Can Functionalization of Quinoline Derivatives Be Exploited to Control Quinolines Cytotoxic Effects?

authors:

avatar Zahra Hami 1 , avatar Ramin Zibaseresht 2 , 3 , *

Department of Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
Biomaterial Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
Department of Chemistry and Physics, Faculty of Sciences, Maritime University of Imam Khomeini, Nowshahr, Mazandaran, IR Iran

How To Cite Hami Z, Zibaseresht R. Can Functionalization of Quinoline Derivatives Be Exploited to Control Quinolines Cytotoxic Effects?. J Arch Mil Med. 2017;5(4):e58194. https://doi.org/10.5812/jamm.58194.

Abstract

Background:

Quinoline and its variety of derivatives have long been studied for their biological activities such as anticancer, antitumor, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant properties.

Objectives:

As part of our research, we are interested in the synthesis and development of heterocyclic compounds such as quinoline derivatives and poly-pyridyl materials that might have potential biological activities. Particularly, anti-cancerous and anti-bacterial properties of such compounds are of our interest.

Methods:

A previously synthesized mixture of two quinoline derivative isomers (7-methylquinoline and 5-methylquinoline (A + B)) and other four quinoline derivatives (7-methyl-8-nitro-quinoline (C), 7- (β-trans- (N,N-dimethylamino) ethenyl) -8-nitroquinoline (D), 8-nitro-7-quinolinecarbaldehyde (E), and 8-Amino-7-quinolinecarbaldehyde (F)) were selected to evaluate their in vitro cytotoxicity against human epithelial colorectal carcinoma (Caco-2) cultured cells by MTT assay. The IC50 values for the mixture and other compounds were calculated by SigmaPlot 12.0 software.

Results:

Compounds (A + B), (C), (D), (E), and (F) showed IC50 values of 2.62, 1.87, 0.93, 0.53, and 1.140 µM, respectively.

Conclusions:

Our investigation suggested that all compounds were cytotoxic against Caco-2 cell lines. We observed that the previously synthesized quinoline derivatives (A + B), (C), (D), (E), and (F) in a reaction sequence show an influence in cytotoxicity against Caco-2 cell lines. Based on our evaluation, quinoline derivative (E) showed the highest cytotoxicity against the cultured cells compared to the other compounds we studied. An increase in cytotoxicity was observed from the mixture (A + B) to the compounds (C), (D) and (E), in sequence, while cytotoxicity of compound (F) appeared to be less than that of compound (E). Based on our observations, we concluded that functionalization of the quinoline derivatives we studied resulted in a change in cytotoxic activities of the compounds. Therefore, the functionalization strategy we employed for the quinoline derivatives could be useful in controlling the cytotoxic level of such compounds.

1. Background

Quinoline and its derivatives have received considerable attention because of their potential activities such as anticancer (1-9), anti-inflammatory (10-12), anti-oxidant, and other biological activities (13-17).

A variety of research have demonstrated that quinoline and its derivatives have shown cytotoxic activity by inhibiting PI3K-PKB, epidermal growth factor receptor, mitogen-activated protein kinase, ALK5, platelet-derived growth factor, or non-receptor tyrosine kinase (18).

Bingul et al. investigated the synthesis of some quinoline derivatives and showed their anti-cancer activity against neuroblastoma cells (19). In another study, Meshram et al. showed that some quinoline derivatives they had prepared were toxic to human cell line HL-60 (myeloid leukemia) and U937 (leukemic monocyte lymphoma) (20). To the best of our knowledge, in all articles we reviewed in literature, the authors have reported the syntheses of quinoline derivatives and investigated their cytotoxic properties against different human cancer cell lines. Here, we have an intention to investigate the possibility of deliberately increasing the cytotoxicity of quinoline derivatives using functionalization reaction methods.

Since there is a growing interest in the development of new quinoline-based compounds for their potential cytotoxicity against cancer cells, in continuation of part of our work- for the preparation of such class of molecules- we reported the synthesis of some quinoline derivatives earlier (21). In that project, we developed a synthetic route for the preparation of a novel terpyridine ligand. The synthetic route involved the preparation of some quinoline derivatives as key materials for the preparation of a terpyridine ligand. Here in, we report the anti-cancer activity of the synthesized quinoline-based molecules and investigate the role of functionalization methods we employed in the level of cytotoxicity of such chemicals.

2. Objectives

The main aims of this research were to investigate the cytotoxicity effect of some quinoline derivatives against cancer cell line and to demonstrate the possibility of the toxicity control of such molecules by functionalization methods in a reaction route.

3. Methods

3.1. Materials

Compounds 7-methylquinoline (A) and 5-methylquinoline (B) as mixture, 7-Methyl-8-Nitro-quinoline (C), 7-(β-trans- (N, N-dimethylamino) ethenyl)-8-nitroquinoline (D), 8-Nitro-7-quinolinecarbaldehyde (E), and 8-Amino-7-quinolinecarbaldehyde (F) were synthesized as previously described (21). 3- (4, 5-dimethylthiaol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) was purchased from Sigma (St Louis, MO, USA). Dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium (DMEM), RPMI 1640 medium, and penicillin/streptomycin solution were obtained from Gibco Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Human epithelial colorectal carcinoma (Caco-2) cells were provided by Pasteur Institute, Tehran, Iran.

3.2. Methods

In vitro cytotoxicity study by MTT assay (22): Caco-2 cells (human epithelial colorectal carcinoma cells) were cultured in a medium consisting of RPMI-1640, Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM), heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), and penicillin-streptomycin in a ratio of 50:34:15:1 at 37°C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2. Stock solutions of the test compounds were prepared in DMSO solvent and diluted 100 folds with the culture medium. The cells were seeded in 96-well transparent plates at 10,000 cells per well. After 24 hours, the old medium was removed and Caco-2 cells were exposed to the test compounds at concentrations ranging from 0.1 - 1000 µg/mL. After 48 houres incubation, 20 µL of MTT solution (5 mg/mL) was added to each well of the plates and the plates were then maintained in incubator. After 4 hours, 100 µL DMSO solvent was added to each well to dissolve the purple formazan crystals and then the plates were read on a Synergy HT Microplate Reader (Bio-Tek Instruments, Winooski, VT) at 570 nm with the reference wavelength at 690 nm. The IC50 values were calculated by SigmaPlot 12.0 software.

4. Results

To study the effect of functionalization reactions of quinoline derivatives on their cytotoxicity, the previously prepared compounds (i.e. a mixture of two quinoline derivative isomers (7-methylquinoline and 5-methylquinoline (A+B) and four quinoline derivatives (7-methyl-8-nitro-quinoline (C), 7-(β-trans- (N, N-dimethylamino) ethenyl)-8-nitroquinoline (D), 8-nitro-7-quinolinecarbaldehyde (E), and 8-Amino-7-quinolinecarbaldehyde (F)) were selected. For this purpose, the sensitivity of human epithelial colorectal carcinoma (Caco-2) cultured cells towards the synthetic compounds was evaluated. The cytotoxic activities of the quinoline derivatives were determined by MTT assay. The IC50 values for the quinoline compounds are shown in Figure 1.

Cytotoxic Activity of Some Quinoline Derivatives Against Human Epithelial Colorectal Carcinoma (Caco-2) Cultured Cells
Cytotoxic Activity of Some Quinoline Derivatives Against Human Epithelial Colorectal Carcinoma (Caco-2) Cultured Cells

5. Discussion

We have previously reported the synthesis and characterization of some quinoline derivatives (Figure 2) (21).

Synthesis of Quinoline Derivatives (7)
(i) sodium m-nitrobenzene sulfonate, m-toluidine, 98% H2SO4 and H2O, reflux; (ii) fuming HNO3 and 98% H2SO4, -5°C; (iii) N, N-dimethylformamide dimethyl acetal, dry DMF, under Ar, 140°C, 24 hours; (iv) NaIO4, THF/ H2O, r.t, 4 hours; (v) Fe/ HCl, EtOH, HOAc, H2O, reflux, 30 minutes (21).

As shown in Figure 1, the cytotoxic activities of the quinoline derivatives against Caco-2 cell lines highly depend on the functional groups attached to the quinoline core structure. Nitration reaction of the mixture (A + B) resulted in a product with a nitro group ortho to a methyl group in compound A (Figure 2) (21). However, compound B remained unreacted and it was separated from the reaction mixture consequently. Based on our observations, the nitro derivative C is more cytotoxic than the mixture (A + B) against Caco-2 cell line. In the next step, the reaction of C with N, N-dimethylformamide dimethyl acetal (DMFDMA) gave the derivative D (21). The cytotoxic activity of compound D was also determined against Caco-2 cell line. We observed that compound D was more toxic that compound C (IC50 values of 0.929 and 1.871 µM, respectively). Oxidation reaction of D produced the nitro-aldehyde derivative E. We again observed an increase in cytotoxicity of E against Caco-2 cell line (IC50 value, 0.535 µM). A decreased cytotoxic activity was observed during the cytotoxicity evaluation of the amine-aldehyde quinoline derivative F as the product of a reduction reaction of derivative E using Fe catalyst in an acidic medium (Figure 3).

Schematic Trend of the Cytotoxic Activity of the Quinoline Derivatives Against (Caco-2) Cell Lines Over the Reaction Sequences (the Values on the Vertical Axis are IC50 Values in µM)
Schematic Trend of the Cytotoxic Activity of the Quinoline Derivatives Against (Caco-2) Cell Lines Over the Reaction Sequences (the Values on the Vertical Axis are IC50 Values in µM)

We observed that the previously synthesized quinoline derivatives (A + B), (C), (D), (E), and (F) in a reaction sequence showed an influence in cytotoxicity against Caco-2 cell lines. Based on our evaluation, nitro-aldehyde quinoline derivative (E) showed the highest cytotoxicity against the cultured cells compared to the other compounds we studied. An increase in cytotoxicity was observed from the mixture (A + B) to the compounds (C), (D) and (E), in sequence, while a decrease in cytotoxicity was demonstrated from the nitro-aldehyde derivative (E) to its corresponding amine-aldehyde derivative (F). The latter trend we observed is consistent with the literature values in which the aromatic amine derivatives were less toxic than their corresponding nitro compounds (23). The change in cytotoxic activities of the compounds showed that functionalization of the quinoline derivatives we studied can be used as a method to control cytotoxicity of such compounds.

Acknowledgements

References

  • 1.

    Ahmed NS, Badahdah KO, Qassar HM. Novel quinoline bearing sulfonamide derivatives and their cytotoxic activity against MCF7 cell line. Med Chem Res. 2017;26(6):1201-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00044-017-1850-9.

  • 2.

    Sun M, Ou J, Li W, Lu C. Quinoline and naphthalene derivatives from Saccharopolyspora sp. YIM M13568. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2017;70(3):320-2. [PubMed ID: 27899791]. https://doi.org/10.1038/ja.2016.142.

  • 3.

    Kouznetsov VV, Sojo F, Rojas-Ruiz FA, Merchan-Arenas DR, Arvelo F. Synthesis and cytotoxic evaluation of 7-chloro-4-phenoxyquinolines with formyl, oxime and thiosemicarbazone scaffolds. Med Chem Res. 2016;25(11):2718-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00044-016-1688-6.

  • 4.

    Mohamede ASI, Elneairy MAA, Eldine SM. 2,4-cycloaddition reactions: preparation and cytotoxicity of novel quinoline and pyrrolo [3,4-f] quinoline derivatives. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2015;7(12):64-8.

  • 5.

    Sidoryk K, Switalska M, Jaromin A, Cmoch P, Bujak I, Kaczmarska M, et al. The synthesis of indolo[2,3-b]quinoline derivatives with a guanidine group: highly selective cytotoxic agents. Eur J Med Chem. 2015;105:208-19. [PubMed ID: 26496013]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.10.022.

  • 6.

    Jhanwar D, Sharma J. Use of quinoline derivatives in cancer treatment. Int J Pharm Res Bio Sci. 2015;4(2):130-48.

  • 7.

    Ghorab MM, Ragab FA, Heiba HI, Nissan YM, Ghorab WM. Novel brominated quinoline and pyrimidoquinoline derivatives as potential cytotoxic agents with synergistic effects of gamma-radiation. Arch Pharm Res. 2012;35(8):1335-46. [PubMed ID: 22941476]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12272-012-0803-6.

  • 8.

    Lira-Rocha A, Teloxa-Cuahtle AS, Solano-Becerra J. Synthesis, cytotoxic activity, and molecular modeling of novel derivatives of 9-anilino-2'-substituted- thiazolo[5,4-b]quinoline as potential antitumor agents. 244th ACS National Meeting & Exposition. August 19-23, 2012; Philadelphia, PA, U.S. 2012.

  • 9.

    V. Kouznetsov V, A. Rojas Ruiz F, Y. Vargas Mendez L, P. Gupta M. Simple C-2-substituted quinolines and their anticancer activity. Lett Drug Des Discov. 2012;9(7):680-6. https://doi.org/10.2174/157018012801319544.

  • 10.

    Jeena V, Naidoo S. Synthesis of 2,4-disubstituted quinoline derivatives via A3-coupling: An ecoscale evaluation. Synthesis. 2017;49(12):2621-31. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1588176.

  • 11.

    Mukherjee S, Pal M. Medicinal chemistry of quinolines as emerging anti-inflammatory agents: an overview. Curr Med Chem. 2013;20(35):4386-410. [PubMed ID: 23862618].

  • 12.

    Kreutzberger A. Condensed heterocycles as structure characteristics in inflammation inhibitors. Dtsch Apoth Ztg. 1972;112(41):1606-13.

  • 13.

    Wen D, Guo J, Jiang F, Huang C, Zhao Z, Lu G, et al. A rapid and sensitive UHPLC-MS/MS method for quantification of 83b1 in plasma and its application to bioavailability study in rats. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2017;134:71-6. [PubMed ID: 27886572]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2016.11.011.

  • 14.

    Silverman R. The organic chemistry of drug design and drug action. San Diego: Academic Press; 1992.

  • 15.

    Thompson LA, Ellman JA. Synthesis and Applications of Small Molecule Libraries. Chem Rev. 1996;96(1):555-600. [PubMed ID: 11848765]. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr9402081.

  • 16.

    Franzen RG. Recent advances in the preparation of heterocycles on solid support: a review of the literature. J Comb Chem. 2000;2(3):195-214. [PubMed ID: 10827923]. https://doi.org/10.1021/cc000002f.

  • 17.

    Foley M, Tilley L. Quinoline antimalarials: mechanisms of action and resistance and prospects for new agents. Pharmacol Ther. 1998;79(1):55-87. [PubMed ID: 9719345]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-7258(98)00012-6.

  • 18.

    Solomon VR, Lee H. Quinoline as a privileged scaffold in cancer drug discovery. Curr Med Chem. 2011;18(10):1488-508. [PubMed ID: 21428893].

  • 19.

    Bingul M, Tan O, Gardner CR, Sutton SK, Arndt GM, Marshall GM, et al. Synthesis, Characterization and Anti-Cancer Activity of Hydrazide Derivatives Incorporating a Quinoline Moiety. Molecules. 2016;21(7). [PubMed ID: 27428941]. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21070916.

  • 20.

    Meshram HM, Reddy BC, Kumar DA, Kalyan M, Pamesh P, Kavitha P, et al. Synthesis and cytotoxicity of new quinoline derivatives. Indian J Chem. 2012;51B:1411-6.

  • 21.

    Zibaseresht R, Karimi P, Mohit Azar S, Amirloo M, Azimi M. An improved synthesis of 2-(Pyrid-2΄-Yl)-1,10-phenanthroline tridentate terpyridyl ligand. Int J Chem Res. 2013;5(1):153-8. https://doi.org/10.9735/0975-3699.5.1.153-158.

  • 22.

    Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: Application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods. 1983;65(1-2):55-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4.

  • 23.

    Razo-Flores E, Donlon B, Lettinga G, Field JA. Biotransformation and biodegradation of N-substituted aromatics in methanogenic granular sludge. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1997;20(3-4):525-38. [PubMed ID: 9340000]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.1997.tb00335.x.