, and the latency time to either jumping or licking was recorded. The cut-off time was set as 15 s to protect mice from any damage. The antinociceptive effects of a single dose of morphine (10 mg/kg s.c.) and PMSF (60, 120, and 300 mg/kg) were determined.
Induction of morphine tolerance and dependence and evaluation
Tolerance and dependence on morphine were induced by morphine 10 mg/kg s.c., twice daily for 10 days and the last dose on day 11, with modifications based on the study of Joshi et al. (7). Tolerance to morphine was evaluated by hot-plate antinociceptive test and physical dependence through naloxone (4 mg/kg)-precipitated morphine withdrawal signs. Withdrawal signs include jumping and weight loss were evaluated.
Experimental design
Experiments were made to evaluate the effects of PMSF on nociception and its role in morphine analgesia. Then, the sub-effective dose of PMSF has been studied on the acute and chronic morphine tolerance and dependence in mice and the associated oxidative stress. Two schedules of studies were conducted to examine PMSF effects on acute and chronic morphine tolerance and dependence (Figure 1). In this way, experiments were carried out as follows: 1) Assessment of antinociceptive effects of PMSF at the doses of 60, 120, and 300 mg/kg in comparison of morphine in the hot-plate test at the times of 45, 60, 75, and 90 min after PMSF or morphine (Figure 2).
2) Evaluation of sub-effective dose of PMSF (60 mg/kg) on morphine antinociception in the hot-plate test. Morphine analgesia was recorded 30 min after PMSF (Figure 3). 3) The effects of PMSF on acute and chronic morphine tolerance were evaluated. Tolerance was evaluated 60 min after morphine injection (Figures 4 and 5). 4) The effects of PMSF on acute and chronic morphine dependence were assessed. Naloxone-precipitated morphine withdrawal signs include the number of jumps and weight loss were recorded and then the brain oxidative stress merkers were assessed (Figures 6-8).
Measurement of oxidative stress factors
After the behavioral testing, the animals were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. Then, the whole brain was removed, homogenized and then centrifuged at 4,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C to measure oxidative stress parameters. Activities of antioxidant enzymes consisting of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and the levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) and glutathione (GSH) were measured using the kit.
Statistical analysis
Data are shown as means ± SEM. Variables compared using a one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s post hoc test and two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

Effects of PMSF on nociceptive responses
The results suggest that the administration of the PMSF doses (120 and 300 mg/kg, i.p.) led to significant changes in the analgesic latency time (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001), while administration with PMSF (60 mg/kg i.p.) had no significant difference (Figure 2). Thus, PMSF at the dose of 60 mg/kg was considered as the sub-effective dose.
Effect of PMSF on acute nociceptive behavior of morphine
Results showed that PMSF (60 mg/kg) did not change the latency of nociceptive response in the hot-plate test. As shown in Figure 3, co-administration of PMSF with morphine could not induce any significant effect in comparison to the group receiving morphine alone.
Effect of PMSF on the acute morphine tolerance
As shown in Figure 4, co-administration of PMSF with morphine significantly increased analgesic effect of morphine during the development of morphine tolerance compared with the group receiving morphine alone (P < 0.001). The results revealed that PMSF was able to reverse the expression of morphine tolerance in mice.
Effect of PMSF on chronic morphine tolerance
As depicted in Figure 5, the injection of morphine for 11 days caused an attenuation in analgesic effect compared to normal mice (saline group) (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001). While chronic co-administration of PMSF with morphine significantly diminished the chronic antinociceptive tolerance with comparison to morphine-treated animals (P < 0.001).
Effect of PMSF on naloxone-induced withdrawal jumps and weight loss in morphine-dependent mice
Results show that jumping behavior and weight loss were not affected in the expression phase, suggesting that PMSF did not have possible effects on the expression of naloxone-precipitated withdrawal signs. As shown in Figure 6, administration of naloxone induced jumping and weight loss in dependent mice on the 11th day as compared to control animals (P < 0.001). In the chronic study, administration of naloxone significantly inhibited jumping and weight loss in comparison to the morphine group (P < 0.001).
Effect of chronic or acute administration of PMSF on naloxone-induced alterations on GPx, SOD, CAT, and GSH levels
As illustrated in Figure 7, the result revealed that the level of antioxidant factors including GPx, SOD, CAT, and GSH decreased in the brain of morphine-dependent mice after naloxone administration as compared with the vehicle-treated control group (P < 0.001). In contrast, chronic administration of PMSF caused an increase in the level of GPx, SOD, CAT, and GSH. These effects compared to the morphine group (P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001, respectively) and showed significant enhancement. In contrast, acute administration PMSF had no effects.
Effect of chronic or acute administration of PMSF on naloxone-induced alterationson MDA level
As illustrated in Figure 8, a significant increase in the level of the brain MDA was seen in the morphine-treated animals compared to that in vehicle-treated mice (P < 0.001). On the other hand, lipid peroxidation was significantly declined by chronic co-administration of PMSF and morphine in comparison to morphine-treated animals (P < 0.001). In contrast, the expression phase showed no significant difference compared to the morphine group.

Discussion

More recent evidence has indicated that opioid receptors have the main role in the peripheral and central neurons of pain (27). Opiate drugs, such as morphine, are the most effective therapy for severe pain, but these compounds are remarkably affected by the development of analgesic tolerance, physical and psychological dependence (28). In the current study, the effects of PMSF on nociceptive responses in the hot-plate test were examined and the antinociceptive threshold was measured in animals. The results demonstrate that PMSF caused antinociception at the doses 120 and 300 mg/kg, whereas the dose of 60 mg/kg PMSF did not change the antinociceptive threshold. Accordingly, the dose of 60 mg/kg was considered as sub-effective dose (Figure 2). It has been shown that parenteral administration of PMSF can cross the blood-brain barrier and is transported into the brain (29). In an investigation, it has been demonstrated the influence of PMSF on anandamide brain levels and pharmacological effects. The result of this survey showed that pretreatment with PMSF was able to induce antinociception by enhancing brain levels of anandamide (17). Antinociceptive effects of PMSF may be mediated through an increase in the level of endocannabinoid, especially anandamide. Anandamide as the agonist of cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors induces analgesia (30). Moreover, PMSF can inhibit serine proteinases, which would normally separate endorphins into inactive pieces (31). The function of endorphins is similar to opioids such as morphine. Endorphins delay perception of pain through interaction with the group of opioid receptors and neurons in the brain that modulate the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) transmission (32, 33). The tolerance and dependence capacity of endorphins is a documentary reality and the mechanism of the expansion of tolerance to endorphins is likely to be relevant to the underlying tolerance to opiates (34). To evaluate the morphine tolerance in the pain model, the selected dose of PMSF should not cause an analgesic response, and also does not change the analgesic effect of morphine. For this purpose, the effects of PMSF on the acute nociceptive behavior of morphine were assessed in mice. The results indicated that the sub-effective dose of PMSF does not affect the antinociceptive behavior of morphine (Figure 3). In this paper, the effect of acute administration of PMSF on the expression of morphine tolerance on day 11 shows that PMSF reverse tolerance to morphine (Figure 4) and chronic use of PMSF resolved morphine tolerance at the days 5, 7, 9 and 11 (Figure 5). Alleviation of acute and chronic morphine tolerance by PMSF may be related to the endocannabinoid Interactions with the opioids system. In this regard, it was shown that the correlation between receptor affinity and potency of anandamide suggests that is probably enhanced with the administration of PMSF (35). In another study, Compton et al indicated that after the administration of PMSF, increased the activity of anandamide in an analgesic test (23). The naloxone jump and weight loss test are as a measure of recognition of opiate dependence or degree of severity of the withdrawal syndrome (36). It was demonstrated that the effect of naloxone, a potent opiate receptor blocker, could be attributed to the removal of the effects of opioid peptides (37). After naloxone administration, significant behavioral alterations such as jumping and weight loss were observed in morphine administered mice, confirming the development of morphine dependence. Chronic administration of PMSF decreased naloxone-induced withdrawal jump and weight loss in morphine-dependent mice. In contrast, acute administration PMSF had no effects (Figure 6). Previous studies have been shown that morphine administration produces ROS. Besides it also able to increases oxidative harm to the DNA, protein, and lipid. Morphine decreases in the activities of the antioxidant enzymes include GPx, SOD, CAT, and also GSH content (38–40). The findings showed that treatment of morphine-dependent mice with naloxone causes an increase in the level of MDA, and a reduction in endogenous antioxidants such as GPx, SOD, CAT, and GSH level of brain tissue. Chronic administration of PMSF induced marked effects possibly through alterations in antioxidant status (including decreasing MDA value, as well as increase in activities of GPx, SOD, CAT enzymes and GSH levels) against the effects of morphine in the brain. Acute administration of PMSF, unlike chronic, did not significantly change oxidative stress markers in morphine-dependent mice (Figure 7 and Figure 8). In the present study, the effect of PMSF as a FAAH inhibitor was evaluated on morphine-induced tolerance and dependence in mice. Inhibitors of FAAH can prohibit the breakdown of endogenous ligands for cannabinoid receptors. The chronic increase of anandamide induced by the FAAH inhibitors diminishes the development of morphine tolerance and dependence than the chronic use of cannabinoid-receptor agonists (41). A growing body of evidence reveals that the targeting of FAAH can be a strategy for the reduction in inflammation, pain, and neuropsychiatric disorders (42). Given this information, it can be confirmed that PMSF can improve the unreliable effects of opioids.
Timeline treatment with PMSF on acute and chronic morphine tolerance and dependence in morphine tolerant and dependent mice
Figure 1

Timeline treatment with PMSF on acute and chronic morphine tolerance and dependence in morphine tolerant and dependent mice

Effects of PMSF and morphine (MPH) on nociceptive responses in the mouse hot-plate test. Vehicle (VEH), PMSF, and MPH were administered 30 min before beginning the test. The latencies of nociceptive responses were measured 45, 60, 75, and 90 min after PMSF administration
Figure 2

Effects of PMSF and morphine (MPH) on nociceptive responses in the mouse hot-plate test. Vehicle (VEH), PMSF, and MPH were administered 30 min before beginning the test. The latencies of nociceptive responses were measured 45, 60, 75, and 90 min after PMSF administration

PMSF effect on the analgesic latency of acute morphine. The latency of nociceptive responses was measured 60 min after MPH administration. To assess the effects of PMSF on acute morphine-induced antinociception in the hot-plate test, the animals received a dose of PMSF (60 mg/kg, i.p.), 30 min before morphine (10 mg/kg, s.c.). Data are expressed as the means ± SEM. Each group consisted of 8 mice. <sup>***</sup><i>P &lt; </i>0.001 compared to vehicle control
Figure 3

PMSF effect on the analgesic latency of acute morphine. The latency of nociceptive responses was measured 60 min after MPH administration. To assess the effects of PMSF on acute morphine-induced antinociception in the hot-plate test, the animals received a dose of PMSF (60 mg/kg, i.p.), 30 min before morphine (10 mg/kg, s.c.). Data are expressed as the means ± SEM. Each group consisted of 8 mice. ***P < 0.001 compared to vehicle control

Effect of acute administration of PMSF on the expression of morphine tolerance in mice. To evaluate whether PMSF could reverse morphine tolerance in mice, the animal received morphine (10 mg/kg, s.c.) twice daily for 10 days and on the test day (day11), PMSF (60 mg/kg, i.p.) was administrated 30 min before morphine injection. The hot-plate test was carried out to evaluate the effect of PMSF on the expression of morphine tolerance. Each point represents the means ± SEM. (n = 8). <sup>***</sup><i>P &lt; </i>0.001 <i>vs.</i> vehicle-treated group (ANOVA Tukey's multiple comparison test)
Figure 4

Effect of acute administration of PMSF on the expression of morphine tolerance in mice. To evaluate whether PMSF could reverse morphine tolerance in mice, the animal received morphine (10 mg/kg, s.c.) twice daily for 10 days and on the test day (day11), PMSF (60 mg/kg, i.p.) was administrated 30 min before morphine injection. The hot-plate test was carried out to evaluate the effect of PMSF on the expression of morphine tolerance. Each point represents the means ± SEM. (n = 8). ***P < 0.001 vs. vehicle-treated group (ANOVA Tukey's multiple comparison test)

Effect of chronic administration of PMSF on the development of tolerance to the analgesic effect of morphine in mice. To evaluate whether PMSF could reverse morphine tolerance in mice, PMSF (60 mg/kg, i.p.) was administered 30 min before morphine (10 mg/kg, s.c.) twice daily for 11 days. The analgesic effect was recorded on the 1<sup>st</sup>, 3<sup>rd</sup>, 5<sup>th</sup>, 7<sup>th</sup>, 9<sup>th,</sup> and 11<sup>th</sup> days, 60 min after morphine injection in the hot-plate test. Each point represents the means ± SEM. (n = 8). <sup>**</sup><i>P &lt; </i>0.01, <sup>***</sup><i>P &lt; </i>0.001 <i>vs.</i> saline-treated group; <sup>###</sup><i>P &lt; </i>0.001 <i>vs.</i> morphine alone treated group (Bonferroni's multiple comparison test)
Figure 5

Effect of chronic administration of PMSF on the development of tolerance to the analgesic effect of morphine in mice. To evaluate whether PMSF could reverse morphine tolerance in mice, PMSF (60 mg/kg, i.p.) was administered 30 min before morphine (10 mg/kg, s.c.) twice daily for 11 days. The analgesic effect was recorded on the 1st, 3rd, 5th, 7th, 9th, and 11th days, 60 min after morphine injection in the hot-plate test. Each point represents the means ± SEM. (n = 8). **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 vs. saline-treated group; ###P < 0.001 vs. morphine alone treated group (Bonferroni's multiple comparison test)

Effect of acute or chronic administration of PMSF on naloxone-induced withdrawal jump and weight loss in morphine-dependent mice. In the chronic study, animals received PMSF (60 mg/kg, i.p.) twice daily for 11 days 30 min before each morphine (10 mg/kg, s.c.) and in the expression phase, animals received PMSF (60 mg/kg, i.p.) on the 11<sup>th</sup> day, 30 min before last morphine (10 mg/kg, s.c.) injection. Naloxone (4 mg/kg) was injected into mice on the 11<sup>th</sup> day, 2h after morphine. Each point represents the means ± SEM. (n = 8). <sup>***</sup><i>P &lt; </i>0.001 <i>vs.</i> morphine treated group alone,<sup> ###</sup><i>P &lt; </i>0.001 <i>vs.</i> vehicle-treated group (ANOVA Tukey's multiple comparisons test)
Figure 6

Effect of acute or chronic administration of PMSF on naloxone-induced withdrawal jump and weight loss in morphine-dependent mice. In the chronic study, animals received PMSF (60 mg/kg, i.p.) twice daily for 11 days 30 min before each morphine (10 mg/kg, s.c.) and in the expression phase, animals received PMSF (60 mg/kg, i.p.) on the 11th day, 30 min before last morphine (10 mg/kg, s.c.) injection. Naloxone (4 mg/kg) was injected into mice on the 11th day, 2h after morphine. Each point represents the means ± SEM. (n = 8). ***P < 0.001 vs. morphine treated group alone, ###P < 0.001 vs. vehicle-treated group (ANOVA Tukey's multiple comparisons test)

Effect of the chronic or acute administration of PMSF on naloxone-induced alterations in the brain GPx (A), SOD (B), CAT (C), and GSH (D) levels in morphine-dependent mice. In the chronic study, animals received PMSF (60 mg/kg, i.p. twice daily for 10 days) 30 min before morphine (10 mg/kg, s.c. twice daily for 10 days) and on the 11<sup>th</sup> in the expression phase, animals received PMSF (60 mg/kg, i.p.) 30 min before last morphine (10 mg/kg, s.c.) injection. In the expression phase, animals received morphine (10 mg/kg, s.c. twice daily for 10 days) and on the 11<sup>th</sup> day PMSF (60 mg/kg, i.p.) 30 min before last morphine (10 mg/kg, s.c.) injection. Naloxone (4 mg/kg) was injected into mice on the 11<sup>th</sup> day, 2h after morphine
Figure 7

Effect of the chronic or acute administration of PMSF on naloxone-induced alterations in the brain GPx (A), SOD (B), CAT (C), and GSH (D) levels in morphine-dependent mice. In the chronic study, animals received PMSF (60 mg/kg, i.p. twice daily for 10 days) 30 min before morphine (10 mg/kg, s.c. twice daily for 10 days) and on the 11th in the expression phase, animals received PMSF (60 mg/kg, i.p.) 30 min before last morphine (10 mg/kg, s.c.) injection. In the expression phase, animals received morphine (10 mg/kg, s.c. twice daily for 10 days) and on the 11th day PMSF (60 mg/kg, i.p.) 30 min before last morphine (10 mg/kg, s.c.) injection. Naloxone (4 mg/kg) was injected into mice on the 11th day, 2h after morphine

Effect of chronic or acute administration of PMSF on naloxone-induced alterations in the brain MDA level in morphine-dependent mice. In the chronic study, animals received PMSF (60 mg/kg, i.p. twice daily for 10 days) 30 min before morphine (10 mg/kg, s.c. twice daily for 10 days) and on day 11 in the expression phase, animals received PMSF (60 mg/kg, i.p.) 30 min before last morphine (10 mg/kg, s.c.) injection. In the expression phase, animals received morphine (10 mg/kg, s.c. twice daily for 10 days) and on the 11<sup>th</sup> day PMSF (60 mg/kg, i.p.) 30 min before last morphine (10 mg/kg, s.c.) injection. Naloxone (4 mg/kg) was injected into mice on the 11<sup>th</sup> day, 2 h after morphine. Each point represents the means ± SEM. (n = 8). <sup>*</sup><i>P &lt; 0.05</i>, <sup>**</sup><i>P &lt; </i>0.01, <sup>***</sup><i>P &lt; </i>0.001 <i>vs</i>. vehicle-treated group, <sup>###</sup><i>P &lt; </i>0.001 <i>vs</i>. morphine-treated group, alone. (ANOVA Tukey's multiple comparisons test)
Figure 8

Effect of chronic or acute administration of PMSF on naloxone-induced alterations in the brain MDA level in morphine-dependent mice. In the chronic study, animals received PMSF (60 mg/kg, i.p. twice daily for 10 days) 30 min before morphine (10 mg/kg, s.c. twice daily for 10 days) and on day 11 in the expression phase, animals received PMSF (60 mg/kg, i.p.) 30 min before last morphine (10 mg/kg, s.c.) injection. In the expression phase, animals received morphine (10 mg/kg, s.c. twice daily for 10 days) and on the 11th day PMSF (60 mg/kg, i.p.) 30 min before last morphine (10 mg/kg, s.c.) injection. Naloxone (4 mg/kg) was injected into mice on the 11th day, 2 h after morphine. Each point represents the means ± SEM. (n = 8). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 vs. vehicle-treated group, ###P < 0.001 vs. morphine-treated group, alone. (ANOVA Tukey's multiple comparisons test)

Conclusion

In summary, PMSF can be recommended for co-treatment with opioids to prevent the appearance of unwanted effects such as the development of tolerance and dependence. Because of the important role of NO in the development of morphine tolerance and dependence (43), we suggest determination of NO along with the endocannabinoid levels in the brain. As these effects can be modulated by the CB1 receptor (44), the use of cannabinoid receptor agonist and antagonist is necessary for further evaluation of PMSF effects on the development of morphine tolerance and dependence.

Acknowledgments

References

  • 1.
    Wise RA, Koob GF. The development and maintenance of drug addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2014;39:254-62. [PubMed ID: 24121188].
  • 2.
    Rodgers HM, Lim SA, Yow J, Dinkins ML, Patton R, Clemens S, Brewer KL. Dopamine D1 or D3 receptor modulators prevent morphine tolerance and reduce opioid withdrawal symptoms. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2020;23:172935.
  • 3.
    Hernández L, Romero A, Almela P, García-Nogales P, Laorden ML, Puig MM. Tolerance to the antinociceptive effects of peripherally administered opioids: expression of β-arrestins. Brain Res. 2009;1248:31-9. [PubMed ID: 19026993].
  • 4.
    Bagherpasand N, Mehri S, Shahroudi MJ, Tabatabai SM, Khezri A, Fathi M, Abnous K, Imenshahidi M, Hosseinzadeh H. Effect of Topiramate on Morphine-induced Conditioned Place Preference (CPP) in Rats: Role of ERK and CREB Proteins in Hippocampus and Cerebral Cortex. Iran. J. Pharm. Res. 2019;18:2000. [PubMed ID: 32184865].
  • 5.
    Alipour P, Khodayar MJ, Mansouri MT, Ghorbanzadeh B. Investigation on the effect of Ketotifen Upon morphine tolerance and dependence in mice. Jundishapur J. Nat. Pharm. Prod. 2018;13:e16303.
  • 6.
    Bohn LM, Gainetdinov RR, Lin FT, Lefkowitz RJ, Caron MG. μ-Opioid receptor desensitization by β-arrestin-2 determines morphine tolerance but not dependence. Nature. 2000;408:720-3. [PubMed ID: 11130073].
  • 7.
    Joshi J, Singh A, Naidu PS, Kulkarni SK. Protective effect of bupropion on morphine tolerance and dependence in mice. Methods Find. Exp. Clin. Pharmacol. 2004;26:623-6. [PubMed ID: 15605122].
  • 8.
    Taylor DA, Fleming WW. Unifying perspectives of the mechanisms underlying the development of tolerance and physical dependence to opioids. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2001;297:11-8. [PubMed ID: 11259522].
  • 9.
    Han X, Yang N, Xu Y, Zhu J, Chen Z, Liu Z, Dang G, Song C. Simvastatin treatment improves functional recovery after experimental spinal cord injury by upregulating the expression of BDNF and GDNF. Neurosci. Lett. 2011;487:255-9. [PubMed ID: 20851742].
  • 10.
    Bachi K, Sierra S, Volkow ND, Goldstein RZ, Alia-Klein N. Is biological aging accelerated in drug addiction? Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 2017;13:34-9.
  • 11.
    Abdel-Zaher AO, Abdel-Rahman MS, ELwasei FM. Blockade of nitric oxide overproduction and oxidative stress by Nigella sativa oil attenuates morphine-induced tolerance and dependence in mice. Neurochem. Res. 2010;35:1557-65. [PubMed ID: 20552271].
  • 12.
    Cao JL, Ding HL, He JH, Zhang LC, Duan SM, Zeng YM. The spinal nitric oxide involved in the inhibitory effect of midazolam on morphine-induced analgesia tolerance. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2005;80:493-503. [PubMed ID: 15740792].
  • 13.
    Liu CH, Cherng CH, Lin SL, Yeh CC, Wu CT, Tai YH, Wong CS. N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist MK-801 suppresses glial pro-inflammatory cytokine expression in morphine-tolerant rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2011;99:371-80. [PubMed ID: 21624390].
  • 14.
    Powell KJ, Hosokawa A, Bell A, Sutak M, Milne B, Quirion R, Jhamandas K. Comparative effects of cyclo-oxygenase and nitric oxide synthase inhibition on the development and reversal of spinal opioid tolerance. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1999;127:631-44. [PubMed ID: 10401553].
  • 15.
    Sloan ME, Gowin JL, Ramchandani VA, Hurd YL, Le Foll B. The endocannabinoid system as a target for addiction treatment: Trials and tribulations. Neuropharmacology. 2017;124:73-83. [PubMed ID: 28564576].
  • 16.
    Kathuria S, Gaetani S, Fegley D, Valiño F, Duranti A, Tontini A, Mor M, Tarzia G, La Rana G, Calignano A, Giustino A. Modulation of anxiety through blockade of anandamide hydrolysis. Nat. Med. 2003;9:76-81.
  • 17.
    Wiley JL, Dewey MA, Jefferson RG, Winckler RL, Bridgen DT, Willoughby KA, Martin BR. Influence of phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride on anandamide brain levels and pharmacological effects. Life Sci. 2000;67:1573-83. [PubMed ID: 10983852].
  • 18.
    Deutsch DG, Chin SA. Enzymatic synthesis and degradation of anandamide, a cannabinoid receptor agonist. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1993;46:791-6. [PubMed ID: 8373432].
  • 19.
    Fowler CJ, Jonsson KO, Tiger G. Fatty acid amide hydrolase: biochemistry, pharmacology, and therapeutic possibilities for an enzyme hydrolyzing anandamide, 2-arachidonoylglycerol, palmitoylethanolamide and oleamide1. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2001;62:517-26. [PubMed ID: 11585048].
  • 20.
    Desarnaud F, Cadas H, Piomelli D. Anandamide amidohydrolase activity in rat brain microsomes Identification and partial characterization. J. Biol. Chem. 1995;270:6030-5. [PubMed ID: 7890734].
  • 21.
    James GT. Inactivation of the protease inhibitor phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride in buffers. Anal. Biochem. 1978;86:574-9. [PubMed ID: 26289].
  • 22.
    Moss DE, Fahrney D. Kinetic analysis of differences in brain acetylcholinesterase from fish or mammalian sources. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1978;27:2693-8. [PubMed ID: 215165].
  • 23.
    Compton DR, Martin BR. The effect of the enzyme inhibitor phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride on the pharmacological effect of anandamide in the mouse model of cannabimimetic activity. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1997;283:1138-43. [PubMed ID: 9399986].
  • 24.
    Schlosburg JE, Carlson BL, Ramesh D, Abdullah RA, Long JZ, Cravatt BF, Lichtman AH. Inhibitors of endocannabinoid-metabolizing enzymes reduce precipitated withdrawal responses in THC-dependent mice. AAPS J. 2009;11:342-52. [PubMed ID: 19430909].
  • 25.
    Fotio Y, Palese F, Guaman Tipan P, Ahmed F, Piomelli D. Inhibition of fatty acid amide hydrolase in the CNS prevents and reverses morphine tolerance in male and female mice. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2020;177:3024-35. [PubMed ID: 32077093].
  • 26.
    Eddy NB, Leimbach D. Synthetic analgesics Dithienylbutenyl-and dithienylbutylamines. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1953;107:385-93. [PubMed ID: 13035677].
  • 27.
    Khasar SG, McCarter G, Levine JD. Epinephrine produces a β-adrenergic receptor-mediated mechanical hyperalgesia and in-vitro sensitization of rat nociceptors. J. Neurophysiol. 1999;81:1104-12. [PubMed ID: 10085337].
  • 28.
    Mansouri MT, Khodayar MJ, Tabatabaee A, Ghorbanzadeh B, Naghizadeh B. Modulation of morphine antinociceptive tolerance and physical dependence by co-administration of simvastatin. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2015;137:38-43. [PubMed ID: 26255154].
  • 29.
    Turini P, Kurooka S, Steer M, Corbascio AN, Singer TP. The action of phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride on human acetylcholinesterase, chymotrypsin and trypsin. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1969;167:98-104. [PubMed ID: 4306345].
  • 30.
    Svíženská I, Dubový P, Šulcová A. Cannabinoid receptors 1 and 2 (CB1 and CB2), their distribution, ligands and functional involvement in nervous system structures—a short review. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2008;90:501-11. [PubMed ID: 18584858].
  • 31.
    Pinsky C, Dua AK, LaBella FS. Phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) given systemically produces naloxone-reversible analgesia and potentiates effects of beta-endorphin given centrally. Life Sci. 1982;31:1193-6. [PubMed ID: 6292607].
  • 32.
    Sprouse-Blum AS, Smith G, Sugai D, Parsa FD. endorphins and their importance in pain management. Hawaii Med. J. 2010;69:70.
  • 33.
    Tseng LF. Evidence for ε-opioid receptor-mediated β-endorphin-induced analgesia. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2001;22:623-30. [PubMed ID: 11730972].
  • 34.
    Bläsig J, Herz A. Tolerance and dependence induced by morphine-like pituitary peptides in rats. Naunyn. Schmiedebergs. Arch. Pharmacol. 1976;294:297-300. [PubMed ID: 1034220].
  • 35.
    Adams IB, Ryan W, Singer M, Thomas BF, Compton DR, Razdan RK, Martin BR. Evaluation of cannabinoid receptor binding and in vivo activities for anandamide analogs. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1995;273:1172-81. [PubMed ID: 7791088].
  • 36.
    VonVoigtlander PF, Lewis RA. A withdrawal hyperalgesia test for physical dependence: evaluation of μ and mixed-partial opioid agonists. J. Pharmacol. Methods. 1983;10:277-82. [PubMed ID: 6142986].
  • 37.
    Sacerdote P, Gaspani L, Panerai AE. The opioid antagonist naloxone induces a shift from type 2 to type 1 cytokine pattern in normal and skin-grafted mice. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2000;917:755-63. [PubMed ID: 11268404].
  • 38.
    Abdel-Zaher AO, Mostafa MG, Farghly HM, Hamdy MM, Omran GA, Al-Shaibani NK. Inhibition of brain oxidative stress and inducible nitric oxide synthase expression by thymoquinone attenuates the development of morphine tolerance and dependence in mice. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2013;702:62-70. [PubMed ID: 23376567].
  • 39.
    Zhang YT, Zheng QS, Pan J, Zheng RL. Oxidative damage of biomolecules in mouse liver induced by morphine and protected by antioxidants. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2004;95:53-8. [PubMed ID: 15379780].
  • 40.
    Xu J, Tian W, Ma X, Guo J, Shi Q, Jin Y, Xi J, Xu Z. The molecular mechanism underlying morphine-induced Akt activation: roles of protein phosphatases and reactive oxygen species. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 2011;61:303-11. [PubMed ID: 21626435].
  • 41.
    Panlilio LV, Justinova Z, Goldberg SR. Inhibition of FAAH and activation of PPAR: new approaches to the treatment of cognitive dysfunction and drug addiction. Pharmacol. Ther. 2013;138:84-102. [PubMed ID: 23333350].
  • 42.
    Schlosburg JE, Kinsey SG, Lichtman AH. Targeting fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) to treat pain and inflammation. AAPS J. 2009;11:39-44. [PubMed ID: 19184452].
  • 43.
    Khan MI, Momeny M, Ostadhadi S, Jahanabadi S, Ejtemaei-Mehr S, Sameem B, Zarrinrad G, Dehpour AR. Thalidomide attenuates development of morphine dependence in mice by inhibiting PI3K/Akt and nitric oxide signaling pathways. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry. 2018;82:39-48. [PubMed ID: 29223784].
  • 44.
    Paquette JJ, Wang HY, Bakshi K, Olmstead MC. Cannabinoid-induced tolerance is associated with a CB1 receptor G protein coupling switch that is prevented by ultra-low dose rimonabant. Behav. Pharmacol. 2007;18:767-76. [PubMed ID: 17989514].
Import into EndNoteImport into BibTex
Crossmark
Crossmark
Checking
Share on
Comments
Number of Comments:0
Cited by
Metrics
Get Permission (article level)

Purchasing Reprints

  • Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) handles bulk orders for article reprints for Brieflands. To place an order for reprints, please click here (   https://www.copyright.com/landing/reprintsinquiryform/ ). Clicking this link will bring you to a CCC request form where you can provide the details of your order. Once complete, please click the ‘Submit Request’ button and CCC’s Reprints Services team will generate a quote for your review.
Search Relations

Author(s):

Related Articles

Related Article in PubMed

Related Article in Google Scholar

Create Citation Alert via Google Reader