Study design and population
This retrospective study was conducted onthe 154 patients (Mean age ± SD, Range) of viper snake bites who were referred tothe emergencyward of Razi Hospital, Ahvaz, Iran over 2 years period (2004-2006). All patients were identified with a diagnosis of coagulopathy following severe viper envenoming and included in this study.This research was approved by the Jundishapur University of medical sciences Ethical Committee, Ahvaz, Iran.
Materials
The anti-venom was a sterile preparation contains equine immunoglobulin fragments F(ab)2. This lyophilized10mL polyvalent is an enzyme refined serum that produced against the most dangerous Iranian snakes including Echis carinatus, Naja naja oxiana , Vipera lebtina, Vipera albicornuta, Agkistrodn halys and Pesudocerates (Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, Karaj, Iran).
Methods
Snake envenoming was defined by patientreport, correlation between clinical manifestations and recognition of snakes by patients and bystanders. There is no available venom-specific enzyme immunoassay, so snake species have not been identified in all cases. The majority of patients were stung by
Echis carinatus (almost 90% of cases).For the prevention of hypersensitivity reactions to polyvalent ASV, corticosteroids, H1 and H2 anti-histamine receptor blockers, and epinephrine were available at the patient›s bedside (
10). Detail of demographic information (age and sex), residency (rural or urban), findings of physical examination including site of bite, local reaction at the bite site and systemic features, and records of investigations including arterial blood gases, serum biochemistry, complete blood count, and coagulation profile were noted, Details of the dosage and schedules of SAV were and related information (number of used vials, interval time between bite and initiation of ASV administration, hypersensitivity reactions to ASV, coagulopathy complications, administration of FFP and packed red blood cell, and hospitalization time) also were reviewed. The coagulopathy was defined by the presence of platelet count <150,000 mm3, prothrombin time above normal, or fibrinogen level <150 mg/dL conditions (
11).
According to the treatment dosage the patients were divided in two groups include group 1, low dose regimen and group 2, high dose one. In group 1, the treatment was performed by administration of 4 to 6 vials of ASV through intravenous infusion (
12). Then, prothrombin time, fibrinogen level, and platelet counts were determined. Then, the patient was evaluated for local injury. These parameters, in addition to clinical evaluation, were used for the purpose of screening for coagulopathy. For achieving endpoint, three maintenance doses of two vials every six hours were given. The endpoint state was defined as arrest of local tissue manifestations and return of prothrombin time, fibrinogen level, platelet counts, and systemic signs to normal. If the endpoint state was achieved, the patient could be discharged and after three days he or she should be visited in follow up clinic; and if the endpoint was not achieved, the patient would be received additional doses of ASV.
In group 2, the patients were given 5 to 10 vials of ASV as an initial dose.Following the initial dose,prothrombin time, fibrinogen level, and platelet counts were measured. Then, the patients were evaluated for local injury. All hematological and clinical monitoring were same as grooup1. Against prior method, the patients should be received additional doses ofASV if coagulopathy, thrombocytopenia, and worsening tissue injury were persisted.The number of used vials reached even 40. The evaluation daysreached even6.Hypersensitivity reactions to ASV were defined solely as urticaria in most cases.In group 1, administration was performed without paying much attention to clinical manifestations, whereas in second group, it was mainly based on clinical manifestations and coagulopathy.Snakes were identified either by direct examination ofthe snakes when brought by the patients or on the basis ofthe signs, symptoms, and results of the investigations.
Statistical analysis
The data wasanalyzed using SPSS 11.5 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The data were expressed as mean±standard deviation (SD) ornumber and percentage were suitable. The Chi square and the Student’s t-tests to find the significant difference when were appropriate. p< 0.05 is considered statistically significant.