This study aimed to conduct an epidemiological investigation of foreign bodies in the ear, as well as their treatment and complications, at Kamkar-Arabnia Hospital in Qom in 2019. A total of 102 participants were included in the study. According to existing studies, the incidence of foreign bodies in the emergency room ranges between 1 - 3%, highlighting its importance as a critical issue that sometimes requires prompt intervention (
12,
13).
The results of this study showed that the average age of the participants was 12.41 ± 7.11 years. Most participants were male and in the age group of 0 - 6 years. The most common foreign bodies were seeds, edible seeds, matchsticks, cotton, and plastic, respectively. In terms of complications, most participants experienced no complications, while others had ear canal scratches or bleeding. A study found that more than 50.1% of patients were 8 years old or younger, with a predominance of males. In adults, foreign bodies in the ear were often self-inflicted due to personal needs (
13). Similarly, a study by Hashemi et al. reported that most patients were male and under 15 years old (
14). These findings align with our study, emphasizing the importance of considering the gender and age of individuals, as young children often insert foreign objects out of curiosity or play, and males might be more frequently affected due to external work environments.
In a study conducted by Mangussi-Gomes et al., it was found that 9.5% of patients required additional tests to detect the foreign body, while 69.4% were identified using a simple CT scan. However, CT scans are not always effective in detecting certain foreign objects, such as fish and chicken bones. Thus, for suspicious cases, further diagnostic measures are necessary, as the types of foreign bodies can vary based on geographical and social characteristics (
13). For instance, in developing countries, foreign bodies are often seeds or cotton pieces, while in developed countries, plastic pieces are more common (
15,
16).
In this section, the results showed that the primary foreign body in the age groups of 0 - 6, 6 - 12, and 12 - 18 years was seeds, while individuals over 18 years of age more commonly had matchsticks, cotton, and plastic. Only 22 patients required anesthesia for foreign body removal. Additionally, in the age groups of 0 - 6, 6 - 12, and 12 - 18 years, most individuals had the foreign body removed without complications. However, 5 individuals over the age of 18 experienced canal bleeding. In other studies, only a small percentage of patients required anesthesia for foreign body removal, which is consistent with our findings (
13). Furthermore, the rate of complications in our study was very low, aligning with similar research (
17,
18).
The differences observed across studies in the need for general anesthesia and complication rates may be attributed to the fact that our cases were managed exclusively by otolaryngologists. As specialists in this field, they are adept at handling foreign body cases, thereby reducing the likelihood of complications. It is crucial to follow up with patients, particularly when insects or other foreign objects that do not cause infection are present.
The rapid removal of foreign bodies from the ear using traditional methods poses a significant challenge for otolaryngologists. Treatment success depends on various factors, and there is no conclusive evidence favoring one method over others. However, it is known that the persistence of foreign bodies in the ear, nose, and throat for more than 72 hours, along with repeated removal attempts, increases the risk of complications. Such situations are both unpleasant and unusual, and they significantly diminish the chances of successful removal.
A strength of this study is its focus on an important issue that has not been extensively studied at the university level, particularly concerning certain age groups. A limitation of the study was the presence of incomplete and illegible files. Future research is recommended to involve longer-term studies and interventions, examining how different medical approaches affect the removal of foreign bodies based on the type of foreign material and specific age groups.
5.1. Conclusions
Based on the study results and the complications associated with foreign bodies in the ear, it is essential to develop and implement strategies to prevent the entry of foreign bodies and to plan for their effective removal if necessary.