Phytochemical Investigation on Euphorbia macrostegia (Persian wood spurge)

authors:

avatar Somayeh Zare a , b , avatar Mehrorang Ghaedi b , avatar Ramin miri a , avatar Sven Heiling c , avatar Mojtaba Asadollahi a , avatar Ian T. Baldwin c , avatar Amir Reza Jassbi a , *

Medicinal and Natural Products Chemistry Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Department of Phytochemistry, Yasouj University, Yasouj 75914-353, Iran.
Department of Molecular Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Hans

how to cite: Zare S, Ghaedi M, miri R, Heiling S, Asadollahi M, et al. Phytochemical Investigation on Euphorbia macrostegia (Persian wood spurge). Iran J Pharm Res. 2015;14(1):e125283. https://doi.org/10.22037/ijpr.2015.1606.

Abstract

Euphorbia macrostegia or Persian wood spurge is one of the seventeen endemic plants of this genus in Iran. Three triterpenoids, 24-methylenecycloartan-3β-ol (1), butyrospermol (2) and cycloartenol (3) and three diglycerides, 1,2-di-O-α-linolenoyl-sn-glycerol (4), 1-O-linoleoyl-3-O-palmitoyl-sn-glycerol (5) and 1-O-α-linolenoyl-2-O-palmitoyl-sn-glycerol (6) were isolated from the hexane soluble part of methanol-dichloromethane extracts of the aerial parts of Euphorbia macrostegia Boiss. The structures of all compounds were elucidated using different spectroscopy methods including, 1H NMR, 13C NMR, HSQC, HMBC, EI-MS and IR. The triterpenes and the unsaturated fatty acids moieties of the diglycerides isolated from the plant were reported previously to have analgesic, anticancer, bactericidal and antifungal activity. Here, we show that E. macrostegia is a new source for the above mentioned biologically active compounds.

Introduction

Euphorbia macrostegia (Persian wood spurge) is one of the seventeen endemic plants of this genus in Iran (1). It grows wild in different parts of Iran including Fars, Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Provinces (2). The plants of the genus Euphorbia are known to have cycloartane triterpenoids, long chain hydrocarbons and fatty acids as their major non-polar constituents (3).

The cycloartane triterpenoids are one of the main groups of the natural products with interesting biological activities including cytotoxic (4), anti-inflammatory (5), and antimicrobial properties (6,7) and are important in the chemical classification of the genus Euphorbia (8). Antitumor, skin-irritant macrocyclic- and polycyclic diterpenoids and triterpenoids are common secondary metabolites of different Euphorbia species; while fatty acid glycerides are less reported from the genus Euphorbia. In this paper, we report the isolation of three triterpenoids, 24-methylenecycloartan-3β-ol (1), butyrospermol (2) and cycloartenol (3) and three diglycerides, 1,2-di-O-α-linolenoyl-sn-glycerol (4), 1-O-linoleoyl-3-O-palmitoyl-sn-glycerol (5) and 1-O-α-linolenoyl-2-O-palmitoyl-sn-glycerol (6) from methanol and dichloromethane extract of the aerial parts of Euphorbia macrostegia Boiss (3,9). Recently, four cycloartane triterpenoids were isolated from dichloromethane extract of E. macrostegia (10) among which 24-methylenecycloartan-3β-ol was the only common compound with our report. The cytotoxic activities of the isolated compounds on two human cancer cell lines were determined, but the less polar triterpenoids, 24-methylenecycloartan-3β-ol did not show high anticancer activity against the tested cell lines (10).

Experimental

General

The purified compounds were subjected to NMR measurements on Bruker Avance DRX500 Spectrometer (500 MHz for 1H and 125 MHz for 13C). 1H- and 13C-NMR were measured in CDCl3 with TMS as internal standard. Mass spectra (EI-MS) were recorded on an Agilent 5975C inert GC/MSD instrument. IR spectra were recorded on a Perkin Elmer Spectrum One FT-IR spectrometer in CHCl3. The chromatography separations were performed using gravity columns chromatography with silica gel 60 (70-230 mesh, 0.063-0.200 mm particle size) and using flash column chromatography (FCC) with silica gel 60 (230-400 mesh, 0.040-0.063-mm particle size) and thin layer chromatography (TLC) using silica gel 60 F254 pre-coated plates (0.25 mm). The above adsorbents were purchased from Merck Chemical Company, Darmstadt, Germany.

Plant material

The aerial parts of E. macrostegia Bioss. in the flowering stage were collected from Chelegah (N 30º 17', E 51° 56'; at 2370 m altitude ) near Sepidan (Ardakan-e-Fars) Fars, Iran, in July 2012 and the plant was identified by Mojtaba Asadollahi in Medicinal and Natural Product Chemistry Research Center (MNCRC), Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. A voucher specimen (PC-91-4-11) has been deposited at the herbarium of (MNCRC).

Extraction and fractionation

The air-dried powdered plant (310 g) was extracted successively in DCM (3 L) and MeOH (3 L) by maceration for eight days at room temperature. The filtered extracts were concentrated under reduced pressure by rotary evaporator to afford residues of MeOH (9 g) and DCM (6 g) extracts. The crude extracts were mixed together and subjected to liquid-liquid extraction (LLE). The LLE has afforded four different phases, from non-polar to polar: n-hexane (5.3 g), DCM (0.9 g), 1-butanol and water. On the basis of TLC examination, we choose the hexane fraction for further phytochemical investigation.

Isolation of compounds from the hexane fraction

The hexane extract was subjected to column chromatography (50 × 5 cm) over silica gel (150 g, 70-230 mesh). The elution of the column was performed using n-hexane with 10% gradient of DCM up to 100%, and then followed by increasing the polarity of the mobile phase with MeOH to afford 48 fractions. Similar fractions were combined based on their similarity in composition, deduced from TLC analyses. Fractions 17-19 (570 mg) were combined and subjected to 5% AgNO3-silica gel (60 g) impregnated FCC (30 ×3 cm) (11). The column was eluted with DCM with increasing the polarity to ethyl acetate (EtOAc) that yielded compounds 1 (15 mg) and 2 (45 mg) as a mixture (their ratios were calculated on the basis of their proton's signal integration in the 1H NMR spectrum) and 3 (20 mg). Fractions 24-27 (170 mg) were pooled and were separated on a FCC (17 g, 20 × 2 cm) using DCM with a gradual increasing of the polarity with EtOAc as the mobile phase. Compound 4 (7.2 mg) was purified from the above column. Fractions 28 to 32 (1.4 g) were mixed and loaded on a flash silica gel column (100 g, 50 × 4 cm) and eluted with DCM with a gradient of the polarity to acetone. It afforded 40 fractions. Fraction mixture 17-28 (70 mg) was further purified by repeated FCC to yield compound 5 (9.1 mg) and 6 (16.2 mg).

Spectral data

The structures of all compounds isolated from E. macrostegia were elucidated using spectroscopy methods including 1H NMR, 13C NMR, EIMS, IR and by comparison of their spectra with those published in the literature for the authentic samples (5,8,12-16).

24-methylenecycloartan-3β-ol (1): White amorphous powder (15 mg) Rf 0.41 (5% AgNO3-silica gel TLC, DCM: EtOAc 95:5). IR νmax cm-1: 3054(=C-H) (cyclopropane ring), 2987(C-H), 1712, 1602, 1421, 1265 (C-O), 739, 705; EIMS (rel. int.%): m/z 440[M]+C31H52O (8), 425 [M-15]+ (12), 407 [425-18]+(15), 315 [M-side chain]+, 297 [315-18]+ (7), 300 (12), 175 (25). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3):δH 4.72 ppm (1H, brs, H-31), 4.66 (1H, brs, H-31), 3.28 (1H, m, H-3), 1.03 (3H, d, J = 6.9Hz), 1.02 (3H, d, J = 6.8, H-26), 0.97 (6H, s, H-18, H-30), 0.90 (3H, brs, H-21), 0.90 (3H, s, H-29), 0.81 (3H, s, H-28), 0.55 (1H, d, J = 4.0 Hz, H-19b), 0.33 (1H, d, J = 4 Hz, H-19a).13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δC 31.9 (C-1), 30.4 (C-2), 78.8 (C-3), 40.5 (C-4), 47.1 (C-5), 21.1 (C-6), 28.2 (C-7), 48.0 (C-8), 20.0 (C-9), 25.2 (C-10), 26.0 (C-11), 32.9 (C-12), 45.3 (C-13), 48.8 (C-14), 34.9 (C-15), 26.5 (C-16), 52.3 (C-17), 18.0 (C-18), 29.9 (C-19), 36.1 (C-20), 18.3 (C-21), 35.6 (C-22), 31.3 (C-23), 156.9 (C-24), 33.9 (C-25), 22.0 (C-26), 19.3 (C-27), 18.3 (C-28), 14.0 (C-29), 25.4 (C-30), 105.8 (C-31) (5,8,12).

Butyrospermol (2): White amorphous powder (45 mg) Rf 0.41. (5% AgNO3-silica gel TLC, DCM: EtOAc 95:5). IRνmax cm-1: 3054(=C-H), 2987 (C-H), 1712, 1602, 1421, 1265 (C-O), 739, 705; EIMS (rel. int%): m/z 426 [M]+ C30H50O (33), 411 [426-15]+ (100), 393 [411-18]+ (33), 379 [393-15]+ (9), 300 (12), 259 (18), 173 (30). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δH 5.30 ppm (1H, d, J = 3.5 Hz, H-7), 5.10 (1H, dd, J = 6.8, 7.2 Hz, H-24), 3.24 (1H, m, H-3), 1.68 (3H, s, H-27),1.61 (3H, s, H-26), 0.97 (3H, s, H-28), 0.97 (3H, s, H-29), 0.86 (3H, s, H-30), 0.84 (3H, brs,H-21), 0.81 (3H, s, H-18), 0.74 (3H, s, H-19).13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δC 37.2 (C-1), 27.7 (C-2), 79.3 (C-3), 38.9 (C-4), 50.6 (C-5), 23.9 (C-6), 117.8 (C-7), 145.9 (C-8), 48.9 (C-9), 35.0 (C-10), 18.2 (C-11), 33.8 (C-12), 43.5 (C-13), 51.3 (C-14), 33.9 (C-15), 28.5 (C-16), 52.2 (C-17), 13.1 (C-18), 22.1 (C-19), 35.8 (C-20), 18.6 (C-21), 35.2 (C-22), 25.4 (C-23), 125.1 (C-24), 130.9 (C-25), 17.7 (C-26), 25.7 (C-27), 27.6 (C-28), 27.3 (C-29), 14.7 (C-30) (8).

Cycloartenol (3): Yellow amorphous powder (20 mg) Rf 0.5 (5% AgNO3-silica gel TLC, DCM: EtOAc 95:5). IR νmax cm-1: 3054(=C-H), 1711, 1594, 1421, 1265(C-O), 738, 705; EIMS (rel. int%): m/z 426 [M]+ C30H50O (58), 411 [M-15]+ (100), 393 [411-15]+ (70), 378, 365 (22), 286 (29), 175 (30). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δH 5.03 ppm (1H, t, J = 7.1, 7.4 Hz, H-24), 3.22 (1H, m, H-3), 1.60 (3H, s, H-27), 1.54 (3H, s, H-26), 0.86 (3H, s, H-18), 0.86 (1H, s, H-29), 0.82 (1H, s, H-28), 0.74 (1H, s, H-30), 0.49 (1H, d, J = 4.3, H-19), 0.26 (1H, d, J = 4.3, H-19). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δC 30.9 (C-1), 29.4 (C-2), 77.8 (C-3), 39.5 (C-4), 46.1 (C-5), 20.1 (C-6), 27.2 (C-7), 46.9 (C-8), 19.9 (C-9), 24.5 (C-10), 25.0 (C-11), 36.4 (C-12), 44.3 (C-13), 47.8 (C-14), 31.8 (C-15), 25.5 (C-16), 51.3 (C-17), 17.0 (C-18), 28.9 (C-19), 34.9 (C-20), 17.2 (C-21), 35.3 (C-22), 23.9 (C-23), 124.2 (C-24), 129.9 (C-25), 16.6 (C-26), 24.7 (C-27), 18.3 (C-28), 14.3 (C-29), 24.4 (C-30) (8).

1,2-di-O-α-linolenoyl-sn-glycerol (4): Colorless gum (7.2 mg) Rf 0.6 (silica gel TLC, DCM: acetone, 98:2) IR νmax cm-1: 3055, 2987, 2305, 1711, 1421, 1265, 738, 705. EIMS (rel. int. %):m/z 612 [M]+ C39H64O5 (20), 596 (100), 574 (12), 558 (60), 530 (80), 502 (40). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δH5.31-5.40 ppm (12H, m, olefinic protons H-9′, H-10′, H-12′, H-13′, H-15′, H-16′), 5.26 (1H, m, H-2), 4.3 (2H, dd, J = 4.0, 11.9, H-1b, H-3b), 4.15 (2H, dd, J = 6.0, 11.7, H-1a, H-3a), 2.80 (8H, dd, J = 5.55, H-11′, H-14′), 2.31 (4H, t, J = 7.2, H-2′, H-2″), 2.10 (4H, m, H-8′), 2.03 (4H, m, H-17′), 1.60 (4H, m, H-3′, H-3″), 1.25 (m, envelope methylenes H-4′-H-7′), 0.97 (6H, t, J = 7.5, H-18′) 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δC 61.1 (C-1), 67.8 (C-2), 61.1 (C-3), 171.8, 172.2 (C-1′), 33.0, 33.2 (C-2′), 23.8 (C-3′), 28.7, 28.6, 28.2, 28.1, 28.0 (C-4′, C-5′, C-6′, C-7′), 26.2 (C-8′), 130.9, 129.2, 127.3, 127.2, 126.7, 126.1 (olefinic carbons), C-9′, C-10′, C-12′, C-13′, C-15′,C-16′), 24.6, 24.5 (C-11′, C-14′), 19.5 (C-17′), 13.3 (C-18′) (15).

1-O-linoleoyl-3-O-palmitoyl-sn-glycerol (5): Colorless gum (9.1 mg) Rf 0.58 (silica gel TLC, DCM: EtOAc 96:4).1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δH 5.25-5.35 ppm (4H, m, olefinic protons), 4.07 (2H, dd, J=5.6, 11.5, H-1a, H-3a), 4.11 (2H, dd, J=4.2, 11.5, H-1b, H-3b), 4.05 (1H, m, H-2), 2.74 (2H, dd, J=6.5, H-11′), 2.28 (4H, t, J =7.5, H-2′, H-2″), 2.03 (2H, m, H-17′), 1.98 (2H, m, H-8′), 1.56 (4H, m, H-3′, H-3″), 1.19-1.24 (m, envelope methylenes), 0.91 (3H, t, J=6.9, H-18′), 0.81 (3H, t, J=6.9, H-16″). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δC 64.0 (C-1, C-3), 67.3 (C-2), 172.9, 172.8 (C-1′, C-1″), 33.09, 33.07 (C-2′, C-2″), 23.88, 23.85 (C-3′,C-3″), 28.68, 28.63, 28.58, 28.44, 28.34, 28.23, 28.13, 28.11, 28.07 (envelope methylenes), 129.21, 128.99, 126.72 (olefinic carbons), 26.2 (C-8′), 24.6 (C-11′), 19.5 (C-17′), 13.2 (C-18′), 13.1 (C-16″) (15).

1-O-α-linolenoyl-2-O-palmitoyl-sn-glycerol (6): Colorless gum (16.2 mg) Rf 0.5 (silica gel TLC, DCM: EtOAc 96:4). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δH 5.25-5.35 ppm (6H, m, olefinic carbons), 5.0 (1H, m, H-2), 4.23 (2H, dd, J = 4.5, 11.9 H-1b, H-3b), 4.18 (2H, dd, J =5.7, 11.9, H-1a, H-3a), 2.74 (2H, dd, J = 5.0, 6.6, H-11′), 2.70 (4H, dd, J = 6.4, 6.7, H-14′), 2.28 (2H, t, 7.5, H-2"), 2.25 (2H, t, 7.5, H-2'), 2.00 (2H, m, H-17′), 1.96 (2H, m, H-8′), 1.55 (4H, m, H-3′, H-3″), 1.20-1.25 (m, envelope methylenes), 0.91 (3H, t, 7.5, H-18′), 0.81 (3H, t, 7.0, H-16″).13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δC 61.0 (C-1), 71.1 (C-2), 60.5 (C-3), 172.8 (C-1'), 172.4 (C-1''), 33.3, 33.1 (C-2′, C-2″), 23.9, 23.8, (C-3′, C-3″), 28.7, 28.6, 28.6, 28.6, 28.6, 28.3, 28.3, 28.2, 28.1, 28.0 (envelope methylenes), 26.2 (C-8′), 127.3, 127.2, 127.2, 127.2, 127.1, 127.0, 126.9, 126.9, 126.8, 126.8 (olefinic carbons), 24.6 (C-11′), 24.5 (C-14′), 19.5 (C-17′), 13.2 (C-18′), 13.1 (C-16″) (15).

Methyl transestrification

For confirming the identification of the acyl moieties of the diacylglycerides, they were transformed to their methyl ester derivatives by reaction with BF3 in MeOH (17). Briefly 2 mg of the compound was added to 500 μL 20% BF3 in MeOH in a sealed test tube and then heated on hot water bath (70 °C) for 1 h. To the above solution, 1 mL water was added and the mixture was extracted three times with 3 mL n-hexane. The organic layer were mixed and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and evaporated under nitrogen stream. The residue dissolved in 1 mL hexane and then subjected to GC-MS analyses (18).

GC-MS analysis

The GC-MS analytical condition was the same as reported previously (18). The methyl esters of the fatty acids resulting from transesterification of compounds 4-6 were identified by comparison of their retention times (19) and mass spectra recorded on GC-MS with those published in the literature (18,20). The results were in good agreement with those obtained from infra-red (IR), EIMS, 1D and 2D NMR spectral data.

Results and Discussion

From the hexane soluble part of the dichloromethane (DCM)-methanol (MeOH) extract of E. macrostegia, three triterpenoids, namely, 24-methylenecycloartan-3β-ol (1), butyrospermol (2) and cycloartenol (3) were isolated using silica gel column chromatography (70-230 mesh) and repeated FCC on AgNO3-silica gel (230-400 mesh). In addition to the above mentioned triterpenoids, from the semi-polar fractions of the first column chromatography, three different diglycerides of fatty acids, 1,2-di-O-α-linolenoyl-sn-glycerol (4), 1-O-linoleoyl-3-O-palmitoyl-sn-glycerol (5) and 1-O-α-linolenoyl-2-O-palmitoyl-sn-glycerol (6) were purified by FCC on silica gel (23-400 mesh). The structure of the compounds were determined by IR, EI-MS and the 1H and 13C NMR spectral data for compounds 1-3 which were confirmed by comparison to those reported in the literature (Figure 1) (5,8,12). The positions of esterification on the glycerol moiety of the diglycerides (4-6) were determined by 1H NMR and HMBC spectral data (Figure 2).

The chemical structure of triterpenoids isolated from E. macrostegia (1-3).
The structure of diglycerides (4-6). The substitution of the esters on C-1 and C-2 of 6 may be interchanged.

Diglycerides (4-6) were isolated from the more polar fraction obtained from the silica gel column chromatography. Their structures were deduced mainly from examinations of 1D and 2D NMR spectra. In the 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra of different glycerides, the approximate positions of the acyl groups can be deduced from the chemical shifts of the signals of the glycerol protons and carbons (13,14). The priority of the 13C NMR spectral data is that the length and degree of unsaturation of the acyl chain does not influence the chemical shift of glycerol carbons chemical shifts but they may alter slightly the chemical shift of the respective protons (13,14). The 1H NMR spectral data of the acyl chains of the glycerides (4-6) were assigned with comparison to those published in the literature (13,15,16).

For compound 4, the molecular ion was detected at m/z 612 [M]+ in EI-MS. APT 13C NMR spectrum showed three signals at δ 61.1, 67.8, 61.1 ppm for the glycerol's C-1, C-2 and C-3 carbon atoms, respectively that confirm the 1,2-diglyceride structure (13). In the 1H NMR the signals of the protons of the glycerol moiety appeared at δ 4.3 ppm (2H, dd, J = 4.0, 11.9, H-1b, H-3b), 4.15 (2H, dd, J = 6.0, 11.7, H-1a, H-3a), and the proton signal of H-2 resonated at δ 5.26 ppm which overlapped with the olefinic protons region of the unsaturated acyl moiety and confirmed the substitution of an acyl group at C-2 OH group. The presence of the olefinic protons of the unsaturated acyl chain resonating at δ 5.3-5.4 ppm (m) and six carbon signals at δ 130.9, 129.2, 127.3, 127.2, 126.7, 126.1 ppm suggested three double bonds in the acyl chain. The 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectral data of the compound suggested the presence of two linolenyl acyl groups in the molecule.

In the 13C NMR spectrum of compound 5, two signals for the glycerol carbon atoms appeared at δ 64.0 (C-1, C-3) and 67.3 ppm (C-2) and the respective protons observed at δ 4.07 (2H, dd, J = 5.6, 11.5, H-1a, H-3a), 4.11 (2H, dd, J = 4.2, 11.5, H-1b, H-3b) and 4.05 ppm (1H, m, H-2) in the 1H NMR spectrum suggested the 1,3-diglyceride substitution (13). On the basis of GC-MS analyses of the transesterified products of the compound, one of the acyl chains was suggested to be linoleic acid and the other was identified as palmitic acid methyl ester. The above finding was compatible with the 1H NMR spectral data with observing the terminal methyl group of the saturated chain resonated at δ 0.81 ppm while the value was recorded at 0.91 ppm for the linoleyl moiety in addition to four olefinic protons at 5.2-5.3 ppm (m). In addition to the 1D NMR data, the substitutions at C-1 and C-3 was confirmed by observing the cross peaks between H-1,3, H-2', H-2'' and C-1', C-1'' in the HMBC spectrum.

1,2-diglyceride structure was deduced for compound 6 because of the presence of three signals for glycerol carbon atoms at δ 61.0 (C-1), 71.1 (C-2), 60.5 ppm (C-3) in the 13C NMR spectrum. The protons attached to glycerol carbons appeared at δ 5.0 (1H, m, H-2), 4.23 (2H, dd, J = 4.5, 11.9 H-1b, H-3b), 4.18 ppm (2H, dd, J = 5.7, 11.9, H-1a, H-3a) in the 1H NMR spectrum (13). The olefinic protons of linolenic chain resonated at δ 5.2-5.3 ppm and the terminal methyl signals appeared at δ 0.91 ppm while this was 0.81 ppm for that of palmityl terminal methyl. The substitution of the esters were confirmed by observing cross peaks between H-1; H-2' and C-1'; H-2 and H-2'' with the C-1'' in the HMBC spectrum, but the substitution of the esters on C-1 and C-2 may be interchanged.

Compound 1 was isolated in several members of the genus Euphorbia and reported to be cytotoxic against p-388 cells and lymphocytic leukemia system at 2.5 μg/mL and more than 20 μg/mL IC50s, respectively (4). It is reported as antiproteolytic (21), and causing a dose-dependent decrease in lymphocyte proliferation which is suggested to be due to the presence of the free C-3-OH group in the molecule (5). It shows pain-relieving activity and anti-inflammatory effect (5).

Compound 2 was purified from “shea-butter” which is prepared from the kernels of the fruit of Butyrospermum parkii, an African medicinal tree (22). It could be used in formulation of pharmaceutical compositions such as in tablets, parenteral solutions and ointments to cure acne, skin cracks, in sun and skin creams (22,23). The compound is reported to have hormonal and bactericidal activity (22).

Cycloartenol (3) and 24-methylenecycloartan-3β-ol (1) are the two major constituent of E. broteri a herbaceous shrub and according to the taxonomic classification suggested by Ponsinet and Ourisson may be in the same clade as E. macrosteigia (8,24).

Different biological activities were reported for linolenic acid and its derivatives such as 1,2-Di-O-α-linolenoyl-3-O-β-galactosyl-sn-glycerol which was identified as a superoxide generation inhibitor and decrease the O2- level in the HL-60 assay system. Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species are toxic molecules against pathogens in the immunological defense system (25). The compound was also reported as a feeding stimulant for Plagiodera versiclora a willow beetle living on Salix integra (26).

The anticancer, analgesic, and bactericidal activity of the triterpernoids, 24-methylenecycloartan-3β-ol, butyrospermol and cycloartenol together with antifungal (27) and antibacterial activity (28) of unsaturated fatty acids suggest the Persian Spurge, Euphorbia macrostegia, is a new source for extraction of the biological active natural products. Although the three diglycerides (4-6) have not shown the above-mentioned biological activities, but their acyl chains such as linolenic and linoleic acid are known to have important biological activities like antimicrobial and antifungal activity especially against important plant pathogens such as Rhizoctonia solani, Phythium ultimum, Pyrenophora avenae and Crinipellis perniciosa (27). The above results encourage us to pay more attention to the biological activity of Euphorbia macrostegia in our future investigation.

Acknowledgements

References

  • 1.

    Mozaffarian V. A Dictionary of Iranian Plant Names. Tehran: Farhang Mo'aser; 2003. 219 p.

  • 2.

    Ghahreman A. Flora of Iran/ Flore de l'Iran en couleurs naturelles. 17. Tehran: Publie' et distribue' par l’Institut de Recherches des Forêts et des Pâturages; 1998. 2045 p.

  • 3.

    Jassbi AR. Chemistry and biological activity of secondary metabolites in Euphorbia from Iran. Phytochem. 2006;67:1977-1984.

  • 4.

    Öksüz S, Gil RR, Chai H, Pezzuto JM, Cordell GA, Ulubelen A. Biologically active compounds from the Euphorbiaceae; part 2 Two triterpenoids of Euphorbia cyparissias. Planta Med. 1994;60:594-596. [PubMed ID: 7809217].

  • 5.

    Ayatollahi AM, Ghanadian M, Afsharypuor S, Choudhary MI, Abdella OM, Shahlaei M, Farzandi G, Mostafavi H. Cycloartanes from Euphorbia aellenii Rech f. and their antiproliferative activity.Iran. J. Pharm. Res. 2010;10:105-111.

  • 6.

    Peers KE. The non-glyceride saponifiables of shea butter. J. Sci. Food Agr. 1977;28:1000-1009.

  • 7.

    Ayatollahi AM, Ghanadian M, Afsharypuor S, Siddiq S, Pour-Hosseini SM. Biological screening of Euphorbia Aellenii. Iran. J. Pharm. Res. 2010;9:429-436. [PubMed ID: 24381609].

  • 8.

    De Pascual Teresa J, Urones J, Marcos I, Basabe P, Cuadrado MS, Fernandez Moro R. Triterpenes from Euphorbia broteri. Phytochem. 1987;26:1767-1776.

  • 9.

    Shi QW, Su XH, Kiyota H. Chemical and pharmacological research of the plants in genus Euphorbia. Chem. Rev. 2008;108:4295-4327. [PubMed ID: 18817355].

  • 10.

    Baniadam S, Ghannadian M, Saeidi H, Ayatollahi AM, Aghaei M. Cycloartane triterpenoids from Euphorbia macrostegia with their cytotoxicity against MDA-MB48 and MCF-7 cancer cell lines. Iran. J. Pharm. Res. 2013;13:135-141. [PubMed ID: 24734064].

  • 11.

    Jassbi AR. Phytochemical Investigation on Some Euphorbiaceae and Lamiaceae Plants, Euphorbia decipiens, Euphorbia teheracina and Zataria multiflora. Lap Lambert Academic Publishing Co; 2000.

  • 12.

    Öksüz S, Ulubelen A, Barla A, Voelter W. Terpenoids and aromatic compounds from Euphorbia heteradena. Turk. J. Chem. 2002;26:457-464.

  • 13.

    Vlahov G. Application of NMR to the study of olive oils. Prog. Nucl. Mag. Res. Sp. 1999;35:341-357.

  • 14.

    Serdarevich B, Carroll KK. Synthesis and characterization of 1- and 2-monoglycerides of anteiso fatty acids. J. Lipid Res. 1966;7:277-284. [PubMed ID: 4287769].

  • 15.

    Cateni F, Falsone G, Zilic J, Bonivento P, Zacchigna M, Žigon D, Sosa S, Altinier G. Glyceroglycolipids from Euphorbia nicaeensis All with antiinflamatory activity. Arkivok. 2004:54-65.

  • 16.

    Gunstone F. 1H and 13C-NMR spectra of six n-3 polyene esters. Chem. Phys. Lipids. 1990;56:227-229.

  • 17.

    Cheung PC, Leung A, Ang JP. Comparison of supercritical carbon dioxide and soxhlet extraction of lipids from a brown seaweed, Sargassum hemiphyllum (Turn ) C. Ag. J. Agr. Food Chem. 1998;46:4228-4232.

  • 18.

    Jassbi AR, Mohabati M, Eslami S, Sohrabipour J, Miri R. Biological activity and chemical constituents of red and brown algae from the Persian Gulf. Iran. J. Pharm. Res. 2013;12:339-348. [PubMed ID: 24250640].

  • 19.

    Farkas O, Zenkevich IG, Stout F, Kalivas JH, Héberger K. Prediction of retention indices for identification of fatty acid methyl esters. J. Chromatogr. A. 2008;1198-1199:188-195. [PubMed ID: 18533170].

  • 20.

    Adams RP. Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry. USA: Allured Publishing Cooperation Carol Stream IL; 2007.

  • 21.

    Öksüz S, Shieh HL, Pezzuto JM, Özhatay N, Cordell GA. Biologically active compounds from the Euphorbiaceae part 1 Triterpenoids of Euphorbia nicaeensis subsp. glareosa. Planta. Med. 2007;59:472-473. [PubMed ID: 8255939].

  • 22.

    Rakoto RA, Pierre B. A61K36/00; A61K36/185; A61K36/60 ed. United Kingdom: Laroche Navarron Lab; 1963.

  • 23.

    Tella A. Preliminary studies on nasal decongestant activity from the seed of the Shea butter tree, Butyrospermum parkii. Br J. Clin. Pharm. 1979;7:495-497.

  • 24.

    Ponsinet G, Ourisson G. Études chimiotaxonomiques dans la famille des euphorbiacées III: Répartition des triterpènes dans les latex d'Euphorbia. Phytochem. 1968;7:89-98.

  • 25.

    Takahashi M, Sugiyama Y, Kawabata K, Takahashi Y, Irie K, Murakami A, Kubo Y, Kobayashi K, Ohigashi H. 1,2-Di-O-α-linolenoyl-3-O-β-galactosyl-sn-glycerol as a superoxide generation inhibitor from Perilla frutescens var crispa. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2011;75:110414-1-110414-3.

  • 26.

    Jassbi AR. Secondary metabolites as stimulants and antifeedants of Salix integra for the leaf beetle Plagiodera versicolora. Z. Naturforsch. C. 2003;58:573-579. [PubMed ID: 12939047].

  • 27.

    Walters D, Raynor L, Mitchell A, Walker R, Walker K. Antifungal activities of four fatty acids against plant pathogenic fungi. Mycopathologia. 2004;157:87-90. [PubMed ID: 15008350].

  • 28.

    Zheng CJ, Yoo JS, Lee TG, Cho HY, Kim YH, Kim WG. Fatty acid synthesis is a target for antibacterial activity of unsaturated fatty acids. FEBS Lett. 2005;579:5157-5162. [PubMed ID: 16146629].