Computerized provider order entry (CPOE) systems are electronic versions that end-users can registration orders into a computer application rather than use paper records (
1) also ensure standardized, legible, and complete orders (
2-
4). Technologically, CPOE is discussed nearly half a century (
5). Until 2009, CPOE was available in less than 20% of US hospitals (
6-
8). In 2012, majority of hospitals use CPOE for variety tests (
9). While the results of searching show that the only one public hospital in Iran uses CPOE just for prescribing (
10).
One of the main aspects that can determine the success of implementation of CPOE is providers’ satisfaction. We know that providers have a crucial role in CPOE development. They could affect the success of the implementation of CPOE (
11). Several studies examined the impact of CPOE implementation on providers’ performance (
12-
14). In 2003, almost all of the providers were dissatisfied with newly installed CPOE (
15). Most studies show that providers’ resistance is a great obstacle to implement CPOE (
16,
17) while other studies reported that providers have a willingness to use CPOE and believed with CPOE usability, efficiency, workflow, and patient safety (
18,
19).
One of the most popular adoption models for understanding how CPOE innovation between providers is the diffusion of innovations theory and understanding how CPOE innovation accepts between providers (
20-
22). To increase the scientific value and generalizability this research, Rogers’ innovation diffusion theory was used to analyze the impact of factors on the nursing staff attitudes toward the acceptance or rejection of the CPOE. A CPOE technology’s relative advantage, compatibility, trialability, and observability generally lead to a faster rate of adoption, while increased complexity leads to a lower rate of adoption.