Hepatoprotective Activity of the Ethanolic Extract of Ficus caricaLinn. LeavesinCarbon Tetrachloride-Induced Hepatotoxicityin Rats

Mohd Mujeeb; Shah Alam Khan; Vidhu Aeri; Babar Ali

doi:10.22037/ijpr.2011.916

Hepatoprotective Activity of the Ethanolic Extract of Ficus caricaLinn. LeavesinCarbon Tetrachloride-Induced Hepatotoxicityin Rats

authors:

Mohd Mujeeb ^{a
, *} , Shah Alam Khan ^b , Vidhu Aeri ^a , Babar Ali ^a

a Department of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi-110062, India.

b Department of HIT, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research : IJPR: Vol.10, issue 2; 301-306

article type: Original Article

received: May , 2009

accepted: April , 2011

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22037/ijpr.2011.916

how to cite: Mujeeb M, Alam Khan S, Aeri V, Ali B. Hepatoprotective Activity of the Ethanolic Extract of Ficus caricaLinn. LeavesinCarbon Tetrachloride-Induced Hepatotoxicityin Rats. Iran J Pharm Res. 2011;10(2):e125986. https://doi.org/10.22037/ijpr.2011.916.

Abstract

The ethanolic extract of Ficus carica leaves was screened for hepatoprotective and antioxidant activity in hepatotoxic Albino rats induced via carbon tetrachloride. The degree of protection was measured by estimating biochemical parameters such as serum glutamate Oxaloacetate transaminase (SGOT), serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase ( SGPT),totalprotein (TP), totalalbumin (TA), alkaline phosphatase (ALKP) and the level of total serum bilirubin. The extract in addition reduced CCl₄ induced lipid peroxidation in-vivo and in-vitro. The ethanolic extract (50 mg/kg, 100mg/kg,200mg/kg)exhibited significant hepatoprotection incarbontetra chloride in toxicated rats in a dose dependant manner. The hepatoprotective effects of the extract were comparable with the standard drug silymarin 10)mg/kg body weight, IP).

Keywords

Ficus carica Hepatoprotective activity Carbontetra chloride Silymarin

Introduction

The Liver is a key organ in the human body, regulating homeostasis and is a frequent target for a number of toxicants (1). In spite of tremendous scientific advancement in the field of hepatology during recent years, liver problems are on the rise. Regrettably there are only a few drugs with serious side effects available for the treatment of liver ailments (2). In view of the undesirable side effects of synthetic agents, there is growing focus towards the therapeutic evaluation of medicinal plants using systemic research methodology.

Ficus carica Linn. (Family; Moraceae) commonly known as Fig is a small or moderatelysized deciduous tree indigenous to asia minor, persia, syria and the mediterranean region (3). The plant leaves has been reported to contain furanocoumarins such as psoralen, bergapten, xanthotoxin (4), triterpenes such as calotropenyl acetate, lupeol acetate (5), isoschaftoside (6) and certain sterols.

Fig leaves have been traditionally used in the treatment of vitiligo, diabetes, coughs, asthma, constipation and gingivitis (3, 7). The other reported pharmacological activities of fig leaves include cytotoxic (8), hypoglycemic (9) and anthelmintic activity (10).

With a view that sterols, flavonoids, furanocoumrains and triterpens found in medicinal plants are used as hepatoprotective drugs (11), it was thought worthwhile to conduct hepatoprotective studies on the leaves of the Ficus carica plant in a scientific manner to validate its use in the traditional system of medicine.

Experimental

Plant material

Leaves of the Ficus carica were collected from Jamia Hamdard (Hamdard university) campus, New Delhi, India and authenticated by the taxonomist at the Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Hamdard University. A voucher specimen was deposited in the herbarium of University for future reference.

Preparation of extract

Air dried and coarsely powdered leaves of the plant (1 kg) were soxhlet extracted with ethanol for 72 h. The ethanolic extract was then concentrated on a water bath and dried under reduced pressure to achieve a dark brown mass (95 g; yield- 9.5%).

Preliminary phytochemical screening

On preliminary phytochemical screening using the reported method (12), the ethanolic extract of the Ficus carica leaves showed positive tests for glycosides, steroids, triterpens and flavonoids.

Determination of phenolic compounds

The total phenols were estimated by the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent according with the method of Gao et al. (13). The total content was expressed as mg of gallic acid equivalents/g extract.

Determinaton of total flavonoids

The total flavonoid content was estimated according to Kosalec et al. (14). The total content was expressed as mg of quercetin equivalents/g extract.

Animals

Hepatoprotective activity was carried out on Albino rats of either sex (110-145 g), supplied by the central animal house facility of Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi (Registration no. 173/CPCSEA). The rats were maintained in a 12 h light/dark cycle at 25 ± 2°C. They were allowed free access to a standard pellet diet (Amrut Laboratory Rat Feed, Navamaharashtra, Pune, India) and water ad libitum. The study was approved by the ethics committee CPCSEA and ethical norms were strictly followed during all experimental procedures.

Drugs and dosing schedule

The animals were divided into six groups; group I (control), group II (CCl₄ treated), group III (CCl₄ + silymarin treated), group IV, V and VI (CCl₄ + extract). Animals of groups II, III, IV, V and VI were administered 50% (v/v) CCl₄ in olive oil in a single dose of 2 mL/kg body weight per day for 4 days via the S.C. route. Simultaneously but at different hours of the day, animals of groups III, IV, V and VI were fed with silymarin suspension (10 mg/kg body weight, IP) in addition to ethanolic extract in doses of 50 mg/kg, 100 mg/kg and 200 mg/kg body weight, IP for 4 days respectively. Animals of group I were given distilled water in a volume of 10 mL/kg body weight.

Serum analysis

On the day 5, after the treatment period all of the subject animals were anaesthetized and sacrificed. Blood was withdrawn from the heart and their serum was separated by centrifugation at 3000 rpm at 30^oC for 15 min. This was subsequently analysed for various biochemical parameters including serum transaminases viz. SGOT (15), SGPT (15), total protein (16), total albumin, alkaline phosphatase (17) and total bilirubin content (18).

In-vitro antioxidant activity by DPPH method

The stable 1, 1-diphenyl-2-picryl hydrazyl radical (DPPH) (75 μM) was used for the determination of free radical-scavenging activity of the extract (19). 2.95 mg of DPPH was dissolved in 100 mL of methanol to achieve a 75 μM DPPH solution.

Table 1

Effects of the ethanolic extract of Ficus carica leaves on biochemical parameters in CCl4 induced hepatotoxicity in rats

Treatment	Dose(mg/Kg)	SGOT(U/mL)	SGPT(U/mL)	TB (g/dL)	ALKP(U/mL)	TP(g/dL)	TA(g/dL)
Control	-	133.80 ± 0.15	74.47 ± 0.04	0.65 ± 0.002	35.93 ± 0.09	14.17 ± 0.02	4.81 ± 0.01
CCl₄	2 mL/Kg	177.76 ± 0.17	112.38 ± 0.05	2.29 ± 0.02	73.74 ± 0.01	7.81 ± 0.05	4.10 ± 0.02
Silymarin	10	133.88 ± 0.02^**	85.30 ± 0.005^**	0.65 ± 0.002^*	37.18 ± 0.08^**	10.65 ± 0.06^**	4.73 ± 0.03^*
Ficus carica	50	158.65 ± 4.25	104.25 ± 0.03^*	1.17 ± 0.017	61.0 ± 0.028^*	6.07 ± 0.012^*	4.43 ± 0.01^*
	100	151.00 ± 0.08^*	98.84±0.05^*	0.92 ± 0.002^*	47.02 ± 0.05^*	6.32 ± 0.06^**	4.60 ± 0.04^*
	200	141.45 ± 0.05^*	90.71 ± 0.005^**	0.74 ± 0.019^*	35.12 ± 0.011^*	7.21 ± 0.08^**	4.65 ± 0.03^*

The ethanolic solution (0.5 mL) of plant extract in various concentrations was mixed in a test tube with 2.5 mL of methanol containing 75 μM DPPH giving a distinctive absorbance at 517 nm. The reaction mixture was set-aside in the dark at room temperature for 90 min and then its absorbance was recorded at 517 nm. Corresponding blank readings were also taken and the remaining DPPH was calculated. The experiment was repeated three times. Ascorbic acid and quercetin were used as standard controls.

In-vivo antioxidant activity

The in-vivo antioxidant activity of the ethanolic extract was carried out in CCl₄ intoxicated rats. The liver samples collected were washed with chilled normal saline, weighed and 10% (w/v) liver homogenate was generated in ice cold 0.15 M KCl solution using a motor driven Teflon pestle. The suspension was centrifuged at 2000 rpm at 4°C for 10 min and the clear supernatant was used for the estimation of the following antioxidant markers.

Estimation of liver TBARS

The measurement of Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) was carried out as an index of lipid peroxidation and measured in terms of malondialdehyde (MDA) content by following the method outlined by Ohkawa et al. (20). The total protein content in the tissue homogenate was determined using the method set out by Lowry et al. (21). The values of TBARS were presented as nmol MDA /mg protein.

Estimation of reduced glutathione (GSH)

Glutathione was estimated using the Ellman reagent (5, 5-dithiobis-2-nitrobenzoic acid) according with Ellman’s method (22) and the attained values were expressed as μmoL/g of liver tissue.

Statistical analysis

The results of biochemical parameters are reported as mean ± SEM. The statistical significance was determined by means of a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnet’s t-test (23). A p-value of < 0.05 was considered as being statistically significant.

Results

HPTLC fingerprints of the ethanolic extract of Ficus carica leaves showed the presence of 20 spots, confirming the presence of a different class of phytoconstituents as revealed by the preliminary phytochemical screening. The total phenolic and flavonoid content was also determined. The overall phenolic and flavonoid content was found to be 135.8 ± 7.21 mg in gallic acid equivalent/g extract and 60.5 ± 5.2 mg inquercetin equivalent/g extract, respectively.

The administration of CCl4 led to significant hepatocellular damage as evident from the increase in serum activities of SGOT, SGPT, Alkaline phosphatase (177.76, 112.38, 73.74 units/mL, respectively) and total bilirubin (2.29 mg/dL). In addition to a decrease in the level of total protein (TP) and total albumin (TA) concentration (7.81, 4.10 g/dL, respectively) in comparison with the normal control group. Treatment of rats with the ethanolic extract of leaves at a dose of 50 mg/kg, 100 mg/kg and 200 mg/kg body weight i.p. exhibited a significant reduction (p < 0.01 and 0.05) in CCl4 induced elevation of serum GOT, GPT, ALKP (158.65–141.45, 104.25-90.71, 61-35.12 units/mL, respectively) bilirubin (1.17-0.94 mg/dL) and increased the level of TP and TA (6.07-7.21, 4.43- 4.65 g/dL, respectively) as illustrated by Table 1. Treatment with silymarin also significantly reversed the hepatotoxicity. However, the extract produced hepatoprotective activity in a dose dependant manner.

The IC₅₀ of the ethanolic extract was found to be 72.9 µg/mL. The value was found to be comparable to that of standard ascorbic acid and quercetin. In the present study, administration of ethanolic extract at doses of 50, 100 and 200 mg/kg body weight to CCl₄ intoxicated rats caused a significant increase in the level of GSH (35.3- 59.46 µmoL/g) and a significant decrease in the level of TBARS (1.47-0.615 nmol MDA/mg protein) in comparison with the CCl₄ treated control group (Table 2). In the liver tissues standard Silymarin at a dose of 10 mg/Kg also showed significant antioxidant activity. The results elicited by the ethanolic extract were comparable with that of the standard drug silymarin.

Table. 2

Effects of the ethanolic extract of Ficus carica leaves on TBARS and GSH levels in the liver tissues of CCl4 intoxicated rats

Treatment	Dose(mg/Kg)	TBARS(nmoL MDA/mg protein)	GSH(µmoL/g liver tissue)
Control	-	0.65 ± 0.049	65 ± 12.22
CCl₄	2 mL/Kg	1.95 ± 0.099^*	13.12 ± 5.53^*
Silymarin	10	0.56 ± 0.08^c	61.25 ± 11.23^***
Ficus carica	50	1.47 ± 0.41^**	35.3 ± 5.78^**
	100	1.33 ± 0.35^**	40.38 ± 14.43^**
	200	0.615 ± 0.06^***	59.46 ± 15.58^***

Discussion

CCl₄ is one of the most commonly used hepatotoxins in experimental studies of liver diseases (24). The hepatotoxic effects of CCl₄ are largely due to its active metabolite, trichloro methyl radical (25). These activated radicals bind covalently to macromolecules and induce peroxidative degradation of endoplasmic reticulum membrane lipids rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids. This leads to the formation of lipid peroxides, which in turn creates products such as malondialdehyde (MDA) that cause damage to the membrane. Lipid peroxidative degradation of the bio membrane is one of the principle causes of CCl₄ toxicity, this is evidenced by the elevation of TBARS and a decrease in the activity of the free radical scavenging enzyme (GSH). In addition an elevation in the serum marker enzymes is also witnessed. The increase in the levels of serum bilirubin reflected the level of jaundice. An increase in transaminases was a clear indication of cellular leakage and a loss of the functional integrity of the cell membrane (26). The ethanolic extract significantly reduced the liver enzyme levels and increased the level of total serum protein in a dose dependant manner, indicating hepatoprotection.

The DPPH test is a very convenient method for screening small antioxidant molecules as the intensity of reaction can be analysed by a simple spectrophotometric method (27). The DPH radical is scavenged by antioxidants through the donation of hydrogen to form stable radical DPPH molecules. The antioxidant radicals formed are stabilized through the formation of a non-radical product.

IC₅₀is considered to be a good measure of the antioxidant efficiency of pure compounds and extracts. The IC₅₀ of the ethanolic extract of Ficus carica leaves (72.9 µg/mL) was found to be comparable to that of standard ascorbic acid and quercetin.

Lipid peroxidative degradation of the biomembrane is one of the principle causes of CCl₄ toxicity. This is evidenced by the elevation of TBARS and a decrease in the activity of free radical scavenging enzymes such as GSH in CCl₄ intoxicated animals. Glutathione is a naturally occurring tripeptide and a non-enzymatic biological antioxidant that is abundant in many living creatures. It is widely known that a deficiency in GSH within living organisms can lead to tissue injury and disorder. The increase in the level of MDA in liver induced by CCl₄ suggests enhanced lipid peroxidation. This leads to tissue damage and the failure of antioxidant defence mechanisms preventing the formation of excessive free radicals. Treatment with the ethanolic extract (50, 100 and 200mg/Kg) reduced the elevated level of TBARS (Thobarbituric acid reactive substances) in CCl₄ intoxicated liver tissues. It was also observed that GSH depletion due to the CCl₄ challenge was reversed by the test extract.

Preliminary phytochemical screening indicated the presence of phenolic and flavonoid glycosides. The free radical mediated process has been implicated in the pathogenesis of different diseases. Thus the antioxidant activity of the ethanolic extract may be due to the presence of flavonoid and phenolic compounds. Its hepatoprotective activity is attributed to its antioxidant properties. Further isolation of the active principles responsible for its hepatoprotective activity is currently in progress within our laboratory.

Acknowledgements

References

1.
Meyer SA, Kulkarni AP. Hepatotoxicity. In: Hodgson E, Smart RC, editors. Introduction to Biochemical Toxicology. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley and sons; 2001. p. 487-490.
2.
Guntupalli M, Chandana V, Pushpangadan P, Shirwaiker AI. Hepatoprotective effects of rubiadin, a major constituent of Rubia cordifolia Linn. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2006;103:484-490. [PubMed ID: 16213120].
3.
Anonymous. The Wealth of India. New Delhi: Volume IV. National Institute of Science and Communication; 2002. p. 26-31.
4.
Abu-Mustafa EA, Tawil E, Fayez E. Constituents of local plants-IV; Ficus carica L., F. sycomorus L. and F. salicofolia L. leaves. Phytochem. 1964;3:701-703.
5.
Ahmed W, Ahmed Z, Malik A. Triterpenes from the leaves of Ficus carica. Fitoterapia. 1990;61:373-375.
6.
Zogg GC, Nyiredy SZ, Sticher O. Preparative medium pressure liquid chromatographic (MPLC) and semipreparative HPLC separation of furanocoumarins isomers. Chromatographia. 1989;27:591-595.
7.
Mohan GK, Pallavi E, Ravi Kumar B, Ramesh M, Venkatesh S. Hepatoprotective activity of Ficus caricaLinn leaf extract against carbon tetrachloride-induced hepatotoxicity in rats. Daru. 2007;15:162-166.
8.
Rubnor S, Kashman Y, Rabinowitz R, Schlesinger M, Mechoulam R. Suppressors of cancer cell proliferation fig (Ficus carica) resin; isolation and structure elucidation. J. Nat. Prod. 2001;64:993-996. [PubMed ID: 11473446].
9.
Pirez C, Domniguez E, Romero A, Campillo JE, Torres MD. To study the hypoglycaemic effect of an aqueous extract of Ficus carica leaves in streptozotocin induced diabetes. Phytochem. Res. 1998;10:82-83.
10.
Amorina A, Borbab HR, Carautta JPP, Lopez D. Anthelmintic activity of the latex of Ficus species. J. Ethnopharmcol. 1999;64:255-258.
11.
Handa SS, Sharma A, Chakraborty KK. Natural products and plants as liver protecting drugs. Fitoterapia. 1989;57:307-351.
12.
Harborne JB. Phytochemical Methods. 3rd ed. UK: Chapman and Hall; 1998. p. 137-139.
13.
Gao X, Ohlander M, Jeppsson N, Bjork L, Trajkovski V. Changes in antioxidant effects and their relationship to phytonutrients in fruits of sea buckthorn(Hippophae rhamnoides L. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000;48:1485-1490. [PubMed ID: 10820047].
14.
Kosalec I, Bakmaz M, Repeliniak S, Vladimir- knezevic S. Quantitative analysis of the flavonoids in raw propolis from northern Croatia. Acta Pharma. 2004;54:65-72.
15.
Rietman S, Frankel S. A colorimetric determination of serum glutamic oxaloacetic and glutamic pyruvic transaminases. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1957;28:56-63. [PubMed ID: 13458125].
16.
Gornall A, Bardawil J, David MM. Determination of protein by biuret modified method. Biol. Chem. 1949;177:751.
17.
Kind PRN, King EJ. Determination of serum alkaline phosphatase. J. Clin. Path. 1954;7:132-136.
18.
Malloy HT, Evelyn KA. The determination of bilirubin with the photometric colorimeter. J. Biol. Chem. 1937;119:481-490.
19.
Blois M. Antioxidant determinations by the use of stable free radicals. Nature. 1958;26:1199-2000.
20.
Ohkawa H Onishi N, Yagi K. Assay of lipid peroxidation in animal tissue by thiobarbituric acid reaction. Anal. Biochem. 1979;95:351-358. [PubMed ID: 36810].
21.
Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Fowr AL, Ramdall RJ. Protein measurement with the Folins phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 1951;193:265-275. [PubMed ID: 14907713].
22.
Ellman GL. Tissue sulphydryl groups. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1959;82:70-77. [PubMed ID: 13650640].
23.
Woolson RF. Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Biomedical Data. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc; 1987. p. 172-174.
24.
Johnson DE, Kroening C. Mechanism of early carbon tetrachloride toxicity in cultured rat hepatocytes. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 1998;83:231-239. [PubMed ID: 9868740].
25.
Srivastava SP, Chen NO, Hotlzman JL. The in-vitro NADPH dependant inhibition by CCl4 of the ATP dependant calcium uptake of hepatic microsomes from male rats. Studies on the mechanism of inactivation of the hepatic microsomal calcium pump by CCl3 radical. J. Biol. Chem. 1990;265:8392-8399. [PubMed ID: 2140358].
26.
Saraswat B, Visen PK, Patnaik GK, Dhawan BN. Anticholestastic effect of Picroliv, active hepatoprotective principle of Picrorhiza kurroa against CCl4 induced cholestasis. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 1993;31:316-318. [PubMed ID: 8359830].
27.
Soler-Rivas C, Espin JC, Wicker HJ. An easy and fast test to compare total free radicals scavenger capacity of foodstuffs. Phytochem. Anal. 2000;11:330-338.

comments