Supply chain management (SCM) is a strategy that integrates chain members to reduce costs and improve customer service. One of the main concerns of supply chain stakeholders is the timely provision of items needed by chain members. Accordingly, various models have been proposed as supply chain purchasing strategies. One of the SCM methods is group purchasing, which is used in many areas, especially in retail chains, to reduce the cost of purchasing goods.
In recent years, ‘group procurement’ has attracted much attention in all industries (
1). This concept is an effective tool for healthcare providers, schools, government agencies, and other associations to keep prices low and help these organizations achieve their goals (
2,
3). Nowadays, organizations aggregate their purchases by procurement groups to achieve economic benefits on a large scale. In the literature, the terms ‘horizontal participatory procurement,’ ‘reciprocal procurement,’ ‘procurement alliances,’ and ‘procurement groups’ are used interchangeably (
4). In commercial organizations and for manufacturers, costs of goods purchase account for 60 - 90% of total turnover (
5), and for service providers, it is typically 35% (
6). In government organizations, such as municipalities, the average of goods purchase accounts for about 60% of costs (
7). In addition, the transactions for purchasing the required products and services involve many organizational costs, and reducing the transaction costs is more complicated than reducing the costs resulting from the purchase price (
8).
In recent decades, this method has been used in some countries for purchasing healthcare goods, including medical supplies and drugs, in hospitals and chain pharmacies. In the group procurement system, a group of buyers’ participation and cooperation help reduce costs, including ordering, shipping, and purchasing (
9).
The supply chain of medicines and medical supplies is one of the most critical parts of aggregated procurement in any country’s health system. It is the most important condition for implementing a strategic purchasing policy in this area. In this chain, aggregated purchasing reduces costs and increases productivity in each loop when it is carried out to improve efficiency. According to Hendrik’s study on aggregated procurement groups, two types of structures can be considered for aggregated procurement (
10). One is a cooperative structure where the purchases are made by this group and distributed among the members. The other is a third-party structure in which another organization negotiates and enters into a contract at the request of the members (
10).
The procurement literature distinguishes between two different structural forms of participatory procurement: informal virtual organizations and third-party organizations. The members own virtual networks, and many operate without formal rules. Typically, new collaborators are not hired into these networks and are not specifically assigned to the partnership. The collaboration is often part of their other job in one of the sourcing group’s member organizations. Third-party organizations are separate organizations explicitly created to manage and coordinate collaborations. They have formal rules and dedicated staff responsible for the aggregated procurement process (
11-
14). In both boundary structures, the degree of collaboration between collections and subsets must be organized to ultimately select and design a form of organization (
13,
15,
16).
Virtual organizations tend to be minor, with direct and immediate interaction between the participants. Third-party organizations tend to be larger and more regional or national, working with a more extensive membership base because they need to support their infrastructure. Professional networks can be national, regional, or local. The second structure may be more collaborative because of the ease of contact between neighboring hospitals. Third-party takeovers outsource to the private sector, and the public sector relinquishes control (
17). Walker et al. pointed out that by relying on the evolutionary models of participatory procurement, one could start collaborating with virtual professional networks where individuals get to know each other and purchase together (
15). This can lead in some way to procurement management, shared services, or backups (
15).
According to Schneller’s study, disciplined models proposed for group purchasing organization (GPO) contract compliance do not achieve effective performance unless the following are addressed: (1) Ensuring executive commitment to procurement excellence; (2) recognizing the legitimacy of suppliers and physicians; (3) creating an integrated business-clinical organizational focus; (4) ensuring the application of advanced skills in SCM and information technology; and (5) fostering an organizational focus where everyone works “smarter” to optimize resources and get the job done (
16). Such a compliance model maintains price fidelity as a critical objective for GPO and ensures that GPO activities are aligned with affected organizations (
16).
Maltz and Ellram have noted the dual function of procurement in complex organizations (
17). On the one hand, procurement involves identifying and screening suppliers, purchasing the necessary structures and obtaining opinions, negotiating final agreements, and monitoring ongoing relationships (
17).
By providing an organizational focus, GPOs can create an environment in which members are accountable for the optimal use of resources by achieving departmental integration, creating and implementing performance measures, and incentivizing system-level performance (
18).
As Huber et al. mentioned, electronic purchasing groups (EPGs) provide information and communication technology-based infrastructures and electronically perform the tasks required to manage the aggregated demand of two or more organizations (
18).
One of the most important links in this chain is pharmacies as suppliers of goods to consumers and buyers of goods from distributors. Since the efficiency of aggregated procurement is highly dependent on the structure of the purchasing organization and is also influenced by the local conditions of a country and its upstream policies, the study of the structure of aggregated procurement organizations in this area is of great importance. The importance of the aggregated procurement structure lies in the fact that the optimal procurement approach may vary depending on the economic status of a country and differences in factors affecting the performance of economic activities. Accordingly, it is paramount to study aggregated procurement in the healthcare system.