Chromatography was conducted on a narrow-bore column and the chromatographic conditions were optimized to obtain the proper retention times for sildenafil and clonazepam.
The effects of the percentage of organic solvent and the concentration of phosphate buffer in the mobile phase on the retention times of sildenafil and clonazepam were investigated. Acetonitrile was preferred over methanol as the organic phase since it resulted in a better peak shape and resolution.
The dependence of log k′ (capacity factor) values of analyte and internal standard on acetonitrile percentage was nearly linear.
Utilization of more than 50% acetonitrile caused the early elution of the analyte peak and acetonitrile concentrations lower than 20% caused seriously delayed elution and peak broadening. The effect of phosphate buffer concentration on the log k′-values of the compounds was evaluated over the concentration range of 5 to 50 mM and the concentration of 20 mM showed the best result.
The optimum wavelength for detection was 292 nm at which the best detector responses for both sildenafil and clonazepam were obtained. Figure 2 shows a representative chromatogram in this analysis.
Under the optimum chromatographic conditions, tailing and asymmetry factors were 1.12 and 1.14 for sildenafil and 1.09 and 1.12 for clonazepam respectively.
Calibration curve, precision and accuracy
For calibration, sildenafil citrate standard solutions were analyzed in triplicate in six analytical runes. Linear relationships were obtained between the analyte-to-internal standard peak-area ratios and the corresponding concentrations (correlation coefficient = 0.9999).
Correlation coefficients invariably exceeded 0.9995.
Calibration curve was linear over the concentration range of 30-4000 ng/mL (
Figure 3). The limit of quantitation (LOQ) is determined as 30 ng/mL. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess intra- and inter-day assay precision. Intra-day and Inter-day relative standard deviations (RSDs) were 0.36-1.62% and 1.53-1.73% respectively. The accuracy of the method recovery was calculated 99.43-101.60% (
Tables 1and 2).
Application of the method to the analysis of commercial formulations
The developed method was successfully utilized to determine the SC content of 12 different tablets and was proved to be suitable for the routine quality control analyses without interference from the excipients and additives such as starch, glucose, lactose and magnesium stearate.
The method was suitable for the content uniformity testing, in which many assay on individual tablets are required. Five different lots of commercially available tablets containing sildenafil citrate were analyzed using the developed method. Therefore, this method can be used for accurate and precise quantification of sildenafil citrate in pharmaceutical dosage forms. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficiency of narrow-bore C-18 column for the high-throughput analysis of sildenafil citrate in its pharmaceutical dosage forms.
The chromatographic parameters assessed in this study included capacity factor, resolution, peak width, selectivity and peak form.
The run time in our experiment was 4 min.
When the flow rate was 0.7 mL/min, the solvent consumption in our experiment was 2.8 mL per sample of which ca 0.7 mL was acetonitrile. This is much less than what would be needed on a 4.6 mm column.
This study shows that the application of narrow-bore column instead of the conventional reversed phase column in HPLC analyses has the advantages of shorter run time and less organic solvent consumption.
Chromatographic performance assessed in terms of selectivity, resolution, symmetry and tailing were easily optimized on this type of column.
We encourage the routine use of narrow-bore columns in high throughput analysis of pharmaceutical substances in their different dosage forms.
| Actual concentration (μg/mL) | Calculated concentration (μg/mL) | Accuracy % | Precision% (R.S.D) |
|---|
| 0.175 | 0.174 | 99.43 | 0.71 |
| 1.750 | 1.778 | 101.60 | 1.62 |
| 3.500 | 3.487 | 99.63 | 0.36 |
| Actual concentration (μg/mL) | Calculated concentration (μg/mL) | Accuracy % | Precision% (R.S.D) |
|---|
| 0.175 | 0.178 | 101.71 | 1.60 |
| 1.750 | 1.723 | 98.46 | 1.53 |
| 3.500 | 3.561 | 101.74 | 1.73 |