https://doi.org/10.5812/compreped.108704

The Impact of Maternal Breast Milk in Preventing Necrotizing Enterocolitis: A Narrative Review

authors:

avatar Siamak Afaghi ORCID 1 , avatar Fateme Sadat Rahimi ORCID 1 , avatar Farzad Esmaeili Tarki ORCID 1 , avatar Sahar Yazdani 1 , avatar Amirhossein Hosseini ORCID 1 , * , avatar Aliakbar Sayyari ORCID 1 , **

Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Research Center, Research Institute for Children’s Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Corresponding Authors:
Journal of Comprehensive Pediatrics: Vol.12, issue 1; e108704
published online: February 22, 2021
article type: Review Article
received: September 30, 2020
revised: December 28, 2020
accepted: January 16, 2021

how to cite: Afaghi S, Rahimi F S , Esmaeili Tarki F, Yazdani S, Hosseini A, et al. The Impact of Maternal Breast Milk in Preventing Necrotizing Enterocolitis: A Narrative Review. J Compr Ped. 2021;12(1):e108704. https://doi.org/10.5812/compreped.108704.

Abstract

Context:

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), as a life-threatening gastrointestinal tract disease, is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Extensive inflammation, progressive hemorrhagic necrosis, and overwhelming infection of the gut are reasons why NEC is known as a devastating disease in premature infants. Almost 45% of affected preterm infants die, and those who survive suffer from multiple complications. Human milk, the best food for newborns, plays a significant role in supporting the immune system. Both mother’s own milk (MOM) and donor human milk (DHM) are particularly important in the prevention and lessening of the severity of NEC.

Evidence Acquisition:

We searched PubMed, Elsevier, and Google Scholar databases for articles that investigated the correlation between NEC and human milk. Then all data were accessed about their relevancy to this current subject.

Results:

In summary, the purpose of this article is to firstly review the protective role of breast milk components against NEC, and secondly discussing the correlation between human milk and NEC in clinical studies. Human milk bio-components, including Lactoferrin, oligosaccharides, maternal soluble IgA, epidermal growth factor, transforming growth factor, prebiotic, probiotics, and antioxidants, have a protective effect against NEC. However, the importance of these components in donor human milk and the formula is underestimated.

Conclusions:

Human milk, as the first-choice of nutritional source, comprises a wide diversity of copious bio-components, which dwindle the risk and severity of NEC in many ways. The exact mechanisms are still unclear, the evidence strongly point out that human milk is superior to any other nutrition concerning protecting the gastrointestinal tract from NEC.

1. Context

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), as a devastating and life-threatening gastrointestinal tract disease, mostly affects infants born with low (or very low) birth weight (1). About 5 to 10% of premature infants with less than 1500 gr of born weight develop NEC (2). Alongside prematurity as the most significant risk factor, black ethnicity, assisted ventilation, cesarean section, surfactant therapy, exchange transfusion, hypotension, and gestational diabetes may contribute to invasion of pathogens, deep injuries, and demolitions of the bowel wall in NEC (3). In addition, prognostic factors including intestinal bacterial overgrowth, sepsis, impaired blood supply, lack of oxygen supply, intestinal damages, inappropriate nutrition (e.g., fortified supplements) contribute to infants' vulnerability to NEC. Histopathologically, a compromised immune system keeps the gastrointestinal tract of infants incomplete and is recognized as a trigger. A brief overview of NEC is provided in Figure 1 (4, 5).

Pathogenesis of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC)
Pathogenesis of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC)
Figure 1.

Pathogenesis of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC)

The mortality rate of NEC is notably high. Besides, the mortality rate of those who need surgical interventions is up to 50% (6). Infants who survive NEC have various short- and long-term complications such as intestinal stricture, short bowel syndrome, cholestasis, liver disease, and feeding difficulties (6). In addition, they suffer from some degrees of poor growth and increased risk of neuro-development impairments (7). While in the early 2000s, NEC was the most common gastrointestinal emergency in neonatal intensive care units (NICU) in the United States (8), fortunately, its incidence has declined in recent years. This decline can be attributed to paying special attention to purposeful preventive efforts such as encouraging all mothers to feed their baby by mother’s own milk (MOM) or preparing the donor human milk (DHM) as an alternative option (9-12). Multiple studies mentioned the prospective advantages of mother’s milk, particularly in the first months of the newborn’s life. Bio-components of human milk support the immune system of newborns. Nevertheless, many mothers of preterm infants’ have difficulties in breastfeeding their infants because of their breast immaturity due to preterm labor. Some of them also suffer from problems in breastfeeding initiation. In spite of these problems, several countries still do not have human milk banks to provide DHM. Therefore, sometimes commercial and fortified milk are preferred options (13). Human milk bio-components are remarkably different from fortified supplements and formulas in terms of immune factors, minerals, vitamins, and cellular contents, with the consideration that these are actually much more abundant in human breast milk (14). Moreover, the donor milk pasteurizing process, including freezing or high-temperature exposure, inevitably causes significant differences, particularly in its immunity power of DHM, compared to the MOM. The current study intended to review human milk bio-components' role in preventing NEC evaluated in the recent studies, and then make our discussion by taking a look at the clinical studies on the role of human milk in NEC.

2. Evidence Acquisition

2.1. Search Strategy

We systematically searched CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane databases in order to find relevant articles published from 1 January 2000 to 30 June 2016 using various combinations of the following search terms: "Breast Milk and Necrotizing Enterocolitis," "Donor Milk and Necrotizing Enterocolitis," and "Human Milk and Necrotizing Enterocolitis." To ensure comprehensiveness of the search, references of identified articles were also hand-searched. Due to the new advances in neonatology, such as a narrower diagnosis of NEC, early initiation and completion of full-feedings, as well as improved preterm formulas and HM fortifiers, the research team decided to limit the search to articles published after January 2000.

2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Articles were deemed suitable for review if 1- they involved premature infants receiving HM feedings, 2- a primary or secondary result was NEC, and 3- an original data-driven study was identified. The following studies were excluded: animal experiments, quality management programs, case notes, case series, recommendations, book chapters, and review papers. According to the abovementioned criteria, of 393 identified and evaluated articles, 29 were excluded.

For definite exclusion criteria and duplication, abstracts of papers found by the initial search were screened. The full-text of the remaining publications was then obtained and fully reviewed, and evaluated for their eligibility. In case of a disagreement, a consensus was reached through discussion. Each reviewer used a standard table for all final articles to collect data, including demographic detail, research design, HM type, dosage given, result, and level of evidence.

2.3. Quality Assessment

Using the Standard of Evidence grading scale from the Centre of Evidence-Based Medicine, Oxford, United Kingdom, the degree of evidence was calculated. This approach assesses the quality of evidence on the basis of a numerical scale (1-5) and an alphabetical scale (a-c). Instead of diagnosis or prognosis, the standard of evidence for this analysis focused on therapy or prevention. The standard of proof for each analysis was separately measured and graded by each reviewer, and findings were compared and debated before consensus was achieved.

2.4. Data Synthesis and Reporting

For each sample, the form and dosage of HM were recorded. The experiments were divided into 3 groups to promote data synthesis: studies that have investigated a DHM, an EHM diet, and the HM (MOM and/or DHM) dosage.

3. Results

Breast milk, in addition to providing an energy source for newborns, plays a major role in supporting the infant's immune system. The most crucial bio-components found in human milk are listed in Table 1. In this section, we have reviewed the most critical and well-recognized constituent elements of human milk, which have key effects on protecting infants against NEC (Table 1).

Table 1.

Main Bio-components of Human Milk That Play a Role in Infant’s Immune System Development

Bio-componentsFuturesFunctionReferences
Cells
MacrophagesContain of soluble Ig-AImprove B and T cell function(15, 16)
NeutrophilsDecreased polarity and motility; High expressed levels of CD11b and L-selectinMild role in development of infant’s immunity(17, 18)
Lymphocyte TOver 80 percent of total CD4 and CD8 typesMaturation of infant’s T cells; Thymus development; Protection against viruses(19-21)
Lymphocyte BClass-switched memory B cell phenotype mostly CD44+ and CD38+Spontaneously Ig secretion; Development of infants humeral immune system(22)
Stem cells-Regeneration and repairmen(23)
Growth factors
IGF-Stimulation of development; Increased hemoglobin (RBC); Immune system modulation(24-27)
NGF-Stimulation of neural development and maturation(24-27)
EGF-Stimulation of cell layers proliferation and maturation(24-27)
Prebiotics
HmosIndigestible carbohydratesIncrease nutrient availability of intestinal flora; Bacterial anti –adhesive reduced intestinal permeability; Prebiotic property(28, 29)
BifidobacteriumGram- positive, none- motile bacteriaProviding infant’s normal gut flora(30)
LactobacillusGram-positive, facultative anaerobic or microaerophilicProviding infant’s normal gut flora(30)
Proteins
Lysozyme-Bactericidal(31)
Lactoferrin-Maturation of Intestinal Cells; Immune System Development; Iron absorption bactericidal(32, 33)
Amino acids
CytrolineNitric oxide cycle regulatorIncreased Intestinal blood supply; Free radical inhibition(34, 35)
ArginineNitric oxide cycle regulatorIncreased intestinal blood supply; Free radical inhibition(34, 35)
Immunoglobulins
Ig-ASoluble Ig-A (sig-A)Pathogen anti-adhesive(36-38)
Ig-GIgg1, igg2, igg3, igg4Phagocyte cells activation; Anti-inflammation; Activate allergen response cycle(36, 38)
Ig-M-Agglutination,(36, 38)
Cytokines
IFN-Y-Stimulation of Th1 cells; Pro-inflammatory characteristic(25, 27)
TGF-β2-T cell phenotype switch promotion(27, 39, 40)
TNF-α-Activation of inflammatory immune factors(27, 41, 42)
Interleukins
IL-1β-Lymphocyte activating factor(27, 43)
IL-6-Stimulation of B cell types pro-inflammatory(40, 44)
IL-7-Development of thymus(45)
IL-8-Neutrophils recruitment(44, 46, 47)
IL-10-Th1 cells repression; Stimulation of Ab production(44, 48)

3.1. Lactoferrin

Lactoferrin, known as a plentiful multifunctional glycoprotein in human milk, plays a key role in the innate immune system, with the features of being antibacterial, antiviral, anti-parasitic, and anti-allergic (13, 49, 50). By disrupting the membrane of bacteria, Lactoferrin inhibits bacterial infections (49, 50). It also plays an important role in the improvement of cell layers of the intestine (51), proliferation and differentiation of B and T lymphocytic cells (52), and absorption of ferric iron (15). Some randomized controlled trials demonstrated that the oral Lactoferrin, as a prophylactic treatment in infants, could lessen the risk of NEC (16, 17). A randomized placebo-controlled trial study with 2203 participants performed in 2019 reported that milk fortified by bovine lactoferrin was associated with reduced risk of mortality as well as delayed onset of sepsis in preterm infants (18).

3.2. Lysozyme

Lysozyme, as a strong bio-active enzyme in human milk, is known for its antibacterial and anti-viral properties (19). Lysozyme binds to polysaccharides of bacterial cell layers and cleaves them (20). Paneth cells are the human gastrointestinal secretory epithelial cells that produce various antibacterial peptides, including lysozyme (21). Some case-control studies reported decreased levels of Paneth cells in the intestinal cell layers of newborns suffering from NEC compared to healthy newborns (22, 23).

3.3. Immunoglobulins

The most abundant immunoglobulins in human milk are IgA, IgM, and IgG. (24). IgM and IgG are less prevalent, and their immunity enhancement is lower than IgA (24, 25). IgA is the most abundant human milk antibody. Besides, it is a noticeable content of the total protein of colostrum. Breast milk IgA has an important antimicrobial defense mechanism in the neonatal gastrointestinal tract by inhibiting pathogens, especially Enterobacteriaceae, from binding to the mucosal surfaces or neutralizing microbial toxins (25, 26). As IgA is not available in formula and fortified milk, their frequent consumption causes significant insufficient immunity. Although some studies showed that in NEC patients, there is an elevated level of IgA-unbound Enterobacteriaceae (27). Foster j. and Cole M. did not show any effect on the prevention of NEC (28).

3.4. Epidermal Growth Factor

Maternal milk and colostrum contain epidermal growth factor (EGF), which inhibits maturation of the intestinal mucosal barrier (5, 29). A clinical study has illustrated the significance of EGF in protecting the intestine against NEC (30). Intestinal epithelial homeostasis is achieved by the main role of EGF in repairing and developing it, which is an important barrier against pathogens (29, 31). On the other hand, significantly low serum levels of EGF in infants with NEC indicates the importance of EGF as a reliable marker that contributes to NEC (32).

3.5. Transforming Growth Factor-β2

High levels of transforming growth factor-β2 (TGF-β2) in breast milk is known as a stromal cell-derived factor, affecting intestinal maturation and immune response (33). TGF-β2 regulates T-cells responses as an invigoration of cell-mediated immunity system, which plays an important role against NEC (33, 34). Breastfeed infants have higher serum levels of TGF-β2 than formula-feeding infants (35). A case-control study, using investigatory analyses, concluded that NEC patients did not have TGF-β (36).

3.6. Antioxidants

Hypo-perfusion, lack of oxygen, ischemia, sepsis or microbial infections, and inflammation are associated with increased levels of reactive oxygen species, hence turning cells into the oxidative stress state and consequently producing free radicals as a cell interrupter (37). Vitamin E, Carotene, Citrulline, Glutamine, Arginine, and Melatonin are effective radical scavengers and antioxidant agents exerting pleiotropic actions (38-41). About 4% of amino acids in human milk are free amino acids (42). Citrulline and Arginine are essential for the formation of nitric oxide (NO), which regulates intestinal blood flow by accelerating the availability of antioxidant and anti-inflammatory factors. Therefore, it is argued that the reduced level of circulatory amino acids, such as Glutamine and Arginine, is associated with an elevated risk of NEC development (43). A systematic review study by Mitchell K and Lytle A. suggested that L-arginine supplementation is an appropriate intervention to prevent NEC (41).

3.7. Human Milk Oligosaccharides

Human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs) are the most plentiful dissolved and emulsified components, after lactose and lipids, found in the breast milk, which are known as multifunctional and indigestible carbohydrates (44-46). HMOs prevent NEC by supporting epithelial cells, inhibiting bacterial adhesion, and speeding up the healing process of the intestine by precipitating the turnover of crypt cells. HMOs also have a modifying role concerning bacterial infections of the intestines (47). Several studies reported the undeniable role of HMOs against NEC. So far, the exact molecular mechanisms of the influence of HMOs are not completely revealed (48, 53).

3.8. Bifidogenic Factors

Human milk contains sufficient prebiotics for infants' intestinal normal flora, including Bifidobacterium species (known as bifidogenic factors) (54, 55). Bifidogenic effect of human milk not only depends on various components such as lactoferrin, lactose, nucleotides, and HMOs, but also relies on the regulated concentration of phosphate, pH, and proteins (56). HMOs are the main bioactive component with prebiotic properties (57). These factors regulate intestinal epithelial homeostasis, inhibit over-colonization of invasive groups of bacteria, and decrease the risk of NEC (58).

3.9. Probiotics

Prebiotic characteristics of human milk affect the type and species of the microbial in the infant’s body. Probiotics protect the gut by inhibiting over colonization of pathogenic bacterial groups (59). Gut flora changes are due to the administrations of Antibiotics; in fact, it increases the risk of NEC (60, 61). The quantity of Bifidobacterium, as the main intestinal normal flora, is less abundant in premature infants (62); In a case-control study, infants suffering from NEC had fewer Bifidobacterium (in their intestine) compared to the controlled group (63). It is well proved that breastfeeding infants have a greater abundance of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacilli in their stool culture. In contrast, formula-fed infants had a higher number of Enterobacteriaceae and Bactericides in their stool culture (64). Likewise, the overgrowth of Enterobacteriaceae is correlated with NEC (65).

4. Discussion

The amazing bio-components of human milk can inhibit NEC development in infants, whether they are coming from MOM or DHM, in contrast to Formulas, which are not rich in any of these curtail factors. Nevertheless, there are considerable differences between MOM and DHM.

The milk collected from donors undergoes different processes, like exposure to light, air, different temperatures, multiple cycles of freezing, and pasteurizing in order to ensure the safety of the product. Not only do these procedures alter the bio-components of MOM, but also they may become inactivated or useless over time. We should bear in mind that DHM is received from mothers with several months of breast milk expression, which is actually different in ingredients compared to the first-days expression milk. (66-69). The best example is the changing level of the human milk lactoferrin during lactating in both term and preterm mothers (70). It has been demonstrated that in the mothers' first days of lactating, Lactoferrin is at its highest levels (9 gr/L), then it drops gradually during the first month to half and subsequently to 2.5 gr/L by the end of the second months (50). By the way, premature infants may need to use DHM due to the inefficacy of their mother’s milk to meet their baby’s needs. Additionally, a study on extra premature infants indicated that merely 30% of mothers could meet their infants' needs during the hospitalization in NICU (71, 72). Nonetheless, it seems that DHM might be used as a suitable temporary substitute for preterm infants, whose mothers have not yet achieved sufficient breastfeeding (73).

The use of the formula is expected in mothers who cannot provide a sufficient amount of milk, living in non-DHM banks counties. A prospective study on 926 preterm infants reported that feeding options for babies were either only human milk, human milk plus formula, and only fed formula. This interventional change in nutrition was introduced in early post-birth. By evaluating the 31 confirmed NEC cases, they found that confirmed NEC has up to ten-fold probability in babies fed with the only formula, as compared to those receiving exclusively human milk. Also, it is reported that confirmed NEC has a three-fold commonality in those who received formula plus human milk. Additionally, in infants born > 30 weeks of gestational age, feeding with the formula (without human milk) increases the risk of NEC by 20 times compared to feeding with human milk (MOM and/or DHM) (74, 75). In the same vein, a clinical trial study demonstrated that preterm infants with less than thirty weeks of gestational age were more affected by NEC when nourished by DHM and formula in comparison with solitary MOM fed infants (76). In addition, two studies vividly showed that infants with a nutrition history of human milk manifested much milder signs and symptoms of NEC (77, 78). In other words, it can be argued that breast milk not only has an important protective role but also alleviates the severity of NEC symptoms, whether is used as a supplement to formula feeding (79).

On the other hand, the feeding introduction timing and volume to newborn, has an important effect on outcomes or risk of NEC. The early introduction of breastfeeding is related to abate in the incidence of NEC. A retrospective assessment of 1272 infants showed that the probability of NEC or death after two weeks was declined by an extent of 0.83 for each 10% rise in the quota of total intake of human milk (80). Besides, in a research on 1028 premature infants, focusing on the comparison between those who developed NEC and circumstantially matched controls, it is shown that if the infants had received MOM for less than a week, there was a four-time elevated risk for NEC. This indicates that even a few days of being fed by MOM can have a protective effect against NEC (81). Also, analyzed data suggest that, in an extremely premature population, the protective features of the early onset of human milk last for a long time (73).

It worth noting that the regulation of the consumption volume of milk is one of the important keys in infants' health. A study has shown that a 100 ml/kg increase in the consumption of human milk, was associated with decreased risk of NEC. This decline was specifically observed in infants born with less than 1000 gr weight, and only if the human milk consumption had taken place in the first two weeks of life (82). Accordingly, another research has come to this conclusion that maternal feeding containing at least 50% human milk in the first two weeks of life is associated with decreased incidence of NEC (by about six-folds) (83). Also, the importance of dose-dependent preserving effects of human milk has been widely shown elsewhere. By comparing those fed on a comprised diet with less than 50% MOM, those receiving a diet with more than 50% MOM in the first two weeks after birth rendered an 83% decrease in the subsequent progression of NEC in infants. Astonishingly, initiating MOM even at a dosage of around 45% in the first 5 days can decrease the incidence of later NEC, sepsis, and/or death within the first two-month of life (84). In addition, a systematic review study on 3753 infants born with very low weight has assessed slow and faster rates of feeding in a comparison manner. It is concluded that infants fed more quickly had a lower risk of severe infections (57). While the daily dose is required to detect the difference in health benefits, this amount should not be the ultimate goal (13); as shown by Berseth and colleagues, increasing the feeding volume, instead of maintaining a prolonged feeding volume, in the first 10 days of life is associated with increased risk of NEC, and this isn't followed by improvement in motor function nor feeding tolerance (85).

4.1. Conclusions

Human milk, as a food choice of the newborn, consists of an incredible variety of biological components that reduce the risk or severity of Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC). Based on these facts, recent evidence distinctly emphasized the preference of breast milk to any alternative food types. Even though DHM is human milk but it is not the same in terms of quantity and quality of MOM’s ingredients that play an important role in supporting the innate immune system as well as preventing NEC development. Despite the benefits of MOM, there are some infants that cannot benefit from breastfeeding. DHM or MOM may be appropriate options for these infants, even in a small amount, compared to only formula feeding. Moreover, the onset of early feeding with human milk in a suitable portion and volume can improve the outcomes. In conclusion, the most preferable food for newborns is MOM that yields the best results.

References

  • 1.

    Mupsilonller MJ, Paul T, Seeliger S. Necrotizing enterocolitis in premature infants and newborns. J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2016;9(3):233-42. [PubMed ID: 27589549]. https://doi.org/10.3233/NPM-16915130.

  • 2.

    Samuels N, van de Graaf RA, de Jonge RCJ, Reiss IKM, Vermeulen MJ. Risk factors for necrotizing enterocolitis in neonates: a systematic review of prognostic studies. BMC Pediatr. 2017;17(1):105. [PubMed ID: 28410573]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5391569]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-017-0847-3.

  • 3.

    Neu J, Walker WA. Necrotizing enterocolitis. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(3):255-64. [PubMed ID: 21247316]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3628622]. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1005408.

  • 4.

    Gordon PV, Clark R, Swanson JR, Spitzer A. Can a national dataset generate a nomogram for necrotizing enterocolitis onset? J Perinatol. 2014;34(10):732-5. [PubMed ID: 25078862]. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2014.137.

  • 5.

    Nolan LS, Parks OB, Good M. A review of the immunomodulating components of maternal breast milk and protection against necrotizing enterocolitis. Nutrients. 2019;12(1). [PubMed ID: 31861718]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7019368]. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12010014.

  • 6.

    Bazacliu C, Neu J. Necrotizing enterocolitis: Long term complications. Curr Pediatr Rev. 2019;15(2):115-24. [PubMed ID: 30864508]. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573396315666190312093119.

  • 7.

    Hintz SR, Kendrick DE, Stoll BJ, Vohr BR, Fanaroff AA, Donovan EF, et al. Neurodevelopmental and growth outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants after necrotizing enterocolitis. Pediatrics. 2005;115(3):696-703. [PubMed ID: 15741374]. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2004-0569.

  • 8.

    Kosloske AM. Epidemiology of necrotizing enterocolitis. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 1994;396:2-7. [PubMed ID: 8086675]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7159721]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.1994.tb13232.x.

  • 9.

    Battersby C, Santhakumaran S, Upton M, Radbone L, Birch J, Modi N, et al. The impact of a regional care bundle on maternal breast milk use in preterm infants: outcomes of the East of England quality improvement programme. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2014;99(5):F395-401. [PubMed ID: 24876197]. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2013-305475.

  • 10.

    Kim JH. Necrotizing enterocolitis: the road to zero. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;19(1):39-44. [PubMed ID: 24268863]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2013.10.001.

  • 11.

    Meier P, Patel A, Esquerra-Zwiers A. Donor human milk update: Evidence, mechanisms, and priorities for research and practice. J Pediatr. 2017;180:15-21. [PubMed ID: 27773337]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5183469]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.09.027.

  • 12.

    Parker MG, Patel AL. Using quality improvement to increase human milk use for preterm infants. Semin Perinatol. 2017;41(3):175-86. [PubMed ID: 28545652]. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2017.03.007.

  • 13.

    Griffiths J, Jenkins P, Vargova M, Bowler U, Juszczak E, King A, et al. Enteral lactoferrin to prevent infection for very preterm infants: the ELFIN RCT. Health Technol Assess. 2018;22(74):1-60. [PubMed ID: 30574860]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6322062]. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta22740.

  • 14.

    Sullivan S, Schanler RJ, Kim JH, Patel AL, Trawoger R, Kiechl-Kohlendorfer U, et al. An exclusively human milk-based diet is associated with a lower rate of necrotizing enterocolitis than a diet of human milk and bovine milk-based products. J Pediatr. 2010;156(4):562-7 e1. [PubMed ID: 20036378]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.10.040.

  • 15.

    Davidsson L, Kastenmayer P, Yuen M, Lonnerdal B, Hurrell RF. Influence of lactoferrin on iron absorption from human milk in infants. Pediatr Res. 1994;35(1):117-24. [PubMed ID: 8134189]. https://doi.org/10.1203/00006450-199401000-00025.

  • 16.

    Pammi M, Suresh G. Enteral lactoferrin supplementation for prevention of sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;6. CD007137. [PubMed ID: 28658720]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6481465]. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007137.pub5.

  • 17.

    He Y, Cao L, Yu J. Prophylactic lactoferrin for preventing late-onset sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(35). e11976. [PubMed ID: 30170397]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6392939]. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011976.

  • 18.

    ELFIN Trial Investigators Group. Enteral lactoferrin supplementation for very preterm infants: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10170):423-33. [PubMed ID: 30635141]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6356450]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32221-9.

  • 19.

    Ragland SA, Criss AK. From bacterial killing to immune modulation: Recent insights into the functions of lysozyme. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13(9). e1006512. [PubMed ID: 28934357]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5608400]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006512.

  • 20.

    Gajda E, Bugla-Ploskonska G. [Lysozyme--occurrence in nature, biological properties and possible applications]. Postepy Hig Med Dosw (Online). 2014;68:1501-15. [PubMed ID: 25531714]. https://doi.org/10.5604/17322693.1133100.

  • 21.

    Elphick DA, Mahida YR. Paneth cells: their role in innate immunity and inflammatory disease. Gut. 2005;54(12):1802-9. [PubMed ID: 16284290]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC1774800]. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2005.068601.

  • 22.

    McElroy SJ, Prince LS, Weitkamp JH, Reese J, Slaughter JC, Polk DB. Tumor necrosis factor receptor 1-dependent depletion of mucus in immature small intestine: a potential role in neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2011;301(4):G656-66. [PubMed ID: 21737776]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3191555]. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00550.2010.

  • 23.

    Coutinho HB, da Mota HC, Coutinho VB, Robalinho TI, Furtado AF, Walker E, et al. Absence of lysozyme (muramidase) in the intestinal Paneth cells of newborn infants with necrotising enterocolitis. J Clin Pathol. 1998;51(7):512-4. [PubMed ID: 9797727]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC500803]. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.51.7.512.

  • 24.

    Rogier EW, Frantz AL, Bruno ME, Wedlund L, Cohen DA, Stromberg AJ, et al. Secretory antibodies in breast milk promote long-term intestinal homeostasis by regulating the gut microbiota and host gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(8):3074-9. [PubMed ID: 24569806]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3939878]. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1315792111.

  • 25.

    Trend S, Strunk T, Lloyd ML, Kok CH, Metcalfe J, Geddes DT, et al. Levels of innate immune factors in preterm and term mothers' breast milk during the 1st month postpartum. Br J Nutr. 2016;115(7):1178-93. [PubMed ID: 26891901]. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114516000234.

  • 26.

    Hsu YC, Chen CH, Lin MC, Tsai CR, Liang JT, Wang TM. Changes in preterm breast milk nutrient content in the first month. Pediatr Neonatol. 2014;55(6):449-54. [PubMed ID: 24861533]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedneo.2014.03.002.

  • 27.

    Gopalakrishna KP, Macadangdang BR, Rogers MB, Tometich JT, Firek BA, Baker R, et al. Maternal IgA protects against the development of necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants. Nat Med. 2019;25(7):1110-5. [PubMed ID: 31209335]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7424541]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0480-9.

  • 28.

    Foster J, Cole M. Oral immunoglobulin for preventing necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm and low birth-weight neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(1). CD001816. [PubMed ID: 14973972]. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001816.pub2.

  • 29.

    Nair RR, Warner BB, Warner BW. Role of epidermal growth factor and other growth factors in the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis. Semin Perinatol. 2008;32(2):107-13. [PubMed ID: 18346534]. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2008.01.007.

  • 30.

    Coursodon CF, Dvorak B. Epidermal growth factor and necrotizing enterocolitis. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2012;24(2):160-4. [PubMed ID: 22227788]. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0b013e3283504ddb.

  • 31.

    Clark JA, Doelle SM, Halpern MD, Saunders TA, Holubec H, Dvorak K, et al. Intestinal barrier failure during experimental necrotizing enterocolitis: protective effect of EGF treatment. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2006;291(5):G938-49. [PubMed ID: 16798726]. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00090.2006.

  • 32.

    Ahmed HM, Kamel NM. The relation between serum levels of epidermal growth factor and necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm neonates. Korean J Pediatr. 2019;62(8):307-11. [PubMed ID: 30999731]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6702115]. https://doi.org/10.3345/kjp.2018.07108.

  • 33.

    Sitarik AR, Bobbitt KR, Havstad SL, Fujimura KE, Levin AM, Zoratti EM, et al. Breast milk transforming growth factor beta is associated with neonatal gut microbial composition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017;65(3):e60-7. [PubMed ID: 28827481]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5596927]. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000001585.

  • 34.

    Tanner SM, Berryhill TF, Ellenburg JL, Jilling T, Cleveland DS, Lorenz RG, et al. Pathogenesis of necrotizing enterocolitis: modeling the innate immune response. Am J Pathol. 2015;185(1):4-16. [PubMed ID: 25447054]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4278236]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.08.028.

  • 35.

    Abou Saif IS, I H Ismail R, Zaki WK, Aa Hamed AER. Serum transforming growth factor beta 2 and feeding intolerance in hydrolyzed protein formula-fed versus breast milk-fed preterm neonates. QJM. 2018;111(suppl_1). https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcy200.143.

  • 36.

    Maheshwari A, Kelly DR, Nicola T, Ambalavanan N, Jain SK, Murphy-Ullrich J, et al. TGF-beta2 suppresses macrophage cytokine production and mucosal inflammatory responses in the developing intestine. Gastroenterology. 2011;140(1):242-53. [PubMed ID: 20875417]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3008335]. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2010.09.043.

  • 37.

    Bhattacharyya A, Chattopadhyay R, Mitra S, Crowe SE. Oxidative stress: an essential factor in the pathogenesis of gastrointestinal mucosal diseases. Physiol Rev. 2014;94(2):329-54. [PubMed ID: 24692350]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4044300]. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00040.2012.

  • 38.

    Katzer D, Pauli L, Mueller A, Reutter H, Reinsberg J, Fimmers R, et al. Melatonin concentrations and antioxidative capacity of human breast milk according to gestational age and the time of day. J Hum Lact. 2016;32(4):NP105-10. [PubMed ID: 27121237]. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334415625217.

  • 39.

    Kul M, Vurucu S, Demirkaya E, Tunc T, Aydinoz S, Meral C, et al. Enteral glutamine and/or arginine supplementation have favorable effects on oxidative stress parameters in neonatal rat intestine. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2009;49(1):85-9. [PubMed ID: 19503000]. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0b013e318198cd36.

  • 40.

    Manzoni P, Guardione R, Bonetti P, Priolo C, Maestri A, Mansoldo C, et al. Lutein and zeaxanthin supplementation in preterm very low-birth-weight neonates in neonatal intensive care units: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Am J Perinatol. 2013;30(1):25-32. [PubMed ID: 22773282]. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1321494.

  • 41.

    Mitchell K, Lyttle A, Amin H, Shaireen H, Robertson HL, Lodha AK. Arginine supplementation in prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis in the premature infant: an updated systematic review. BMC Pediatr. 2014;14:226. [PubMed ID: 25205007]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4166475]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-14-226.

  • 42.

    Agostoni C, Carratu B, Boniglia C, Lammardo AM, Riva E, Sanzini E. Free glutamine and glutamic acid increase in human milk through a three-month lactation period. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2000;31(5):508-12. [PubMed ID: 11144435]. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005176-200011000-00011.

  • 43.

    Becker RM, Wu G, Galanko JA, Chen W, Maynor AR, Bose CL, et al. Reduced serum amino acid concentrations in infants with necrotizing enterocolitis. J Pediatr. 2000;137(6):785-93. [PubMed ID: 11113834]. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpd.2000.109145.

  • 44.

    Autran CA, Kellman BP, Kim JH, Asztalos E, Blood AB, Spence ECH, et al. Human milk oligosaccharide composition predicts risk of necrotising enterocolitis in preterm infants. Gut. 2018;67(6):1064-70. [PubMed ID: 28381523]. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312819.

  • 45.

    Fuchs SC, Victora CG, Martines J. Case-control study of risk of dehydrating diarrhoea in infants in vulnerable period after full weaning. BMJ. 1996;313(7054):391-4. [PubMed ID: 8761225]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2351803]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7054.391.

  • 46.

    He Y, Lawlor NT, Newburg DS. Human milk components modulate toll-like receptor-mediated inflammation. Adv Nutr. 2016;7(1):102-11. [PubMed ID: 26773018]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4717889]. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.115.010090.

  • 47.

    Yu ZT, Chen C, Kling DE, Liu B, McCoy JM, Merighi M, et al. The principal fucosylated oligosaccharides of human milk exhibit prebiotic properties on cultured infant microbiota. Glycobiology. 2013;23(2):169-77. [PubMed ID: 23028202]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3531294]. https://doi.org/10.1093/glycob/cws138.

  • 48.

    Jantscher-Krenn E, Zherebtsov M, Nissan C, Goth K, Guner YS, Naidu N, et al. The human milk oligosaccharide disialyllacto-N-tetraose prevents necrotising enterocolitis in neonatal rats. Gut. 2012;61(10):1417-25. [PubMed ID: 22138535]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3909680]. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301404.

  • 49.

    Gifford JL, Hunter HN, Vogel HJ. Lactoferricin: a lactoferrin-derived peptide with antimicrobial, antiviral, antitumor and immunological properties. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2005;62(22):2588-98. [PubMed ID: 16261252]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-005-5373-z.

  • 50.

    Rai D, Adelman AS, Zhuang W, Rai GP, Boettcher J, Lonnerdal B. Longitudinal changes in lactoferrin concentrations in human milk: a global systematic review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2014;54(12):1539-47. [PubMed ID: 24580556]. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2011.642422.

  • 51.

    Zhao X, Xu XX, Liu Y, Xi EZ, An JJ, Tabys D, et al. The in vitro protective role of bovine lactoferrin on intestinal epithelial barrier. Molecules. 2019;24(1). [PubMed ID: 30609730]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6337092]. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24010148.

  • 52.

    Actor JK, Hwang SA, Kruzel ML. Lactoferrin as a natural immune modulator. Curr Pharm Des. 2009;15(17):1956-73. [PubMed ID: 19519436]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2915836]. https://doi.org/10.2174/138161209788453202.

  • 53.

    Patel AL, Kim JH. Human milk and necrotizing enterocolitis. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2018;27(1):34-8. [PubMed ID: 29275815]. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2017.11.007.

  • 54.

    Simpson MR, Avershina E, Storro O, Johnsen R, Rudi K, Oien T. Breastfeeding-associated microbiota in human milk following supplementation with Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5, and Bifidobacterium animalis ssp. lactis Bb-12. J Dairy Sci. 2018;101(2):889-99. [PubMed ID: 29248229]. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13411.

  • 55.

    Coppa GV, Zampini L, Galeazzi T, Gabrielli O. Prebiotics in human milk: a review. Dig Liver Dis. 2006;38 Suppl 2:S291-4. [PubMed ID: 17259094]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1590-8658(07)60013-9.

  • 56.

    Sodhi C, Richardson W, Gribar S, Hackam DJ. The development of animal models for the study of necrotizing enterocolitis. Dis Model Mech. 2008;1(2-3):94-8. [PubMed ID: 19048070]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2562191]. https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.000315.

  • 57.

    Oddie SJ, Young L, McGuire W. Slow advancement of enteral feed volumes to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;8. CD001241. [PubMed ID: 28854319]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6483766]. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001241.pub7.

  • 58.

    Bering SB. Human milk oligosaccharides to prevent gut dysfunction and necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm neonates. Nutrients. 2018;10(10). [PubMed ID: 30297668]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6213229]. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10101461.

  • 59.

    Frost BL, Modi BP, Jaksic T, Caplan MS. New medical and surgical insights into neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis: A review. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(1):83-8. [PubMed ID: 27893069]. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.2708.

  • 60.

    Bury RG, Tudehope D. Enteral antibiotics for preventing necrotizing enterocolitis in low birthweight or preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(1). CD000405. [PubMed ID: 11279690]. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000405.

  • 61.

    Carrion V, Egan EA. Prevention of neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1990;11(3):317-23. [PubMed ID: 2246712]. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005176-199010000-00006.

  • 62.

    Torrazza RM, Ukhanova M, Wang X, Sharma R, Hudak ML, Neu J, et al. Intestinal microbial ecology and environmental factors affecting necrotizing enterocolitis. PLoS One. 2013;8(12). e83304. [PubMed ID: 24386174]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3875440]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083304.

  • 63.

    Underwood MA, German JB, Lebrilla CB, Mills DA. Bifidobacterium longum subspecies infantis: champion colonizer of the infant gut. Pediatr Res. 2015;77(1-2):229-35. [PubMed ID: 25303277]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4350908]. https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2014.156.

  • 64.

    Pietzak M. Bacterial colonization of the neonatal gut. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2004;38(4):389-91. [PubMed ID: 15085016]. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005176-200404000-00005.

  • 65.

    Powell J, Bureau MA, Pare C, Gaildry ML, Cabana D, Patriquin H. Necrotizing enterocolitis. Epidemic following an outbreak of Enterobacter cloacae type 3305573 in a neonatal intensive care unit. Am J Dis Child. 1980;134(12):1152-4. [PubMed ID: 7446502].

  • 66.

    Demmelmair H, Koletzko B. Variation of metabolite and hormone contents in human milk. Clin Perinatol. 2017;44(1):151-64. [PubMed ID: 28159202]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2016.11.007.

  • 67.

    Hanson C, Lyden E, Furtado J, Van Ormer M, Anderson-Berry A. A comparison of nutritional antioxidant content in breast milk, donor milk, and infant formulas. Nutrients. 2016;8(11). [PubMed ID: 27801820]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5133069]. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu8110681.

  • 68.

    Albenzio M, Santillo A, Stolfi I, Manzoni P, Iliceto A, Rinaldi M, et al. Lactoferrin levels in human milk after preterm and term delivery. Am J Perinatol. 2016;33(11):1085-9. [PubMed ID: 27603541]. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1586105.

  • 69.

    Briere CE, Jensen T, McGrath JM, Young EE, Finck C. Stem-like cell characteristics from breast milk of mothers with preterm infants as compared to mothers with term infants. Breastfeed Med. 2017;12:174-9. [PubMed ID: 28277748]. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2017.0002.

  • 70.

    Ronayne de Ferrer PA, Baroni A, Sambucetti ME, Lopez NE, Ceriani Cernadas JM. Lactoferrin levels in term and preterm milk. J Am Coll Nutr. 2000;19(3):370-3. [PubMed ID: 10872899]. https://doi.org/10.1080/07315724.2000.10718933.

  • 71.

    Bry A, Wigert H. Psychosocial support for parents of extremely preterm infants in neonatal intensive care: a qualitative interview study. BMC Psychol. 2019;7(1):76. [PubMed ID: 31783784]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6883543]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-019-0354-4.

  • 72.

    Heidari H, Hasanpour M, Fooladi M. The experiences of parents with infants in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2013;18(3):208-13. [PubMed ID: 23983756]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3748539].

  • 73.

    Maffei D, Schanler RJ. Human milk is the feeding strategy to prevent necrotizing enterocolitis!. Semin Perinatol. 2017;41(1):36-40. [PubMed ID: 27836421]. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2016.09.016.

  • 74.

    Lee JS, Polin RA. Treatment and prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis. Semin Neonatol. 2003;8(6):449-59. [PubMed ID: 15001117]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7128229]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1084-2756(03)00123-4.

  • 75.

    Lucas A, Cole TJ. Breast milk and neonatal necrotising enterocolitis. Lancet. 1990;336(8730):1519-23. [PubMed ID: 1979363]. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(90)93304-8.

  • 76.

    Schanler RJ, Lau C, Hurst NM, Smith EO. Randomized trial of donor human milk versus preterm formula as substitutes for mothers' own milk in the feeding of extremely premature infants. Pediatrics. 2005;116(2):400-6. [PubMed ID: 16061595]. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2004-1974.

  • 77.

    Kurscheid T, Holschneider AM. Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC)--mortality and long-term results. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1993;3(3):139-43. [PubMed ID: 8353114]. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1063530.

  • 78.

    McGuire W, Anthony MY. Donor human milk versus formula for preventing necrotising enterocolitis in preterm infants: systematic review. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003;88(1):F11-4. [PubMed ID: 12496220]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC1756003]. https://doi.org/10.1136/fn.88.1.f11.

  • 79.

    Covert R, Barman N, Domanico R. Prior enteral nutrition with human milk protects against intestinal perforation in infants who develop necrotizing enterocolitis. Pediatr Res; 1995. 305 p.

  • 80.

    Meinzen-Derr J, Poindexter B, Wrage L, Morrow AL, Stoll B, Donovan EF. Role of human milk in extremely low birth weight infants' risk of necrotizing enterocolitis or death. J Perinatol. 2009;29(1):57-62. [PubMed ID: 18716628]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2801431]. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2008.117.

  • 81.

    Kimak KS, de Castro Antunes MM, Braga TD, Brandt KG, de Carvalho Lima M. Influence of enteral nutrition on occurrences of necrotizing enterocolitis in very-low-birth-weight infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015;61(4):445-50. [PubMed ID: 25944218]. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000000835.

  • 82.

    Sisk PM, Lovelady CA, Dillard RG, Gruber KJ, O'Shea TM. Early human milk feeding is associated with a lower risk of necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. J Perinatol. 2007;27(7):428-33. [PubMed ID: 17443195]. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211758.

  • 83.

    Schanler RJ, Shulman RJ, Lau C. Feeding strategies for premature infants: beneficial outcomes of feeding fortified human milk versus preterm formula. Pediatrics. 1999;103(6 Pt 1):1150-7. [PubMed ID: 10353922]. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.103.6.1150.

  • 84.

    Corpeleijn WE, Kouwenhoven SM, Paap MC, van Vliet I, Scheerder I, Muizer Y, et al. Intake of own mother's milk during the first days of life is associated with decreased morbidity and mortality in very low birth weight infants during the first 60 days of life. Neonatology. 2012;102(4):276-81. [PubMed ID: 22922675]. https://doi.org/10.1159/000341335.

  • 85.

    Berseth CL, Bisquera JA, Paje VU. Prolonging small feeding volumes early in life decreases the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2003;111(3):529-34. [PubMed ID: 12612232]. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.111.3.529.