General experimental procedures and materials
NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker DRX 500 spectrometer. Chemical shifts are given relative to TMS as an internal standard. ESI mass spectra were carried out on an Agilent 6210 ESI-TOF mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Semi preparative HPLC was performed on a Shimadzu instrument with PRC- ODS C18 (20 mm × 25 cm) column. Silica gel 60 (0.063- 0.2; 0.2- 0.5 mm; Merck) was used for column chromatography. All solvents for semi preparative HPLC were of technical grade and purified by distillation.
Plant material
The roots of D. hyrcanum (Apiaceae), collected in June 2008 from Almed Valley in Golestan District, Iran, were identified by Mr. H. Moazeni from Traditional Medicine and Materia Medica Center (TMRC), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Iran. The voucher specimen 2495 (TMRC) of the plant has been deposited in the herbarium of the TMRC.
Extraction
The powdered dried root of D. hyrcanum was macerated in methanol (MeOH), for 24 hours with constant shaking, at room temperature. The filtrates of total extract were evaporated to dryness and investigated for its in-vitro and in-vivo antiplasmodial and cytotoxic effects.
Biological assays
In-vitro antiplasmodial activity
Antiplasmodial activity of the total extract was determined against the chloroquine-resistant (K1) and chloroquine-sensitive (3D7) strains of
Plasmodium falciparum that were continuously cultured according to the methods described by Trager and Jensen (
13). Plant extract was assessed for antiplasmodial activity
in-vitro in human blood using parasite lactate dehydrogenase method (pLDH) with slight modifications(
14,
15). The range of examined concentration was from 64 µg/mL to 125 ng/mL. A solution of chloroquine diphosphate and artemisinin served as positive control. The test was performed in duplicate. Absorbance was measured with an ELISA plate reader at 630 nm. The percentage inhibition at each concentration was determined and the mean of IC
50 value of parasite viability was calculated using Probit analysis(
16).
In-vivo antimalarial assay
Peters’ 4-day suppressive test against NICD strain of Plasmodium berghei infection in mice was employed(17) for evaluating of the samples of D.hyrcanum antiplasmodial activities. Adult male albino mice from the Pasteur Institute of Iran were housed under standard environmental conditions and fed with standard pellets and water. All the procedure was accepted by Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Ethics Committee and in accordance with the principles for laboratory animal use and care in the European Community guidelines.
Briefly, the parasites (blood contained parasites) were maintained by serial passage of blood from mouse to mouse. Adult male albino mice weighing 20–25 g were inoculated by intra-peritoneal (I.P) injection with 1×107 infected erythrocytes. The mice were randomly divided into groups of five per cage and treated during consecutive days with 10 mg/mL of the sample by I.P injection for 4 days. Two control groups were used in this experiment, one treated with chloroquine at dose of 20 mg/Kg as a positive control while the other group was kept untreated as a negative group. On day 5 of the test, thin blood smears were prepared and blood films were fixed with methanol. The blood films were stained with Giemsa, and then microscopically examined. Percentage of parasitaemia was counted based on infected erythrocytes calculated per 1000 erythrocytes.
The mice were inoculated by intra-peritoneal (I.P) injection with 107 infected erythrocytes. The mice were treated during consecutive days with 10 mg/Kg of the sample by I.P injection for 4 days. Two control groups were used in this experiment, one treated with chloroquine at dose of 20 mg/Kg as a positive control while the another group was kept untreated as a negative group. Percentage of parasitaemia was counted based on infected erythrocytes calculated per 1000 erythrocytes and the inhibition percentage of each group expressed in relation to the untreated group.
In-vitro cytotoxicity assay
Cytotoxicity of samples was determined using MDBK cells(
2,
18) by the colorimetric methyl thiazole tetrazolium (MTT) assay (
19,
20) and scored as a percentage of absorbance reduction at 570 nm of treated cultures versus untreated control cultures. Tests were run in triplicate and Tamoxifen was used as a positive control. IC
50 values were calculated from the drug concentration–response curves.
Bioassay guided fractionation and isolation
D. hyrcanum was subjected to a bioassay-guided fractionation protocol based on the
in-vivo model. For this purpose the roots of
D. hyrcanum (750 g) were macerated in ethyl acetate (EtOAc) for 24 hours at room temperature with constant shaking (2: 1) for 3 times(
21). After filtration, the extract was concentrated to yield 180g of a brown residue. Compound 1 (50 mg) precipitated when the ethyl acetate extract was evaporated. The ethyl acetate extract was fractionated twice with 500 mL water. The dried ethyl acetate fraction was separated by silica gel column chromatography (Silica gel 60, 0.2-0.5 mm; Merck) eluting with hexane, hexane- dichloromethane (DCM) (5: 5), DCM, DCM- EtOAc (5:5), EtOAc, EtOAc- MeOH (5:5), MeOH to give five fractions. The ethyl acetate extract, as well as fractions 2 (1.20 g) and 3 (40 g), 4 (3 g) which were eluted with hexane- DCM (5:5), DCM and EtOAc- MeOH (5:5) respectively, were evaluated for
in-vivo antiplasmodial and cytotoxicity activity.
Fraction 2 was separated using silica gel column chromatography (0.063- 0.2 mm; Merck) eluting with hexane, a gradient of hexane- chloroform (9:10, 8:2, 6:4, 40:60, 1:9 to pure chloroform), a gradient of chloroform- EtOAc (9:1, 8:2 to pure EtOAc), EtOAc- MeOH (5:5) and MeOH to give 14 fractions. Compound 2 (200 mg) was isolated from fraction 2- 6 (237 mg) which was eluted with hexane- chloroform (1:9) to 100% chloroform.
Fraction 3 was separated by silica gel column chromatography (0.02- 0.5 mm; Merck) eluting with a gradient of petroleum benzene- DCM (3:7, to pure DCM), a gradient of DCM- EtOAc (9:1, 8:2, 7:3, 6:4, 5:5, 3:7 to pure EtOAc), EtOAc- MeOH (5:5) and MeOH to give 8 fractions. Fraction 3-2 (2 g), which was eluted with DCM- EtOAc (9:1), was separated by silica gel column chromatography (0.02- 0.5 mm; Merck) eluting with a gradient of petroleum benzene- DCM (8:2, 7:3, 6:4, 5:5, 4:6, 3:7 to pure dichloromethane), gradients of dichloromethane- EtOAc (9:1, 8:2, 7:3, 6:4, 5:5 to pure EtOAc), EtOAc- MeOH (5:5) and MeOH. There were obtained 7 sub fractions. Fraction 3-2-3 (230 mg) was separated by semi preparative HPLC [MeOH 100%, 30 min, flow rate 8 mL/min] and then isolated the subfraction with Rt = 23.5min (76 mg). It was purified on a silica gel column (0.63- 0.2 mm; Merck) wi'th a gradient of petroleum benzene- DCM (7:3, 4:6 to pure dichloromethane), a gradi'ent of dichloromethane- EtOAc (8:2, 7:3, 6:4, 5:5 to pure EtOAc), EtOAc- MeOH (5:5), MeOH to yield compounds 3 (18 mg) and 4 (20 mg). All pure compounds were evaluated for in-vivo antiplasmodial effects.
4-methoxy-6-hydroxyacetophenone-2-O-β-D-gentiobioside (1): Yellow crystal, 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ ppm= 6.14 (s, H-3), 6.25 (s, H-5), 5.19 (d, J= 8.5 Hz, H-1'), 13C-NMR: δ =206.4 (C-7), 166.8 (C-4), 164.5 (C-2), 160.2 (C-6), 106.9 (C-1), 103.2 (C-1''), 100.0 (C-1'), 96.0 (C-5), 95.0 (C-3), 76.4 (C-3'), 76.1 (C-5''), 76.0 (C-5,'C-3''), 74.0 (C-2''), 73.2 (C-2'), 70.1 (C-4''), 69.6 (C-4'), 68.8 (C-6'), 61.2 (C-6''), 56.3 (C-OMe), 33 (C-8); HR‑ESI‑TOF‑MS (positive): m/z = 506.1631 [M + Na]+ (calcd. For C21H30O14 Na: 506.4533).
1(2-hydroxy-4-methoxy)- 3,7,11- trimethyl-3-vinyl-6
(E), 10 dodecadiene- 1- dione (2): Yellow oil;
1H- (500 MHz, CDCl
3) and
13C‑NMR (125 MHz) data: see
Table 2; HR‑ESI‑TOF‑MS (positive): m/z = 393.2438 [M + Na]
+ (calcd. For C
24H
34O
3 Na: 393.5134).
2,3-dihydro-7-methoxy-2S*,3R*-dimethyl-2-[4,8-dimethyl-3(E),7-nonadienyl]-furo[3,2-c]coumarin (3): yellow oil, 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ ppm = 7.52 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-9), 6.85 (dd, J = 1.5,8.5 Hz, H-6), 6.83(d, J =1.5, H-8), 5.08 (t, overlap, H-3'), 5.05 (overlap, H-7'), 3.86 (s, H-OMe), 3.27 (q, J =7.0 Hz, H-3), 2.09 (m, H-2'), 2.01 (m, H-6'), 1.94 (m, H-5'), 1.67 (s, H-9'), 1.59 (s, H-4' Me, H- 8' Me), 1.77 (m, H-1'), 1.44 (s, H-2Me), 13C-NMR: δ = 165.4 (C- 9b), 165.2 (C4), 163.2 (C-7), 156.9 (C- 5a), 131.9 (C-8'), 136.0 (C-4'), 124.2 (C-7'), 122.8 (C-3'), 123.7 (C-9), 112.1 (C- 8), 106.3 (C-9a), 103.7 (C-3a), 100.7 (C-6), 96.6 (C-2), 55.2 (C-OMe), 39.0 (C-5'), 42.0 ( C-3), 41.5 (C-1'), 25.7 (C-9'), 22.1 (C-2 '), 20.2 (C-2Me), 17.7 (C-8'Me), 16.0 (C-4'Me), 13.7; HR‑ESI‑TOF‑MS (positive): m/z = 419.2221 [M + Na]+ (calcd. For C25H32O4 Na: 419.5077).
2,3-dihydro-7-methoxy-2R*,3R*dimethyl-2-[4,8-dimethyl-3(E),7-nonadienyl]-furo[3,2-c]coumarin (4): yellow oil, 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ ppm= 7.52 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-9), 6.85 (dd, J = 1.5Hz, H-6), 6.83 (dd, J =1.5,8.5, H-8), 5.19 (t, overlap, H-3'), 5.05 (overlap, H-7'), 3.86 (s, H-OMe), 3.22 (q, J =7.0 Hz, H-3), 2.24 (m, H-2'), 2.01 (m, H-6'), 1.94 (m, H-5'),1.67 (s, H-9'), 1.63 (s, H-4' Me), 1.60 (s, H- 8' Me), 1.90 (m, H-1'), 1.48(s, H-2Me), 13C-NMR: δ = 165.4 (C- 9b), 165.2 (C4), 163.2 (C-7), 156.9 (C- 5a), 131.9 (C-8'), 136.0 (C-4'), 124.2 (C-7'), 122.8 (C-3'), 123.7 (C-9), 112.1 (C- 8), 106.3 (C-9a), 103.7 (C-3a), 100.7 (C-6), 96.6 (C-2), 55.2 (C-OMe), 39.0 (C-5'), 44.4 ( C-3), 35.4 (C-1'), 25.7 (C-9'), 23.1 (C-2'), 25.7 (C-2Me), 17.7 (C-8'Me), 16.0 (C-4'Me), 13.7; HR‑ESI‑TOF‑MS (positive): m/z = 419.2221 [M + Na]+ (calcd. For C25H32O4 Na: 419.5077).