Abstract
Keywords
Amoxicillin pH sensitive drug delivery system Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) Gastric retention
Introduction
Oral gastro-retentive delivery system exhibits a prolonged controlled release which has been a topic of interest in terms of their potential for targeted release in the stomach. These systems are also appropriate for drugs which are locally active in gastric mucosa of the stomach, in particular case of antibiotic administration for H. pylori eradication to treat the peptic ulcer and other associated diseases (1).
H. pylori are small, spiral, microaerophilic, Gram-negative bacteria and it is recognized to be associated with gastritis and duodenal ulcers. The microorganism has also been reported to be involved with the pathogenesis of other diseases, such as chronic atrophic gastritis, adenocarcinoma of the body or antrum of the stomach, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, peptic esophagitis etc. (2). The bacteria penetrates the gastric mucus layer and fixes itself to various phospholipids and glycolipids in the mucus gel. Therefore, the access of antimicrobial drugs to the site is restricted from both the lumen of the stomach and the gastric blood supply. Conventional tablets or capsules are, in general, used for eradication therapy, but these preparations do not remain in the stomach for long duration. Therefore, it is difficult to reach the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) in the gastric mucus where H. pylori colonize. It is therefore necessary to design the drug delivery systems that not only can alleviate the shortcomings of conventional delivery but can also deliver antibiotics to the infected cell lines (Figure 1).
The stomach specific gastroretantive (GR) and controlled release delivery system can maintain the MIC of an antibiotic in the gastric region where H. pylori exist and thereby improve the therapeutic efficacy. The absorption of an antimicrobial agent from the gastric lumen into the mucus through the mucus layer is believed to be more effective for H. pylori eradication than absorption through the basolateral membrane (from blood).
Narkar et al. 2010 (4) prepared and evaluated stomach-specific controlled release mucoadhesive drug delivery system containing amoxicillin trihydrate. Rajinikanth and Mishra (5) reported gellan gum-based floating beads. Babu et al. 2010 (6) prepared controlled release gellan gum macro beads of amoxicillin.
It is therefore necessary to design drug delivery systems that not only can alleviate the shortcomings of conventional delivery vehicles but can also deliver the antimicrobial agent to the infected cell lines. Design of novel mucoadhesive, a pH-sensitive formulation, may improve the local therapy of GI and minimize the premature drug degradation. Stomach-specific antibiotic drug delivery, for instance, would be highly beneficial in the treatment of H. pylori infection in peptic ulcer disease (7-9). Amoxicillin is one of the most active and predictable antimicrobial agents against H. pylori and also has rapid bactericidal activity compared with various antibiotics and antiulcer agents (10, 11). Amoxicillin inhibits transpeptidase and stops the synthesis of peptidoglycan, thereby weakening the cell wall and making H. pylori more susceptible to death due to bursting.
There are several benefits in controlled drug delivery systems over the conventional pharmaceutical dosage form: reduction in drug plasma level and fluctuation, reduction in adverse side effect and improvement in tolerability, patient comfort, complains and finally reduction in healthcare cost (12-14). Gellan is an anionic, high molecular weight, deacetylated exocellular polysaccharide gum produced as a fermentation product through a pure culture of Pseudomonas elodea (15). In the present study, oil entrapped buoyant gel bead of Amoxicillin consisting of hydrophilic polymer (carbopol 934P or hydroxylpropyl methyl cellulose), blended with gellan gum, was designed, using calcium carbonate (CaCO3) as a gas forming agent. The primary objective of the work was to develop a consistent formulation of Amoxicillin that enjoys all the advantages of a floating single unit dosage form, but at the same time, it lacked disadvantages of single unit dosage forms, like sticking or being obstructed in GI. The release behaviour of the gel beads capable of floating in gastric fluid was investigated with the aim of achieving a GR, multiple units, and controlled release formulation of amoxicillin.
Composition for amoxicillin loaded polymeric blended gellan gum beads
Formulation | Drug | Gum | oil | Calcium carbonate | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(COB) | (HOB) | ||||
K1 | S1 | 0.62 | 1.5:1.0 | 05 | 0.55 |
K2 | S2 | 0.62 | 1.5:1.0 | 10 | 0.55 |
K3 | S3 | 0.62 | 1.5:1.0 | 15 | 0.55 |
K4 | S4 | 0.62 | 1.5:1.0 | 05 | 1.50 |
K5 | S5 | 0.62 | 2.0:0.5 | 05 | 0.55 |
K6 | S6 | 0.62 | 2.0:0.5 | 10 | 0.55 |
K7 | S7 | 0.62 | 2.0:0.5 | 15 | 0.55 |
K8 | S8 | 0.62 | 2.0: 0.5 | 05 | 1.50 |
Experimental
Amoxicillin was obtained as a gift sample from Ranbaxy Laboratories, Gurgoan, India. Gellan gum was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals Ltd, New Delhi, India. Carbopol 934P and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose K4M were obtained as gift samples from Ranboxy laboratory Devash, India. Calcium chloride and ethyl cellulose were obtained from SD. Fine Chem. India. Light mineral oil was obtained from the Central Drug House, India. All other ingredients, reagents and solvents were of analytical grades. Brucella broth and fetal calf serum were purchased from Himedia Mumbai, India.
Preparation of polymeric blend oil entrapped bead
Oil entrapped polymeric blend gel bead of amoxicillin was prepared through the ionic gelation method. Aqueous solution of gellan gum (1.5-2.0 % w/v) was prepared using de-ionized water and heating at 70°C. The gellan gum solution below 35°C was successively dispersed into the slurry of 0.5 -1.0 % w/v of HPMC or carbopol 934P in order to prepare specific ratio of blended polymeric dispersion (Table 1) with continuous stirring for 20 min. The drug (0.62 % w/v) and calcium carbonate (0.55-1.5 % w/v) were dispersed uniformly into 20 mL of the polymeric blended mixture with continuous stirring until a uniform dispersion was obtained. The mixture was emulsified with 05-15 % w/v of light mineral oil using Silverson emulsifier (Hicon, L5M-4, India) with continuous stirring at 500 rpm for 5 min. The resulting drug of the loaded emulsions was added through a 21G syringe needle into 100 mL of 0.45 mol/mL of calcium chloride (CaCl2) solution. After 5 min of curing, the gel beads of amoxicillin loaded gellan gum blended, either with hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HOB) or carbopol 934P (COB). Gel beads took place after 5 min of curing, the formed beads were washed with distilled water, collected and dried at 40°C for 6 h in tray dryer.
Coating of gel beads
The formulated microgel beads were selected for the optimization in order to modify the drug release pattern further. The coating parameters were 5-10% (w/v) ethylcellulose (EC) solution in acetone and coating time was fixed (5-10 min). Gel beads (2 g) were placed in a fluidized bed dryer (TG 100, Retsch, Germany) and the coating solution was sprayed on the fluidized beads using a spray gun for a period of 10 min at an air inlet speed of 220 m/s at room temperature. The beads were dried at room temperature for a period of 24 h until all solvents were evaporated, leaving a film of EC coat on the gel beads (Table 2).
Independent variables of the formulation bead coated with ethyl cellulose
Formulation | EC concentration | Time of coating | %drug release | R2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
K41 | 5 | 5 | 88 ± 1.3 | 0.982 |
K42 | 5 | 10 | 85 ± 1.4 | 0.975 |
K43 | 10 | 5 | 80 ± 1.6 | 0.934 |
K44 | 10 | 10 | 79 ± 1.4 | 0.926 |
Morphology and size
The external and internal morphology of micro gel beads were studied through scanning the electron microscopy (SEM). Particle size of the prepared beads were determined in three sets using an optical microscope (Model BH-2, Olympus, Japan) fitted with a stage and an ocular micrometer. Mean diameter was calculated through measuring the diameter of 20 dried beads.
In-vitro floating study
In-vitro floating study was performed using a USP 24 dissolution apparatus II containing 900 ML of phthalate buffer solution (pH = 3.4). The medium temperature was kept at 37 ± 0.5°C. The floating beads (1.0 g beads) were soaked in the dissolution medium and the medium was agitated with a paddle at 50 rpm. After the agitation, the beads that were floated on the surface of the medium and those that settled down at the bottom of flask were recovered separately. The percentage of floating was measured through the visual observation (16).
Determination of encapsulation efficiency and drug loading
Accurately weighed (100 mg) grounded powder of beads was soaked in 100 mL phosphate buffer (pH = 7.5) and allowed to be disintegrated completely for 4 h. The resulting dispersion was sonicated using a probe sonicator (UP 400 s, Dr. Hielscher GmbH, Germany) for 30 min and then filtered through a 0.45 μm filter. The polymeric debris was washed twice with fresh phosphate buffer to extract any adhered drug. The drug content was determined spectrophotometrically (Systronics, Mumbai, India) at 334.5 nm against constructed a calibration curve. The drug content (DC) was calculated according to Equation 1.
(DC) = (amount of drug in beads / amount of beads) × 100 (Equation 1)
The encapsulation efficiency (EE) was calculated by Equation 2.
EE (%) = (C D) / (T D) × 100 (Equation 2)
Here, C D is the calculated drug content and T D is the theoretical drug content.
In-vitro drug release
In-vitro dissolution studies were performed for all the formulation gel beads using USP 24 dissolution test apparatus II with a basket type (17). An accurately weighed 50 mg amount of the beads were taken into 900 mL dissolution medium of the simulated gastric fluid (fasting state condition, pH = 1.2) or phthalate buffer solution (fed state condition, pH = 3.4) conditions maintained at a temperature of 37 ± 0.5ºC and stirred at a speed of 50 rpm. Sample aliquots (10 mL) were withdrawn at 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0 and 8.0 h and the volume was replaced with an equivalent amount of a plain dissolution medium. The collected samples were filtered and suitably diluted and analyzed at 334.5 nm using a UV-visible spectrophotometer. Additionally, an experimental batch of BE and BF containing 10 mg Amoxicillin and lactose (q.s.) filled in a capsule (#2) was used as a reference formulation.
In-vitro growth inhibition studies
The bacterial strain used in this study was originally isolated with gastric biopsy from the peasant suffering from chronic gastritis and peptic ulcer in Institute of Medical Science, Banaras Hindu University Varanasi-India. Turbid metric method with slight modification was employed to evaluate the growth inhibition (18). The protocol of the study was approved by Institutional Animals Ethical Committee of the BHU. To suppress the growth of indigenous or exogenous contaminating bacteria, the isolated biopsy sample was grown in brucellla agar (Merck Co, Germany) containing 10% horse blood, Vancomycin, polymyxin B and amphotericin and incubated at 37°C for 7 days. Isolated sample was subcultured on Brucella agar containing 10% horse blood without antibiotics and incubated at 37°C for three days in microairofilic condition.
H. pylori strains were grown in brucella broth at 37°C after 7 days in microaerobic atmosphere (5% O2, 10% CO2, 85% N2). The growth of the bacteria was monitored by measuring the optical density (OD) of broth cultures with spectrophotometrically at λmax of 640 nm (19). The numbers of bacteria were determined in terms of optical density at λmax of 640 nm with one optical density unit corresponding to 108 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL. To study the effect of formulations on H. pylori growth inhibition, 10 mL of nutrient broth containing H.pylori were transferred into sterile test tubes. Plain drug (Am) and optimized formulation of the ethylcellulose coated batches were taken containing amoxicillin equivalent to 32 µg/mL which is twice in concentration with respect to MIC (16 µg/mL) and added to the tubes and all the tubes were incubated at 37°C in a microaerobic atmosphere for 24 h. The tubes containing culture were shaken at 100 rpm at 37°C in a microaerobic atmosphere condition in incubator for 24 h. Then, 100 μL of nutrient broth of H.pylori containing drug and different formulations were removed at various time points (4, 8 and 12 h) and optical density was determined to assess the growth inhibition of bacteria through counting the viable colony using spectrophotometer. The percentage of growth inhibition was calculated using Equation 3.
(Equation 3)
Here, ODTP = Optical density of test organism at particular interval. ODTS = optical density of test mixture at same time interval.
Kinetic release evaluation
To investigate the mode of drug release from the micro gel bead, the release data were analyzed with various release kinetic models (zero order, higuchi and korshmaer-Peppas) were applied to elucidate the mechanism of drug release from the beads in the fed state (20-22). These Kinetic models were used to analyse the dissolution study, , Equations 4, 5 and 6.
Zero-order model
Mt = M0 + K0t (Equation 4)
Higuchi model
Mt = M0 + KH t0:5 (Equation 5)
Korshmaer-Peppas model
M t /M ∞ = k (t) n (Equation 6)
Here, Mt is the amount of drug dissolved in time, M0 is the initial amount of drug, K0 is the zero order release of constant and KH is the Higuchi rate constant. Mt/M∞ is the fraction of drug release at time t, k is the release rate constant, and n is the release exponent indicative of the mechanism of release.
Statistical analyses
The experimental results are expressed as mean ± SD (standard deviation). Statistical evaluation of data was performed using an analysis of variance (ANOVA), depending on the outcome of the ANOVA (Dunnett’s multiple comparison test). The evaluation data was used to assess the significance of differences. Statistically significant differences between the means of batches were defined as p < 0.05.
Results and Discussion
The hydrophilic polymer was blended in gellan gum, in optimized ratio, to enhance the mucoadhesion efficacy of prepared microgel beads. Mucoadhesion involves different kinds of interaction forces between mucoadhesive materials and the mucus surface; these include electrostatic attraction, hydrogen bonding, Vander Waals forces, mechanical interpenetration etc. A combination approach, i.e. mucoadhesive and pH-sensitive controlled delivery system, is explored for the effective and improved treatment of H. pylori infection.
Morphology and size
The shape and surface morphology of prepared microgel beads were investigated using scanning electron microscopy. SEM of Amoxicillin-loaded oil entrapped gellan gum blended with carbopol 934P of batch K4 (COB formulation) and HPMC blended batch S5 (HOB formulation) are shown in Figure 2. Batch K4 gel beads were white, translucent and rigid, whereas, batch S5 gel beads were off-white, translucent and elastic. The beads size of formulation COB varied between 1.85 ± 1.3 and 2.28 ± 1.3 mm while that of COB was between 1.34 ± 1.4 and 1.62 ± 1.6 mm (Table 3). The diameter of microbeads were increased significantly (p < 0.05) as gellan gum or CaCO3 concentration were increased. Similar findings have been observed by Rajinikanth et al. 2009 (5).
In-vitro floating study
The floating ability of COB formulation was in the range of 61 ± 0.4 % to 85 ± 0.4 % and formulation HOB varied from 60 ± 0.4 % to 79 ± 0.6 % (Table 3). By increasing CaCO3 concentration, floating ability of micro gel beads was increased. This could be attributed to the increase in amount of calcium ions (Ca+2) and consequently the amount of evolved carbon dioxide (CO2) is entrapped in the gel network of the formulation cause gel rise to the surface of the dissolution medium.
Determination ofencapsulation efficiency and drug loading
The parameters of the formulation effect on encapsulation efficiency and drug content are shown in Table 3. Encapsulation efficiency of the drug was found to be consistently higher in the prepared formulation of COB (79 ± 1.7 – 96 ± 1.8 %) and HOB (73 ± 1.5 to 88 ± 1.6 %). It has been observed that the encapsulation efficiency of beads is increased through increasing the gellan concentration; the result was similar as reported by Narkar et al. 2010 (23). Further more, it was observed that there was no significant difference in encapsulation efficiency with different concentrations of calcium carbonate and CaCl2 used as gas forming and cross linking agent, respectively. The drug content of COB formulation was found to be in the range of 61 ± 0.4 to 82 ± 0.6% w/w, HOB formulation was found to be in the range of 48 ± 0.6 to 69 ± 0.8 % w/w. No significant (p < 0.05) effect was observed with CaCO3 and CaCl2 on the drug content of beads.
Characterization of prepared formulation of polymeric blended gellan gum beads
Formulation | Diameter | Floating ability (%)a,c | Encapsulation | Drug content % a,d ,c | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COB | HOB | COB | HOB | COB | HOB | COB | HOB | COB | HOB |
K1 | S1 | 1.85 ± 1.3 | 1.3 4± 1.4 | 85 ± 0.4 | 76 ± 0.4 | 82 ± 1.6 | 75 ±1.3 | 68 ± 0.5 | 58 ± 0.4 |
K2 | S2 | 1.90 ± 1.5 | 1.42 ± 1.5 | 82 ± 0.6 | 73 ± 0.6 | 86 ± 1.4 | 73 ±1.5 | 63 ± 0.8 | 51 ± 0.5 |
K3 | S3 | 2.17 ± 1.2 | 1.48 ± 1.6 | 77 ± 0.4 | 68 ± 0.4 | 79 ± 1.7 | 74 ±1.5 | 61 ± 0.4 | 48 ± 0.6 |
K4 | S4 | 2.28 ± 1.3 | 1.39 ± 1.4 | 82 ± 0.2 | 70 ± 0.5 | 96 ± 1.8 | 84 ± 1.4 | 82 ± 0.6 | 67 ± 0.4 |
K5 | S5 | 2.08 ± 1.8 | 1.70 ± 1.5 | 74 ± 0.3 | 79 ± 0.6 | 94 ± 1.4 | 88 ± 1.6 | 73 ± 0.9 | 69 ± 0.8 |
K6 | S6 | 2.20 ± 1.6 | 1.62 ± 1.6 | 66 ± 0.4 | 63 ± 0.5 | 85 ± 1.5 | 79 ± 1.4 | 64 ± 0.7 | 66 ± 0.5 |
K7 | S7 | 1.88 ± 1.2 | 1.47 ± 1.4 | 61 ± 0.4 | 60 ± 0.4 | 86 ± 1.4 | 82 ± 1.8 | 68 ± 0.3 | 64 ± 0.6 |
K8 | S8 | 2.03 ± 1.3 | 1.60 ± 1.2 | 69 ± 0.4 | 63 ± 0.5 | 85 ± 1.8 | 84 ± 1.5 | 64 ± 0.6 | 62 ± 0.3 |
In-vitro drug release
In-vitro release study of Amoxicillin gel beads was carried out in the fasted state (SGF solution, pH = 1.2) and fed state (phthalate buffer, pH = 3.4) for a period of 8 h. The results indicate that 62 ± 1.4% of the pure drug (batch BE) was dissolved within 2 h in fasting state (pH of 1.2) and in the fed state (batch BF, pH of 3.4) and the release was 79 ± 1.2 %. After 8 h, drug release from batch K4E and batch K4F was 76.0 ± 2.1% and 62.0 ± 2.2% (fasting state and fed state) in the SGF and phthalate buffer solution (Figure 3a), respectively. Drug release from the optimized formulations K4 followed the Higuchi (R2 = 0.984) and Peppas models (R2 = 0.946, n= 0.36) and suggested a diffusion based mechanism of the drug release as the diffusion exponent values were less than 0.45 (23).
Batch K4 of the formulation COB was selected for optimization through coating with ethyl cellulose in order to modify the drug release pattern (24). However, the dissolution profiles of all EC-coated beads were best fitted to the zero-order kinetic model (Figure 3b). The batch K41 which showed the highest release (Table 2) of amoxicillin (88 ± 1.3%) was regarded as pH sensitive controlled release formulation of amoxicillin.
In-vitro growth inhibition studies
The antimicrobial efficacy of the prepared drug-loaded, placebo (drug-free) beads and plain drug was investigated at various time intervals in the isolated H.pylori bacterial strain up to 12 h and the results are shown in Figure 3. The EC-coated formulation (K41, K42, K43, K44), the placebo and the plain amoxicillin were selected for in-vitro growth inhibition studies. Culture tube of H. pylori containing placebo bead did not show significant percent growth inhibition (2.3 ± 1.2 %) and the percentage of growth inhibition sequence in the coated formulation was varied (K41 (70 ± 1.2 % ) >K42 (67 ± 1.4 % ) >K43 (62 ± 1.3 % ) > K44 (60 ± 1.2 %)) whereas, the plain amoxicillin inhibited hundred percent H. pylori growth at 4 h of the studies (Figure 4). Continuing the incubation of H. pylori up to 8 h, the optimized formulation (batch k14) was eradicated hundred percent growth of the H. pylori and through further incubation for 12 h, all the optimized coated batches showed complete termination of the microbial infection.
This was due to the controlled delivery of amoxicillin from the formulation and the long time exposure of the microorganism in the MIC state which resulted in complete clearance of H. pylori. EC-coated formulation (batch S41) was more effective in term of the microbial eradication, abolished all the mechanisms of the bacterial survival in-vivo and may provide targeted eradication of H. pylori cell lines.
Conclusions
Design formulation contains optimized ratio of the blended hydrophilic polymer, allowing the initially penetration of the drug into the unique niche of the gastric mucosa. The preferential accumulation of the formulation in the stomach mucosa may be very useful for targeting the antibiotics at the site of infection and also possibly for H. pylori eradication. Thus, from the result, we concluded that the optimized batch K41 appears to have promising potential for opening up possibility for targeting antibiotics like amoxicillin at the site of infection and also for H pylori eradication.
Acknowledgements
References
-
1.
Marshall BJ, Warren JR. Unidentified curved bacilli in the stomach of patients with gastritis and peptic ulceration. Lancet. 1984;1:1311-1315. [PubMed ID: 6145023].
-
2.
Suerbauma S, Michetti P. Helicobacter pylori infection. NewEng. J. Med. 2002;347:1175-86.
-
3.
Tripathi GK, Singh S, Nath G, Dubey RK. Evaluation of pH sensitive gastroretantive polymeric blend buoyant beads of acetohydroxamic acid for clearance of Helicobacter pylori. Asian J. of Pharm Sci. 2011;6:132-140.
-
4.
Narkar M, Sher P, Pawar A. Stomach-specific controlled release gellan beads of acid-soluble drug prepared by ionotropic gelation method. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2010;11:267-277. [PubMed ID: 20180053].
-
5.
Rajinikanth PS, Mishra B. Stomach-site specific drug delivery system of clarithromycin for eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2009;10:1068-1075. [PubMed ID: 19801860].
-
6.
Babu RJ, Sathigari SK, Thilek M, Pandit JK. Formulation of controlled release gellan gum macro beads of amoxicillin. Curr. Drug Deliv. 2010;1:36-43. [PubMed ID: 19863487].
-
7.
Nagahara N, Akiyama Y, Tada M, Nakao M, Kitano M, Ogawa Y. Mucoadhesive microspheres containing amoxicillin for clearance of Helicobacter pylori. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1998;42:2492-2494. [PubMed ID: 9756746].
-
8.
Hejazi R, Amiji M. Stomach-specific anti-H. pylori therapy. I. Preparation and characterization of tetracycline-loaded chitosan microspheres. Int. J. Pharm. 2002;235:87-94.
-
9.
M MalekJafarianM, Ghazvini K. In-vitro Susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori to Licorice Extract. Iranian J. Pharm. Res. 2007;6:69-72.
-
10.
Umamaheshwari RB, Jain S, Jain NK. A new approach in gastroretentive drug delivery system using cholestyramine. Drug Deliv. 2003;10:151-160. [PubMed ID: 12944135].
-
11.
Berry V, Jennings K, Woodnutt G. Bactericidal , morphological effects of amoxycillin on Helicobacter pylori. Antimicrob. Agents.Chemother. 1995;39:1859-1861. [PubMed ID: 7486933].
-
12.
Rolin C, Whistler RL, Bemiller JN. Industrial Gums: Polysaccharides and their Derivatives. New York: Academic Press; 1993. p. 257-293.
-
13.
Schols HA, Voragen AG. Complex pectin: structure elucidation using enzymes. In: Visser J, Voragen AGJ, editors. Progress in Biotechnology: Pectin and Pectinases. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1996. p. 3-19.
-
14.
Deyani MB, Patel IT, Patel TM. Spectrophotometric determination of amoxicillin and its dosage forms. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 1992;10:355-358. [PubMed ID: 1511038].
-
15.
Carceles CM, Escudero E, Vicente MS. Pharmacokinetics of amoxicillin/ clavulanic acid combination after intravenous and oral administration in goats. J. Vet. Pharmacol. 1995;17:134-138.
-
16.
Agnihotri SA, Aminabhavi TM. Controlled release of clozapine through chitosan microparticles prepared by a novel method. J. Control. Rel. 2004;96:245-259.
-
17.
Connors KA, editor. . 27th ed. Rockville: NF 18. The USP Convention; 1995. p. 2303-2304. (United States Pharmacopoeia).
-
18.
Portal N, Glauser M, Saraga E, Haas R, Kraehenbushl JP, Blem AL, Michetti P. Oral immunization against H. felis infection. Gastroenterol. 1995;107:1002-1011.
-
19.
Umamaheswari RB, Jain S, Tripathi PK, Agrawal GP, Jain NK. Floating-bioadhesive microspheres containing acetohydroxamic acid for clearance of Helicobacter pylori. Drug Deliv. 2002;9:223-231. [PubMed ID: 12511200].
-
20.
Wagner JG. Interpretation of percent dissolved-time plots derived from in-vitro testing of conventional tablets and capsules. J. Pharm. Sci. 1969;58:1253-1257. [PubMed ID: 5349114].
-
21.
Higuchi T. Mechanism of sustained-action medication: Theoretical analysis of rate of release of solid drug dispersed in solid matrices. J. Pharm. Sci. 1963;52:1145-1149. [PubMed ID: 14088963].
-
22.
Korsmeyer RW, Gurny R, Peppas N. Mechanisms of solute release from porous hydrophilic polymers. Int. J. Pharm. 1983;24:25-35.
-
23.
Costa P, Lobo JM. Modelling and comparison of dissolution profiles. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2001;13:123-133. [PubMed ID: 11297896].
-
24.
Streubel A, Siepmann J, Bodmeier R. Floating microparticles based on low density foam powder. Int. J. Pharm. 2002;241:279-292. [PubMed ID: 12100855].