Evaluation of Crocin Effect on Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Following Coronary Angiography or Angioplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial

authors:

avatar Lida Shojaei # 1 , avatar Shima Esfandiary # 1 , avatar Mohammad Rouzbahani 2 , avatar Fatemeh Heydarpour 3 , avatar Mostafa Bahremand 2 , avatar Reza Heidary Moghadam 2 , avatar Ghazal Mahmoudi 1 , avatar Farzaneh Korani 4 , avatar Farshid Raissi 5 , avatar Foroud Shahbazi ORCID 1 , *

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
Clinical Research Development Center, Imam Ali and Taleghani Hospital, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
Medical Biology Research Center, Health Technology Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Imam Ali Hospital, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
# These authors are contributed equally as the first author.

how to cite: Shojaei L, Esfandiary S, Rouzbahani M, Heydarpour F, Bahremand M, et al. Evaluation of Crocin Effect on Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Following Coronary Angiography or Angioplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Iran J Pharm Res. 2022;In Press(In Press):e126920. doi: 10.5812/ijpr-126920.

Abstract

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is the third cause of hospital-acquired acute kidney injury. The CIN prophylactic strategies adopted to date, although not highly efficient, are mostly based on antioxidant activity and hydration therapy. This study was designed and conducted to evaluate crocin’s efficacy in the prevention of CIN in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients undergoing coronary angiography/angioplasty. In this randomized clinical trial, a total of 110 eligible CKD stage 3 patients requiring contrast agent administration for coronary angiography/angioplasty were enrolled and randomly assigned to either crocin (n = 57) or control (n = 53) group. The patients in both groups received standard hydration therapy; nevertheless, in the crocin group, the patients were also orally administered three consecutive oral doses of 30 mg crocin tablets 1 day before up to 1 day after contrast media (CM) exposure. The primary endpoint was CIN incidence defined as an increase in serum creatinine (SrCr) level by ≥ 0.3 mg/dL or any change in urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) from the baseline within 48 hours of CM exposure. During 4 months, 130 patients were recruited. The mean age of the patients was 65.62 ± 9.05 years, and the majority of them were male (64.54%). The SrCr in the crocin group did not significantly increase within 48 hours of angiography/angioplasty. The changes in the urinary NGAL level were not significant in both groups. The CIN incidence was significantly lower in the crocin group than in the control group (1.75% and 13.2%; P = 0.028). Crocin administration plays an important nephron-protective role in the prevention of CIN.

1. Background

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) as a severe complication of iodine media administration is common after angiography/angioplasty, especially in high-risk patients, including chronic kidney disease (CKD) and diabetic patients (1). The CIN, as the third cause of acute renal failure in the hospital setting, is considered when there is a rise in serum creatinine (SrCr) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) or a decline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) within 24 - 72 hours after contrast media (CM) exposure (2). The CIN is also associated with increased mortality, hospital stay, and long-term adverse events (3).

Up to 3% of patients experience CIN following angiography/angioplasty according to the Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, and End-stage renal failure, the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN), and the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria (4, 5). The notable fluctuation of CIN incidence declared in previous studies within the range of 1 - 50% [half of which is among coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) cases] (6, 7) is explainable by the lack of a standardized definition of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) and understanding the meaning of population-based incidence rates of CIN; accordingly, some risk factors, including diabetes, volume depletion, congestive heart failure, CKD, prior CM exposure, CM volume, and nephrotoxic drug history, put the particular population at higher risk of developing CI-AKI; therefore, vulnerable population and general population significantly differ statistically (1, 4, 7-10).

According to the previous studies, AKI is defined by an SrCr absolute rise ranging from 0.3 to 0.5 mg/dL or 25% to 50% for a relative increase (11). However, in recent studies, due to long-term major adverse events, CIN is presumed as an increase in SrCr ≥ 0.3 mg/dL from the baseline values or any slight decrement in renal function within 48 hours of CM administration in the absence of other causes (12-14). The SrCr is not the ideal biomarker for the early detection of AKI. The factors, including body mass index (BMI), measurement techniques, and medications, might influence SrCr concentration (15).

Several biomarkers, including neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), cystatin C, kidney injury molecule-1, and interleukin-18, have been proposed for the early detection of CIN (16). Although no ideal marker is available for the early detection of CIN in patients undergoing angiography/angioplasty, several recent studies showed that NGAL might be a valuable biomarker for the early detection of CIN (17, 18). Overall, the guidelines by the American Society of Radiology defined CIN as one of the following criteria: (1) an absolute SrCr increase of ≥ 0.3 mg/dL; (2) a 50% increase in SrCr; (3) urine output of < 0.5 ml/kg/hour for at least 6 hours within 48 hours after CM administration (19).

Two critical mechanisms mentioned in previous studies are renal ischemia and direct cytotoxicity. The increased production of endothelin and adenosine, along with decreased nitric oxide by endothelial cells, is responsible for renal vasoconstriction (20). The CM administration also increases the release of reactive oxygen species (ROS), resulting in renal tubular direct cytotoxicity, inflammation, and induction of renal cell apoptosis. Taking the crucial role of ROS in CIN pathogenesis into account potentiates the use of free radical scavenger compounds and antioxidants as a promising CIN prevention strategy (20).

Saffron (derived from Crocus sativus L. dried stigmas) is a traditional spice, food coloring, and herbal medicine with a potent antioxidant activity that has extensively been used for different indications. The four main bioactive components of saffron are picrocrocin, crocin, safranal, and crocetin. Crocin, the water-soluble carotenoid, is responsible for the distinct color of saffron (21). Crocin is a potent antioxidant that ameliorates oxidative stress and potentiates the antioxidant defense system, thereby exhibiting several features, including antitumor (22), antihypertensive (23), antidepressant (24), and anti-inflammatory activity (25) plus neuroprotective (26), renoprotective (27), and cardioprotective (28) effects. The rat model investigations of crocin have proven efficacy in chronic stress-induced kidney damage, nephropathy, and renal ischemia/reperfusion damage (29-31). However, the role of crocin in CIN prevention has not yet been investigated.

2. Objectives

This study was designed to evaluate the crocin role in the prevention of CIN in angiography/angioplasty candidates in addition to standard treatment.

3. Methods

3.1. Study Population

The study was designed as an open-label, randomized controlled trial in a single center to evaluate the efficacy and safety of crocin in the prevention of CIN in CKD patients candidate for either diagnostic coronary angiography or PCI. The sample size was calculated based on the pilot study. A total of 115 patients with CKD stage 3 according to the modification diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula were enrolled in this study within February 2019 to July 2020. Permuted block randomization (block size: 4) was used to randomly allocate a participant to an intervention or control group.

The inclusion criteria were the age over 18 years, CKD stage 3 defined as the eGFR between 30-60 mL/min based on the MDRD formula, and systolic blood pressure of greater than 90 mmHg. The patients were excluded from the study due to a history of hypersensitivity to saffron, any contraindication to adequate intravenous hydration therapy, end-stage renal disease on dialysis (the eGFR less than 30 mL/min), acute renal failure, pregnancy or lactation, emergent coronary angiography, cardiogenic shock, platelets less than or equal to 100,000/mm3, left ventricular ejection fraction less than 30%, life-threatening condition, and a history of a kidney transplant.

3.2. Study Protocol

The eligible patients were randomly allocated into either control or intervention group, using a predesigned balanced permuted block randomization method. For the purpose of not depriving individuals of the most effective CIN prevention method, which is hydration therapy, the patients in both groups received standard hydration therapy based on cardiac ejection fraction either with intravenous isotonic normal saline (0.9%) or half saline (0.45%) at a rate of 1 mL/kg/hour 12 hours before up to 12 hours after the procedure. The patients in the intervention group received three consecutive oral doses of 30 mg crocin tablets (each tablet containing 15 mg crocin; Samisaz Co., Mashhad, Iran) 1 day before up to 1 day after the procedure. All physicians, catheterization staff, nurses, and laboratory staff were blinded to the study.

The patients’ demographic and clinical data, including age, gender, weight, BMI, drug history, laboratory data, medical history, and echocardiography findings, were recorded in a predesigned data collection checklist. The interventional procedures were performed according to standard clinical practice using a radial or femoral approach. Due to the lower rate of CIN, the iso-osmolar iodinated contrast agents (iodixanol, 320 mg/mL visipaque®, Marlborough, MA: GE Healthcare) are the preferred CM in Imam Ali hospital, affiliated to Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences. Low-osmolar iodinated contrast agents (e.g., iopamidol 300 or 370 mg/mL and iopromide® 300 ultravist®) were the alternatives.

3.3. Measurements

Three blood samples for each patient were collected at the time of admission, before the coronary angiography, and 48 hours after contrast exposure to measure the levels of BUN and SrCr. The SrCr level was measured by the Jaffe colorimetric method. In addition, for all the allocated patients, the Mehran Risk Score (MRS) was calculated (32). For the determination of the urinary NGAL, two urine samples were collected before and 12 hours after coronary angiography. The first urine sample was collected after 12 hours of hydration. The samples were centrifuged at 1500 × g at 4°C for 15 minutes, frozen in a polypropylene tube, and stored at -20°C for further analysis. The urinary NGAL concentration was determined by the Hycult Biotech® NGAL ELISA kit (Hycult Biotech, Netherlands). The minimum concentration which can be measured was 0.4 ng/mL. All the measurements were performed based on the manufacturer’s instructions.

3.4. Study Endpoints

The AKIN criteria were used for the classification of CIN (Appendix 1) (33). The primary outcome of the study was CIN occurrence, which was defined as an absolute rise in SrCr by more than 0.3 mg/dL within 48 hours of CM exposure in both groups. The secondary endpoints were the value of the urinary NGAL for the prediction of CIN and SrCr level changes. The patients were followed for potential crocin-related side effects during the study.

3.5. Study Analysis

The data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 21). The categorical variables were expressed as numbers and percentages. The Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test were used to compare these variables between the two groups. The continuous variables were reported as mean ± standard deviation. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to determine the normality of the distributed variables. Normally distributed continuous variables were compared by the Student t-test, and nonnormally distributed variables were compared by the Mann-Whitney rank-sum test. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3.6. Ethical Statement

The current study was directed according to the Helsinki Declaration. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran (ethical approval No.: KUMS.REC.1398.1152) and registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (registered code No.: IRCT20200202046335N1). Informed consent was obtained from all the patients before the study.

4. Results

During the study period, 1,990 patients were nominated for angiography/angioplasty (Figure 1). Totally 1,875 patients did not meet the inclusion criteria. Of 115 patients randomly allocated, 5 patients were excluded due to self-discharge after the procedure and missing 24-hour follow-up. Table 1 shows the baseline clinical and laboratory data of the two groups. The mean age of the participants was 65.62 ± 9.05 years, and the majority of them were male (64.54%).

Table 1. Baseline Clinical and Laboratory Data in Intervention and Control Groups
Characteristics Intervention Group (n = 57)Control Group (n = 53)P-Value
Age (y, mean ± SD)65.07 ± 9.0166.21 ± 9.140.51 a
Gender0.16 b
Male33 (57.9)38 (71.7)
Female24 (42.1)15 (28.3)
Creatinine (mg/dL)1.25 ± 0.161.26 ± 0.190.69 c
BUN (mg/dL)46.16 ± 14.5843.06 ± 11.210.22 a
Weight (kg)75.65 ± 14.5575.25 ± 13.730.96 c
Height (cm)165.39 ± 9.92164.23 ± 8.820.52 a
Serum NGAL (μg/L) 23.89 ± 9.5519.75 ± 10.190.020 c
BSA (m2)1.86 ± 0.201.84 ± 0.190.80 c
BMI (kg/m2)27.77 ± 5.5227.84 ± 4.640.94 a
eGFR (mL/min)47.46 ± 7.1449.70 ± 7.240.10 a
Contrast volume (mL)89.04 ± 56.8992.45 ± 58.540.72 c
Mehran risk score 6.23 ± 2.765 ± 2.910.016 c
Diabetes24 (42.1)16 (30.2)0.24 b
Dyslipidemia9 (15.8)5 (9.4)0.39 b
Anemia17 (29.8)12 (22.6)0.52 b
Heart failure17 (29.8)11 (20.75)0.27 b
Prior myocardial infarction8 (14.04)6 (11.32)0.67 b
Prior coronary angiography9 (15.79)7 (13.21)0.68 d
Procedure type0.56
Angiography49 (85.96)48 (90.57)
Angioplasty8 (14.04)5 (9.4)
Access type0.85
Femoral33 (57.89)29 (54.72)
Radial24 (42.10)24 (45.28)
Nephrolithiasis 16 (28.07)14 (26.42)> 0.99
Drug History
Loop diuretics35 (71.4)37 (78.7)0.48 b
ACEI or ARB34 (59.6)35 (66)0.56 b
NAC2 (3.5)3 (5.7)0.67 d
Sodium bicarbonate 1 (1.8)0 (0)1.00 d
Statin38 (66.7)35 (66)1.00 b
Aspirin37 (64.91)41 (77.36)0.15 b
Clopidogrel15 (26.32)18 (33.96)0.38 b
Type of contrast agent0.56
Iodixanol51 (89.47)46 (86.79)
Iopamidol3 (5.26)2 (3.77)
Iopromide3 (5.26)5 (9.4)
History of smoking10 (17.54)14 (26.42)0.26 b
Opium addiction5 (8.77)8 (15.09)0.30 b

All the baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups except the MRS and urinary NGAL. The SrCr, BUN, and NGAL were measured multiple times. No significant differences were observed in SrCr and BUN levels between the two groups before angiography/angioplasty. All the recruited patients had CKD stage 3; therefore, the eGFR was similar in both groups. The mean volume of contrast agents and infused fluid were similar between the control (P = 0.72) and intervention (P = 0.99) groups. During the study, SrCr decreased significantly in the intervention group (-0.04 ± 0.14; P = 0.012) but not in the control group (0.08 ± 0.18; P = 0.008) (Table 2).

Table 2. Comparison of Laboratory Parameters Before and After the Study in Each Group
Parameters and GroupsBefore the StudyAfter the StudyP-Value a
Creatinine (mg/dL)
Intervention group1.25 ± 0.161.20 ± 0.190.012
Control group1.25 ± 0.191.33 ± 0.240.003
eGFR (mL/min)
Intervention group47.46 ± 7.1459.30 ± 14.25< 0.001
Control group49.70 ± 7.2455.32 ± 17.30.011
NGAL
Intervention group23.89 ± 9.5526.47 ± 8.440.18
Control group19.75 ± 10.1923.79 ± 6.330.56

The SrCr measured 48 hours after the administration of contrast agents was significantly higher in the control group than in the intervention group (P = 0.001; Table 3). Therefore, the eGFR was higher in the intervention group at the end of the study than in the control group (P = 0.009; Table 3). The measured urinary NGAL 12 hours after the angiography/angioplasty was significantly higher in the crocin group than in the control group but not clinically significant (P = 0.006; Table 3).

Table 3. Comparison of Laboratory Data After the Study between Two Groups
ParametersIntervention Group (n = 57)Control Group (n = 53)P-Value
Creatinine (mg/dL)1.2 ± 0.191.33 ± 0.240.001 a
Serum NGAL (μg/L) 26.47 ± 8.4423.79 ± 6.330.006 a
AKI1 (1.75)7 (13.21)0.028 b
eGFR (mL/min)59.29 ± 14.2555.31 ± 17.300.009 a

Although the MRS was significantly lower in the control group than in the intervention group (P = 0.016), CIN was lower in the intervention group (1.75% and 13.21%; P = 0.028; Table 3). In the crocin group, there was a significantly lower rate of CIN (relative risk: 13%; 95% CI: 1.01 - 1.26). No patients experienced adverse effects during the study.

5. Discussion

The incidence of CIN among the general population undergoing angiography/angioplasty is about 1 - 2% in the general population and might increase up to 50% for high-risk subgroups (34), which is in concordance with the findings of the current study. In the present study, the incidence of CIN was 7.3% in the total population. The population of this study was selected from patients with CKD stage 3; as a result, they were at higher risk of CIN than the normal population. Although the MRS in the intervention group was significantly higher than in the control group, CIN incidence in the crocin group was significantly lower. The analysis of the results revealed a significant AKI risk reduction in patients receiving contrast agents by crocin administration.

To the best of our knowledge, this study has been the first randomized clinical trial that evaluated the protective effects of crocin on CIN. Although recent studies have attributed renoprotective features to crocin, no clinical trial has been conducted on the effect of crocin on CIN prevention in CKD patients undergoing coronary angiography/angioplasty. Crocin is a potent antioxidant and ROS scavenger with renal protection properties due to renal ischemia amelioration (35), oxidative stress attenuation (27), lipid peroxidation prevention (35), anti-apoptotic effect (36), and endothelin reduction (37). It also has vasodilatory and Antioxidant properties (37). Ascorbic acid, N-acetyl cysteine, statins, sodium bicarbonates, nicorandil, alpha-tocopherol, alprostadil, allopurinol, adenosine antagonists, sarpogrelate, silymarin, isosorbide dinitrate, pentoxifylline, L-arginine, beta-blockers, and theophylline have been used to reduce CIN by other researchers (38).

The results of the current study showed that crocin could prevent CM-associated nephropathy. Although this reduction was statistically significant but not clinically, this study could prevent the SrCr rise in the crocin group. Since hydration remains the mainstay of treatment and the standard by which other CIN prevention strategies are judged, both groups received adequate hydration therapy (19). Consequently, in both groups, the eGFR was improved statistically but not clinically. Other factors, including contrast agents, contrast volume, and N-acetylcysteine consumption, were similar between the two groups.

Inflammation, ethnicity, gender, hydration, age, BMI, renal function, chronic illness, detection methods, and medications might influence SrCr concentration (39). During the last decades, the biomarkers, including NGAL, cystatin C, β2 microglobulin, α-1 microglobulin, and urinary insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7, have been proposed for the early detection of AKI. For instance, urinary NGAL is increased within 2 hours after CM administration and can predict the occurrence of CIN approximately 24 hours before SrCr increase (40). However, in the present study, no significant difference in urinary NGAL concentration was observed between the two groups. It should be noted that an increase in NGAL concentration is associated with a poor prognosis following CM administration (41). No patient in the current study needed renal replacement therapy. Only patients with CKD stage 3 were included in this study. Accordingly, patients with stage 3 had a higher risk of AKI, and crocin pretreatment significantly decreased CIN.

5.1. Limitations

The patients were discharged within 24 hours after angiography leading to not having more samples (e.g., 6, 24, and 48 hours after CM administration) to calculate the kinetics of urinary NGAL.

5.2. Conclusion

Crocin pretreatment is associated with a lower rate of CIN. Furthermore, studies with a larger sample size are needed to confirm the results of the present study. Based on the literature, there is controversy concerning whether SrCr could be a better predictor of CIN than NGAL as a new biomarker. In this study, urinary NGAL could not predict and diagnose AKI. One possibility to explain NGAL inefficiency in this study was the probable degradation and reduction of NGAL concentration in the urine samples due to long-term (6 months) storage at -24°C and freeze-thawing cycles. The NGAL in urine samples is stable at 4°C for up to 24 hours and -80°C for up to 5 years; however, it was not possible to provide -80°C. Moreover, the small sample size and missing some urine samples in the collection process might account for NGAl’s incompetence with the literature confirming its predictor role in CIN. Another reason that NGAL was not a good predictor of AKI in our study was that urine samples were collected 12 hours before and after procedure. However, measured NGAL 24 hours after contrast exposure could be a more promising biomarker for predicting CIN.

References

  • 1.

    Chyou AC, Thodge A, Feldman DN, Swaminathan RV. Statins in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2015;17(4):375. doi: 10.1007/s11936-015-0375-0. [PubMed: 25778426].

  • 2.

    Isaka Y, Hayashi H, Aonuma K, Horio M, Terada Y, Doi K, et al. Guideline on the use of iodinated contrast media in patients with kidney disease 2018. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2020;24(1):1-44. doi: 10.1007/s10157-019-01750-5. [PubMed: 31709463]. [PubMed Central: PMC6949208].

  • 3.

    Pannu N, Wiebe N, Tonelli M, Alberta Kidney Disease N. Prophylaxis strategies for contrast-induced nephropathy. JAMA. 2006;295(23):2765-79. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.23.2765. [PubMed: 16788132].

  • 4.

    Azzalini L, Spagnoli V, Ly HQ. Contrast-Induced Nephropathy: From Pathophysiology to Preventive Strategies. Can J Cardiol. 2016;32(2):247-55. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.05.013. [PubMed: 26277092].

  • 5.

    Rihal CS, Textor SC, Grill DE, Berger PB, Ting HH, Best PJ, et al. Incidence and prognostic importance of acute renal failure after percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. 2002;105(19):2259-64. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000016043.87291.33. [PubMed: 12010907].

  • 6.

    Vandenberghe W, Hoste E. Contrast-associated acute kidney injury: does it really exist, and if so, what to do about it? F1000Res. 2019;8. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.16347.1. [PubMed: 31275558]. [PubMed Central: PMC6544074].

  • 7.

    Mamoulakis C, Tsarouhas K, Fragkiadoulaki I, Heretis I, Wilks MF, Spandidos DA, et al. Contrast-induced nephropathy: Basic concepts, pathophysiological implications and prevention strategies. Pharmacol Ther. 2017;180:99-112. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.06.009. [PubMed: 28642116].

  • 8.

    Eshraghi A, Naranji-Sani R, Pourzand H, Vojdanparast M, Morovatfar N, Ramezani J, et al. Pentoxifylline and prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: Is it efficient in patients with myocardial infarction undergoing coronary angioplasty? ARYA Atheroscler. 2016;12(5):238-42. [PubMed: 28458699]. [PubMed Central: PMC5403018].

  • 9.

    Scharnweber T, Alhilali L, Fakhran S. Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: Pathophysiology, Manifestations, Prevention, and Management. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2017;25(4):743-53. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2017.06.012. [PubMed: 28964464].

  • 10.

    Bartorelli AL, Marenzi G. Contrast-induced nephropathy. J Interv Cardiol. 2008;21(1):74-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2007.00318.x. [PubMed: 18086132].

  • 11.

    Khan SU, Khan MU, Rahman H, Khan MS, Riaz H, Novak M, et al. A Bayesian network meta-analysis of preventive strategies for contrast-induced nephropathy after cardiac catheterization. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019;20(1):29-37. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.06.005. [PubMed: 30757995].

  • 12.

    Thomas ME, Blaine C, Dawnay A, Devonald MA, Ftouh S, Laing C, et al. The definition of acute kidney injury and its use in practice. Kidney Int. 2015;87(1):62-73. doi: 10.1038/ki.2014.328. [PubMed: 25317932].

  • 13.

    Mehran R, Nikolsky E. Contrast-induced nephropathy: definition, epidemiology, and patients at risk. Kidney Int Suppl. 2006;(100):S11-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5000368. [PubMed: 16612394].

  • 14.

    Andreis A, Budano C, Levis M, Garrone P, Usmiani T, D'Ascenzo F, et al. Contrast-induced kidney injury: how does it affect long-term cardiac mortality? J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2017;18(11):908-15. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000543. [PubMed: 28678146].

  • 15.

    Askenazi DJ, Ambalavanan N, Goldstein SL. Acute kidney injury in critically ill newborns: what do we know? What do we need to learn? Pediatr Nephrol. 2009;24(2):265-74. doi: 10.1007/s00467-008-1060-2. [PubMed: 19082634]. [PubMed Central: PMC2755786].

  • 16.

    Devarajan P. Biomarkers for the early detection of acute kidney injury. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2011;23(2):194-200. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e328343f4dd. [PubMed: 21252674]. [PubMed Central: PMC3257513].

  • 17.

    Li H, Yu Z, Gan L, Peng L, Zhou Q. Serum NGAL and FGF23 may have certain value in early diagnosis of CIN. Ren Fail. 2018;40(1):547-53. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2018.1487860. [PubMed: 30278796]. [PubMed Central: PMC6171456].

  • 18.

    Liao B, Nian W, Xi A, Zheng M. Evaluation of a Diagnostic Test of Serum Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin (NGAL) and Urine KIM-1 in Contrast-Induced Nephropathy (CIN). Med Sci Monit. 2019;25:565-70. doi: 10.12659/MSM.912569. [PubMed: 30659575]. [PubMed Central: PMC6347915].

  • 19.

    Kodzwa R. ACR Manual on Contrast Media: 2018 Updates. Radiol Technol. 2019;91(1):97-100. [PubMed: 31471485].

  • 20.

    Yang JS, Peng YR, Tsai SC, Tyan YS, Lu CC, Chiu HY, et al. The molecular mechanism of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) and its link to in vitro studies on iodinated contrast media (CM). Biomedicine (Taipei). 2018;8(1):1. doi: 10.1051/bmdcn/2018080101. [PubMed: 29480796]. [PubMed Central: PMC5826038].

  • 21.

    Zhang A, Shen Y, Cen M, Hong X, Shao Q, Chen Y, et al. Polysaccharide and crocin contents, and antioxidant activity of saffron from different origins. Ind Crops Prod. 2019;133:111-7. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.03.009.

  • 22.

    Sun Y, Xu HJ, Zhao YX, Wang LZ, Sun LR, Wang Z, et al. Crocin Exhibits Antitumor Effects on Human Leukemia HL-60 Cells In Vitro and In Vivo. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:690164. doi: 10.1155/2013/690164. [PubMed: 23573146]. [PubMed Central: PMC3615578].

  • 23.

    Imenshahidi M, Hosseinzadeh H, Javadpour Y. Hypotensive effect of aqueous saffron extract (Crocus sativus L.) and its constituents, safranal and crocin, in normotensive and hypertensive rats. Phytother Res. 2010;24(7):990-4. doi: 10.1002/ptr.3044. [PubMed: 20013822].

  • 24.

    Hosseinzadeh H, Karimi G, Niapoor M. Antidepressant Effect of Crocus Sativus L. Stigma Extracts and Their Constituents, Crocin and Safranal, in Mice. Acta Horticulturae. 2004;(650):435-45. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.650.54.

  • 25.

    Pashirzad M, Shafiee M, Avan A, Ryzhikov M, Fiuji H, Bahreyni A, et al. Therapeutic potency of crocin in the treatment of inflammatory diseases: Current status and perspective. J Cell Physiol. 2019. doi: 10.1002/jcp.28177. [PubMed: 30673132].

  • 26.

    Hosseinzadeh H, Talebzadeh F. Anticonvulsant evaluation of safranal and crocin from Crocus sativus in mice. Fitoterapia. 2005;76(7-8):722-4. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2005.07.008. [PubMed: 16253437].

  • 27.

    Qiu Y, Jiang X, Liu D, Deng Z, Hu W, Li Z, et al. The Hypoglycemic and Renal Protection Properties of Crocin via Oxidative Stress-Regulated NF-kappaB Signaling in db/db Mice. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:541. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00541. [PubMed: 32425787]. [PubMed Central: PMC7212392].

  • 28.

    Baradaran Rahim V, Khammar MT, Rakhshandeh H, Samzadeh-Kermani A, Hosseini A, Askari VR. Crocin protects cardiomyocytes against LPS-Induced inflammation. Pharmacol Rep. 2019;71(6):1228-34. doi: 10.1016/j.pharep.2019.07.007. [PubMed: 31670059].

  • 29.

    Yaribeygi H, Mohammadi MT. [Protective effect of crocin on kidney performance in chronic uncontrolled hyperglycemia-induced nephropathy in rat]. Journal of Zanjan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services. 2017;25(109):36-49. Persian.

  • 30.

    Hosseinzadeh H, Sadeghnia HR, Ziaee T, Danaee A. Protective effect of aqueous saffron extract (Crocus sativus L.) and crocin, its active constituent, on renal ischemia-reperfusion-induced oxidative damage in rats. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2005;8(3):387-93. [PubMed: 16401388].

  • 31.

    Bandegi AR, Rashidy-Pour A, Vafaei AA, Ghadrdoost B. Protective Effects of Crocus Sativus L. Extract and Crocin against Chronic-Stress Induced Oxidative Damage of Brain, Liver and Kidneys in Rats. Adv Pharm Bull. 2014;4(Suppl 2):493-9. doi: 10.5681/apb.2014.073. [PubMed: 25671180]. [PubMed Central: PMC4312396].

  • 32.

    Mehran R, Aymong ED, Nikolsky E, Lasic Z, Iakovou I, Fahy M, et al. A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: development and initial validation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(7):1393-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.06.068. [PubMed: 15464318].

  • 33.

    Lopes JA, Jorge S. The RIFLE and AKIN classifications for acute kidney injury: a critical and comprehensive review. Clin Kidney J. 2013;6(1):8-14. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfs160. [PubMed: 27818745]. [PubMed Central: PMC5094385].

  • 34.

    Rear R, Bell RM, Hausenloy DJ. Contrast-induced nephropathy following angiography and cardiac interventions. Heart. 2016;102(8):638-48. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306962. [PubMed: 26857214]. [PubMed Central: PMC4819627].

  • 35.

    Jalili C, Ghanbari A, Roshankhah S, Salahshoor MR. Toxic Effects of Methotrexate on Rat Kidney Recovered by Crocin as a Consequence of Antioxidant Activity and Lipid Peroxidation Prevention. Iran Biomed J. 2020;24(1):39-46. [PubMed: 31454862]. [PubMed Central: PMC6900476].

  • 36.

    Mohammadzadeh L, Abnous K, Razavi BM, Hosseinzadeh H. Crocin-protected malathion-induced spatial memory deficits by inhibiting TAU protein hyperphosphorylation and antiapoptotic effects. Nutr Neurosci. 2020;23(3):221-36. doi: 10.1080/1028415X.2018.1492772. [PubMed: 30789100].

  • 37.

    Boskabady M, Ghorani V, Alavinezhad A. Saffron, its main derivatives, and their effects on the respiratory system. In: Koocheki A, Khajeh-Hosseini M, editors. Saffron. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing; 2020. p. 461-9. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-818638-1.00031-9.

  • 38.

    Ozkok S, Ozkok A. Contrast-induced acute kidney injury: A review of practical points. World J Nephrol. 2017;6(3):86-99. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v6.i3.86. [PubMed: 28540198]. [PubMed Central: PMC5424439].

  • 39.

    Dipiro JT, Talbert RL, Yee GC, Matzke GR, Wells BG, Posey LM. Pharmacotherapy: A Pathophysiologic Approach, ed. Connecticut: Appleton and Lange. 2014;4:141-2.

  • 40.

    Connolly M, McEneaney D, Menown I, Morgan N, Harbinson M. Novel Biomarkers of Acute Kidney Injury After Contrast Coronary Angiography. Cardiol Rev. 2015;23(5):240-6. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0000000000000058. [PubMed: 25699983].

  • 41.

    Haase M, Devarajan P, Haase-Fielitz A, Bellomo R, Cruz DN, Wagener G, et al. The outcome of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin-positive subclinical acute kidney injury: a multicenter pooled analysis of prospective studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(17):1752-61.

Copyright © 2022, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.