Abstract
Keywords
Introduction
L-Asparaginase (EC 3.5.1.1) catalyzes the hydrolysis of asparagine to aspartate and ammonia and is found in a wide range of organisms including mammals, birds, plants, and microorganisms. Owing to their ability to specifically remove asparagine from complex systems, L-Asparaginases have found a number of applications in medicine and food industries (1-4). For example, L-asparaginases derived from Escherichia coli and Erwinia chrysanthemi are an essential part of treatment protocols for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (4-7). They exert their effect by depleting the extracellular L-asparagine pool required for the growth and proliferation of cancer cells. Unlike tumor cells, normal cells do not depend on extracellular L-asparagine. L-Asparaginases are also used to prevent the formation of acrylamide in heat-treated foods (8-10). During high-temperature cooking, asparagine and reducing sugars may react via the Maillard reaction to produce acrylamide (11). Although the significance of such low levels of acrylamide is not yet completely understood, the food industry has voluntarily taken some steps to further reduce acrylamide levels in final products due to concerns regarding its carcinogenicity (12). A major strategy toward this end is to pretreat raw material with L-asparaginase to reduce asparagine levels and a few commercial enzyme preparations for this purpose are available (13, 14). However, such industrial-scale enzymatic processes are often performed under harsh conditions such as high temperature or salinity that may deactivate enzymes obtained from ordinary microorganisms. Enzymes produced by halophilic or halotolerant microorganisms, on the other hand, tend to show higher tolerance to extreme conditions such as high salt concentrations, high temperatures, non-physiological pH values and the presence of organic solvents (15). This study was conducted in an attempt to identify halophilic\halotolerant microorganisms capable of producing L-asparaginases with potential industrial applications.
Moderate and extreme halophiles isolated in this study and localization of their L-asparaginase activity.
| Type of halophile | Number of isolates | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| With L-asparaginase activity | With intracellular activity only | With extracellular activity only | With both intra and extracellular activity | Without L-asparaginase activity | Total | |
| Moderate | 21 | 13 | 0 | 8 | 47 | 68 |
| Extreme | 17 | 12 | 0 | 5 | 35 | 52 |
| Total | 38 | 25 | 0 | 13 | 82 | 120 |
Characteristics of isolates showing the highest level of L-asparaginase activity among all isolates investigated in this study
| Isolate | Growth medium NaCl concentration (M) | Intracellular L-asparaginase activity (U/mL) | extracellular L-asparaginase activity (U/mL) | Identification results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H2 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 0.2 | Halomonas |
| H3 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 0.2 | Halomonas |
| H23 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 0.3 | Halomonas |
| H27 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 0.2 | Halomonas |
| H28 | 1.5 | 2.4 | 0.2 | Halomonas |
| H33 | 3.5 | 1.3 | 0.1 | Aidingimonas |
Experimental
Screening and isolation of halophilic microorganisms exhibiting L-asparaginase activity
Soil and water samples were collected in sterile containers. In order to isolate moderate and extreme halophilic bacteria from soil samples, samples were suspended in phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) supplemented with 1.5 M and 3.5 M NaCl, respectively, and briefly incubated on an orbital shaker at room temperature. Samples were then centrifuged to separate solid particles and the supernatant was used to streak Luria-Bertani agar plates supplemented with 1.5 M or 3.5 M NaCl. To ensure clone purity, all isolates were subjected to successive rounds of streak plating. Water samples were processed in a similar way except that they were first filtered to separate solid particles and then directly transferred to screening plates.
L-Asparaginase-producing microorganisms were screened using the plate assay method (16). Briefly, halophilic isolates were transferred to screening plates containing a modified M9 agar medium (pH 7.0) supplemented with L-asparagine (10 g/L), either 1.5 M or 3.5 M NaCl and the pH indicator phenol red (0.009%). Plates were then incubated at 37 °C for at least 48 h. L-Asparaginase activity results in an increase in medium pH that can be detected by the formation of pink zones around the colonies.
Cell fractionation
Bacterial cells were inoculated into 20-mL volumes of the modified M9 medium described above (minus phenol red and agar) and incubated at 37 °C and 180 rpm for 24 h. Cultures were then centrifuged at 10000g for 5 min at 4 °C. The culture supernatants were used to determine the L-asparaginase activity in the extracellular compartment. The collected cells were washed twice in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.5) and disrupted using an ultrasonic homogenizer. The lysates were clarified by centrifugation at 13000g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatants were used to measure intracellular enzyme activity.
L-Asparaginase assay
L-Asparaginase activity was measured by the Nessler’s reagent method (17). In brief, 100 μL of enzyme preparation was mixed with 400 μL of distilled water, 500 μL of 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.6) supplemented with NaCl (final concentration of 0-3.5 M) and 100 μL of 94.5 mM asparagine solution and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. The enzyme reaction was stopped by adding 50 μL of trichloroacetic acid (1.5 M). An aliquot of 100 μL of the above mixture was added to 2150 μL of distilled water and 250 μL of Nessler’s reagent (Sigma-Aldrich). The absorbance was measured at 436 nm. One enzyme unit was defined as the amount of enzyme that produces 1 μmol of ammonia in 1 min under assay conditions.
Identification
In order to extract genomic DNA, 2-3 fresh colonies of each isolate grown on modified M9 plates were mixed, suspended in distilled water and incubated in a boiling water bath for 10 min. The lysate was centrifuged at 12000g for 10 min and the supernatant was used as template. A region of approximately 1500 pb of the 16S rDNA gene was amplified using primers 27F (5’-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3’) and 1492R (5’-TACGGCTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3’) (18, 19). The PCR reactions were carried out in a thermocycler (peqSTAR, PEQLAB Biotechnologie, Germany) with the following conditions: initial denaturation 95°C for 300 s, followed by 30 cycles of 95 °C for 60 s, 60 °C for 60 s and 72 °C for 90 s and final extension 72 °C for 600 s. The amplified region was sequenced using primers 27F, 518F (5’-CAGCAGCCGCGGTAATA-3’) and 1492R (18, 19). Isolates were identified by comparing the obtained 16S rDNA sequences with the NCBI 16S Ribosomal RNA Sequences database.
Results and discussion
Screening and isolation
Several water and soil samples were collected from 17 hypersaline environments in Iran including 9 salt lakes (Aran va Bidgol, Hoze soltan, Damghan, Khur, Selkenoon, Golestan, Shoor Mast, Shourabil and Urmia), 4 wetlands (Ajigol, Alagol, Almagol and Gomishan), 2 brine springs (Abhar and Kal Shoor) and 2 deserts (Maranjab and Mesr) between 2010 and 2011. A total number of 120 halophilic bacterial isolates were retrieved from these samples using the screening procedure described in the Experimental section. Although the definition of moderate and extreme halophiles remains somewhat arbitrary, microorganisms that grow best at 0.8 M to 3.4 M are usually considered moderate halophiles while those that require more than 3.4 M salinity are classified as extreme halophiles (20). Using this classification scheme as a benchmark, we investigated the ability of isolates to grow in the presence of 1.5 M and 3.5 M NaCl. Among the 120 isolates, 68 were able to grow in the presence of 1.5 M NaCl and 52 demonstrated the ability to grow in the selection medium containing 3.5 M NaCl. These findings are summarized in Table 1. As described in the following sections, both groups are considered potential sources for industrial enzymes.
L-Asparaginase activity
Approximately one-third of both moderate and extreme halophilic isolates showed asparaginase activity on agar plates (Table 1). Thus, a total number of 38 halophilic isolates with L-asparaginase activity were obtained. Since the agar plate method may produce false positive results, the presence of L-asparaginase activity in these isolates was also investigated and confirmed using the Nessler assay.
Since bacteria have been reported to produce both intracellular and extracellular L-asparaginases, all isolates were screened for the presence of both intra and extracellular activity. Most isolates showed only intracellular L-asparaginase activity. Only 13 isolates tested positive for extracellular L-asparaginase activity, all of which also demonstrated the ability to produce intracellular L-asparaginase. In all cases, the extracellular activity was very low. Although these observations may have resulted from the suboptimal assay conditions, they may also suggest that the extracellular activity actually results from leaked or released periplasmic or membrane-bound enzymes rather than actively secreted ones. It may at first seem counterintuitive to base a screening program for halotolerant L-asparaginases on intracellular enzymes; however, as described in the next section, even intracellular enzymes from moderate halophiles may demonstrate very useful properties. As seen in Table 1. the relative abundance of the strains with extracellular L-asparaginase activity does not appear to be de related to their salt tolerance.
Identification
Most of the isolates demonstrated very low levels of L-asparaginase activity. As the objective of this study was to identify halophilic bacterial strains with potential industrial applications, only those producing high enzyme levels were selected for further study. Since a relatively large difference in L-asparaginase activity between isolates producing more than 1 U/mL and those producing lower levels was observed, this level was chosen as a threshold. None of the halophilic isolates with extracellular L-asparaginase activity showed satisfactory activity levels. This is rather unfortunate in that it is actually this group of enzymes that are exposed to hypersaline conditions (21). In addition, the purification of extracellular enzymes is usually less challenging than their intracellular counterparts. However, intracellular enzymes from halophiles may also show higher tolerance to unusual conditions compared to those obtained from other microorganisms depending on the osmoregulation mechanisms used by their hosts. Halophilic microorganisms use two different strategies to maintain proper cytoplasmic osmotic pressure when exposed to high salinity (22, 23). The first mechanism is known as the salt-in strategy and involves the accumulation of high concentrations of KCl in the cytoplasm that, depending on growth conditions, may exceed 2 M. This strategy is not very common and is only used by a few species from the orders Halobacteriales and Haloanaerobiales (22). In this group of halophilic microorganisms, the intracellular enzymes have adapted to high salt concentrations and show remarkable halotolerance. A number of such enzymes have been characterized so far (24, 25). The second mechanism used by halophiles to cope with their unusual environment, usually referred to as the compatible-solute strategy, is to synthesize high levels of specialized organic solute known as osmolytes. These are neutral and highly soluble low molecular mass molecules that not only do not interfere with enzymatic activity, but provide some protective effect against denaturing conditions (23, 26). Although from a bioenergetics view point this strategy is less favorable than the first one, it has been more widely adopted by halophilic microorganisms since, at least theoretically, it does not require any adaptation of the intracellular enzymes (22). In practice, however, some intracellular enzymes from these organisms also appear to show significant salt tolerance (27). This is probably due to the fact that even halophilic species that predominantly use the compatible-solute strategy may accumulate high concentration of potassium ions under certain conditions (28). In this study, among isolates with intracellular L-asparaginase activity, 6 isolates showed activity levels higher than the selected threshold of 1 U/mL. As indicated in Table 2, 5 isolates are moderate halophiles (H2, H3, H23, H27 and H28) while the last one is an extreme halophile (H33). These isolates were identified through 16S rDNA sequencing. Although 16S rDNA sequencing is not as accurate as robust identification methods such as DNA-DNA hybridization, it has widely been used in the identification of unknown bacteria isolated from clinical or environmental samples mostly due to its ease of use, affordability and overall reliability (29). It is of interest to note that despite the fact that they were isolated from geographically distant locations, 5 out of 6 isolate identified in this study turned out to belong to the same genus (i.e., Halomonas). This may have resulted from the enrichment effect of the selection medium used in this study. The M9 medium used for the isolation of moderate halophiles was supplemented with 1.5 M (8.7%) NaCl. This is very close to the optimal concentration of 8% recommended for Halomonas cultivation (20). Other minor constituents may also have contributed to this effect. It is probably impossible to avoid this phenomenon completely as no medium can support the growth of all halophilic species due to their different requirements (20).
Halomonas species are moderate halophiles that use the compatible-solute strategy for osmotic adaptation (26). However, they have also been shown to use K+-dependent mechanisms (28). In fact, reports about the presence of halotolerant intracellular enzymes in Halomonas species have already been published (30). The five Halomonas strains isolated in the present study may thus be of potential value.
H33, on the other hand, most likely belongs to the genus Aidingimonas. Aidingimonas has been described as a moderately halophilic bacterium (31). Yet, in the same study, it has been reported to tolerate NaCl concentrations as high as 4 M which is in accordance with our observations. Unlike Halomonas, Aidingimonas is not extensively studied or characterized. However, Aidingimonas probably also uses the compatible-solute strategy as it is a member of the family Halomonadaceae (32). Although apparently no salt tolerant enzymes have been identified in this genus to date, this probably stems from the fact that very few studies about the enzymatic capabilities of this genus have been conducted. As any other bacterium with the ability to thrive in hypersaline environments, Aidingimonas may well contain a number of intracellular halotolerant enzymes.
The halophilic Halomonas and Aidingimonas strains isolated in this study provide a potential source of L-asparaginase for industrial applications. Studies are underway in our laboratory to optimize enzyme production by these isolates and to purify and characterize the enzymes responsible for the observed L-asparaginase activity. Of paramount importance, is the salt tolerance of these enzymes that, if observed, would also help better understand the enzymatic properties of less studied isolates such as Aidingimonas.
Acknowledgements
References
-
1.
Del Casale T, Sollitti P, Chesney RH. Cytoplasmic L-asparaginase: isolation of a defective strain and mapping of ansA. J. Bacteriol. 1983;154:513-5. [PubMed ID: 6339481].
-
2.
Adamson R, Fabro S. Antitumor activity and other biologic properties of L-asparaginase (NSC-109229)-a review. Cancer Chemother. Rep. 1968;52:617-626. [PubMed ID: 4895425].
-
3.
Wriston J, Yellin T. L-asparaginase: a review. Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas Mol. Biol. 1973;39:185-248. [PubMed ID: 4583638].
-
4.
Boos J, Werber G, Ahlke E, Schulze-Westhoff P, Nowak-Göttl U, Würthwein G, Verspohl E, Ritter J, Jürgens H. Monitoring of asparaginase activity and asparagine levels in children on different asparaginase preparations. Eur. J. Cancer. 1996;32:1544-50.
-
5.
Zalewska-Szewczyk B, Andrzejewski W, Młynarski W, Jędrychowska-Dańska K, Witas H, Bodalski J. The anti-asparagines antibodies correlate with L-asparagines activity and may affect clinical outcome of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leuk. Lymphoma. 2007;48:931-6. [PubMed ID: 17487737].
-
6.
Cheung N-KV, Chau IY, Coccia PF. Antibody response to Escherichia coli L-asparaginase: prognostic significance and clinical utility of antibody measurement. J. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol. 1986;8:99-104.
-
7.
Andrade AF, Borges KS, Silveira VS. Update on the use of L-asparaginase in infants and adolescent patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Clin. Med. Insights Oncol. 2014;8:95-100. [PubMed ID: 25210485].
-
8.
Zyzak DV, Sanders RA, Stojanovic M, Tallmadge DH, Eberhart BL, Ewald DK, Gruber DC, Morsch TR, Strothers MA, Rizzi GP. Acrylamide formation mechanism in heated foods. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003;51:4782-7. [PubMed ID: 14705913].
-
9.
Mottram DS, Wedzicha BL, Dodson AT. Food chemistry: acrylamide is formed in the Maillard reaction. Nature. 2002;419:448-9. [PubMed ID: 12368844].
-
10.
Pedreschi F, Mariotti MS, Granby K. Current issues in dietary acrylamide: formation, mitigation and risk assessment. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2014;94:9-20. [PubMed ID: 23939985].
-
11.
Knol JJ, Linssen JPH, van Boekel MAJS. Unravelling the kinetics of the formation of acrylamide in the Maillard reaction of fructose and asparagine by multiresponse modelling. Food Chem. 2010;120:1047-57.
-
12.
Xu Y, Cui B, Ran R, Liu Y, Chen H, Kai G, Shi J. Risk assessment, formation, and mitigation of dietary acrylamide: current status and future prospects. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2014;69:1-12. [PubMed ID: 24713263].
-
13.
Pedreschi F, Kaack K, Granby K. The effect of asparaginase on acrylamide formation in French fries. Food Chem. 2008;109:386-392. [PubMed ID: 26003362].
-
14.
Han S, Jung J, Park W. Biochemical characterization of L-asparaginase in NaCl-tolerant Staphylococcus sp. OJ82 isolated from fermented seafood. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014;24:1096-1104. [PubMed ID: 24861344].
-
15.
de Lourdes Moreno M, Pérez D, García MT, Mellado E. Halophilic bacteria as a source of novel hydrolytic enzymes. Life. 2013;3:38-51. [PubMed ID: 25371331].
-
16.
Gulati R, Saxena RK, Gupta R. A rapid plate assay for screening L-asparaginase producing micro-organisms. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 1997;24:23-6. [PubMed ID: 9024001].
-
17.
Imada A, Igarasi S, Nakahama K, Isono M. Asparaginase and glutaminase activities of micro-organisms. Microbiology. 1973;76:85-99.
-
18.
Furushita M, Shiba T, Maeda T, Yahata M, Kaneoka A, Takahashi Y, Torii K, Hasegawa T, Ohta M. Similarity of tetracycline resistance genes isolated from fish farm bacteria to those from clinical isolates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003;69:5336-42. [PubMed ID: 12957921].
-
19.
Reysenbach AL, Wickham GS, Pace NR. Phylogenetic analysis of the hyperthermophilic pink filament community in Octopus Spring, Yellowstone National Park. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1994;60:2113-9. [PubMed ID: 7518219].
-
20.
Schneegurt AM. Media and conditions for the growth of halophilic and halotolerant bacteria and archaea. In: Vreeland HR, editor. Advances in Understanding the Biology of Halophilic Microorganisms. Springer; 2012. p. 35-58.
-
21.
Ventosa A, Nieto JJ, Oren A. Biology of moderately halophilic aerobic bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1998;62:504-544. [PubMed ID: 9618450].
-
22.
Oren A. Bioenergetic aspects of halophilism. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1999;63:334-348. [PubMed ID: 10357854].
-
23.
Siglioccolo A, Paiardini A, Piscitelli M, Pascarella S. Structural adaptation of extreme halophilic proteins through decrease of conserved hydrophobic contact surface. BMC Struct. Biol. 2011;11:1-12. [PubMed ID: 21208404].
-
24.
Wright DB, Banks DD, Lohman JR, Hilsenbeck JL, Gloss LM. The effect of salts on the activity and stability of Escherichia coli and Haloferax volcanii dihydrofolate reductases. J. Mol. Biol. 2002;18:327-344.
-
25.
Wilson HL, Aldrich HC, Maupin-Furlow J. Halophilic 20S proteasomes of the archaeon Haloferax volcanii: purification, characterization, and gene sequence analysis. J. Bacteriol. 1999;181:5814-24. [PubMed ID: 10482525].
-
26.
Nakayama H, Yoshida K, Ono H, Murooka Y, Shinmyo A. Ectoine, the compatible solute of Halomonas elongata, confers hyperosmotic tolerance in cultured tobacco cells. Plant Physiol. 2000;122:1239-1247. [PubMed ID: 10759521].
-
27.
Setyorini E, Kim YJ, Takenaka S, Murakami S, Aoki K. Purification and characterization of a halotolerant intracellular protease from Bacillus subtilis strain FP-133. J. Basic Microbiol. 2006;46:294-304. [PubMed ID: 16847833].
-
28.
Kraegeloh A, Kunte HJ. Novel insights into the role of potassium for osmoregulation in Halomonas elongata. Extremophiles. 2002;6:453-462. [PubMed ID: 12486453].
-
29.
Janda JM, Abbott SL. 16S rRNA gene sequencing for bacterial identification in the diagnostic laboratory: pluses, perils, and pitfalls. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2007;45:2761-4. [PubMed ID: 17626177].
-
30.
Phucharoen K, Hoshino K, Takenaka Y, Shinozawa T. Purification, characterization, and gene sequencing of a catalase from an alkali- and halo-tolerant bacterium, Halomonas sp. SK1. Biosci., Biotechnol., Biochem. 2002;66:955-962. [PubMed ID: 12092846].
-
31.
Wang Y, Tang SK, Lou K, Lee JC, Jeon CO, Xu LH, Kim CJ, Li WJ. Aidingimonas halophila gen nov, sp nov, a moderately halophilic bacterium isolated from a salt lake. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2009;59:3088-94. [PubMed ID: 19643876].
-
32.
Argandona M, Vargas C, Reina-Bueno M, Rodriguez-Moya J, Salvador M, Nieto JJ. An extended suite of genetic tools for use in bacteria of the Halomonadaceae: an overview. Methods Mol. Biol. 2012;824:167-201. [PubMed ID: 22160899].