Spinal vs General Anesthesia in patients undergoing urogenital surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Maryam Deldarpasikhani; Negar Eftekhar; Mohammad Mireskandari; Jalil Makarem; Arash Zamani; Fahimeh Ghotbizadeh Vahdani; Razieh Akbari; Nourieh Ghattan Kashani

doi:10.22037/jcma.v5i3.29970

Journal of Cellular & Molecular Anesthesia

Journal Information Editors & Boards Indexing and Listing Sources Journal Metrics Open Peer Review (OPR)Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement New Publisher Announcement Reviewer and AE Registration Form Contact Us Support

APC

Authors Guide Submit Manuscript

https://doi.org/10.22037/jcma.v5i3.29970

Spinal vs General Anesthesia in patients undergoing urogenital surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Author(s):

Maryam Deldarpasikhani^1,*,

Negar Eftekhar²,

Mohammad Mireskandari²,

Jalil Makarem²,

Arash Zamani²,

Fahimeh Ghotbizadeh Vahdani

¹,

Razieh Akbari¹,

Nourieh Ghattan Kashani¹

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Journal of Cellular & Molecular Anesthesia:Vol. 5, issue 3; e149614

Published online:May 07, 2020

Article type:Brief Communications

How to Cite:Maryam DeldarpasikhaniNegar EftekharMohammad MireskandariJalil MakaremArash ZamaniFahimeh Ghotbizadeh VahdaniRazieh AkbariNourieh Ghattan Kashaniet al.Spinal vs General Anesthesia in patients undergoing urogenital surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.J Cell Mol Anesth.5(3):e149614.https://doi.org/10.22037/jcma.v5i3.29970.

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the pain in the 24 hours after surgery, quality of life, and the outcome of surgery in patients undergoing urogenital surgery by spinal and general anesthesia. Materials and Methods: Women referring a candidate for urogenital surgery in Vali-e-Asr Hospital entered the study after their informed consent; in one of the two study groups: Spinal Anesthesia (SA) vs. General Anesthesia (GA). The pain scores around the clock were measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively. Also, the two groups were compared regarding patient satisfaction at the time of ambulation. The surgery outcomes were measured using International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaires ICIQ. Data were entered and analyzed by SPSS software. Results: There was no significant relationship between parity, previous non-cesarean abdominal surgery, and urinary complications. However, there was a statistically significant difference between pain score in the two groups; while the postoperative days were not different in the two groups of anesthesia methods Conclusion: Considering the different influence of treatment methods for this disease, further research is needed to clarify, the results of anatomical, and anatomical outcomes after treatment for pelvic floor disorders in women.

Keywords

Pain in the first 24 hours after surgery

References

1.
References are in the PDF file of the article.

comments

Crossmark

Checking

Share on

Comments

Number of Comments:0

Cited by

CrossRef 0

Metrics

Get Permission (article level)

Purchasing Reprints

Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) handles bulk orders for article reprints for Brieflands. To place an order for reprints, please click here ( https://www.copyright.com/landing/reprintsinquiryform/ ). Clicking this link will bring you to a CCC request form where you can provide the details of your order. Once complete, please click the ‘Submit Request’ button and CCC’s Reprints Services team will generate a quote for your review.

Search Relations

Author(s):

Maryam Deldarpasikhani:[PubMed][Scholar]
Negar Eftekhar:[PubMed][Scholar]
Mohammad Mireskandari:[PubMed][Scholar]
Jalil Makarem:[PubMed][Scholar]
Arash Zamani:[PubMed][Scholar]
Fahimeh Ghotbizadeh Vahdani:[PubMed][Scholar]
Razieh Akbari:[PubMed][Scholar]
Nourieh Ghattan Kashani:[PubMed][Scholar]