Studies conducted in the 1980’s and 1990’s on preterm infants at risk of RDS showed surfactant administration (of animal origins) after birth reduces mortalities and improves survival rate without the development of chronic lung disease complications (
18). Some studies show that up to 80% of preterm infants with moderate to severe RDS end up requiring intubation, and this rate is inversely related to gestational age (
19). The INSURE technique for administering surfactant reduced the duration of the need for intubation and mechanical ventilation in preterm infants. Nevertheless, this method failed to fully prevent the incidence of intubation complications (
20). Verder et al. first published the results of their study on surfactant administration through a thin catheter in infants capable of spontaneous breathing in 1992 (
21). However, this technique was first used as a treatment option in 2001 and the first serious study on the feasibility of this technique and its patient prognosis was published in 2007 (
22,
23).
This technique appears to quickly improve infants ’physiological conditions and reduce their need for FiO
2 and mechanical ventilation and their duration of oxygen treatment (
17).
The present study showed a 75% success rate for the first attempt at catheterization using the MIST technique. The 25% failure rate can be explained by the operators’ lack of experience with this method. Other studies also showed the need for repeating catheterization in about 20% of the cases (
17,
22).
Meanwhile, since no sedatives are required for this technique, there will be no need for long post-procedure respiratory support. Coughing and gagging were observed in the MIST group in more than one-third of the infants as the most prevalent complication. Other studies reported the prevalence of this complication between 11% and 32% (
22,
24). In the present study, intubation was performed with no sedatives; as a result, one-third of the infants developed this complication in the INSURE group, which is consistent with the results obtained by Al Ethawi (
24), while Mirnia (
25) reported this complication in only 3% of the infants following sedation and intubation.
Surfactant reflux was observed in almost 22.2% of the cases examined in the present study, which is consistent with the results obtained by Kanmaz (
22) and Dargaville (
17) upon using the MIST technique in preterm infants (29 - 32 weeks of gestation). In the study by Dargaville et al., one-third of preterm infants (25 - 28 weeks of gestation) developed this complication upon using the MIST technique (
17). In the present study, this complication was reported in nearly 23.1% of the cases upon the administration of surfactant using the INSURE method.
In the present study, almost 10% of the infants in the MIST group developed bradycardia less than 100 bpm for over 10 seconds. Different studies have reported the prevalence of this complication as 17% to 44% (
17,
22,
24).
In the study conducted by Kribs (
23), where atropine was administered prior to catheterization, this complication was reported as 7.4%, which is lower than the rate in the present study. This complication was reported in about 25% of the cases in the present study following the administration of surfactant using the INSURE method. This self-limiting complication tends to occur due to stimulations during the attempts to see the vocal cords and is often relieved after pausing the procedure for a few minutes (
17).
In the present study, both groups received 200 mg/kg of Curosurf, and about 15% in the INSURE group and 7.5% in the MIST group required a second dose of surfactant. In the study by Kanmaz (
22), treatment began with an initial 100 mg/kg dose of Curosurf, and an almost equal percentage of both groups (about 20%) required the second administration of surfactant. In the study by Aguar (
16), the infants in the MIST group received a 100 mg/kg dose of Curosurf and those in the INSURE group received a 200 mg/kg dose, and about 36% of the MIST group and only 6.5% of the INSURE group needed the second administration of surfactant. The initial dose of surfactant appears to dictate the need for a second administration regardless of the technique used.
Four hours after the administration of surfactant, the need for supplemental oxygen reduced in both groups by about 20%, which is consistent with the results obtained in other studies (
22,
24). These results indicate the good and immediate effects of both techniques in reducing the need for supplemental oxygen due to adequate exogenous surfactant reaching the respiratory alveoli and eliminating underlying atelectasis in patients receiving respiratory support with CPAP.
Auxiliary oxygen was administered nearly 80 hours to the infants in the MIST group and 70 hours in the INSURE group. Unlike the results obtained in the present study, most other studies (
17,
22,
24) found the mean oxygen requirement to be relatively greater in the INSURE group, with the difference being significant only in the study by Dargaville (
17), in which FiO
2 was set to maintain SpO
2 between 88% and 92%. In other studies, including in the present one, FiO
2 was adjusted to maintain SpO
2 between 85% and 92%. The administration of surfactant appears to cause a more immediate and effective lung tissue function correction with the MIST technique, due to its ability to correct atelectasis.
Nevertheless, in terms of the duration of time required for the administration of oxygen, the difference is negligible, only by considering a minimum acceptable value of 85% for SpO2 compared to in the INSURE technique.
The present study showed that the mean FiO
2 was consistently lower in the MIST group than in the INSURE group during the first 48 hours after the treatment. As shown in
Figure 2, FiO
2 did not change significantly over time from values of 70% - 80% at hour 1 to 25% - 30% at hour 48 in either of the treatment groups. It is therefore not possible to combine all the values together over time, which comprises one of the study limitations. Moreover, since FiO
2 was set by the researchers to maintain arterial O
2 saturation between 85% and 95% and since the researchers were not blinded to the participants’ group allocation, a potential bias may have occurred with respect to the FiO
2 setting, making for another limitation of the study. Furthermore, the infants treated with the MIST technique had a shorter NICU stay by about 2 days compared to the infants in the INSURE group, which is consistent with the results obtained in other studies on infants of various age groups (
16,
17).
About 30% of the infants in the MIST group and 25% in the INSURE group required intubation in the first 72 hours after their surfactant administration. These results are consistent with the results obtained in other studies (
16,
26). Dargaville (
17) also showed that, although preterm infants of 25 - 28 weeks of gestation required significantly less intubation in the MIST group than in the INSURE group in the first 72 hours of life, the difference was not statistically significant in preterm infants of 29 - 32 weeks of gestation.
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia was reported in only 3.8% of the cases in the INSURE group, which is consistent with the results obtained by Dargaville with regard to preterm infants of 29 - 32 weeks of gestation (
17). In studies conducted on infants below 28 weeks of gestation, this complication was reported in about 10% to 30% when using the MIST technique and about 20% to 30% with the INSURE technique (
17,
22). Although the risk of BPD appears to be lower in infants over 28 weeks of gestation, it should be noted that, in more-preterm infants, the need for intubation and even brief positive pressure ventilation by bagging for surfactant administration could be more damaging when using the INSURE method than with the MIST method. On the other hand, spontaneous breathing during the MIST technique is believed to spread surfactant more uniformly and with less lung injury caused. The incidence of BPD could thus be reduced.
PDA was reported in 11% of the infants in both groups. However, in studies by Gopel and Mirnia, this complication was reported as less than 5% (
25,
26), while other studies reported it as about 13% to 36% in the MIST group and about 7% to 63% in the INSURE group (
16,
17).
After surfactant administration, a major part of lung atelectasis is resolved, and the oxygenation rate therefore improves, pulmonary vascular resistance decreases, and the likelihood of PDA left-to-right shunt increases, which could justify the development of this complication in infants under treatment (
17).
Neonatal morbidities such as pneumothorax, pulmonary hemorrhage, grade II intraventricular hemorrhage, and necrotizing enterocolitis were each observed in only one infant treated by the INSURE method. There were no significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05). These results are consistent with the results obtained by Kanmaz et al. (
22).
None of the patients had retinopathy of prematurity greater than stage II, which is in line with the results obtained by Dargaville for preterm infants of 29 - 32 weeks of gestation (
17).
Only one preterm infant at 31 weeks of gestation weighing 1150 grams and treated with the MIST method died due to sepsis on the 7th day of birth. Other studies reported an infant mortality rate below 5% in both groups (
16,
17). However, the studies did not discuss the cause of the infants’ death.
Although, in this study, preterm infants of 28 to 34 weeks of gestation were treated with 200 mg/kg of surfactant (Curosurf) and although the favorable effect of this method has been demonstrated, further multi-centric clinical trials are required for determining the best gestational age range and the most appropriate dose of surfactant for this type of treatment.
The present study had many limitations, including a small sample size and the failure to include infants with gestational ages less than 28 weeks. Moreover, since the researchers used only Curosurf, they are unable to comment on other surfactant products.
To conclude, surfactant administration via a thin catheter is a feasible and effective treatment for preterm infants. Nevertheless, further studies are required to confirm the implementation and applicability of this method.