The preparation of of Fe3O4@PPy–CuIIcomposite microspheres
The preparation plan of Fe
3O
4@PPy–Cu
IIcomposite microspheres was shown in
Scheme 1. .
Figure 1a is the scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of the Fe
3O
4 microspheres. As it can be seen that the as-prepared Fe
3O
4 microspheres have a spherical shape with an average diameter of 140-145 nm. The Fe
3O
4@PPy is composed of microspheres with a mean diameter of 300 nm, and a continuous layer of PPy can be observed on the outer shell of the Fe
3O
4 microsphere and the thickness of these shells are about 20 nm (
Figure 1b). In
Figure 1c, it could be seen that the morphology of Fe
3O
4@PPy–Cu
II almost remained the same after addition of CuCl
2 on Fe
3O
4@PPy composite microspheres
.The structures of the Fe
3O
4 microspheres, Fe
3O
4@PPy, and Fe
3O
4@PPy–Cu
II were analyzed using FT-IR spectroscopy, as shown in
Figure 2, respectively. In curve (a), the strong absorption peak at 576 cm
-1 corresponds to the Fe–O vibrations, the adsorption peaks were located at 3384, 1622, and 1406 cm
-1 and can be attributed to the stretching vibration of -OH, C
=O, and C-O of carboxyl groups, respectively. In the Fe
3O
4@PPy spectrum (
Figure 2b), peaks at 1559 cm
-1 and 1453 cm
-1were assigned to the characteristic absorption peaks of pyrrole rings (
33). Furthermore, the peaks at 1332 cm
-1, 1049 cm
-1, and 934 cm
-1 could be attributed to C–N in-plane (
34), N–H in-plane (
35) and C=C out-of-plane deformation vibrations (
33) in the pyrrole ring, respectively. The bands at 1162 and 775 cm
−1 corresponded to C–H in-plane and out-plane vibration of pyrrole (
36). The FT-IR spectrum of Fe
3O
4@PPy–Cu
II (
Figure 2b) was similar to that of Fe
3O
4@PPy, but the C–N stretching frequency shifted to a lower wavenumber, which was probably caused by N bonded to electron-deficient Cu to form the Cu complex (
37).
XRD analysis of the samples was performed
Figure 3 all detected diffraction peaks marked in
Figure 3a can be indexed to (111), (220), (311), (400), (422), (511), (440), and (533) planes of face-centered cubic Fe
3O
4 phase. In
Figures 3b and3c, the main peaks of Fe
3O
4@PPy, Fe
3O
4@PPy–Cu
II are similar to the Fe3O
4. Thus, either the coating of PPy shell or the immobilizing Cu (II) does not affect the crystal structure of the Fe
3O
4 particles.
Figure 4 illustrates the results of the thermogravimetric analysis of the Fe
3O
4@PPy–Cu
II. The initial mass loss at lower temperatures was assigned to the release of water and solvent molecules in the polymer matrix. A sharp decrease in mass was observed at 300 °C due to thermal degradation of the PPy chains. From the TG analysis, the mass percentages of the PPy in the magnetic core/shell composite is about 18%.
The copper content in Fe
3O
4@PPy–Cu
II composite microspheres was determined by means of ICP-AES and amounted to 4 wt%. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) elemental survey scans of the surface of Fe
3O
4@PPy–Cu
II show clear peaks corresponding to oxygen, nitrogen, carbon, copper, and iron which confirm the successful formation of Fe
3O
4@PPy–Cu
II composite microspheres (
Figure 5a). As it can be observed, in
Figure 5b the peaks located at 933 and 952.8 eV are attributed to the core level Cu 2p
3/2 and Cu 2p
1/2, respectively, which confirms that the oxidation state of copper in the Fe
3O
4@PPy–CuIImicrospheres is (+ II) (
38).
The typical SEM images of different electrodes were shown in
Figure 6 As can be seen at the surface of a bare CPE (
Figure 6a), irregularly shaped graphite flakes and separated layers were isolated from each other. As seen in
Figure 6b, the SEM image shows CPE sheets in presence of ionic liquid more uniform and smooth without separated carbon layer, which was due to binding and blanketing role of ionic liquid. After Fe
3O
4@PPy–Cu
II were added to carbon ionic liquid (
Figure 6c), it can be seen that they were distributed on the surface of electrode with spherical structure.
For further electrochemical characterization, Nyquist plots of CPE, CILE, Fe
3O
4/CILE, Fe
3O
4@PPy /CILE, and Fe
3O
4@PPy–Cu
II/CILE were recorded in the presence of 1.0 mM(Fe(CN)
6)
3-/4- with 0.1 M KCl as the supporting electrolyte are given in
Figure 7 As it can be seen, a well-shaped semi-circle was observed at higher frequencies at the CPE, due to the charge transfer process in the electrode–electrolyte interface (curve a). The small charge transfer resistance of CILE in comparison with the bare CPE indicating the presence of high ionic conductive ionic liquids in the carbon paste could greatly enhance the conductivity of the electrode (curve b). From Nyquist plots, the electron transfers resistance value relating to Fe
3O
4/CILE is smaller compared with the CILE, because the electrode modified with Fe
3O
4 possesses the least electroactive surface area between the above electrodes which is due to the repulsion between
(Fe (CN)
6)
3-/4- redox probe and negative surface charges of nanoparticles as well as relatively agglomerated nature of nanoparticles themselves (curve c). When Fe
3O
4@PPy was incorporated in the electrode, the charge transfer resistance increases dramatically (curve d) due to high conductivity of the PPy polymer. Finally, From Nyquist plots, Fe
3O
4@PPy–Cu
II/CILE show the lowest charge-transfer resistance among the studied five electrodes. This behavior can be attributed to the fact that Cu
2+ions can facilitate the electron transfer between the electrochemical probe (Fe (CN)
6)
3-/4- and the electrode surface (curve e).
Determination of surface area
To illustrate that the Fe
3O
4@PPy–Cu
II could improve the surface area of the CILE, the electroactive surface areas (A) of ordinary CILE and Fe
3O
4@PPy–Cu
II modified electrodes were determined using CV in a 1.0 mM (Fe(CN)
6)
3-/4-solution containing 0.1 M KCl at different scan rates (v) according to the Randles-Sevcik Equation (
39), as follows: ip = 2.69 × 10
5 A D
1/2 n
3/2 v
1/2 C, where Ip is the peak current, D is diffusion coefficient (7.6 × 10
–6 cm
2s
–1),v is scan rate (Vs
–1) , C
0 is the concentration of K
4(Fe(CN)
6) in mol L
–1, υ is the scan rate
n is the number of electron transferred, and A is the effective surface area. As shown in
Figure 8, both the peak currents (ip) of Fe
3O
4@PPy–Cu
IImodified electrode (
Figure 8a) and unmodified electrodes (
Figure 8b) were proportional to the square root of the scan rate. The surface area could be calculated from the slope of ip
vs v
1/2 plot, which were found as 0.147 cm
2, and 0.376 cm
2 for bare CILE and Fe
3O
4@PPy–Cu
II/CILE, respectively, where the electroactive area of the electrode increased 2.49 fold. The results show that the presence of Fe3O4@PPy–Cu
II makes the active surface of the electrode larger.
Electrochemical behavior of CBZ at Fe3O4@PPy–CuII/CILE
The electrochemical behavior of CBZ at different modified electrodes was studied in 0.04M solution of Britton–Robinson buffer (BR) and a 100 μM CBZ solution with a cyclic voltammetry technique, and the results are shown in
Figure 9 Due to slow electron transfer, CBZ did not show obvious oxidation peak at bare CPE (curve a), while the responses were considerably improved at the CILE (curves b), As can be seen in curves c, the peak current increased due to the presence of Fe
3O
4 could increase active surface area. The significant increase in peak current and shift in peak potential at the surface of Fe
3O
4@PPy/CILE in comparison with those obtained CILE/Fe
3O
4, CILE and CPE is due to the large surface and high conductivity of Fe
3O
4@PPy. It also must be noted that the enhancement in the peak currents and shift in peak potential towards less positive potentials at the surface of Fe
3O
4@PPy–Cu
II/CILE in comparison with Fe
3O
4@PPy/CILE, indicates the better catalytic activity of Fe
3O
4@PPy–Cu
IIdue to synergism effect of copper ions in the composition of the modified electrode.
Investigation of the scan rate
The influence of potential scan rate on the oxidation reaction of 100 μM CBZ at the Fe
3O
4@PPy–Cu
II/CILE was investigated by cyclic voltammetry (
Figure 10a). The results showed that the peak currents vary linearly with the square root of the scan rate (υ
1/2) (
Figure 10b), which confirms a diffusion-controlled process for CBZ oxidation on the surface of the modified electrode in the studied range of potential sweep rates, with following Equations: I
pa = 90.444 υ
1/2 +0.7958 (R
2 = 0.996). A plot of log i
pavs. log υ also yields a straight line (
Figure 10C) with the linear regression Equation of log i
pa (μA) = 0.5108 log υ (V s
-1) + 1.9521 (R
2 = 0.9982). The slope of 0.51 is very close to the theoretical value of 0.5, which further confirms a diffusion-controlled process in this case.
Charge transfer coefficient
The transfer coefficient (α), is a quantity which characterizes the effect of electrochemical potential on the activation energy of an electrochemical reaction, can be obtained using Equation 1 for an irreversible diffusion-controlled process. This Equation refers to peak potential and natural logarithm of peak current (ln i
pa), and can be expressed as follows (
40):
Ipa = 0.227 nFAC × ks exp (-α F/ RT (Epa− E0))
(Equation 1)
where α is the electron transfer coefficient, n is the number of transferred electrons, k
s is the heterogeneous electron transfer rate constant, E
0 is the formal redox potential and the other symbols have their usual meanings. The value of E
0 in Equation 1 can be obtained from the intercept of Ep
vs. curve by extrapolating to the vertical axis at = 0 when ν was approached to zero (
41). Moreover, value of α can be calculated from the slope the dependence of ln i
pa on (E
pa-E
0) (
Figure 10d). With the slope of 15.543, the value of α was evaluated to be 0.38 for the Fe
3O
4@PPy–Cu
II/CILE, which is smaller than the reported value of 0.49 at ERGO–SWCNT modified GCEs (
42). The lower α value suggests that the oxidation of CBZ proceeds more easily at Fe
3O
4@PPy–Cu
II/CILE, for which a reasonable reason is that the better conductivity and lots of defect sites of Fe
3O
4@PPy–Cu
II hybrid facilitate the electrons to transfer.
Diffusion coefficient (D)
Chronoamperometric method was employed to evaluate the diffusion coefficient (D) of CBZ at the modified electrode (
Figure 11). In chronoamperometry studies, the value of D of CBZ was determined in solution by using the Cottrell Equation (
43).
I = nFAD1/2 C0 π-1/2 t-1/2
Under diffusion control, a plot of I versus t-1/2 will be linear, and from the slope the mean value of D can be determined. The value of the D for CBZ was 2.1 × 10−5cm2/sec.
Electron transfer number (n)
The number of transferred electrons involved in the overall oxidation process (n) and in the rate-determining step (nα) can be calculated from Equation 2 for a totally irreversible diffusion controlled process, ip is defined by the following Equation (
44).
ip = 2.99 × 105 n ((1-α) nα)1/2 v1/2 C0 A D1/2
(Equation 2)
Where D is the diffusion coefficient (2.1 × 10−5cm2/s), A is the electroactive area (0.376 cm2), and C0 (100 μM) is the bulk concentration of CBZ. The linear Equation between ipa and v1/2 has been peresented when the scan rate effect was studied. So, the value of n (nα1/2) was calculated (2.23) by substituting all the values in Equation 2. Considering the integer value for electron transfer number, the result of n = 2 should be acquired. In addition, the equal numbers of protons and electrons are involved in this electro-oxidation reaction, which are supported by the discussion in the study of effect of pH. Thus, two-proton transferred before or after the rate-determining step.
Standard heterogeneous rate constant (ks)
The standard heterogeneous rate constant (k
s) for the totally irreversible oxidation of CBZ can be estimated according to the following Equation provided by Velasco (
45):
ks = 2.415 exp (-0.02F/ RT) D1/2 (Ep–EP/2)-1/2 υ1/2
(Equation 3)
where E
p is the peak potential in mV, and E
P/2 is the potential where the current equals half of the peak current, also in mV. According to CV curves in
Figure 9, E
p–E
P/2 is 48 mV. Therefore, the k
s value of Fe
3O
4@PPy–Cu
II/CILE is 7.33 10
-3 cm sec
-1.
The influence of pH
The pH of the supporting electrolyte affects the electrochemical behavior of CBZ. To investigate the influence of the pH on the electro-oxidation of CBZ at the Fe
3O
4@PPy–Cu
II/CILE modified electrode, cyclic voltammograms of 100 μM CBZ was recorded at different pH values in the range of 1.0 to 6.0 (
Figure 12a). It was found that with the increase in pH of the solution the peak potential shifted negatively suggesting the participation of H
+ ions in the oxidation reaction. The plot of E
pavs pH values show good linear relationships described by the following Equation:
Epa (V) = −0.056pH + 1.2348 (R
2 = 0.993) (
Figure 12b).
On the other hand, by increasing the pH values, the anodic peak current of CBZ gradually decreased. Hence, Britton–Robinson buffer (BR) solution of pH 2.0 was chosen as the optimum supporting electrolyte and used for all further experiments. The absolute value of the slope 0.05 V pH
−1 is close to the theoretical value of 0.0586 V pH
−1 which indicates that the number of protons and transferred electrons involved in the electro-oxidation mechanism is equal (
46).
Analytical characteristics
The validation tests were carried out for the developed sensor using Fe3O4@PPy–CuII composite microspheres. Optimal conditions were used to find out recovery, linearity, correlation coefficient (R2), limit of detection (LOD), and intra-day and inter-day precisions of this method.
The quantitative determination of CBZ at the Fe
3O
4@PPy–Cu
II/CILE under optimum conditions described above was achieved by DPV. As it can be seen in
Figure 13, the oxidation peak current was linearly related to the CBZ concentration in the range of 0.05 to 25 µmol L
-1 with a calibration Equation of I
p = 0.4911C +1.0401 (R
2 = 0.9939). The detection limit was estimated to be 0.032 µmol L
-1.In order to evaluate the analytical performance of the developed sensor, a literature comparison for CBZ determinations using different modified electrodes is shown in
Table 1. Clearly, that the Fe
3O
4@PPy–Cu
II/CILE is comparable and even better than those obtained from most of other works with respect to their detection limit and linear dynamic range.
Precision, expressed as relative standard deviation (RSD), was evaluated in terms of repeatability and reproducibility whose value for intra-day RSD% was between 2.3% and 3.9% and for inter-day RSD% was in the range of 4.1–5.1%.
Real sample and interference study
The determination of CBZ is clinically significant in therapeutic drug monitoring as it decreases the risk of toxic reactions and increases the possibility of reaching the expected therapeutic result. The practical applicability of the proposed sensor was examined to determine CBZ in human serum and urine samples using standard addition method. The samples were prepared as described in the experimental section. According to the results in
Table 2, the good accuracy and precision obtained demonstrate the reliability of the designed sensor for the determination of CBZ in biological fluids. In order to investigate the selectivity of the designed sensor toward CBZ detection, some ordinary compounds in biological media and drugs were selected. Under the optimum conditions, no interference effect was found for the detection of 50 µM CBZ from the following compounds: NaCl, KNO
3, Tryptophan, Cysteine, Uric acid, and Ascorbic acid.
Investigation of stability and reproducibility
The storage stability of the modified electrode was also investigated by examining its response current after storage period of 30 days. It is found that the current responses remain about 95.2% of their initial values, indicating the appreciable storage stability of this sensor. In continuous, the reproducibility of the modified electrode was investigated using five different electrodes. The relative standard deviations (RSD) for peak currents were less than 5.4%, which indicates that reproducibility of Fe3O4@PPy–CuII/CILE sensor is suitable.
The preparation process of Fe3O4@PPy–CuII
| Reference | LOD(μM) | Linearrange (μM) | Electrode |
|---|
| 3.03 | 5–100 | Au/graphene–AuNPs/GCE |
| 0.029 | 0.05–3 | ERGO–SWCNT/GCE |
| 0.092 | 0.5–100 | Fe–SnO2/SPCE |
| 0.04 | 0.05–100 | MWCNT/GCE |
| 0.016 | 0.15-100 | Fullerene-C60/GCE |
| 3.89 | 84.6–846 | Graphite/GCE |
| This work | 0.032 | 0.05 – 30 | Fe3O4/PANI–CuII/CILE |
| RSD (%) | Recovery (%) | Found (μM) | Added (μM) | |
|---|
| - | - | Not detected | 0 | Blood serumSamples |
| 1.6 | 101 | 3.05 ± 0.05 | 3 |
| 2.7 | 102 | 5.1 ± 0.14 | 5 |
| 3.2 | 97.5 | 9.75 ± 0.32 | 10 |
| - | Not detected | 0 | Urine |
| 2.8 | 95 | 2.85 ± 0.07 | 3 |
| 2.2 | 101 | 4.9 ± 0.11 | 5 |
| 2.3 | 104 | 10.2 ± 0.24 | 10 |
(a) SEM images of Fe3O4; (b) TEM images of Fe3O4@PPy; (c) TEM images of Fe3O4@PPy–CuII
FT-IR spectra of (a) Fe3O4 (b) Fe3O4@PPy and, (c) Fe3O4@PPy–CuII.
XRD patterns of (a) Fe3O4; (b) Fe3O4@PPy and (c) Fe3O4@PPy–CuII.
TGA curve of the as-prepared Fe3O4@PPy–CuII microspheres
XPS spectra of (a) Fe3O4@PPy–CuII; (b) Cu 2p of Fe3O4@PPy–CuII
SEM images of: (a) CPE, (b), CILE and (c) Fe3O4@PPy–CuII/CILE
EIS for (a) CPE, (b) CILE (c) Fe3O4/CILE (d) Fe3O4@PPy /CILE/ and Fe3O4@PPy–CuII/CILE (e) in 1 mM (Fe(CN)6)3-/4- with 0.1 M KCl
Cyclic voltammograms s of 1 mM (Fe(CN)6 )3-/4- in 0.1 M KCl at various scan rates (a-i) (10-250 mV s-1) on Fe3O4@PPy–CuII/CILE (a) and CILE (c); The slope of Ipa vs. v1/2 for 1 mM (Fe(CN)6 )3-/4- on Fe3O4@PPy–CuII /CILE (b) and CILE (d).
Cyclic voltammograms for 100 μM CBZ at scan rate 100 mV s-1 at CPE (a); CILE (b); Fe3O4/CILE (c); Fe3O4@PPy/CILE (d) and Fe3O4@PPy–CuII/CILE (e) in B-R buffer
(a) Cyclic voltammograms of 100 μM CBZ at Fe3O4@PPy–CuII/CILE in B-R buffer at different scan rates. The numbers of 1–8 correspond to 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 150 and 200 mVs−1, respectively. (b) Variation of the peak current with square root of scan rate (υ 1/2); (c) Variation of the the logarithmic peak currents vs. the logarithmic scan rate, and (d) plot of (Epa–E0) and the logarithmic scan rate
Chronoamperograms obtained at the Fe3O4@PPy–CuII/CILE in the presence of 300, 400, 500 and 600 μM CBZ in in B-R buffer. Inset) Cottrell's plot for the data from the chronoamperograms
Cyclic voltammograms of 100 μM CBZ at Fe3O4@PPy–CuII/CILE in B-R buffer recorded (a) from pH 1.0 to 6.0 at a scan rate of 100 mVs−1 (b) effect of pH of CBZ solutions on peak potential
Differential pulse voltammograms of Fe3O4@PPy–CuII/CILE in B-R buffer containing different concentrations of CBZ in the ranges 0.05–25 μM. Inset: Plot of the peak current against concentration of CBZ