1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
3.1. Preparation of the High-Fat Emulsion
| High-Fat Emulsion Components | Amount |
|---|---|
| Corn oil (g) | 400 |
| Saccharose (g) | 150 |
| Total milk powder (g) | 80 |
| Cholesterol (g) | 100 |
| Sodium deoxycholate (g) | 10 |
| Tween 80 (g) | 36.4 |
| Propylene glycol (g) | 31.1 |
| Vitamin mixture (g) | 2.5 |
| Cooking salt (g) | 10 |
| Mineral mixture (g) | 1.5 |
| Distilled water (mL) | 300 |
| Total energy (kcal/L) | 4342 |
3.2. Isolation and Cultivation of ADSCs
3.3. Induction of ADSCs with LPS
3.4. DiFFerentiation Assays of ADSCs
3.5. Ascertaining the ADSC Surface Markers
3.6. Animals and Experimental Design
3.7. Biochemical Measurements
3.8. Gene Expression Investigation
| Gene | Forward Primer | Reverse Primer |
|---|---|---|
| SREBP-1c | TCTTGACCGACATCGAGACAT | CCTGTGTCTCCTGTCTCACC |
| FAS | CCCGGACCCAGAATACCAAG | TCTTCAAGTCACACGAGGTG |
| ACC | TTAAGGGGTGAAGAGGGTGC | CACTTCCAAAGACCTAGCC |
| PPARγ | CGAGTGTGACGACAAGGTGA | ACGCTTCTTCAATCTGTCTG |
| PPARα | TGGTGCATTTGGGCGTATCT | CACGAGCGCTAAGCTGTGA |
| CPT-1α | AGCCCTGAGACAGACTCACA | ATCACGAGGGTCCGTTTTCC |
| IL-1β | TGCCACCTTTGACAGTGATG | TGATGTGCTGCTGCGAGATT |
| IL-6 | CCAGTTGCCTTCTTGGGACT | TGCCATTGCACAACTCTTTC |
| TNF-α | ATGGGCTCCCTCTCATCAGT | GCTTGGTGGTTTGCTACGAC |
| NOX1 | AGGCTCCAGACCTCCATTGA | AAGGCAAGGCAGTTCCGAG |
| NOX2 | GGCATTCGTAGTACAGCTCA | ATTGGTCCTCGGGAGTCAGA |
| NOX4 | TGGCCAACGAAGGGGTTAAA | ACACAATCCTAGGCCAACA |
| TGF-β1 | CTGCTGACCCCCACTGATAC | GGGGCTGATCCCGTTGATT |
| GAPDH | CTCTCTGCTCCTCCCTGTTC | CGATACGGCCAAATCCGTTC |
Abbreviations: SREBP-1c, sterol regulatory element binding protein-1c; FAS, fatty acid synthase; ACC, acetyl-CoA carboxylase; PPARγ, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors gamma; PPARα, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors alpha; CPT-1α, carnitine palmitoyltransferase I; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor α; NOX1, NADPH oxidase 1; TGF-β1, transforming growth factor β1; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase.
3.9. Histopathological Examination
3.10. Statistical Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Determination of the Phenotypes of ADSCs
Immunophenotyping and differentiation potentials of adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs). A, oil red O staining of ADSCs, intracellular lipid accumulation-stained bright red in adipocytes at day 21; B, alizarin red S staining of ADSCs, calcium deposition-stained bright orange-red in osteocytes at day 21; C, flow cytometry analysis of surface markers shows that ADSCs express CD44 and CD105––but CD34 and CD45 in a downregulated manner.
4.2. Making a Comparison of Body Weight and Liver Index Following Treatment
A, body weight gain; B, liver weight; and C, liver triglyceride in the high-fat-induced NASH model before and after treatment with FENO and MSCs. The mean and SD (n = 8) values are provided. Significant differences between HFD and CON are indicated by ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001, and significant differences between HFD and other groups are indicated by # P < 0.05; ## P < 0.01; ### P < 0.001; D, histopathological analysis of the NASH model after therapy with FENO, MSCs, and MSCs + LPS. Typical images of × 100-magnified HE-stained liver tissue from various treatment groups. Abbreviations: NASH, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; FENO, fenofibrate; MSCs, mesenchymal stem cells; HFD, high-fat diet; CON, control; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; HE, hematoxylin and eosin; ND, normaldiet.
4.3. The Effect of FENO and ADSC Treatment on Liver Enzymes and Lipid Profiles in the NAFLD Model
The values represent the mean and SD of 7 rats. An ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison tests were used to examine differences between the groups. Significant differences between HFD and CON are indicated by ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001, and significant differences between HFD and other groups are indicated by # P < 0.05; ## P < 0.01; ### P < 0.001; #### P < 0.0001. Abbreviations: ANOVA, analysis of variance; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HFD, high-fat diet; CON, control; FENO, fenofibrate; MSC, mesenchymal stem cell; LPS; lipopolysaccharide.
4.4. Regulation of Lipid-Related Gene Expression Following FENO and ADSC Treatment
Gene expression levels pertaining to lipid-related genes. Using quantitative real-time PCR, hepatic mRNA levels were measured and normalized to GAPDH mRNA expression. The values are shown as the mean and SD of fold changes compared to the CON. An ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer tests were used for multiple comparisons to evaluate between-group differences. Significant differences between HFD and NC are indicated by **P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001, and significant differences between HFD and other groups are indicated by # P < 0.05; ## P < 0.01; ### P < 0.001; #### P < 0.0001. Abbreviations: SREBP-1c, sterol regulatory element binding protein-1c; FAS, fatty acid synthase; ACC, acetyl-CoA carboxylase; PPARγ, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors gamma; PPARα, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors alpha; CPT-1α, carnitine palmitoyltransferase I; CON, control; HFD, high-fat diet; FENO, fenofibrate; MSC, mesenchymal stem cell; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; ANOVA, analysis of variance.
4.5. Reduction of Oxidative Stress and Related Gene Expression after the FENO and ADSC Treatment
Gene expression levels of oxidative stress in response to MSC group (MSC, MSC + LPS) treatment. Using quantitative real-time PCR, hepatic mRNA levels were evaluated and normalized to GAPDH mRNA expression. The values are given as the mean and SD of fold changes compared to the normal control group. An ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons tests were used to examine between-group differences. Significant differences between HFD and NC are indicated by ** P < 0.01; **** P < 0.0001, and significant differences between HFD and other groups are indicated by # P < 0.05; ## P < 0.01; ### P < 0.001. Abbreviations: NOX1, NADPH oxidase 1; ROS, reactive oxygen species; CON, control; HFD, high-fat diet; FENO, fenofibrate; MSC, mesenchymal stem cell; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; MSC, mesenchymal stem cell; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; ANOVA, analysis of variance.
4.6. Reduction of Inflammatory mRNA Expression Following the FENO and ADSC Treatment
Gene expression levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and TNF-α in response to MSC group (MSC, MSC + LPS) treatment. Using quantitative real-time PCR, hepatic mRNA levels were evaluated and normalized to GAPDH mRNA expression. The values are given as the mean and SD of fold changes compared to the CON. An ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons tests were used to examine between-group differences Significant differences between HFD and NC are indicated by ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001, and significant differences between HFD and other groups are indicated by; ## P < 0.01; ### P < 0.001. Abbreviations: CON, control; HFD, high-fat diet; FENO, fenofibrate; MSC, mesenchymal stem cell; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor α; MSC, mesenchymal stem cell; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; ANOVA, analysis of variance.





