The Effect of Antiplatelet Drugs on the Patency Rate of Arterio-venous Fistulae in Hemodialysis Patients

authors:

avatar Mohsen Rouzrokh a , * , avatar Mohammad Reza Abbasi b , avatar Ali Reza Mirshemirani c , avatar Mohammad Reza Sobhiyeh d

Department of Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Surgery Research Center,Mofid Children’s Hospital, ShaheedBeheshti University of Medical Sciences,Tehran, Iran.
Department of Adult Nephrology, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
PediatricSurgery Research Center, Mofid Children’s Hospital, ShaheedBeheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
ShaheedBeheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research : IJPR: Vol.9, issue 4; 451-457
article type: Original Article
received: August , 2009
accepted: January , 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22037/ijpr.2010.913

how to cite: Rouzrokh M, Abbasi M R, Mirshemirani A R, Sobhiyeh M R. The Effect of Antiplatelet Drugs on the Patency Rate of Arterio-venous Fistulae in Hemodialysis Patients. Iran J Pharm Res. 2010;9(4):e126072. https://doi.org/10.22037/ijpr.2010.913.

Abstract

Although arterialovenous fistulae (AVF) is considered to be vital for chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, but they may cause complications and problems. For instance they may fail soon after their creation. The most important cause of failure in these cases is intrafistula thrombus formation.
Whereas anti-platelet drugs are not routinely used after fistulae creation, we conducted this study to determine the effect of these drugs (aspirin and dipyridamol) on the patency of AVFs. From Sep 2003 to Aug 2007, all CKD patients who needed AVF for hemodilysis were included in our study.
After fistulae creation, they were randomly divided in 3 groups. The first group was received aspirin and the second one with dipyridamol and the third one was the control group that received placebo. Each group consisted of 130 patients. Exclusion criteria were bleeding tendency, active peptic ulcer disease, pregnancy, lactation, use of anticoagulant and or non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, hepatic insufficiency and history of significant side effects from aspirin or dipyridamol. The patency of AVF in the control, aspirin and dipyridamol groups were obtained 69.2%, 70.8% and 75.4% respectively. Although the patency in the aspirin and the dipyridamol group were 1.6% and 6.2% more than the control group, but there was no statistically significant difference between them and placebo (The p-value was 0.892 for the aspirin group and 0.332 for the dipyridamol group). Our study showed that neither the aspirin nor the dipyridamol can be effective on the patency of AVF after 72 h even within six months period.

Introduction

Safe, reliable and durable vascular access is essential for successful hemodialysis. Long term patency rates demonstrate that native AV fistulae has the best outcome compared to other methods e.g. synthetic grafts and double lumen sialistic catheter. Autogenous AVF also has lowest cost and lowest infection rate (1-3). The patency rate of AVFs in most parts of the world is 60-70% in the first year and 50-60% in the second year. The Primary failure rate of an AVF ranges between 20–54% during the first six months (4, 5). Ineffective AVF and complications of AVF is one of the most problems of chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Some of the complications are thrombosis, infection, stenosis, aneurysm formation and distal limb ischemia (6). A team approach with nephrologists, surgeons, interventionalists, the patient, and the nursing staff, as well as the primary care staff is essential to preserve the vasculature for eventual fistula placement (7, 8). This is to start a policy to preserve access sites and to allow adequate time for planning, creation and maturation of the vascular access. The planning stage involves examination and pre-operative vascular mapping. The upper extremity AVF should be the preferred access and should be placed as distal as possible. The wrist radial-cephalic (RC) AVF is the first option for access creation. Any staff involved in handling vascular access or cannulating veins in renal patients should be adequately trained and be in a continuous training scheme for access management. The patient with chronic kidney disease should have a declared plan for preserving the vascular access and potential access sites (8).

Besides thrombosis and failure of maturation as the most factors for the primary failure rate of an AVF, patients in groups of elderly, female sex, underlying vascular disease and diabetes have higher failure rate (2-4, 9-11). It is recognized that 85% of AVF failures may be due to thrombosis. The most important predisposing factors for thrombosis are the size of the vein and artery, the skill of the surgeon creating the access. Other mechanisms of thrombosis that are less common include arterial stenosis, hypertension, increased hematocrite, and hypovolemia and hypercoagulative status (12).

Platelet activation from endothelial injury may play an important role in stimulating platelet aggregators such as thromboxane A2, in addition to directly stimulating vascular intimal proliferation. Therefore the therapeutic potential of antiplatelet agents including aspirin, sulfinpyrazone, dipyridamole, and ticlopidine might be useful (13-16). Antiplatelet agents often used the treatment of coronary artery diseases, peripheral vascular diseases, and cerebrovascular diseases (17). These drug use indicators are intended to measure specific aspects of health providers and drug use in a hospital or health center (18). However, safety concerns regarding the use of these agents have prompted the need for safe and effective base on treatment goals (19). The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of two anti platelet drugs (aspirin and dipyridamol) on AVF patency rate.

Experimental

Methods

501 ESRD patients who needed hemodialysis were enrolled in the study. 111 patients were excluded by the end of the study due to fail of AVFs function within the first 72 h after the surgery, fail of follow up or drugs disadventages. These failures are mainly the result of technical problems during the operation.

Time for the first cannulation of the AVF was 2 months after AVF creation. These patients underwent fistulae creation surgery in Taleghani Hospital, Kermanshah, Iran from December 2003 to August 2007 by the same group of surgeon. Examination and pre-operative vascular mapping was done by application of a proximal tourniquet. Vein diameters of > 2–2.5 mm have been considered for this study with cephalic vein at the wrist as the first choice and the cubital veins as the second. The cephalic vein diameter increase after application of a proximal tourniquet is an important predictor of success. The AVFs fashioned in the snuff box (231 of all) were End to side anastomosis of cephalic vein to radial artery and AVFs of arm (remaining 159) were side to side anastomosis of cephalic or basilica vein to brachial artery. Patients were randomly divided into 3 groups (130 in each). The first group (78 females and 52 males) were treated with a daily 100 mg of Aspirin. The second group (65 women and 65 men) were treated with a daily 75 mg of dipyridamol. The third group (65 women and 65 men) were treated with placebo. All patients received anti-platelet drugs for at least 6 months. Aspirin and dipyridamol was made by one of Iranian companies.

The patients with known bleeding disorder, pregnancy, lactation, active or suspected bleeding tendency, active peptic ulcer disease,severe hepatic insufficiency, already receiving anti-coagulation and regular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAIDS) agents drugs and significant side effects of drugs were excluded. Patency in the first 72 h post surgery was determined by the presence of a bruit over the site of the anastomosis, with standard stethoscope. The patency of the AVF at two months after randomization evaluated by the presence of an audible bruit and palpation the characteristic thrill and the intravascular pressure over the site of the AVF. Time to first cannulation of the AVF (time taken as surgery until the first attempt at access cannulation) was 2 month. Failing AVF was considered with decreased thrill or pulse alone, elevated venous dialysis pressures, no bruit over AVF site, decreasing dialysis dose delivery, decreasing flow rates, and difficulty in cannulating. At least all of the patients were followed for functional patency 6 months to 2 years and this was defined as the ability to use the AVF for dialysis to the satisfaction of the clinician(s). No surgical or radiological intervention was done for correction of AVF.

We collected all data on age, gender, and underlying disease, site of the AVF, extremity dominancy, and effects of aspirin and dipyridamol on patency rate of the AVF.

The data was processed by the SPSS 16 software and statistical analysis was performed by Chi-square test and fisher’s exact test.

Results and Discussion

At least in six month period, 390 patients out of 501 (130 cases randomized in each group) remained and 111 patients were excluded, because they had failed to follow up, whose AVFs had failed within the first 72 h after the surgery or drugs discontinuity.

In 390 patients (179 males, 211 females), 22 patients were aged less than 25 years old, and 74 cases were above 66 years of age and the rest were aged between these ages.

Among different age groups the best patency rate belonged to patients between 46-65 years, and the worst patency rate was for patients above 66 years old, possibility related to the vascular atherosclerosis that is common in elderly patients. Overall there was no statistically significant difference between differ age groups (Table 1).

Table 1

Fistula (AVF) patency rate according to different age groups

AVF patency in age groupaspirin (%)p-valuedipyridamol (%)p-valuecontrol (%)
< 2510/10 (100)0.23088/9 (88.9)0.45452/3 (66.7)
26 - 3511/11 (100)0.476213/13 (100)0.19939/11 (81.8)
36 - 4515/27 (55.5)0.287021/24 (87.5)0.436115/20 (75)
46 - 5525/30 (83.3)0.666923/28 (82.1)0.769425/33 (75.8)
56 - 6524/30 (80)0.969824/33 (72.7)0.762426/34 (76.5)
66 >7/22 (31.8)0.64479/23 (39.1)0.835713/29 (44.8)

There was no statistically significant difference between the patency rates among different genders and different anatomic places of anastomosis (left wrist, left arm, right wrist and right arm) either (Table 2).

Table 2

AVF patency rate according to gender in aspirin, dipyridamol and control groups

AVF patency in Gender aspirin (%) p-value dipyridamol (%) p-value control (%)
Female 58/78 (74.4%) 0.2028 50/65 (76.9%) 0.2671 41/65 (63%)
Male 40/52 (76.9%) 0.8463 48/65 (73.8%) 0.9515 49/65 (75.4%)

The patency rate of the AVF in two groups of aspirin and placebo is higher in male than female probably due to better vasculature (Table 2).

The most important underline disease was diabetic mellitus and hypertension (diabetic mellitus in 96 cases, Hypertension in 114 cases and both hypertension and diabetic mellitus in 110). Others had not important underlying diseases.

The lowest patency rate was related to the combination of hypertension and diabetes (Table 3).

Table 3

AVF patency rate according to underlying disease in aspirin, dipyridamol and control groups

AVF patency in each underlying disease aspirin (%) p-value dipyridamol (%) p-value control (%)
DM 14/20 (70%) 0.9531 28/35 (80%) 0.5065 29/41 (70.7%)
HTN 21/33 (63.6%) 0.5911 30/38 (78.9%) 0.6486 31/43 (72.1%)
HTN+DM 29/45 (64.4%) 0.7958 22/36 (61.1%) 0.8386 17/29 (58.6%)

The high AVF patency rate related to left wrist and elbow in the two groups mentioned is lower than the patency rate related to the right elbow (Table 4).

Table 4

AVF patency rate according to anatomic location in aspirin, dipyridamol and control groups.

AVF patency in anatomic location aspirin (%) p-value dipyridamol (%) p-value control (%)
Left wrist 38/52 (76%) 0.4808 42/56 (75%) 0.3420 33/51 (64.7%)
Left elbow 32/45 (71.1%) 0.8743 31/40 (77.5%) 0.7928 30/40 (75%)
Right wrist 16/23 (69.6%) 0.9798 17/23 (73.9%) 0.9639 18/26 (69.2%)
Right elbow 6/10 (60%) 0.6850 8/11 (72.8%) 1 9/13 (69.2%)

The AVF were created in dominant upper extremity in 121 cases (15 cases in right and 106 cases in left) and in non-dominant extremity for 284 cases. There was no significant difference in the patency rate of AVF between dominant and non-dominant extremity (Table 5).

Table 5

AVF patency rate according to limb dominancy in aspirin, dipyridamol and control groups.

AVF patency in dominant extremities aspirin (%) p-value dipyridamol (%) p-value control (%)
Dominant 30/42 (71.4%) 0.8756 29/40 (72.5%) 0.9365 26/39 (66.6%)
Non-dominant 60/88 (68.1%) 0.9331 63/90 (76.6%) 0.3042 63/91 (69.2%)

The patency rate of AVF in the control, aspirin and dipyridamol groups was obtained 69.2%, 70.8% and 75.4%, respectively. Although the patency rate in the aspirin group and the dipyridamol group was 1.6% and 6.2% more than the control group respectively but there was no statistically significant difference between them and the placebo (with a p-value of 0.892 for the aspirin group and 0.332 for the dipyridamol group) (Table 6). The most side effects of the aspirin was gastrointestinal bleeding, nausea and stomach pain and about the dipyridamole was nausea and vomiting in up to 6% of patients.

Table 6

Distribution of fistulae status in the aspirin and dipyridamol group six month after operation

Groupaspirin (%) p-value dipyridamol (%) p-value control (%)
Fistulae status
Patency 92/130 (70.8%) 0.892 98/130 (75.4) 0.332 90/130 (69.2)

Early referral of CKD patients to the nephrologists and/ or vascular surgeon is strongly recommended. This is to start a policy to preserve access sites and to allow adequate time for planning, creation and maturation of the vascular access. The vein diameters of <1.6 mm have been associated with AVF failure (19), while good patency rates were obtained in patients with radio-cephalic AVFs where the diameter of the cephalic vein at the wrist was >2–2.6 mm and 2 mm or larger for arteries (20). An autogenous fistula requires at least 6 weeks for maturation before it can be used. For these reasons, it is recommended that the fistula is created at least 2–3 months before the earliest likely date for starting haemodialysis (19, 20). The preoperative criteria for creating a successful upper extremity AVF were diameters of 2 mm or larger for arteries and 2.5 mm for veins (21-22).

Venous preservation with additional handgrip exercise may enhance the quality and diameters of arteries and veins for fistula creation (23, 24). Protection of forearm and central vein vasculature from repeated cannulation injury, preoperative venous mapping to optimize the location and type of fistula placement and to rule out possible outflow obstruction, adequate maturation time, and dialysis staff expertise with fistula cannulation (25). All of these advices were attended in our series. According to our study, except the age of the patient that is important in patency rate of the AVF (which in young patients are better than it is in older patients), gender and site of the AVF were not significant (Tables 1, 2, 4). It seems the existence diabetes and hypertension could be worsening AVF survival (Table 3). Dominant upper extremity has more muscles activity and it may cause a better quality vascular of AVF creation than non dominant one, although no significant difference has been found in this study (Table 5).

One of the most causes for AVF failure is thrombosis. Platelet activation from endothelial injury may play an important role in stimulating platelet aggregators, and thrombus forming.

Aspirin has been chosen as it has well-established anti-platelet effects, aspirin’s anti-platelet effect is mediated by the inhibition the platelet enzyme cyclo-oxygenase resulting in blockade of the synthesis of the pro-aggregatory vasoconstrictor and thromboxane A2. Low dose of aspirin doubles the risk of serious gastrointestinal bleeding (26) and the theoretical risk may be higher in patients with CKD because of the presence of uremic induced impairment of haemostasis. In some studies a significant elevation in bleeding times in patients on haemodialysis treatments administered a single dose of aspirin was shown, but surprisingly little evidence-based clinical trial data is available in this population (27-29). Dipyridamol is a vasodilator that inhibits platelet function by inhibiting adenosine uptake and cyclic GMP phosphodiesterase activity (28).

No trial with a follow up longer than 36 months demonstrated a beneficial effect of anti platelet treatment to increase patency rate of AVF. In this study, drugs were prescribed at the most period of 2 years. In another study, it was concluded that consistent use of aspirin may be beneficial for AVF survivals among incident hemodialysis patients (15). On the other hand a cohort study demonstrated that treatment with antiplatelet medications was associated with significantly worse AVF patency rate (30, 31).

In this study, the rate of AVF failure after six months of operation was 30.8%, 29.2% and 24.6% in control, aspirin and dipyridamol groups, respectively. No significant difference was observed as it is shown. However, long term effect of antiplatelet agents on AVF patency needs further investigation.

It was concluded that the patency rate does not depend on gender, however, but the patient’s personal factors such as age and underlying diseases are important. The young patients without underlying diease (diabetes and hypertension) have longer patency period. There was no significant difference in different places of the AVF. In conclusion, neither the aspirin nor the dipyridamol had any effect on the patency rates of the AVFs after 72 h and over a period of six months. In any case, further researches on the effects of antiplatelet drugs on AVF patency is recomended.

References

  • 1.

    Francis DM, Lu Y, Robertson AJ, Millar RJ, Amy J. Two stage brachiobasilicaarteriovenous fistulae for chronic hemodialysis access. ANZ J. Surg. 2007;77:150-155. [PubMed ID: 17305990].

  • 2.

    Allon M, Robbin ML. Increasing arteriovenous fistulas in hemodialysis patients: Problems and solutions. 2002;62:1109-1124.

  • 3.

    Pastan S, Soucie JM, McClellan WM. Vascular access and increased risk of death among hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2002;62:620-626. [PubMed ID: 12110026].

  • 4.

    Rooijens PPGM, Tordoir JHM, Stijnen T, et al. Radiocephalic wrist arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis: meta-analysis indicates a high primary failure rate. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2004;28:571-680. [PubMed ID: 15531189].

  • 5.

    Kherlakian GM, Roedersheimer LR, Arbaugh JJ, et al. Comparison of autogenous fistula versus expanded polytetrafluoroethylene graft fistula for angioaccess in hemodialysis. Am. J. Surg. 1986;152:238-24. [PubMed ID: 3740363].

  • 6.

    Van Hoek F, Scheltinga MR, Kouwenberg I, et al. Steal in hemodialysis patients depends on type of vascular access. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2006;32:710-711. [PubMed ID: 16875849].

  • 7.

    Leitch R, Ouwendyk M, Ferguson E. Nursing issues related to patient selection, vascular access, and education in quotidian hemodialysis. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2003;42:56-60. [PubMed ID: 12830445].

  • 8.

    Basile C, Casucci F, Lomonte C. Timing of first cannulation of arteriovenous fistula: time matters, but there is alsosomething else. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2005;20:1519-1520. [PubMed ID: 15870216].

  • 9.

    Ascher E, Gade P, Hingorani A. Changes in the practice of angioaccess surgery: impact of dialysis outcome and quality initiative recommendations. J. Vasc. Surg. 2000;31:84-92. [PubMed ID: 10642711].

  • 10.

    Caplin N, Sedlacek M, Teodorescu V, Falk A, Uribarri J. Venous access: women are equal. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2003;41:429-432. [PubMed ID: 12552506].

  • 11.

    Asif A, Roy-Chaudhury P, Beathard GA. Early arteriovenous fistula failure: a logical proposal for when and how to intervene. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2006;1:332-339. [PubMed ID: 17699225].

  • 12.

    Wong V, Ward R, Taylor J, Selvakumar S, How TV, Bakran A. Factors associated with early failure of arteriovenous fistulae for haemodialysis access. Eur. J.Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 1996;12:207-213. [PubMed ID: 8760984].

  • 13.

    Sreedhara R, Himmelfarb J, Lazarus JM, randomized, double-blind study, et al. Kidney Int. 1994;45:1477-1483.

  • 14.

    Gaspari F, Vigano G, Orisio S. Aspirin prolongs bleeding time in uremia by a mechanism distinct from platelet cyclooxygenase inhibition. J. Clin. Invest. 1987;79:1788-1797. [PubMed ID: 3108321].

  • 15.

    De Abajo FJ, Garcia Rodriguez LA: Risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, perforation associated with low-dose aspirin as plain, enteric-coated formulations. BMC Clin. Pharmacol. 2001;1:1-2.

  • 16.

    Livio M, Vigano G, Benigni A. Moderate doses of aspirin and risk of bleeding in renal failure. Lancet. 1986;1:414-416. [PubMed ID: 2868341].

  • 17.

    Khan H, Jan H, Hafizullah M. study on clopidogrel in inhibition of platelet aggregation in suspected angina patients, treated with a daily dose of 75 mg of clopidogrel for 7 days. Iranian J. Pharm. Res. 2009;8:135-140.

  • 18.

    Fahimi F, BaniasadiSh, Behzadnia N, Varahram F, Ghazi Tabatabaie L. Enoxaparin utilization evaluation: an observational prospective study in medical inpatients. Iranian J. Pharm. Res. 2008;7:77-82.

  • 19.

    Movahedian A, Sajjadi SE, Ahmadi M. Lipid lowering effect of ethanolic extract of aerial parts of PeucedanumpastinacifoliumBoiss. andHausskn in hypercholesterolemic rats. Iranian J. Pharm. Res. 2009;8:301-306.

  • 20.

    Ortega T, Ortega F, Diaz-Corte C, et al. The timely construction of arteriovenous fistulae: a key to reducing morbidity and mortality and to improving cost management. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2005;20:598-603. [PubMed ID: 15647308].

  • 21.

    Brimble KS, RabbatChG, Treleaven DJ, Ingram AJ. Utility of ultrasonographic venous assessment prior to forearm arteriovenous fistula creation. Clin. Nephrol. 2002;58:122-127. [PubMed ID: 12227684].

  • 22.

    Ravani P, Marcelli D, Malberti F. Vascular access surgery managed by renal physicians: the choice of native arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2002;40:1264-1276. [PubMed ID: 12460046].

  • 23.

    Ortega T, Ortega F, Diaz-Corte C, Rebollo P, Ma Vassalotti JA, Falk A, Cohl ED, et al. Obese and non-obese hemodialysis patients have a similar prevalence of functioning arteriovenous fistula using pre-operative vein mapping. Clinical. Nephrol. 2002;58:211-214.

  • 24.

    Sedlacek M, Teodorescu V, Falk A, et al. Hemodialysis access placement with preoperative noninvasive vascular mapping: comparison between patients with and without diabetes. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2001;38:560-564. [PubMed ID: 11532689].

  • 25.

    Silva MB Jr, Hobson RW 2nd, Pappas PJ, et al. A strategy for increasing use of autogenous hemodialysis access procedures: impact of preoperative noninvasive evaluation. J. Vasc. Surg. 1998;27:302-308. [PubMed ID: 9510284].

  • 26.

    Rus RR, Ponikvar R, Kenda RB, Buturovic-Ponikvar J. Effect of local physical training on the forearm arteries and veins in patients with end-stage renal disease. Blood Purif. 2003;21:389-39. [PubMed ID: 14586181].

  • 27.

    Brimble KS, RabbatChG, Treleaven DJ, et al. Utility of ultrasonographic venous assessment prior to forearm arteriovenous fistula creation. Clin. Nephrol. 2002;58:122-127. [PubMed ID: 12227684].

  • 28.

    Grontoft KC, Larsson R, Mulec H, Weiss LG, Dickinson JP: Effects of ticlopidine in AV-fistula surgery in uremia. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol. 1998;32:276-283.

  • 29.

    Kaufman JS. Antithrombotic agents and the prevention of access thrombosis. Semin. in Dial. 2000;13:40-46.

  • 30.

    Hasegawa T, Elder SJ, Bragg-gresham JL. Consistent aspirin use associated with improved AVF survival among incident hemodialysis patients in the dialysis outcomes and practice patterns study. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2008;3:1373-1378. [PubMed ID: 18596119].

  • 31.

    Yevzlin AS, Conley EL, Sanchez RJ. Vascular access outcomes and medication use: A USRDS study. Semin. Dial. 2006;19:535-539. [PubMed ID: 17150056].