Paternal Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy and Infant and Young Child Feeding Practice Three Months Postpartum

authors:

avatar Seyedehzahra Kiyaeimolasaraei 1 , avatar Shahnaz Torkzahrani 2 , * , avatar Padideh Janati 2 , avatar Malihe Nasiri ORCID 3

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Department of Basic Sciences, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

how to cite: Kiyaeimolasaraei S, Torkzahrani S, Janati P, Nasiri M. Paternal Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy and Infant and Young Child Feeding Practice Three Months Postpartum. J Compr Ped.13(3):e126395. doi: 10.5812/compreped-126395.

Abstract

Background:

Breastfeeding benefits both mother and newborn and plays a significant role in controlling chronic diseases. Fathers' breastfeeding attitude and self-efficacy are their ability to help their partner breastfeed the newborn and appear to be among the factors that affect women’s breastfeeding.

Objectives:

This correlational descriptive study investigates paternal breastfeeding self-efficacy and its relationship with Infant and young child feeding practice three months postpartum.

Methods:

This study was performed in 2019 on 206 fathers. Fathers waited for the mother and baby outside the postpartum ward and filled out the paternal breastfeeding self-efficacy scale and demographic information questionnaire in the hospital. Three months after delivery, mothers were called and asked about Infant and young child feeding practices. The SPSS software version 23 was used for statistical analysis by the Spearman’s test, independent t-test, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, chi-squared test, and analysis of variance.

Results:

In the present study, 5.8% of Iranian children used formula feeding at three months of age, 74.3% were exclusively breastfed, and 19.9% received both formula feeding and breast milk. Fathers who participated in antenatal classes had a higher paternal breastfeeding self-efficacy score than the others (P = 0.003). The results showed a significant relationship between paternal cooperation in prenatal care and paternal breastfeeding self-efficacy score (P = 0.001). No correlation was found between paternal breastfeeding self-efficacy scores and infant feeding practices three months after delivery (P = 0.99).

Conclusions:

Fathers' attendance in antenatal classes and paternal cooperation in prenatal care can increase paternal breastfeeding self-efficacy.

1. Background

Breastfeeding is the source of nutrients in children aged 6 - 23 months. It plays an important role in providing energy to babies aged 6 - 12 months, and one-third of energy needs between 12 and 24 months. Moreover, the mortality rate is lower in breastfed babies, and breastfeeding is also a critical source of energy and nutrients during illness (WHO). Breastfeeding is useful for the mother and the newborn and significantly controls chronic diseases (1). Statistics show that the lack of breastfeeding in developing countries contributes to the death of 1 child every 30 seconds and 1.5 million children annually, accounting for 70% of the neonatal mortality in these countries (2). Evidence suggested that 149 million children under five were stunted, 45 million were wasted, and 38.9 million were overweight or obese in 2020.

Factors such as the mother’s age and education, family income, family support, prenatal actions, decisions about the first breastfeeding, time of the first feeding, as well as maternal skills and self-efficacy, are effective in successful breastfeeding (3). Self-efficacy, the perceived ability to successfully perform a task, is an important principle linking awareness to action (3). Self-efficacy affects individuals’ decisions, choices, activities, and persistence (4). Fathers’ attitudes and support are alterable factors that significantly affect breastfeeding onset (5). Paternal breastfeeding self-efficacy denotes the father’s ability to help mothers breastfeed their newborn (6). Breastfeeding cessation may be due to the feelings of frustration and guilt or even helplessness in fathers as they might think that they cannot help, and starting formula feeding might seem the most straightforward solution (7).

Fathers' involvement in breastfeeding training can improve the amount and duration of exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) (8, 9). Fathers’ participation in breastfeeding promotion programs in maternity wards can significantly increase EBF in the first six months of a newborn’s life, probably due to the information given to fathers in these wards about EBF. Paternal training can encourage fathers and thus, have a positive effect on mothers in avoiding feeding the infant with water, herbal drinks, or different formulas (10). Fathers’ self-efficacy score is significantly correlated with mothers’ self-efficacy, attitudes toward breastfeeding, the importance of breastfeeding for the father, the promotion of breastfeeding, EBF, and the belief in making progress in breastfeeding (6).

Improved paternal breastfeeding self-efficacy and mothers’ perception of fathers’ cooperation and assistance show that programs to support parental cooperation in breastfeeding can benefit the parents (11). Given the recommendations of WHO about the role of breastfeeding in children’s health, the impact of parents’ self-confidence in this matter, and the more prominent role of fathers and their breastfeeding support, there is undoubtedly a need to conduct further studies on this subject.

2. Objectives

This research seeks to determine the relationship between paternal breastfeeding self-efficacy and infant and young child feeding practice.

3. Methods

3.1. Samples and Procedures

This descriptive-correlational study was conducted after obtaining the necessary approvals from the Ethics Committee of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (ethical approval: IR.SBMU.PHARMACY.REC.1398.060). After the verbal consent, 220 couples were recruited for the study in a hospital in Karaj. Baseline data were collected from fathers and mothers in the hospital. Mothers were in the postpartum ward, and fathers waited for the mothers and their babies outside the postpartum ward. Follow-up data were collected from mothers three months postpartum via telephone. The inclusion criteria were the parents living together, not taking any medications affecting breastfeeding, singleton birth, birth weight over 2500 grams, gestational age of 37 weeks or more at delivery, normal Apgar score at birth, and no neonatal diseases or anomalies. The exclusion criteria entailed the lack of access to the subjects to complete the questionnaire three months after delivery and severe postpartum complications for the mother or newborn that had either separated them or led to their death.

3.2. Measures

Data were collected from fathers and mothers in hospitals and mothers three months after delivery. The data collected in the hospital included (1) personal characteristics, such as maternal and paternal age, education, and income; (2) mothers' midwifery characteristics, such as gravidity, type of delivery, and prenatal disease; (3) infant characteristics, such as gestational age and weight; (4) paternal breastfeeding self-efficacy. The data collected three months after delivery encompassed infants' feeding practices. The Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale-short form (Appendix 1) (6) was used to assess paternal self-efficacy. This questionnaire consists of 14 items scored based on a 5-point Likert scale from “always confident” to “not at all confident." The lowest score is 14, and the highest is 70. This scale was initially developed in English and was translated into Persian using the forward-backward translation method. For this purpose, the English version of the scale was first translated into Persian by two translators with expertise in medical texts. Next, the translations were compared by two obstetricians who were also faculty members, and a Persian version of the tool was prepared by matching the items in terms of meaning and concept and selecting the best options. To ensure the expressiveness of the sentences in the Persian text and their match with the original text, the initial translated version was re-translated into English by two other translators who could speak English very well and had not seen the original questionnaire before. Afterwards, the two English versions were compared, and the necessary corrections were made. A single version of the Persian questionnaire was developed (12). In order to assess the questionnaire’s face validity, it was distributed among ten fathers, who were asked to comment on the legibility, clearness, writing style, grammar, and spelling of the words, as well as the ease of completing the tool. In the present study, the reliability of this questionnaire was confirmed by Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.94.

Infant and young child feeding practices were assessed by the infant nutrition questionnaire three months after delivery via phone calls to the mothers participating in the study. This questionnaire was prepared using the WHO model and was distributed among ten faculty members of the Midwifery and Reproductive Health Department of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences for content and face validity evaluation. The final infant and young child feeding practice questionnaire was developed based on their comments. Infant feeding practices were assessed based on the practices in the last 24 h prior to the study as defined by WHO. This questionnaire includes questions about the breastfeeding methods of mothers, reasons to use infant formula, maternal physical and mental illness three months after delivery, mothers’ incentives for breastfeeding, and support and opposition of spouses and others for breastfeeding. A demographic information questionnaire was also designed for the study, and its content validity was approved. Data were analyzed by the SPSS software version 23 using descriptive statistical methods, including the frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation tables. Moreover, the inferential statistical methods included the independent t-test, analysis of variance, Spearman’s test, and chi-squared test. At the end of sampling, 14 people were excluded from the study, reducing the sample size to 206. The reasons for this sample loss entailed not answering the phone calls (n = 10), the mother’s unwillingness to continue cooperation (6), and the death of the infant (6).

4. Results

In the present study, the mean age of fathers was 33.79 years. Table 1 presents the fathers' demographic characteristics, and Table 2 presents the infants' characteristics along with the infants feeding practices. Among the fathers participating in the study, 22.8% had participated in antenatal classes, and 67.6% had cooperated in prenatal care. In addition, 87.9% of fathers chose to breastfeed as their preferred feeding method for their infant during their wife's discharge from the postpartum ward. Furthermore, 85.9% of mothers reported receiving adequate paternal breastfeeding support three months after the delivery, while 2.4% of the fathers opposed breastfeeding during three months postpartum. Among the reasons for their opposition were thinking that breast milk was insufficient, being concerned about the mother's comfort, and the deformation of mothers’ breasts due to breastfeeding. Table 3 demonstrates the relationship between paternal self-efficacy score and the examined variables, indicating that only two variables, namely the father’s cooperation in prenatal care (P = 0.0001) and the father’s attendance of antenatal classes (P = 0.0003), were correlated with paternal self-efficacy score. Table 4 shows the relationship between infant and young child feeding practice and the study variables. The father’s support for the mother in breastfeeding was the only variable correlated with the feeding practice (P = 0.006).

Table 1. Absolute and Relative Frequency Distribution of the Study Subjects Based on the Fathers’ Demographic Characteristics
VariablesValues a
Age group (y)
22 - 2613 (6.31)
27 - 3161 (29.61)
32 - 3677 (37.38)
37 - 4140 (19.42)
42 - 4611 (5.34)
47 - 512 (0.97)
52 - 562 (0.97)
Total206 (100)
Mean ± SD33.5 ± 79.27
Education
Primary school54 (26.2)
High school109 (52.9)
Associate degree15 (7.3)
Bachelor’s degree19 (9.2)
Master’s degree7 (3.4)
Ph.D.2 (1)
Total206 (100)
Father’s occupation
Unemployed2 (1)
Employed44 (21.4)
Self-employed160 (77.7)
Total206 (100)
Housing status
Renting103 (50)
Owner103 (50)
Total206 (100)
Father’s income status
Less than sufficient104 (4.4)
Sufficient94 (50)
To the extent of saving8 (45.6)
Total206 (100)
Drug use status
Smoking34 (16.5)
Alcohol3 (1.5)
None169 (82)
Total206 (100)
Table 2. Absolute and Relative Frequency Distribution of the Newborns’ Gender and Type of Delivery in the Studied Mothers
VariablesNo. (%)
Newborn’s gender
Female104 (50.5)
Male102 (49.5)
Total206 (100)
Type of delivery
Vaginal delivery103 (50)
Cesarean section103 (50)
Total206; 100
Table 3. Relationship Between Paternal Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scores and the Study Variables
VariablesTestP-Value
Father’s agePearson0.949
EducationANOVA0.731
Father’s cooperation in prenatal careIndependent-t0.001
Father’s attendance of antenatal classesIndependent-t0.003
Father’s decision on the type of neonatal feedingANOVA0.347
Father’s income statusANOVA0.634
Father’s occupationANOVA0.822
Infant feeding practice three months after deliveryANOVA0.99
Father’s support for breastfeedingANOVA0.757
Table 4. Relationship between the Paternal Variables and Maternal Breastfeeding Patterns
VariableChi-Square Test Results
Father’s education0.240
Father’s occupation0.194
Father’s income status0.406
Father’s attendance of antenatal classes0.203
Father’s cooperation in prenatal care0.180
Housing status0.812
Father’s decision on the type of neonatal feeding0.279
Father supports the mother in breastfeeding0.006

5. Discussion

The current study was conducted to determine paternal breastfeeding self-efficacy and its relationship with infant feeding practices. The mean paternal breastfeeding self-efficacy score before the discharge of mothers was 58.33 out of 70 in the present research. This was the first investigation on the breastfeeding self-efficacy of Iranian fathers, there was no other information that could be used for comparison purposes. In a study by Dennis, the self-efficacy score of Canadian fathers was 48.96 out of 70. This discrepancy and the higher self-efficacy score of Iranian fathers can be due to cultural differences between the two samples and the importance of breastfeeding upon birth in Iranian families. Meanwhile, this study found no relationship between paternal breastfeeding self-efficacy and infants' feeding practices three months after delivery. This finding contradicts the results reported by Dennis, who found a significant relationship between paternal self-efficacy score, attitudes toward breastfeeding, breastfeeding rate, and EBF (6). Nonetheless, Dennis did not specify the feeding practice at 12 weeks (13) and the rate of EBF. In the present study, only 5.8% of Iranian children used formula feeding at three months of age, 74.3% were exclusively breastfed, and 19.9% received both formula feeding and breastfeeding, and there was no relationship between these infant feeding practices and paternal self-efficacy. Another study (14) reported a relationship between paternal self-efficacy score, breastfeeding support, and the onset of breastfeeding, while the long-term breastfeeding pattern (11) was not investigated. Several factors affect infant feeding practices, including but not limited to the father's role. Research findings indicate a direct relationship between fathers' support for breastfeeding and the greater likelihood of continued breastfeeding (15). In contrast, some studies do not find the role of fathers significant in EBF. A study in India (16) suggested that although fathers’ attitude toward breastfeeding is effective, it does not affect the duration of EBF. The present study only examined paternal breastfeeding self-efficacy concerning infant feeding practices. One of the limitations of the current research was the impossibility of measuring the self-efficacy of fathers three months postpartum. If the self-efficacy of fathers had been measured three months after delivery, the trend of changes in this variable could have been better evaluated and analyzed.

We found a significant relationship between paternal breastfeeding self-efficacy scores after childbirth and fathers who cooperated in prenatal care, as the mean paternal breastfeeding self-efficacy score was higher in the fathers who cooperated in prenatal care (P = 0.001). According to the results of the present study, paternal breastfeeding self-efficacy score had a significant relationship with attending antenatal classes (P = 0.003) (17). Attending antenatal classes prepared fathers for accepting the role of father. Research suggested that educating fathers before and after childbirth improved EBF six and four months postpartum, reduced using formula feeding two months postpartum, and decreased breastfeeding problems (16). In the present study, there was no correlation between paternal breastfeeding self-efficacy scores at discharge and fathers’ decision on the type of neonatal feeding after childbirth, their income status, occupation, age, education, and breastfeeding support.

Fathers’ support is a modifiable and alterable factor. Parental cooperation in breastfeeding offers an ideal framework for designing interventions to raise fathers’ involvement and help the parents work together to meet their breastfeeding goals (15). In the current investigation, a significant relationship was observed between fathers' support for breastfeeding three months after delivery and infants' feeding practices three months postpartum (P = 0.006). This finding is consistent with the results of another study (9), which showed that although fathers' attitudes were effective in supporting breastfeeding, infant and young child practice three months after delivery was not correlated with occupation, education, income, housing status, father’s attendance to antenatal classes, father’s cooperation in prenatal care, and father’s decision on the type of neonatal feeding at the time of discharge (18). Moreover, fathers' attitudes were not correlated with the duration of EBF.

5.1. Conclusions

According to the findings of the present study, no correlation was found between paternal breastfeeding self-efficacy scores and infant and young child practice three months postpartum. Paternal breastfeeding self-efficacy scores correlated significantly with the fathers attending antenatal classes and the father's cooperation in prenatal care. Nonetheless, the paternal breastfeeding self-efficacy score was not significantly related to fathers’ age, occupation, education, income, and breastfeeding support. Furthermore, in this study, infant feeding practice was not correlated with the father’s education, occupation, income status, housing status, and decision on the type of neonatal feeding. However, there was a significant relationship between infant and young child practice and paternal support for breastfeeding (P = 0.006).

Acknowledgements

References

  • 1.

    Binns C, Lee M, Low WY. The Long-Term Public Health Benefits of Breastfeeding. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2016;28(1):7-14. doi: 10.1177/1010539515624964. [PubMed: 26792873].

  • 2.

    Varaei SH, Mehrdad N, Bahrani N. [The Relationship between Self-efficacy and Breastfeeding, Tehran, Iran]. Hayat. 2009;15(3):31-8. Persian.

  • 3.

    Taghdisi MH, Latifi M, Afkari ME, Dastoorpour M, Estebsari F, Jamalzadeh F. [The impact of educational intervention to increase self efficacy and awareness for the prevention of domestic violence against women]. Iran J Health Educ Health Promot. 2015;3(1):32-8. Persian.

  • 4.

    Artino AJ. Academic self-efficacy: from educational theory to instructional practice. Perspect Med Educ. 2012;1(2):76-85. doi: 10.1007/s40037-012-0012-5. [PubMed: 23316462]. [PubMed Central: PMC3540350].

  • 5.

    Wolfberg AJ, Michels KB, Shields W, O'Campo P, Bronner Y, Bienstock J. Dads as breastfeeding advocates: results from a randomized controlled trial of an educational intervention. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(3):708-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.05.019. [PubMed: 15467529].

  • 6.

    Dennis CL, Brennenstuhl S, Abbass-Dick J. Measuring paternal breastfeeding self-efficacy: A psychometric evaluation of the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form among fathers. Midwifery. 2018;64:17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.05.005. [PubMed: 29864577].

  • 7.

    Sherriff N, Hall V. Engaging and supporting fathers to promote breastfeeding: a new role for Health Visitors? Scand J Caring Sci. 2011;25(3):467-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2010.00850.x. [PubMed: 21223346].

  • 8.

    Boccolini CS, Boccolini PMM, Monteiro FR, Venancio SI, Giugliani ERJ. Breastfeeding indicators trends in Brazil for three decades. Rev Saude Publica. 2017;51:108. doi: 10.11606/S1518-8787.2017051000029. [PubMed: 29166437]. [PubMed Central: PMC5697916].

  • 9.

    Su M, Ouyang YQ. Father's Role in Breastfeeding Promotion: Lessons from a Quasi-Experimental Trial in China. Breastfeed Med. 2016;11:144-9. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2015.0144. [PubMed: 26836960].

  • 10.

    Susin LR, Giugliani ER. Inclusion of fathers in an intervention to promote breastfeeding: impact on breastfeeding rates. J Hum Lact. 2008;24(4):386-92. quiz 451-3. doi: 10.1177/0890334408323545. [PubMed: 18784322].

  • 11.

    Abbass-Dick J, Stern SB, Nelson LE, Watson W, Dennis CL. Coparenting breastfeeding support and exclusive breastfeeding: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2015;135(1):102-10. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-1416. [PubMed: 25452653].

  • 12.

    Pashandi SH, Khaghanizade M, Ebadi A. [Review of translation and cultural adaptation process of questionnaires]. Bimonthly of Education Strategies in Medical Sciences. 2009;2(3):117-20. Persian.

  • 13.

    Brandao S, Mendonca D, Dias CC, Pinto TM, Dennis CL, Figueiredo B. The breastfeeding self-efficacy scale-short form: Psychometric characteristics in Portuguese pregnant women. Midwifery. 2018;66:49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.07.014. [PubMed: 30121478].

  • 14.

    Carlisle SA. Fathers and Breastfeeding: The Role of Paternal Breastfeeding Support Self-Efficacy in Breastfeeding Initiation [master's thesis]. Ohio, USA: University of Akron; 2013.

  • 15.

    Abbass-Dick J, Dennis CL. Breast-feeding Coparenting Framework: A New Framework to Improve Breast-feeding Duration and Exclusivity. Fam Community Health. 2017;40(1):28-31. doi: 10.1097/FCH.0000000000000137. [PubMed: 27870751].

  • 16.

    Mahesh PKB, Gunathunga MW, Arnold SM, Jayasinghe C, Pathirana S, Makarim MF, et al. Effectiveness of targeting fathers for breastfeeding promotion: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):1140. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6037-x. [PubMed: 30249216]. [PubMed Central: PMC6154400].

  • 17.

    Premberg A, Lundgren I. Fathers’ experiences of childbirth education. J Perinat Educ. 2006;15(2):21-8. doi: 10.1624/105812406X107780.

  • 18.

    Karande S, Perkar S. Do fathers' attitudes support breastfeeding? A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study in Mumbai, India. Indian J Med Sci. 2012;66(1-2):30-9. [PubMed: 23603570].

Copyright © 2022, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.