Occurrence of Deoxynivalenol in Foods for Human Consumption from Tehran, Iran

authors:

avatar Hassan Yazdanpanah a , b , * , avatar Alireza Shafaati a , avatar Seyed Mohsen Foroutan a , avatar Afshin Zarghi a , avatar Farshid Aboul-fathi c , avatar Arash Khoddam c , avatar Fatemeh Shaki d , avatar Firoozeh Nazari a

School of Pharmacy, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Food and Drug Organization, Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran.
Noor Research and Educational Institute, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Pharmacy, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research : IJPR: Vol.13, issue Suppl; 87-92
article type: Original Article
received: December , 2013
accepted: December , 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22037/ijpr.2014.1462

how to cite: Yazdanpanah H, Shafaati A, Foroutan S M, Zarghi A, Aboul-fathi F, et al. Occurrence of Deoxynivalenol in Foods for Human Consumption from Tehran, Iran. Iran J Pharm Res. 2014;13(Suppl):e125434. https://doi.org/10.22037/ijpr.2014.1462.

Abstract

The occurrence of deoxynivalenol (DON) in retail foods in Tehran (Iran) was determined using high-performance liquid chromatography technique and immunoaffinity column as the clean-up step. A method was validated for analysis of DON in rice, bread, puffed corn snack and wheat flour. The average recoveries and precision (RSD) for DON in different foods ranged 84.2-93.1% and 2.9-12.0%, respectively. A survey of DON was performed on the 72 samples of rice, bread, puffed corn snack, and wheat flour collected from Tehran retail market. The data showed that 10 samples (13.9%) out of 72 samples were contaminated with DON with the maximum level of 368.7 ng/g. The samples had contamination level lower than the maximum tolerated level of DON in foods in Iran. The total intake of DON was under the provisional maximum tolerable daily intake set for DON by the JECFA.

Introduction

Mycotoxins are secondary metabolites produced by microfungi that are capable of causing disease and death in humans and other animals (1). Deoxynivalenol (DON) is one of the most important mycotoxins which are considered to be economically and toxicologically important in worldwide. It is produced by several Fusarium species, most commonly, Fusarium graminearum and F. Culmorum (2, 3). DON can accumulate in human and animal bodies and has teratogenic, neurotoxic, embryotoxic, immunosuppressive and acute effects (4-6). DON predominantly contaminates a number of cereals including wheat, corn, rye, rice and barley (7). The United States FDA has issued advisory levels of 1000 ng/g for wheat products for human consumption (8). FAO has issued advisory levels of 100–2,000 ng/g for DON in cereal and finished cereal products intended for human consumption (9). In Iran, maximum tolerated level (MTL) of DON in cereals including barley, maize, rice and wheat is 1,000 ng/g (10, 11).

High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is the most widely used laboratory method for analysis of DON. Most reported methods are UV or fluorescent detection coupled with immunoaffinity column clean-up step and C18-reversed phase column (3, 4, 12 and 13). However, most of these methods are time-consuming or complex and therefore are not suitable for all conditions.

There is little data on the natural occurrence of DON in cereals and cereal products in Iran. In this study, we investigated the presence of DON in various foods collected from the Tehran retail markets using a rapid HPLC method. We also used the data to estimate DON intake by the population of Tehran.

Experimental

Equipment and reagents

All reagents were of analytical grade. Solvents used for the experiments were of either HPLC or analytical grade. The standard of DON was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich as pure mycotoxins (MO, United States). The IAC for DON was purchased from Vicam Company, MA and USA. The chromatographic apparatus consisted of a model Wellchrom K-1001 pump, a model Rheodyne 7125 injector and a model K 2501 UV detector connected to a model Eurochrom 2000 integrator, all from Knauer (Berlin, Germany). The separation was performed on Chromolith Performance (RP-18e, 100 × 4.6 mm) column from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Glass microfiber filters (pore size: 1 μm and/or 1.5 μm) were purchased from Vicam Company, MA, USA.

Sampling and sample preparation

Seventy two samples including 18 rice, 18 puffed corn snack, 18 wheat flour and 18 “lavash” bread samples were collected by a trained person from various sales outlets in nine geographical zones in Tehran, Iran in June 2005 according to the sampling method for the official control of the levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs (14). About 1-5 kilograms of the samples were collected, labeled, packaged and taken to the laboratory. The both “lavash” bread samples and wheat flour samples (used for preparation of “lavash” bread samples) were collected from “lavash” bread bakeries. Regarding puffed corn snack, the packaged samples (each 65 g) were collected from retail market. The samples were finely ground by mill and/or blender, mixed thoroughly and subsamples stored in freezer at -32º C until analysis.

DON analysis

After preparation of stock standard solution of DON, the concentration was determined using UV spectrophotometer. This standard was used to prepare mixed working standards for HPLC analysis. Samples were analyzed using a HPLC method with some modification (4). Twenty five grams of bread and rice samples were extracted with water. Samples of puffed corn snack and wheat flour were extracted with acetonitrile (60%). After filtration, the extract was diluted with water and filtered through glass microfiber filter. For cleanup of samples, DONtest IACs were used. Accordingly, 1 mL of the filtrate was passed through the IAC. The column was washed twice with 5 mL deionized water and dried under vacuum. Finally, DON was eluted from IAC with 1 mL methanol. The eluate was dried and then reconstitute with 300 μL acetonitrile-water (10:90, v/v) and then 100 μL was injected into the HPLC. Mobile phase was acetonitrile-water (10:90, v/v) with a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The UV detector was operated at 218 nm.

Method validation

Recovery experiments were performed for determination of accuracy and precision of the method. Each test was performed three times and the mean recovery values are shown in Table 1. The values for percent recovery of DON from spiked rice, bread, puffed corn snack and wheat flour (RSD as % are given in parentheses) were 84.16% (12.00%), 84.96% (2.88%), 93.10% (11.32%) and 92.10% (8.27%), respectively (Table 1). These values fall well within EU method performance criteria for DON analysis (15). Calibration curves were obtained by six standards at the range of 0.1-5 μg/mL. The regression coefficient (r2>0.997) obtained indicated a good linearity of the analytical response. The limit of detection (LOD), signal-to-noise ratio of 3:1, and limit of quantification (LOQ), signal-to-noise ratio (s/n) of 9:1 were 2 and 6 ng/g, respectively.

Table 1

Results of validation assessment of HPLC method developed for determination of DON in different foods (n=3).

SampleSpiking levelRecovery %RSDr
Rice50095.55.5
100076.23.2
200080. 814.0
Mean recovery ± SD84.16±10.1012
Bread50082.515.8
100087.45.3
20008511.8
Mean recovery ± SD84.96±2.452.88
Puffed corn snack500105.111.4
100088.913.7
200085.36.8
Mean recovery ± SD93.10±10.5411.32
Wheat flour50082.78.9
100096.689.9
200096.91.8
Mean recovery ± SD92.10±8.138.27

The IAC applied for purification of this toxin eliminated false positive result and cleared peak without interfering compound obtained. In our study, due to using a short monolithic column, the total run time decreased to about 3 min. Typical chromatograms for DON are shown in Figure 1. This method is well suited for routine analysis of DON.

HPLC chromatograms of a) blank bread, and b) DON standard (1000 ng/mL).

HPLC chromatograms of a) blank bread, and b) DON standard (1000 ng/mL).

Figure 1

Quality assurance

To evaluate the reliability of the results, in addition to applying regular validation assessment to the developed method, internal quality control experiments were also performed. In each working day, a blank and a spiked sample were analyzed. According to the recovery values, DON levels were corrected for recoveries. In addition, a certified reference material (CRM) from FAPAS (UK) was analyzed.

Exposure assessment of DON

Exposure to mycotoxins for each type of food depends on the mycotoxins concentration in food and the amount of food consumed. The rates of rice and bread consumption were based on a consumption survey performed in Iran since 2001-2003 (16). Average consumptions of rice and bread in adults are 107 g and 286 g per day per person in Tehran, respectively (16). There are no official data of puffed corn snack consumption in Iran. So, we assumed mean of consumption is a package (65 g) per day.

For estimation of DON dietary intake, deterministic methods were performed combining food daily intake (per body weight) with mean concentration of DON in food as follows: individual DON exposure (μg/Kg bw/day) = (daily food intake/body weight) × (mean concentration of DON in food).

Result and Discussion

Occurrence of DON in retail foods

The data showed that the level of DON in 62 out of 72 samples was lower than the LOQ (6 ng/g) and in 10 samples, level of DON contamination was between 6.0 ng/g and 368.7 ng/g. DON was detected only in one sample of rice and bread. Range of contamination in 8 positive puffed corn snack samples was between 60.2 and 368.7 ng/g (Table 2).

Table 2

Contamination data for DON (ng/g) in rice, bread, puffed corn snack and wheat flour samples marketed in Tehran, Iran

Sample NO. of samples Sample positive (%) Mean(±SD)a Median Max
Rice 18 1 (5.6 ) 345.0 - 345.0
Bread 18 1 (5.6 ) 120.5 - 120.5
Puffed corn snack 18 8 (44.4) 113.2 (104±) 74.0 368.7
Wheat flour 18 0 - - -

There is only one report on DON contamination in Iran. In 2004-2005, Karimi-Osboo determined DON in corn samples produced in Golestan and Ardabil Provinces, Iran, and found DON in 76.7% of samples in the range of 54.4-518.4 ng/g (17). The mean of contamination was 116.25 ng/g. In Turkey, DON was detected in six out of 68 cereal samples and in none of 15 pulse products collected from markets and street Bazaars (18). The maximum detected level of DON was 2.67 mg/Kg in a corn flour sample. In a 3-year survey in South Korea, the concentration of DON was determined in cereal-based foods (19). Among 689 samples, 272 samples (39%) were contaminated with DON. Relatively high DON levels were detected in dried corn, with a mean concentration of 109 μg/Kg. González-Osnaya et al. found DON in 28.0% and 62.6% of the bread and pasta samples, with mean content of 42.5 and 137.1 μg/Kg, respectively (20). In South Africa, 69.6 % of wheat flour samples were contaminated with DON at the levels equal to or below 100 μg/Kg (mean of 16 positives, 29 μg/Kg) (21).

Exposure assessment of Tehran population to DON

There are some published papers regarding exposure assessment of Tehran population to AFB1 and zearalenone (22- 23). In this study, the estimated daily intake of DON was studied and is shown in Table 3. The mean dietary exposure of DON through all food products consumption was less than the PMTDI of 1 μg/Kg bw/day (24) (Table 3).

Table 3

Estimated daily intake of DON (ng/Kg bw/day) through consumption of rice, bread and puffed corn snack marketed in Tehran, Iran

SamplesMeana,b (ng/g)Mean Daily intake(ng/kg bw/day)a,c
Rice22.0033.63
Bread9.5338.92
Puffed corn snack 48.9745.48

In South Korea, daily intake of DON was estimated to be between 0.066 and 0.142 μg/Kg bw for males and between 0.066 and 0.144 μg/ Kg bw for females. The young children (3–6 yr) showed the highest relative intake, with a mean intake of 0.142 μg/Kg bw/d for males and 0.144 μg/Kg bw/d for females (19). Soubra et al. (2009) calculated DON intakes for average and high consumers (75th and 95th percentile) among children and teenagers in Beirut (Lebanon). The intakes of DON were found to be below the PMTDI of 1 μg/Kg bw/day (25). In Japan, the intake of DON was estimated based on its presence in wheat using a probabilistic computer simulation method. The results showed that children aged 1-6 years old had the highest DON intake. The 99th percentile of simulated DON intake in the 1-6 years old group was greater than PMTDI (26).

In this study, the specifically developed HPLC method was found to be accurate, precise and rapid and meets EU method performance criteria for DON analysis. Upon applying the proposed method, none of the various food samples had contamination more than the Iranian MTL. The total intake of DON was under the PMTDI set for DON by the JECFA.

Acknowledgements

References

  • 1.

    Bennett JW, Klich M. Mycotoxins. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2003;16:497-516. [PubMed ID: 12857779].

  • 2.

    He J, Yang R, Zhoub T, Tsao R, Young JC, Zhu Z, Z Li X, Boland GJ. Purification of deoxynivalenol from Fusarium graminearum rice culture and mouldy corn by high-speed counter-current chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A. 2007:1151 187-192.

  • 3.

    Omurtag GZ, Beyoglu D. Occurrence of deoxynivalenol (vomitoxin) in beer in Turkey detected by HPLC. Food Control. 2007;18:163-166.

  • 4.

    Cahill LM, Kruger SC, McAlice BT, Ramsey CS, Prioli R, Kohn B. Quantification of deoxynivalenol in wheat using an immunoaffinity column and liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A. 1999;859:23-28. [PubMed ID: 10563412].

  • 5.

    Larsen JC, Hunt J, Perrin I, Ruckenbauer P. Workshop on trichothecenes with a focus on DON: summary report. Toxico Lett. 2004;153:1-22.

  • 6.

    Pestka JJ, Smolinski AT. Deoxynivalenol: toxicology and potential effects on humans. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health B. 2005;8:39-69.

  • 7.

    Birzele B, Prange A, Kramer J. Deoxynivalenol and ochratoxin A in German wheat and changes of level in relation to storage parametres. Food Addit. Contam. 2000;17:1027-1035. [PubMed ID: 11271837].

  • 8.

    Chesemore RG. Letter to state agricultural directors, state feed control officials and food. FDA Associate Commissioner for Regulatory Affairs. 1993.

  • 9.

    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Worldwide regulations for mycotoxins in food and feed in 2003. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2004. 17 p.

  • 10.

    FAO,Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Worldwide regulations for mycotoxins in food and feed in 2003. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2004. 81 p.

  • 11.

    ISIRI,Institute of Standard and Industrial Research of I.R. Iran. Maximum tolerated limits of mycotoxins in foods and feeds. National Standard; 2002. 5925 p.

  • 12.

    Delmulle B, De Saeger S, Adams A, De Kimpe N, Van Peteghem C. Development of a liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method for the simultaneous determination of 16 mycotoxins on cellulose filters and in fungal cultures. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2006;20:771-776. [PubMed ID: 16470672].

  • 13.

    Richard JL, Bennett GA, Ross PF, Nelson PE. Analysis of Naturally Occurring Mycotoxins in Feedstuffs and Food. J. Anim. Sci. 1993;71:2563-2574. [PubMed ID: 8407669].

  • 14.

    European Commission. laying down the sampling methods and the methods of analysis for the official control of the levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs. Official J. Euro. Uni. L. 1998;201:93-101.

  • 15.

    European Commission. laying down the methods of sampling and analysis for the official control of the levels ofmycotoxins in foodstuffs. Official J. Euro. Uni. 2006;70:12-34.

  • 16.

    National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute. Comprehensive study of food basket pattern and nutrition status in Iran during 2000-2002. Tehran, Iran: Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences and Health Services; 2004. 24 p.

  • 17.

    Karami-Osboo R, Mirabolfathy M, Aliakbari F. Natural Deoxynivalenol Contamination of Corn Produced in Golestan and Moqan Areas in Iran. J. Agr. Sci. Tech. 2010;12:233-239.

  • 18.

    Omurtag GZ, Beyoglu D. Occurrence of deoxynivalenol (vomitoxin) in processed Cereals and pulses in Turkey. Food A dditives and Contaminants. 2003;20:405-409.

  • 19.

    Ok HE, Kim HJ, Cho TY, Oh KS, Chun HS. Determination of Deoxynivalenol in Cereal-Based Foods and Estimation of Dietary Exposure. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A. 2009;72:21-22.

  • 20.

    González-Osnayaetal L, Cortés C, Soriano JM, Moltó JC, Mañes J. Occurrence of deoxynivalenol and T-2 toxin in bread and pasta commercialized in Spain. Food Chem. 2011;124:156-161.

  • 21.

    Shephard GS, Westhuizen Lvd, Katerere DR, Herbst M, Pineiro M. Preliminary exposure assessment of deoxynivalenol and patulin in South Africa. Mycotoxin Res. 2010;26:181-185. [PubMed ID: 23605382].

  • 22.

    Yazdanpanah H, Zarghi A, Shafaati AR, Foroutan SM, Aboul-Fathi F, Khoddam A, Nazari F, Shaki F. Analysis of Aflatoxin B1 in Iranian Foods Using HPLC and a Monolithic Column and Estimation of its Dietary Intake. Iran. J. pharm. Res. 2013;12:83-89. [PubMed ID: 24250676].

  • 23.

    Yazdanpanah H, Zarghi A, Shafaati AR, Foroutan SM, Aboul-Fathi F, Khoddam A, Nazari F. Exposure Assessment of the Tehran Population (Iran) to Zearalenone Mycotoxin. Iran. J. pharm. Res. 2012;11:251-256. [PubMed ID: 24250447].

  • 24.

    JECFA, Joint FAO/WHO Expert committee on Food Additives. . Rome, Italy; 2001. p. 281-320. (Safety evaluation of certain mycotoxins in food).

  • 25.

    Soubra L, Sarkis D, Hilan C, Verger P. Occurrence of total aflatoxins, ochratoxin A and deoxynivalenol in foodstuffs available on the Lebanese market and their impact on dietary exposure of children and teenagers in Beirut. Chem. Anal. Control. Expo. Risk Assess. 2009;26:189-200.

  • 26.

    Nakatani Y, Satoh T, Saito S, Watanabe M, Yoshiike N, Kumagai S, Sugita-Konishi Y. Simulation of deoxynivalenol intake from wheat consumption in Japan using the Monte Carlo method. Food Addit. Contam: Part A. 2011;28:471-476.