The aim of this study was to compare the serum bilirubin level of neonates using two methods of serological transcutaneous measurements after covering the frontal and sternal area. In general, the purpose of this study was to answer the question of whether covering the frontal and sternal area could reduce the correlation between the two TcB and TSB methods. The findings of this study showed a moderate correlation between serological and transcutaneous measurement methods before and after phototherapy. The results also showed a greater correlation between serological-transcutaneous sternal versus serological-transcutaneous frontal tests. Overall, the results of this study indicate that TcB could be a good alternative to TSB in its absence.
To the best of our knowledge, this is a first study to investigate the correlation between TcB and TSB with the covered frontal and sternal area. However, the correlation between the two methods of TcB and TSB has been addressed in several studies. The results of a study by Tan et al. showed that the correlation between TcB and TSB in the covered frontal area (r = 0.74) was close to the correlation of the areas under phototherapy (r = 0.60) and the correlation for the frontal area was less than the control group that was not under phototherapy (r = 0.88) (
14). In another study by Rylance et al., the results showed that TcB correlation (in both covered frontal and non-covered sternal areas) with TSB in infants under phototherapy (r = 0.66) was lower than those without phototherapy (r = 0.83) (
15). The findings of these two studies suggest that phototherapy can affect the correlation between TcB and TSB through the bleaching effects on the skin. In some other studies, the correlation between the two methods for the covered frontal area has been reported higher than our study. These studies include the Rizvi et al. (r = 0.88) (
2), Rohsiswatmo et al. (r = 0.87) (
16), and Mansouri et al. (r = 0.89) studies (
13). High levels of correlation reported by these studies could be related to the different versions of TcB instruments used in these studies.
In the study by Mahajan et al. (
17), the correlation between the two methods for the uncovered sternal area was reported r = 0.90, which is more than the value of correlation for the corresponding area in our study. But in studies conducted by Taylor et al. (
18) and Tan et al. (
14), the correlation for this area was r = 0.78 and 0.60, respectively, which is close to that of our study. Our study also found that the TcB method overestimated the serum bilirubin levels compared to TSB. These results are consistent with the results of the studies conducted by Greco et al. (
19) and Murli et al. (
20). This can be due to the TcB method standard and tool used for the measurement.
Considering the TcB test has good diagnostic accuracy and is a reliable tool to assess bilirubin for the screening of neonatal jaundice, it can replace the TSB test to reduce repeated blood sampling. Since this is the first study carried out in term neonates using the TcB test with covering sternum and frontal areas, additional data needs to be collected to verify our findings, so further studies are recommended with higher sample size and using a different type of Bilicheck.
5.1. Strengths and Limitations
One of the major limitations of our study was using one type of Bilicheck instead of two or three versions and also that it was not the newest one. Moreover, sample size was not enough to statistically analyze the difference between extreme premature and premature infants. On the other hand, the main strength of our study is having a new method by covering sternum and frontal that was not applied by other studies.