Animal, Model induction, and Treatment
Thirty-two adult female C57BL/6 mice (10-12 weeks, 18-20 g.) were obtained from Pasteur Institute of Iran and randomly divided into four experimental groups including: 1) control (healthy mice), 2) EAE, 3) sham (EAE + vehicle), and 4) treatment group. Each group was kept in a separate and standard cage. The animals were allowed to adapt in an isolated room under constant temperature (25 °C), and intermittent 12 h dark/light for a week. Animal Research Ethics Committee of the University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences approved all procedures of our experiment (IR.USWR.REC.1397.161).
Briefly, EAE was induced in C57BL/6 mice with Hooke kit (Hooke Laboratories, Inc, USA) by the subcutaneous injection of 300 µg of emulsified MOG35-55 peptide in 0.1 ml PBS plus an equal amount of Incomplete Freund’s Adjuvant containing 4 mg/mL of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Then, 500 ng of Bordetella pertussis toxin was injected intraperitoneally on the first day of the model induction and on the second day (48 h after the first injection). No treatment was performed in the control and EAE groups. In the treatment group, 10 mg/kg of the herbal extract compound (that obtained by Nano Hayat Darou company, Iran) was daily injected via IP from day one post-immunization for 21 days. The sham group just received the vehicle (dilution of 82% ethanol) of the drug.
Assessments
Scoring
Typically, the gradual onset of signs of EAE begins between days 10 and 12 post-immunization. After the disease signs appear, the animals were daily scored based on the following criteria: no symptom (score = 0); partial tail paralysis (score < 1); tail paralysis and partial hind limb numbness (1 ≤ score < 2); tail paralysis, hind limb numbness and apparent waddling gait (2 ≤ score < 3); complete hind limb paralysis (3 ≤ score < 4); tail paralysis, complete hind limb paralysis and forelimb numbness (3 ≤ score < 4); tail paralysis and quadriplegia (4 ≤ score < 5), death (score = 5).
Moreover, animal weight, as an objective indicator of disease progression, was measured daily.
Grip Strength
Test is commonly a non-invasive in-vivo method to properly evaluate the weakness of muscles. Based on this method, each mouse was allowed to tightly hold the triangular bar of grip strength meter (Columbus Instruments), then pulled away horizontally at a constant speed. The test was repeated three times for each mouse, and the result of the best performance was recorded.
Gene Expression Evaluation
Total RNA was carefully extracted from the corpus callosum tissue using the Hybrid-R
TM RNA isolation kit (GeneAll, South Korea), and then the quality and quantity of extracted RNA were determined by agarose gel electrophoresis and NanoDrop ND-2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, USA), respectively. 500 ng of extracted RNA was reverse-transcribed to cDNA via the PrimeScript™ RT reagent Kit (Takara, Japan). Specific primers for target genes were uniquely designed using the NCBI database and primer3 software. The necessary information of primers was listed in (
Table 1).
Finally, real-time PCR reaction for target and internal control genes was performed using the SYBR Green Master Mix protocol and kit (Ampliqon, Denmark). In this experiment, duplicate qPCR reactions were efficiently performed in 40 cycles using the ABI 7500 instrument (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).
The relative expression value of target genes was normalized with HPRT-1 as an internal control and calculated using the 2-ΔΔCt method, and fold change expression between groups was computed.
Histopathological Process
For histopathological examination, two mice from each group were used. The animals were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of ketamine (20 mg/kg) and xylazine (0.64 mg/kg). The animals were perfused and fixed with 0.1% PBS and paraformaldehyde (PFA) and kept in 4% PFA for 48 h (post-fixation) and then processed and blocked. Next, the paraffin blocks were coronally cross-sectioned 5 µm by rotary microtome (Leica microsystem RM2235, UK), and 20 sections of corpus callosum tissue were obtained. To evaluate demyelination, the samples were stained with Luxol Fast Blue (based on Kluver-Barrera method), and after staining, the samples were analyzed by light microscope and Image J software.
Glutathione peroxidase Enzyme Activity Assay
Glutathione Peroxidase (GPX-1) catalyzes the glutathione (GSH) oxidation reaction by Cumene Hydroperoxide. In the presence of glutathione reductase enzyme and NADPH, oxidized glutathione (GSSG) is reconstituted into reduced glutathione (GSH), which is accompanied by the simultaneous oxidation of NADPH to NADP +. In this reaction, the light absorption is measured at 340 nm. The measurement of NADPH oxidation reflected the enzyme activity level of GPx. Briefly, a solution mixture of glutathione, sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.2), EDTA, and glutathione reductase was prepared in this assay. Then the samples were incubated in the solution for 4 min. Afterward, NADPH was added, and the absorbance was measured at 340 nm over 3 min.
Statistical Analysis
The data of histopathological and enzymatic activity assessments were analyzed by GraphPad Prism software version 8 (La Jolla, Ca, USA. Student t-test was used for the comparison of two groups and ANOVA was used for comparison of more than two groups. The efficiency values of qPCR reactions were determined by the LinReg method. REST 2009 software was used to calculate gene expression levels. The P-value of less than 0.05 was statistically significant.