In this study, a similarity in the age distribution of pediatric patients with acute diarrhea was observed in both the disease and control groups. Most cases of acute diarrhea were predominantly concentrated in the age group under 24 months, with no significant difference between the two groups. Notably, the proportion of dehydrated cases in acute diarrhea was 88.2% and 85.4% for children with and without dehydration, respectively, indicating consistency in age distribution among children with acute diarrhea. These findings align with previous research by Zhu et al. in 2016, focused on Children under 5 Years of Age in Wuhan City, China, where the rate of children with diarrhea under 24 months old was reported as 86.9% (
7). The study by the author Tor A. Strand et al. in Bhaktapur city near Kathmandu, Nepal highlights a similar trend, with an incidence rate of diarrhea in the group of children under 24 months old reported as 80.6% (
8). Regarding the gender ratio in both groups of children with acute diarrhea, including both the case group and the control group, there is a tendency towards a higher male ratio. In the group of children with acute diarrhea and dehydration, the proportion of males was 70.6%, while in the group of children with acute diarrhea without dehydration, the proportion of males was 59.1%. Compared to previous studies by the author Muziburrahman et al. in Bolo and Wawo's Public Health Center Area, Bima District, Indonesia, in 2020, the proportion of males in cases of acute diarrhea accounts for 61.76% (
9). In this study, the male-to-female ratio is 1.59/1. This result is also consistent with the study conducted by the author Mahmud et al., on 13 361 children under the age of 5 who were admitted to the hospital between January 2008 and December 2017 in Dhaka, Bangladesh, where the male-to-female ratio was reported as 1.59/1 (
10). Boys are often more prone than girls to become sick, both more quickly and with greater severity. This is true not only for acute diarrhea but also for other infectious diseases (
11,
12).
In terms of clinical characteristics, the majority of children with acute diarrhea have weight-for-age within the normal range, accounting for a high proportion of 83%. A notable observation in our study is that children with dehydrated acute diarrhea often exhibit a higher average body temperature compared to the non-dehydrated group, with an average of 38.24 ± 0.72°C. The frequency of diarrhea episodes and vomiting in the group of children with dehydrated acute diarrhea is also higher, at 10.15 ± 3.77 times and 4.76 ± 3.53 times, respectively. These results align with the findings of Zodpey's works performed on children under 5 years old in Nagpur, India. The author emphasizes the issue of dehydration in children with diarrhea, concluding an increase in the frequency of diarrhea episodes and vomiting compared to cases without dehydration (
13).
In the logistic regression analysis to determine factors related to the degree of dehydration, this study demonstrates a correlation between the degree of dehydration and factors such as temperature, number of diarrhea episodes per day, number of vomiting episodes per day, and weight-for-age > +2SD. These results align with a previous study by Zodpey et al., which also noted an association between dehydration status and the frequency of vomiting and diarrhea episodes per day (
13). After identifying factors related to the degree of dehydration, we developed a new predictive tool by constructing a scoring system called the KVAD score. In this scoring system, we assigned weights to relevant factors, including assigning 2 points for each degree increase in temperature above 37°C, 2 points for each diarrhea episode per day, 1 point for each vomiting episode per day, and 3 points for weight-for-age > +2SD.
The KVAD Score and the WHO dehydration assessment scale approach the evaluation of dehydration from different perspectives. While the WHO scale relies on general indicators like general appearance, eyes, thirst, and skin turgor, the KVAD Score delves into specific physiological parameters such as body temperature variations, vomiting frequency, weight for age > +2SD, and loose stool frequency. In comparing the two methods, the KVAD Score's emphasis on quantitative analysis sets it apart. By assigning numerical values to each parameter and establishing a threshold for dehydration based on the total score, the KVAD Score provides a standardized and objective assessment framework. This quantitative precision enables healthcare providers to gauge dehydration severity more accurately, leading to more targeted interventions.
Moreover, the KVAD Score offers a comprehensive evaluation by considering multiple facets of dehydration. By encompassing various parameters, including body temperature, vomiting frequency, weight for age > +2SD, and loose stool frequency, this multifaceted approach ensures that no aspect of dehydration goes unnoticed, allowing for a more thorough assessment. The standardized scoring system of the KVAD Score further enhances its utility. By promoting consistency in assessment practices across different healthcare settings, it facilitates comparability of results and ensures uniformity in patient care. This standardization streamlines the assessment process, making it easier for healthcare providers to interpret results and make informed decisions regarding patient management.
Overall, the KVAD Score offers several advantages over the WHO dehydration assessment scale, including quantitative precision, comprehensive evaluation, and standardization. These features contribute to its effectiveness as a dehydration assessment tool and highlight its potential to improve patient care outcomes. Subsequently, we calculated the total score and conducted ROC curve analysis, calculating the AUC to assess the predictive ability of this model for the degree of dehydration. Next, we determined the cutoff point to achieve the highest sensitivity and specificity in predicting the dehydration status.
The KVAD scoring system demonstrates an AUC of 0.889 in the ROC curve analysis, indicating its effectiveness as a screening model applicable in clinical settings. The optimal cutoff point for predicting dehydration likelihood is determined to be 21 points, with a sensitivity of 79.4% and specificity of 85.4%. In comparison to a study by author Modi et al., conducted on 771 children under 5 years old at the rehydration unit of the International Center for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh in 2014, which utilized the inferior vena cava ultrasound method to predict dehydration in children, the KVAD score in this study not only exhibits higher sensitivity (79.4% vs. 67%) but also higher specificity (85.4% vs. 49%). Furthermore, the AUC of the KVAD score's ROC curve is 0.889, surpassing the AUC of the inferior vena cava ultrasound method ROC curve (0.6) (
14).
When compared to the Gorelick score, performed on 220 children under 15 years old in Bangkok, Thailand by author Kanjanaphan et al in 2017, which has a sensitivity of 45.5%, specificity of 58%, and AUC of 0.52 (
15), and the CDS score, with a sensitivity of 68% and specificity of 45% for moderate dehydration, conducted by Kimberly Pringle et al on children under 15 years old hospitalized in the pediatric department of three district hospitals, Kirehe, Rwinkwavu, and Butaro, in Rwanda (
16), it becomes evident that the KVAD score in this study exhibits higher accuracy in predicting the likelihood of dehydration in children with acute diarrhea.
Overall, our KVAD scoring system can be applied in clinical practice to forecast the likelihood of dehydration, especially in primary healthcare settings, enabling the early detection of dehydration and timely implementation of fluid replacement interventions.
One of the limitations of this study is the relatively small sample size of the dehydration group. However, this was simply the first step in our research endeavor. We will continue to conduct further studies involving larger and more diverse groups of individuals across various locations to enhance the accuracy and applicability of the KVAD score. This incremental approach to research will allow us to refine the KVAD score, enabling healthcare providers to utilize it more effectively. Although our initial study had its constraints, it lays the groundwork for the development of a reliable dehydration assessment tool in the future.
In conclusion, the KVAD score represents the initial phase in the development of an effective and reliable screening tool to estimate the risk of dehydration in children with acute diarrhea.