Although the FDA has not yet approved the use of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in neonates, it has been used in numerous trials. Alloimmune hemolytic disease (AIHD), including ABO or Rh incompatibility, is the most common indication for IVIG administration to prevent or treat severe IHB. The IVIG blocks the RBC receptors, prevents antigen-antibody interactions and hemolysis, and subsequently decreases severe hyperbilirubinemia. Additionally, IVIG has an effect on antigen-presenting cells and Fc receptors (
69). Moreover, in a systematic review performed by Louis et al., the authors concluded that IVIG is beneficial in cases of Rh incompatibility (
70). El Fekey et al. concluded that the administration of IVIG, along with phototherapy, significantly reduces bilirubin levels in hemolysis, duration of phototherapy, need for ET, and hospital stay (
71). According to Vardar et al.’s study, IVIG reduces the need for ET and should be considered due to its relative benefits in neonates with AIHD (
72). In contrast to this finding, Al-Lawama et al. observed a higher risk of rebound IHB and the need for ET in infants who received IVIG with phototherapy (
73). In a recent meta-analysis by Zwiers et al., which was performed on nine eligible studies, IVIG did not prevent the need for ET in neonates with hemolysis (
74). Furthermore, Okulu et al., in an RCT, determined that one dose of IVIG did not prevent ET or decrease the duration of phototherapy in infants with hemolytic disease due to ABO incompatibility and severe IHB (
75). Consistent with the results of the aforementioned study, one RCT conducted by Smits-Wintjens et al. concluded that the prophylactic prescription of IVIG could not significantly decrease the need for ET in infants with Rh incompatibility (
76). In this regard, Pan et al. demonstrated no appreciable benefits from IVIG administration in neonates with ABO incompatibility (
77). Different results might be due to the characteristics of specific IVIG formulations and the primary etiology of jaundice in each case (
69). Due to the unclear risk-benefit ratio of using IVIG to treat immune-mediated IHB, further studies are needed to evaluate IVIG’s efficacy and safety in neonates. In addition, the side effects of IVIG, including necrotizing enterocolitis, thrombosis, anaphylaxis, apnea, and cardiac arrhythmia, should be considered.