Study setting
This prospective and blinded randomized clinical trial was conducted in an academic referral hospital affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences from August 2019 to October 2020.
Ethical considerations
This study was approved by review boards of Tehran University of Medical Sciences by reference number: IR.TUMS.MEDICINE.REC.1399.070 and registered as a clinical trial by reference number IRCT20130808014301N2. The protocol of the study was designed according to the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants agreed to participate in the study, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria were:
Tubular EP as an inappropriate increase in β-hCG levels less than or equal to 63% increase within 48 h
Age between 18 and 45 years
A β-hCG levels ≤3500
Absence of fetal heart rate
The average diameter of the adnexal mass ≤3.5 cm
Stable hemodynamic condition
Absence of significant abdominal pain
No history of allergic reactions to MTX
No history of allergic reactions to letrozole and other aromatase inhibitors
Exclusion criteria were:
Dissatisfaction with MTX or letrozole administration
Methadone use
Significant free fluid in the pelvis
Any known liver disorder or abnormal liver enzyme levels (AST or ALT)
Any known renal disorder or impaired renal function tests (abnormal creatinine)
Heterotopic pregnancy
Randomization
After confirming the eligibility criteria, participants were randomly assigned to MTX + placebo and MTX + letrozole groups in a 1:1 allocation by a computer‐generated simple randomization list. The allocation sequence was kept blinded to the recruiters and local staff. The stratification factors to be balanced across treatment groups were age and BMI. The patient, the prescribing nurse, the data collector, and the statistical analyst were unaware of the intervention.
Patient setting
At the beginning of the study, preliminary serum biochemistry markers such as hematological, hepatic, and creatinine were obtained and repeated at the end of the treatment period. The serum β-hCG titration was checked with the same laboratory kit on days 1, 4, 7, and 14 of treatment.
After confirming tubal EP diagnosis. On the same day, a single dose of intramuscular MTX (50 mg/m2) by Ebewe Pharma, Bulgaria was ordered in both groups. The MTX + placebo group took two placebo tablets every 12 hours for seven days from the day of MTX administration; while the MTX + letrozole group received two letrozole tablets (Abureyhan Co., Iran, 2.5 milligram letrozole tablets) every 12 hours for seven days from the day of MTX administration.
If the decrease in β-hCG level between days 4 and 7 was less than 15%, the second dose of intramuscular MTX (50 mg/m2) was administered. After day 7, the β-hCG level was checked weekly. All patients were hospitalized at least in the first week of intervention. They were also advised to increase their fluid intake and avoid exposure to sunlight. They were informed of the common side effects of MTX and warned to avoid alcohol, non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs and aspirin.
Patients with severe pain were further evaluated with transvaginal ultrasonography. Patients with findings of hemoperitoneum by ultrasound or any hemodynamic changes which may accompany a tubal rupture underwent emergency surgery.
Criteria for discontinuation of trial treatment
Severe adverse effects which may be related to the study medication, severe pain with findings of hemoperitoneum by transvaginal ultrasonography, hemodynamic changes, or unstable general condition that led to emergency management were the criteria for discontinuation of the trial.
Outcome measures
During and at the end of the study, the need for urgent surgical intervention and instability of patients’ hemodynamic as well as safety and efficacy of two regimens and their effect on the course of serum β-hCG titration were evaluated.
Statistical analysis
The statistical analyses were done using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24.0 (IBM, New York, USA). A P-value of less than 0.05 was determined as the level of statistical significance. We used Independent T-test and repeated measures to assess differences in means. A Chi-square and Fisher’s Exact test were applied to evaluate differences in proportions.