Early treatment of ADHD can prevent many of its complications. Because of reasons which have not been determined yet, the response to treatment is not the same in patients with ADHD. In this regard, D4 receptors regulate a number of signaling events, including adenylate cyclase inhibition, stimulation of arachidonic acid release, and modification of potassium channels. The
DRD4 gene contains four exons and encodes a 387-amino acid protein. The gene is highly expressed in pyramidal, frontal cortex, and retinal neurons, but the intensity of its expression is low in basal ganglia, hippocampus, and thalamus. The relationship between the types of genetic variants in
DRD4 sequences has been investigated along with a variety of neurological diseases, and its relationship with ADHD disease has been confirmed in some studies but rejected in some others (
13). Also, some studies have investigated the effect of different polymorphisms of the gene and its response to the drug treatment that has been differently implemented in different populations (
15).
According to the results of the present study and compared to ADHD groups (responder and non-responder), no significant relationship was observed between genotype and allele frequencies of exon III VNTR and rs3758653 polymorphisms with responding to drug treatment in ADHD groups.
Also, in the non-responder group, 107 patients did not respond appropriately to drug treatment which among these, 51 (41.8%) patients showed CT genotype of rs3758653 polymorphism, and 83 (67.8%) patients showed 2R repeat allele of exon III VNTR. The total results of this study showed that the reduction of ADHD symptoms with drug treatment is not related to DRD4 sub-types in patients with ADHD.
In agreement with the results of our study, a study performed in the Korean population did not show a relationship between polymorphism of
DRD4 gene and the response to treatment with methylphenidate (
14). Also, Brookes et al. reported that the
DRD4 gene in ADHD patients in Taiwan is not related to the incidence or intensity of this disease, and the incidence of this allele is approximately the same in patients with ADHD and control group (
16).
Qian et al. performed two studies in China and did not observe a significant association between four and six repeats of VNTR alleles and the incidence of ADHD (
17,
18). These findings were confirmed by Leung et al. (
19), who investigated the repeat II VNTR alleles in patients with ADHD. Carrasco et al., in 2006, in a Chilean population, also reported a negative relationship between 7-repeats and ADHD (
20). However, contradictory findings have been reported in many studies. Tabatabaei et al. revealed two to six repeats in control alleles in all individuals under study (control and infected) at a time interval. In this study, the dominant allele was 4R, 5R, and 6R, among which 4R was the most frequent repeat (76.2% of ADHD patients and 53.8% of the control group) (P = 0.004) (
21). Moreover,
DRD4 gene polymorphisms is a risk factor for children with attention deficit. Also, Bidwell observed that 4Rrepeats in the
DRD4 gene could be significantly related to ADHD (
22). In the other study, Cheuk and Wong showed that the 4R allele was the most abundant repeat in their population with 48% abundance, and a significant relationship with ADHD was observed (
7).
According to the studies above, although 4R repeat was a clear marker for ADHD, studies in other populations, especially European and American white populations, including the study of Nikolaidis and Gray, and the study of Leung et al., showed that 7R had a significant relationship with ADHD compared to other repeats (
15,
19). In all of the above-mentioned studies that were investigated the associations, studies were performed in the form of case-control and intuitively, but the present study was a cohort study, and only the incidence of the above alleles was expressed descriptively in the present study. Therefore, we could not investigate the relationship in this study.
Treatment with methylphenidate had healing effects with increasing synaptic dopamine levels and tried to make up for the receptor’s slow response. In the current study, it was observed that the presence of DRD4 sub-types alleles in either homozygote or heterozygote forms could not change the rate of reduction in patients' symptoms, and the intensity of symptoms did not relate with this sub-type.
Jovanovic et al. suggested that there are no significant differences in presenting drugs or pharmacological cellular functions between the types of long and short repeats (
23). Hamarman revealed that ADHD patients with seven repeats (7R) require higher doses of the drug for drug treatment (
24). Also, McGough showed that there is a significant relationship between the gene and the dose of drug needed to control the disease (
25).
Therefore, the DRD4 promoter with P = 0.008 and DRD4 exon III VNTR with P = 0.006 were associated with the intensity of symptoms after drug treatment approval. Surveying the above studies show that the relationship between gene and drug treatment in patients with ADHD is relative, and it is not observed in some studies. Subsequently, many causes are likely to be involved in the response of treatment in the patients, which is called meddler causes and leads to inconsistencies in the results of this study.
5.1. Conclusions
The results of this study show that the reduction of ADHD symptoms with drug treatment is not related to DRD4 sub-types in patients with ADHD.